President Obama Highlights an Ongoing ‘Conspiracy Against Rights’ During Interview with Media


Posted originally on CTH on May 9, 2026 | Sundance 

I have been requested to put some context behind a recent set of statements made by former President Barack Obama to Stephen Colbert.  As many interested observers understand (some may gain deeper appreciation later on) statements -even defensive- made in furtherance of a conspiracy can be used later in court to highlight intent.

To encapsulate for those who requested, we first start with the recent statement by the former President. Listen closely:

On May 19, 2020, Acting DNI Richard Grenell declassified the hidden paragraph of the Susan Rice memo that was hidden for three years.  This enabled us to put a full context to the ‘memo to file‘ that was published by Susan Rice on January 20, 2017; an event that was timed to happen during President Trump’s inauguration.

The context was President Obama and Susan Rice holding a meeting with FBI Director James Comey during the transition period approximately two weeks before President Trump took office.   On January 5, 2017, President Obama and Susan Rice were discussing incoming National Security Advisor Michael Flynn with FBI Director James Comey.

When you understand the context, you understand exactly why the Intelligence Community tried to keep this paragraph hidden.  The motive to write the January 20, 2017, memo is clear.  Also, the IC did not ever expect this to be released. Here’s the formerly hidden paragraph:

Within this paragraph we find the motive for Susan Rice writing it (emphasis mine):

“Director Comey affirmed that he is proceeding “by the book” as it relates to law enforcement.” … “Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak.”  “Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing senssitive information.”  “President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn.”  “Comey replied “potentially.””  “He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that “the level of communication is unusual.”

Remember, the position of President Obama and Susan Rice is that they were never aware of any FBI investigation of Flynn (or the Trump campaign); nor did they have any involvement in directing it to take place.

The content of this January 5th meeting makes the first part of their claim challenging to accept.   Thus, the need for Susan Rice to cover for it.

Here’s the full memo in context (including the redacted paragraph):

On January 5, 2017, James Comey officially put President Obama on notice about the FBI conducting an investigation and surveillance upon the Trump campaign.   Obviously, Obama already knew this; however, at these moments in real time each of the participants was trying to protect themselves by documenting all of the activity and making sure the entire group was attached to the legal risk if anything went wrong.

Now it gets a little uncomfortable for the Obama White House here because just a few days earlier DNI James Clapper created a document trail from the FBI to the Office of The President.  That trail created by Clapper was problematic, and that’s why the January 5th meeting was organized.

We learned from James Comey’s testimony, that a day or two prior to this January 5, 2017 meeting, DNI James Clapper briefed President Obama on the nature of the call between Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and Michael Flynn.

James Clapper received raw “intelligence cuts” about the call from FBI Director James Comey and used them to brief President Obama.

James Comey knew he gave the information to Clapper, and James Comey knew Clapper went to the White House to brief Obama.  As a consequence, it becomes very problematic for the Obama white house to claim they didn’t know about, nor direct, an FBI investigation of incoming President Trump or incoming National Security Advisor Michael Flynn given the fact they were briefed on the intercepted phone communications conveyed by the FBI, via DNI Clapper, to President Obama.

If the FBI wasn’t investigating Flynn, then why was the FBI intercepting his calls?

Understandably President Obama and NSA Susan Rice would be worried about being attached to a potentially very unlawful investigation of the incoming administration and NSA Michael Flynn; hence the ‘stay behind’ meeting.

As a result of prior briefing material given to President Obama, he knew the FBI was monitoring the Trump transition team and intercepting Flynn’s communication.  The aspect of Obama questioning Comey about sharing sensitive information from Flynn; and Comey’s response; points to Obama/Rice knowledge of an FBI operation against Flynn.  

This is an FBI operation against Flynn (and Trump) that Susan Rice knows she needs to claim she and Obama did not know about.

From a hindsight perspective it gets very sticky for Obama/Rice to deny knowledge with that 1/5/17 meeting content in the fray. That’s the purpose of the Jan 20th CYA memo to file.  Think about it:

Question:  Ms Rice how can you claim to have no knowledge of an FBI investigation when the FBI was providing the White House FBI with intercepts of Flynn communication?

Are you saying the FBI intercepts were not authorized by President Obama?

Rice’s CYA memo was essentially saying exactly that.  She’s positioning FBI Director James Comey as rogue with his investigation, and that is a threat to James Comey.  Hence, Comey giving DNI Clapper the information knowing he would walk it into the White House. 

Without the memo FBI Director James Comey could claim President Obama and Susan Rice were well aware of the FBI’s Flynn operation. 

With the memo Obama/Rice position themselves as having no idea until FBI Director Comey started talking.

That’s the purpose for the memo; Obama & Rice protecting themselves from Comey if things go sideways.

Now, to further illustrate this intent, it’s worth remembering the letter from Susan Rice’s lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler to the Senate:

Note the second to last paragraph, Rice’s letter in 2018 is trying to deny knowledge of FBI operations, writ large, against the Trump campaign or incoming administration.

This letter from Rice’s lawyer to the Senate Judiciary Committee is false, demonstrably false.  However, the written lie highlights that Susan Rice and Kathryn Reummler never expected that “classified paragraph” to ever be released.

….”President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn.”….

Go back and read that second to last paragraph from Susan Rice in February 2018, and contrast it against what Susan Rice wrote on January 5, 2017.  See the problem?

When James Clapper walked directly into the White House with “intelligence cuts” on January 3, 2017, specifically from FBI Director James Comey, to share with President Obama, it is clear the white house legal team around Obama -specifically including Kathryn Reummler- went bananas.

DNI James Clapper was always a doofus, but usefully so.  However, in this context doofus Clapper -with his FBI cuts in hand- just infected the White House with direct knowledge of an ongoing FBI investigation of the incoming administration.  In that briefing Clapper just walked over their carefully assembled plausible deniability.  Clapper carried the evidence into the Oval Office, removing Obama’s ability to say he was unaware of any FBI surveillance of Michael Flynn (and Trump).

The white house next move was to call for the January 5, 2017, meeting with FBI Director James Comey, and the January 20th Susan Rice memo-to-file was supportive material for the intention of again putting the issue onto Comey, not Obama.  That is why Susan Rice memorialized the meeting as a cya to mitigate legal risk.

It must be emphasized that for three years the redaction of that key paragraph remained hidden.  The DOJ/FBI, Intelligence Community and Robert Mueller’s crew were trying to keep James Comey protected, while simultaneously maintaining the offensive against the Trump administration.

Imagine if this fully unredacted Susan Rice memo had been released in 2017 or 2018?  The sunlight would have been unbearable for a multitude of ongoing narratives.  Robert Mueller could never have attempted to prosecute Flynn in 2017 against the backdrop of a known and fabricated FBI investigation to target Donald Trump and Michael Flynn. An investigation that President Obama was fully aware of despite his denials.

17 Americans on Hantavirus Cruise Will Be Flown from Tenerife to Quarantine Center in Nebraska


Posted originally on CTH on May 9, 2026 | Sundance |

The cruise ship MV Hondius (Oceanwide Expeditions) which has been trying to find a port following an outbreak of Hantavirus, will be permitted by Spain to transfer passengers at the island of Tenerife.   There are 17 Americans on board who will be transferred by the CDC from Tenerife to the National Quarantine Center at the University of Nebraska, Omaha.  Once there, they will remain in isolation for 42-days under observation.

(VIA CBS) – World Health Organization Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus arrived in Tenerife Saturday to personally oversee the painstaking process of evacuating more than 100 people from a cruise ship dealing with an outbreak of the rare and deadly hantavirus.

Addressing the people of the Canary Islands, where the ship will anchor off the coast of its largest island, the WHO chief said the public’s concern is legitimate after what the world experienced in 2020 during the global coronavirus pandemic.

“This disease is not COVID,” Tedros said, reiterating a letter he wrote earlier Saturday. “The risk to the local population is low.”

Tedros said that the nature of the hantavirus is not the same as the coronavirus, but “that trauma is still in our minds.”

“That’s why also I came here,” he said. “To be on the side of the people because saying things from far could be easy. But I had to change my plans to come here because this is very, very important to the whole world and to the people of Tenerife as well.”

Eight people on the cruise ship had confirmed or suspected cases of the hantavirus and three people have died, the WHO said on Friday. None of the 147 people currently on board, including 60 crew members, are symptomatic, according to Oceanwide Expeditions, which owns the vessel.

Tedros estimated Saturday that there will be six evacuation flights headed for the EU and four for non-EU countries.

There are 17 Americans on the MV Hondius, according to Oceanwide Expeditions, who will be taken off the ship in a small boat, taken to shore and immediately to a plane on the runway waiting for them. The plane, provided by the U.S. government with oversight from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, will take the Americans to the National Quarantine Center at the University of Nebraska, Omaha, according to the CDC.

“I’m sure they’re very anxious to get home, but (we need) to make sure they do that in the most safe way possible,” Maria van Kerkhove, WHO’s acting director of the Department of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention, said at a press conference on Saturday.

Each country with passengers on board the ship will proceed with a similar evacuation to awaiting planes, according to the Spanish Health Ministry.

The WHO said it was recommending each country keep the passengers removed from the ship in isolation for 42 days from the last point of exposure to the virus. (Read More)

Just another reason to avoid cruise ships.

Prime Minister Mark Carney Celebrates “Europe Day” by Meeting with Barack Obama and Alex Soros During Toronto Strategy Session,


Posted originally on CTH on May 9, 2026 | Sundance 

Be of good cheer. As Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney meets with Barack Obama, Alex Soros, and a mix of global figures and intelligence operatives in Toronto, the number of people who grasp the true purpose of this gathering is far greater than the attendees might imagine.

The gathering, officially dubbed a “think tank” meeting, was closed to the media. Barack Obama gave the keynote address, and the assembly of political leftists took place as the U.S. and Canada remain at odds over differing worldviews and an economic dispute surrounding the USMCA trade agreement.

That said, the global audience of pragmatic ‘noticers’ understand that following Prime Minister Carney’s recent remarks in Europe and Canada about the next era of globalism being strengthened by the joint efforts of the British Commonwealth (Canada, Australia, U.K) and Europe, while putting the travels of Obama into context with his continued meetings at Number 10 Downing Street, the content of the ‘think tank’ assembly is transparent.

All of the figures are aligned in common interest to strategize ways to defeat their indefatigable nemesis known as Donald J Trump. It is both the policy of economic nationalism and the outcomes of seismic shifts in geopolitical alignment that cause the brain trust of leftists to assemble with urgency.  There is a myriad of Trump victories recently that have begun to destroy their precious systems of control.

President Trump is using the combined power of the U.S. Treasury, U.S. Military and U.S. Economy as a wrecking ball against one-hundred years of Euro-centric control operations.  Heck, even the recently paused tariffs against EU automobiles is connected to the larger objective of ending the never-ending Marshal Plan. And, then there’s that little reference point of King Charles failed recent tour, against the backdrop of Starmer’s electoral collapse.

I doubt very much the arrival of Pete Buttigieg and Elissa Slotkin (CIA) will offset the leftist defeats in the redistricting effort.  But, well, sure, I guess assembling to try and organize internal operations against Godzilla Trump may benefit from Soros and his Bazooka Joe glasses.

In the economic competition, Canada faces the biggest vulnerability, as its entire system of investment, banking, and production relies heavily on maintaining trade preferences that benefit from the $30 trillion U.S. economy. Prime Minister Carney’s control measures are ultimately futile attempts to counter Trump’s insistent and justified reciprocity stance. This push for control stems from a place of fear.

Canada and the EU are trying to use China as a counterbalance and shield against Trump’s direct hits to their interests.  However, along with all of those who can see the big picture behind the leftist assembly, Big Panda (Beijing) and Big Grizzly (Russia) well understand what is happening.  Remember, all varieties of bears are omnivorous, and while Pandas may be cute the Kamchatka is very underrated.

Thankfully, a God in control of all things doesn’t give us a President we need, He anoints a President He needs.  The audience disliked Moses immensely, and the same can be said for David; however, each served His purpose.

Like I said at the beginning, be of good cheer.  Prime Minister Carney may have blocked and controlled visibility on the assembly by restricting media access, but given what is very visible and viral on social media, a Great Awakening is very evident.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard Delivers Remarks at 2026 Independent Women’s Policy Summit


Posted originally on CTH on May 8, 2026 | sundance |

On May 7, 2026, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard addressed the 2026 Independent Women’s Policy Summit in Washington, D.C. Given her current position at the tip of the IC accountability spear, it is worth reviewing DNI Gabbard’s remarks. The transcript of her speech is below.

[Transcript] – “Thank you so much for the introduction. Carrie, thank you for your leadership and all of the hard work that goes into making this day possible, and, of course, thanks to all of you for being here and for your support of the tremendous work that IWF does. I’m trying to remember what year I kind of first started getting involved. It might’ve been around the end of my time in Congress, but it’s been incredible to see the trajectory just over the last five, six years and the impact that IWF has had, and how much it has sparked and inspired people, women and girls, people all across the country, to take it upon themselves to really be the solution and confront the grave and serious and historic challenges that we are facing today. I think the focus of this summit today is around leadership, which is essential.

I have found too often in my time in politics, now that has spanned over 20-something years, my time serving in the military in different capacities, you know, the challenge and opportunity of leadership is a perpetual one. I find it now in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Intelligence Community across the board. And too often, what I see, especially in some of our young women and girls, but even some of the moms groups that I’ve met over the years, is a concern or question around not being qualified to lead.”

“Whether it’s running for office or taking on an organization, or going and testifying before Congress or before a school board meeting, people who haven’t done it before, never imagined themselves to be in this position, often say, “Well, you know, someone else can do it. Someone else will be better to do it. Someone else is more experienced. Someone else has the right qualifications and meets that criteria, for example, to be a candidate for office.”

And my response to them is always to focus on the most important characteristic that we should all look for in a leader, and that we should strive for in the leaders whom we choose to elect and that we choose to support. And that characteristic is someone who cares. If you care about serving and making a positive impact on your community, your state, your country, you will therefore then care about telling the truth.

You’ll care about standing up for what is right. And the courage that we see, especially in this vitriolic political environment that we are in, that courage is necessary because of the radical responses that we all get when we do very simple, common-sense things like stand up for the truth and speak the objective truth.

And obviously, the foremost example, and the one that’s been really gratifying to see the progress around, is the truth of the biological difference between men and women and girls and boys, and that, you know, girls should be able to play sports against girls. It’s a perfect case study. I think the fundamental issue is so much greater than this example because this whole fight and this whole challenge is impacting a generation. But when you look at what’s really at stake, the existence and acceptance that there is such a thing as objective truth is really the issue. And so this is the current fight over this, and the progress that’s been made here in the US and around the world with a lot of these international sporting entities is truly incredible. But it all drives down to the implications of what happens when we live in a society that rejects the existence of objective truth.

It erodes and removes the guardrails that must exist in our society, that there is such a thing as truth, that we expect our lawmakers and our leaders to understand that there is such a thing as truth, and that we expect our media to understand that there is such a thing as truth. How does a journalist, a true, honest journalist, which is a rare breed these days–I know we have a few in the room, thank you for being here. How does a journalist report on the truth if they, the journalist or their outlet, reject the existence of truth?

You can apply this almost universally across the board, but all of this comes back to courage. When we care about each other, when we care about our country, when we care about the consequences of the decisions being made by policymakers, when we care about our Constitution, our fundamental freedoms, the bedrock of this republic that we are citizens of, that is the qualification that we need to step up and lead and to make that difference.

I went through my own version of facing these constant challenges and questions in the ways that I have tried to and chosen to serve over the last few decades, where people constantly told me, “You are too young. You are not qualified. You don’t have an Ivy League degree. You don’t have a degree at all,” back in the day. But I– I’m grateful to my parents for this, they homeschooled us– I’m the fourth of five kids. They instilled this ethic of service and being the solution to a problem that you see, that no matter the detractors who came my way, even those who meant well, who said, “Oh, you know, you’re too young to run for Congress.”

I was 31 at the time. “You’re too young to run for Congress. You know, the other guy who’s running, he’s got all the money, he’s got all the endorsements, he’s gonna win. Just hang back and try again in 20 years,” And they thought they were giving me good advice and were being helpful. And I smiled, and this is Hawaii, so I said, “Thank you, aloha.” And then proceeded to ignore their very helpful feedback.

But they were looking at all of the wrong things. They were looking at what they viewed as, like, the political resume, the political establishment requirements, rather, and fundamentally forgetting the most important thing, which is we step up to serve the people, period. And in my race for Congress, that was the big difference. I was running against a candidate who was highly funded, had all the endorsements, and nearly a hundred percent name recognition. He had just run a statewide race and lost. And my seat was essentially a statewide seat. He thought he was gonna win the big final debate night that we had.

I remember we were in two different green rooms right next to each other, about to walk out in the debate. I’d known him forever. It’s Hawaii, you know, we know everybody. And as he walked out two minutes before me, he was singing a song. He’s a former basketball player, probably like 6’8”. And he looked back over his shoulder at me as I was about to walk out, singing the Black-Eyed Peas song. And he looked at me, and he was like, “Tonight’s gonna be a good night.”

And I smashed him in the debate… because he took it for granted. He took the people for granted. He took me for granted. And so he didn’t prepare. I am a prepper. I did the work, and I came with the goods, and I was running on a very clear platform based on substance and how I could best serve my community. So, fast forward, I had like 3% name recognition when we started this race. Five months before the election, I had, I think, 20% in the polls. He had 60%. And there were a couple of other candidates who kind of had broken out the rest of the margins. He was already interviewing staff that he planned to hire for his office in Congress at that point in time. And then I ended up winning the race and beating him by a 22% margin.

We spent the same amount of money, but arguably, on paper, he was the candidate who was definitely going to win. As he was interviewing his future staff, I was going island by island, holding town halls, knocking on doors, standing outside the supermarket, introducing myself to people, and saying, “I’m interviewing for a job to work for you. How can I serve you? What do you care most about? Here’s what I care about and here’s what I stand for.” And I point to this story often as I’m talking to folks who are thinking about running for Congress, who are thinking to themselves, like, “How can I get involved? I don’t even know where to start.” And usually always going back to, “Well, I don’t have the resume that’s required. I don’t have the money. I can’t self-fund. I don’t know how to pick up the phone and call a donor to ask for support.”

And I tell them my story because it’s a real one. Because that was me. That was me. And when we focus on having that servant’s heart guiding us, inspiring us, giving us that courage every single day, and focusing on those whom we are trying to serve and positively impact, this goes back to the vision that our founders had for our country. Truly, how do we have a government of, by, and for the people?

We have real people, not those who’ve been handpicked by the powers that be. We have real people who care and who want to serve, who are stepping up and responding to one of my favorite verses in the Bible from Isaiah 6:8, when the Lord says, “Whom shall I send? Who will go for us?” “Here I am, Lord, send me.” He didn’t ask for a resume. He didn’t say, “Well, are you qualified?”

He said, “Who will go for us?” He said, “Here I am, send me.” And that, to me, is the fundamental question. It’s one that I ask and reflect on myself on a daily basis: how can I best serve? How and where can I make that most positive impact? And continuously reflecting on that throughout my life, it’s taken me in a lot of different interesting directions. It’s taken me in different political positions.

I started out in the State House when I was 21 years old, and then to Congress. When I got elected to Congress, the Democratic Party somehow rolled out the red, red carpet. I was named a, you know, the rising star. CNN was talking about who was gonna play me in the movie. True story. I was like, “I don’t know what’s going on here.” Vogue Magazine wanted to do a spread and, like, all of this stuff.

And I was like, “Hmm, this is interesting. How can I use any of these opportunities as a platform to be able to make the positive impact that I wanted to make?” The problem with them was that they really thought I was gonna be a puppet for them, and that whatever they were dangling in front of me was somehow going to entice me into allowing them to control what I was there to do. It didn’t last long.

Within a few months, then-President Obama was coming to Congress and wanted to start a new war in the Middle East, this time in Syria. And I was the first Democrat, that’s maybe the only one, I don’t remember, but the first Democrat who came out publicly and opposed his request and gave very specific reasons why. I was on the House Foreign Affairs Committee at the time, which was based on my own experience of having deployed to the Middle East twice and understanding the implications of what he was asking Congress to approve.

And the fact that the very most basic questions that we should always ask, especially when you’re talking about sending our men and women in uniform into harm’s way, is what is the objective?

At that time, John Kerry was the Secretary of State, and he came before the committee, and I came in with an open mind, saying, “Hey, if this is something we have to do to secure our nation, we have to take a hard look at it.” But when I asked what was the objective, they said, “Oh, well, we wanna go in and deliver a punch in the gut to the Syrian regime. Not a pinprick, not a decapitation. We wanna deliver a punch in the gut.”

I was like, “Okay, that’s not a clear objective. How does that serve our best interests as a country? How does that secure our nation? How does that make the American people more safe? And what’s the plan?” I asked. “When they punch back, or their friends punch back?” “Oh, we don’t think they will.” Like, also not a good plan. “We don’t think they will.”

But by taking that step and asking the tough questions, doing the work, and coming out in opposition to President Obama’s request at that time, the red carpet was quickly rolled up and taken away. I got a very quick call from the White House saying, “How dare you go against your president?” They had no questions and no statements to make about the substance of the issues and questions that I had raised. And that was the first of many examples that would follow over the eight years that I was in Congress, where I realized that they weren’t actually interested.

You know, they made a big deal. “I’m a veteran. I deployed twice to the Middle East.” They weren’t actually interested in hearing what I had to say or drawing on the experience that I had. And ultimately it became about their own, their own partisan politics.

It became evident again, you know, the Democratic Party used to call themselves the party of women, the party that champions women. I found out at a number of women’s events that they only like a certain kind of woman that will say certain things and had no problem dismissing other women, women candidates, women of color.

I experienced this a lot when I ran for president in 2020. There was a forum where they had all of the female candidates there, and it was called She The People. The Washington Post covered the event, and I was not mentioned anywhere in the article. And so I had my press person call ’em up. They’re like, “Hey, Tulsi was there.” He was like, “Yeah, I know.” Like, “Okay, so why wouldn’t you report all of the female candidates that are there?” He was like, “I have no obligation to do so.”

One of many examples I could tell you about the bias of, you know, the so-called mainstream media. But all of it, again, pointing back to my initial message, that when we have people who care more about power than they do about the people, then everything starts to fall apart.

We’ve got tremendous leaders now, and I give so much credit to President Trump and the cabinet that he’s assembled, really hand-selecting people to lead each of these different agencies and saying, “Okay, I’m giving you this privilege of service and giving you this responsibility to lead. Now go out and deliver results.” And as you all know, the man does not rest. He is sprinting every single day, and he expects those results to be delivered, but he empowers the leaders on his team to actually go out and do the work.

And when we look at the high tempo across the board, whether you’re talking about Kelly Loeffler, who’s, you know, featured this week, it’s Small Business Week. But what a lot of people don’t see is the tremendous work she’s doing behind the scenes.

You have Sean Duffy, who’s going out and really, really doing a long-overdue revamp of the Department of Transportation, which, by the way, little side story there, he shared with me in his first conversations with his predecessor, Pete Buttigieg, you know, they’re doing a handoff. And Pete told him, Pete told Sean Duffy, he’s like, “Don’t worry about it. The organization basically runs itself.”

But you look at what Sean has done, you know, Sean and Rachel are great friends, but you look at what Sean has done, what he has uncovered with the infrastructure that we all rely on just to travel across the country, the safety of Americans. And you look at what happens and the difference when you have leaders who care and who are leaning into that mission of service, focusing on that mission every single day, versus those who are in it just for the optics or just for the resume bullet. And that’s where IWF has done and continues to do such tremendous work in bringing up, supporting, and empowering leaders across the country.

In 2024, I had the opportunity in the fall to go. I was in Reno and went to watch one of the girls’ basketball and volleyball games there. And this was one of the teams that was taking a very principled and courageous stand to not play against any of the volleyball teams that had a biological male on the women’s team. And it was so cool just to be there to offer our support.

Markwayne Mullin was there with me to offer our support to these young women. And then to see them, we invited some of them. This was right before the Madison Square Garden rally, the final, the big Trump rally. And to then see them go on and start doing media interviews, and to see them then go on and start to do things they never ever thought that they’d be capable of doing. And seeing how they, along with Riley Gaines and all of these incredible young women, really demonstrated the power of their voice and their personal experience that helped to trigger and inspire truly historic change that we’re continuing to see unfold.

And that’s really where, when we look at the opportunity that all of you, whether you’re donors or supporters, or your candidates, or those who are working on policy issues on the Hill, while we may not see results as quickly as we would like, this is a moment that requires all of us to not only look at ourselves in the mirror every day and say, “How can I do more? How can I be a part of the solution?” But in doing so, recognize that the decisions and the actions that we take, whether we realize it or not, are inspiring others to do the same. Where they may say, “If she can do that, maybe I can too.” I’ve been grateful to have experienced this over and over and over again and to help be that supporting voice, to encourage people to step outside of their comfort zone, to not be afraid of that discomfort, and to remain truly rooted in a spiritual foundation, recognizing the great responsibility that we have.

People don’t believe me when I tell them this, but my younger sister would attest to it. But growing up, fourth of five, my head was buried in books. I did martial arts. I was surfing, but I was extremely shy and am a textbook introvert. And so when I first decided to run for office in Hawaii when I was 21, I will never forget the first speech I gave. It was in an elementary school cafeteria in Waipahu on the island of Oahu. And I had to give a three-minute speech telling people, “This is who I am, this is why I’m running.” It seems pretty simple. I felt so sick, so sick leading up to that. I was standing outside that cafeteria door. They had all these candidates sweating beyond belief as they went through.

I had borrowed my mom’s dress to wear to this. And I don’t remember anything that I said, to be honest, but I did not walk out–I did what I had to do–I did not walk out of there thinking like, “Easy, I got this.”

It took years of knocking on doors and experiencing those nerves, experiencing that fear, that anxiety, that insecurity, not once, not twice, but every single day as I knocked on thousands of doors in that district every single day. And after each conversation, realizing, “Oh God, that was so nice. They were just such nice, nice people. What’s the problem?” And then all of the anxiety comes back in, like, “Oh, the next one’s gonna be the tough one,” then the next one, then the next one. And ultimately, I had to confront this because it was not productive, and I had to figure out a way through it.

And I definitely, you know, learned the hard way. But I had to ask myself like, “What’s your problem? What are you so afraid of? Why is this causing you so much anxiety?” And what I realized was that all of my fears and anxiety were ultimately coming from a pretty selfish place of like, “What if I look stupid? What if they ask me a question I don’t know the answer to? What if I don’t say the right words?”

But in all of my own responses to that, it was all about I, I, I. That word was repeating itself way too much, especially given what I was there to do. And my mission was, “How can I serve you? What can I do for you and your family? Tell me about your concerns.” And so when I talk about a spiritual foundation, for me, that was a spiritual realization that my aim and my goal and my purpose is to try to be of service to God, and how best to serve God than to be of service to God’s children.

And to try to make that positive impact. And it changed everything for me from where I used to walk into a room like this, just like, “Nobody talk to me. I’m just gonna stand in the corner and, you know, do what I gotta do, and then I’m gonna leave.” But instead of that, being able to walk into a room like this and recognize like, “Hey, I have the opportunity to share a kind word, to share respect, to share thanks, to maybe share a story that might encourage someone else,” and see what can I offer and how can I make a positive impact, even if I’m only having an interaction with someone for 30 seconds, that could be the thing that changes that person’s outlook or causes them to ask a question or may have that positive impact. And that, to me, is really collectively, yes, what IWF is about and has been making a positive impact for so long in this country. Yes, for women and girls, but we can’t talk about women and girls without talking about our husbands and our fathers and our brothers and our society as a whole.

And so I’ve personally gone through my own journey and learned the hard way and run into a bunch of brick walls. But I’m grateful for IWF because I didn’t have a group of supporters and mentors and those who were out doing the tough work and having the tough conversations on the TV when I was learning and figuring out how can I best serve.

So all of that is really just to say, I’m grateful to be here and really grateful for the work that IWF does and the support that they are getting from all of you, however you are contributing to this cause. We face some of the greatest challenges right now to the fundamental fabric of our country. And it is up to every single one of us as citizens of this great country to be the one who steps up and says, “Here I am, send me,” and every day asking, “Okay, I’m doing things I didn’t think I would do. What more can I do? How can I best serve? How can I make a greater impact?”

And we are making that impact, whether it be individually but certainly collectively. We’ve seen the power of change when enough patriots, leaders, and citizens who care stand up for what is right. Stand up for common sense, stand up for the truth, and stand up for those fundamental principles that make this country the great country that it is, those principles enshrined in our Constitution as they are being challenged every single day.

Thank you all so much for the opportunity to be here and share this time with you. Thank you.” [SOURCE LINK]

President Trump Delivers Impromptu Remarks Departing the White House


Posted originally on CTH on May 8, 2026 | sundance

The audio is a little challenging in parts; however, President Trump delivers remarks just prior to boarding Marine One as he departs the White House.

President Trump discussed ongoing issues with the Strait of Hormuz and difficult negotiations with Iran.  Trump noted the positive job growth, increase in the stock market and expanded economic activity.  President Trump also outlined his involvement in getting Russia and Ukraine to agree to a 3-day ceasefire, hoping the period of peace can be expanded.

.

President Trump Mediates a Three-Day Ceasefire Between Ukraine and Russia Coinciding with Victory Day


Posted originally on CTH on May 8, 2026 | sundance 

May 9, celebrated as Victory Day, is one of the most significant and heartfelt holidays in Russia, symbolizing resilience, unity, and remembrance. This day honors the Soviet Union’s victory over Nazi Germany in World War II, known in Russia as the Great Patriotic War. It is a time when the nation collectively reflects on its history, pays tribute to those who sacrificed their lives, and celebrates the enduring spirit of its people.

Russian President Vladimir Putin seems to have noticed the same EU/Ukraine chatter that we drew attention to a few days ago, and Moscow has stopped public attendance from tomorrow’s Victory Day celebration in Red Square. The Russian govt told people to stay away from Moscow central and watch the event on livestream. Other precautions have been similarly announced.

Emboldened by European allies, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy began yesterday by ridiculing a ceasefire offer by Russian intermediaries.

As Ukraine was a former part of the United Soviet Socialist Republic (until 1991), Putin views both Ukraine and Russia as celebrating the same Victory Day remembrance; a united victory over Nazism.  Zelenskyy, born in 1978, rejects that commonality.  However, after President Trump stepped into the discussion, a 3-day ceasefire was brokered.

[Via Truth Social] – “I am pleased to announce that there will be a THREE DAY CEASEFIRE (May 9th, 10th, and 11th) in the War between Russia and Ukraine. The Celebration in Russia is for Victory Day but, likewise, in Ukraine, because they were also a big part and factor of World War II. This Ceasefire will include a suspension of all kinetic activity, and also a prison swap of 1,000 prisoners from each Country. This request was made directly by me, and I very much appreciate its agreement by President Vladimir Putin and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Hopefully, it is the beginning of the end of a very long, deadly, and hard fought War. Talks are continuing on ending this Major Conflict, the biggest since World War II, and we are getting closer and closer every day. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

 ~ President DONALD J. TRUMP

Due to the psychology of Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in combination with his co-dependent enablers in Europe and the U.K., I would caution everyone to review Ukraine’s participation in the ceasefire tenuously.   Zelenskyy, leading a non-NATO member state, gains NATO’s protection because France, Germany, Italy, and the U.K. see Russia as a major threat to Europe.

If the conflict stops, Zelenskyy has to start paying for his own nation’s government operations again.  Currently all of his state and municipal govt expenses are subsidized by Europe and the USA.  If fighting stops there will be a movement to stop giving Ukraine subsidies.

Zelenskyy’s government officials have become very wealthy from the money they are able to skim from U.S, U.K and EU support.  The taxpayer laundry operation is very lucrative, and Ukraine is well known for its institutional corruption systems. If fighting stops, the money supply shrinks.  For Zelenskyy this is a big problem.

Pentagon Releases Newly Declassified Files on UFOs and UAPs, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena


Posted originally on CTH on May 8, 2026 | sundance 

Specifically, because I follow the networks of the U.S. intelligence community and how they intersect with political objectives and interests of the U.S. government, I would be remiss if I did not point out that next month a Hollywood production by Stephen Spielberg is being released.

The Spielberg movie is called “Disclosure Day,” and the plot of the movie is the U.S. government informing the American people that alternative life systems, essentially alien entities, exist in our universe.  Perhaps it is a coincidental data point, perhaps not.  It is, however, a data point. You can decide if the two releases are related.

Today the Dept of War releases declassified files highlighting Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).  The FILES ARE HERE. The files contain videos, images and witness statements.

PRESS RELEASE – Today, the Department of War announced the initial release of new, never-before-seen files on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) as part of the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE). This interagency effort includes The White House, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the Department of Energy (DOE), the DOW’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and additional components of U.S. intelligence agencies. The collection will be housed on WAR.GOV/UFO and additional files will be released by the Department of War on a rolling basis.

This release follows the direction of President Donald J. Trump to begin the process of identifying and declassifying government files related to UAP in the interest of total transparency. No other President or administration in history has followed through on this level of UAP transparency.

The American people can now access the federal government’s declassified UAP files instantly. The latest UAP videos, photos, and original source documents from across the entire United States government are all in one place – no clearance required. While past administrations sought to discredit or dissuade the American people, President Trump is focused on providing maximum transparency to the public, who can ultimately make up their own minds about the information contained in these files.

The American people have asked for more transparency on these topics, and President Trump is delivering. While all of the files have been reviewed for security purposes, many of the materials have not yet been analyzed for resolution of any anomalies.

• Secretary of War Pete Hegseth: “The Department of War is in lockstep with President Trump to bring unprecedented transparency regarding our government’s understanding of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. These files, hidden behind classifications, have long fueled justified speculation — and it’s time the American people see it for themselves. This release of declassified documents demonstrates the Trump Administration’s earnest commitment to unprecedented transparency.”

• Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard: “The American people have long sought transparency about the government’s knowledge of unidentified anomalous phenomena. Under President Trump’s leadership, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is actively coordinating the Intelligence Community’s declassification efforts with the Department of War to ensure a careful, comprehensive, and unprecedented review of our holdings to provide the American people with maximum transparency. Today’s release is the first in what will be an ongoing joint declassification and release effort.”

• FBI Director Kash Patel: “The FBI is proud to stand alongside President Trump and our interagency partners in this landmark release of UAP records. For the first time in history, the American people have unfettered access to declassified government files on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon – a level of transparency that no prior administration has delivered. The FBI remains committed to supporting this rolling declassification effort with the same rigor and integrity we bring to every national security matter. As these files continue to be reviewed and released, the American people can be confident that their security remains our highest priority.”

• NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman: “I applaud President Trump’s whole-of-government effort to bring greater transparency to the American people on unidentified anomalous phenomena. At NASA, our job is to bring the brightest minds and most advanced scientific instruments to bear, follow the data, and share what we learn. We will remain candid about what we know to be true, what we have yet to understand, and all that remains to be discovered. Exploration and the pursuit of knowledge are core to NASA’s mission as we endeavor to unlock the secrets of the universe.”

WAR.GOV/UFO is a dedicated Department of War webpage to stay up to date with the latest UAP file releases. {SOURCE}

CTH has no idea what all this stuff means.  However, CTH does know what the background process entails.

Without question, the Pentagon, FBI, ODNI, NSA, CIA and NASA had to spend a great deal of time and labor in finding and getting these files extracted; then reviewed and declassified by each stakeholder as they were prepared for release to the public.

Thousands and thousands of total hours work.

Thousands.

Those are hours not spent on other matters that might be considered adverse to the interests of Washington DC politicians.

Prime Minister Starmer Refuses to Step Aside as Labor Party Loses 1,100 Seats in Regional Elections and Losses Continue Mounting


Posted originally on CTH on May 8, 2026 | sundance

U.K Prime Minister Keir Starmer has suffered a massive defeat as the British regional election results continue to be counted.  So far, Starmer’s Labour Party has lost 1,100 seats and Nigel Farage’s Reform Party has gained a whooping 1,229 seats.

The results continue to be tallied as many regions and local councils have a form of ranked choice voting.  However, despite the mounting electoral losses, Keir Starmer is refusing to step aside.

(VIA AP Newswire) – LONDON (AP) — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer insisted Friday that he will not resign after bruising elections that saw his governing Labour Party suffer big losses and the hard-right Reform UK make major gains.

The local and regional elections were widely seen as an unofficial referendum on Starmer, whose popularity has plummeted since he led the center-left Labour Party to power less than two years ago. […] Starmer said he took responsibility for the “very tough” results but would not quit.

“The voters have sent a message about the pace of change, how they want their lives improved,” he said. “I was elected to meet those challenges, and I’m not going to walk away from those challenges and plunge the country into chaos.”

Reform UK, led by the veteran nationalist politician Nigel Farage, won hundreds of local council seats in working-class areas in England’s north, such as Sunderland, that were solid Labour turf for decades, and also made gains from the Conservatives in areas like the county of Essex, east of London. Reform, which ran on an anti-establishment and anti-immigration message, did particularly well in areas that backed the U.K. to leave the European Union in the historic Brexit vote in 2016.

[…] Tony Travers, professor of government at the London School of Economics, said the elections show established parties struggling “to respond to populists on the left and right who appear to provide painless and simple solutions to intractable political and economic problems.” (read more)

The results will continue to be counted with more concrete outcomes likely on Saturday.

(VIA POLITICO UK) – It’s been an extraordinary day, which has seen a monumental shift in the political landscape across the country. Labour MPs are already calling on Keir Starmer to either go now or set a date — but not yet in huge numbers. That could change over the weekend.

Starmer’s party suffered a historic defeat in Wales, topped off with the loss of First Minister Eluned Morgan. Both Labour and the Conservatives have been reduced to single digits in the Welsh Senedd, while Nigel Farage’s Reform UK soared from a standing start to 34 seats, and Welsh nationalists Plaid Cymru emerged as the largest party with 43 seats, leaving them short of an overall majority.

Labour’s woes in England were huge. The party has lost 1,099 councillors so far, with heartlands falling to both Farage’s Reform UK, who have gained a whopping 1,229 seats, and the left-wing Green Party, who are currently up 289. (more)

History may not always repeat, but it often rhymes. 😂

April Jobs Report Shows 115,000 Gains, Federal Govt Employment Drops Another -9,000


Posted originally on CTH on May 8, 2026 | sundance 

The Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) has released the April jobs report showing 115,000 jobs gained [DATA HERE]. Inside the numbers, federal government employment continued to decline in April (-9,000). Since reaching a peak in October 2024, federal government employment is down by 348,000, or 11.5 percent since the 2024 election.

The March report was also revised upward from 178,000 to 185,000.  The overall jobs gain was double what most ‘experts’ and economic pundits had expected.  The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3 percent.

[Source BLS, Table-2]

BLS – […] Total nonfarm payroll employment edged up by 115,000 in April, after showing little net change over the prior 12 months. In April, job gains occurred in health care, transportation and warehousing, and retail trade. Federal government employment continued to decline. (See table B-1.)

In April, health care added 37,000 jobs, in line with the average monthly gain of 32,000 over the prior 12 months. Over the month, job gains occurred in nursing and residential care facilities (+15,000) and home health care services (+11,000).

Transportation and warehousing employment increased by 30,000 in April, reflecting a gain in couriers and messengers (+38,000). However, employment in transportation and warehousing is down by 105,000 since reaching a peak in February 2025.

Retail trade added 22,000 jobs in April. Employment increased in warehouse clubs, supercenters, and other general merchandise retailers (+18,000) and in building material and garden equipment and supplies dealers (+13,000). These gains were partially offset by job losses in department stores (-7,000) and in electronics and appliance retailers (-2,000). Retail trade employment had shown little net change over the prior 12 months.

Employment in social assistance continued to trend up in April (+17,000), reflecting a gain of 24,000 jobs in individual and family services.

Federal government employment continued to decline in April (-9,000). Since reaching a peak in October 2024, federal government employment is down by 348,000, or 11.5 percent. (more)

Building supply (retail) shows strong growth (+12,500); that’s good – that’s Main Street.  Leisure and Hospitality showed strong growth (+14,000); mostly from restaurants, that’s good – again, Main Street.  Shrinking the federal government by another 9,000 – that’s priceless.

[MEDIA] – April jobs report: Economy adds 115,000 jobs, far better than expected. Payrolls rose by 115,000 last month, and the unemployment rate stayed at 4.3%, the Labor Department said Friday. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg had estimated a median gain of 65,000 jobs following March’s blockbuster increase of 178,000 roles, which was revised upward to 185,000. (more)

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Holds a Press Briefing Following Visit with Pope and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in Rome


Posted originally on CTH on May 8, 2026 | sundance 

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio travelled to Rome, Italy, for discussions with the Pope and Prime Minister.  Secretary Rubio holds a press conference following his diplomatic trip.  The press questions cover the meeting with the Pope, foreign policy discussions and ongoing international relations between the United States, Italy and NATO allies.

Secretary Rubio notes President Trump is reevaluating current troop deployment throughout Europe and President Trump will make further decisions on troop levels based on a variety of factors.  The previous “base denials” is one of the factors for decision-making. WATCH:

.