Book Review of American Apocalypse The Second American Civil War


This is a book review of a great book written by Kurt Schlichter that I finished reading a few weeks ago. I found it very interesting, especially since I was a Green Beret officer in Vietnam in 1967. It was not a well-managed war AND I left the military in September 1969.

Over the next several decades I did a lot of reading on military history going back to the Roman empire as I wanted to know as much as I could about war. I ended the study with what happened in Vietnam, and why. The video below was based from a from a book I read By Robert McNamara who was an American businessman and Secretary of Defense (1916-2009). I think this video came out after the book.

In 1998 I read a book published in 1997 the   Fourth Turning an American Prophecy written by William Strauss and Neil Howe. The book was about the cycles of history. Which contained 4 sub cycles. And the title the Fourth Turning was the story of wat we are now going into. The prediction of the authors was right on, and we are mow at the end of this fourth turning and getting set for the next first Turning. Which means a totally new government. I do have a review of that book Posted here, on my blog.

 

Now back to this review which goes along with what was in the Book the Fourth Turning. Which is a new structure of society.

The Book starts with some back ground and is a little confusing at first but by page 22/23 you begin to get oriented at the way the book is written. At this point we find out the US House was taken over by the Democrats in November 2026 and President Trump and his VP JD Vance were assassinated in New York on September 11 2027 while at 9-11 celebration. Both were killed by drones.

The US House Speaker at the time was Debra Holmes and was sworn in as President the same day. She lost no time getting rid of every one she didn’t like. And declared that All Republicans were insurrectionists and band them from any government positions. At that point the country split into two segments Red states and Blue states and the army split into the Red states geeing rid of all Woke require things and the blue states going full Woke. There was a lot of movement between the various states, as the citizens moved to a state compatible with their views. And the 2nd civil war was started.

The book is a series of chapters each with a story of someone in the Red states and the Blue states. The Red states were not Woke and as we know Trump and Pete Hegseth had had got the military back in shape after Trump was elected in a landside in 22024,  

And since the Blue states were very Woke, Since the Evil Woman President Holmes, put back all the Wokness of President Biden prior to President Trump. With no component officers or solders they were no match for a real army and they just didn’t have a chance.

The story in the book is well written and it ends Realistically.

A warning, with my background as a Green Beret with the rank of Captain, I can say that the story in this book is what would likely happen to us if we don’t keep the house and the senate in Nonmember 2026.

 

 

 

Sam Tanenhaus: Why William F. Buckley Saw Castro’s Cuba Through the Lens of Mexico’s Revolution — Early Claims of Soviet Missile Intentions That Earned Him the “Conspiracy Theorist” Tag


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: May 27, 2026

Sam Tanenhaus: Defending the Right to Praise Chambers and Buckley— Why Admiring Their Character Matters Even If Today’s Politics Won’t Allow It


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: May 27, 2026

Caroline Wren: “Well, I think Paxton is looking very good, Cornyn is going around begging Democrats to vote for him.” – Paxton on the Rise, Ground Reports Show Cornyn Under Strain


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: May 27, 2026

John Solomon: South Carolina Senate votes down measure to create new congressional map


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: May 27, 2026

Scott Presler: “I don’t think I had a single person tell me that they were voting for Cornyn” – Ken Paxton’s Momentum Grows as Voters Signal Rejection of Cornyn


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: May 27, 2026

LIVE: President Trump Holds Cabinet Meeting at the White House…


Posted originally on Rumble on Bright Bart News Network on: May 27, 2026

It’s YOUR Money Being Stolen by Fraud!


Posted originally on Rumble on Bright Bart News Network on: May 27, 2026

Stephen Miller: U.S. Can Balance Federal Budget Just by Ending Fraud


Posted originally on Rumble on Bright Bart News Network on: May 27, 2026

Russia Tells Banks to “Shoot Down Drones Yourself”


Posted originally on May 28, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

DragonFire military laser weapon obliterates drones in Scotland tests

The line between civilian society and war is disappearing completely. That is the real story behind Russia now authorizing its central bank and Sberbank to operate anti-drone systems and arm personnel to defend financial infrastructure. A country’s banking system is no longer simply processing transactions or moving money. It is now becoming part of the battlefield itself.

Russia passed a new law allowing the central bank, Sberbank, and the Russian Cash Collection Association to deploy their own drone defense systems after repeated Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russian territory. Staff at these institutions can now reportedly be armed as well.

This is what happens when modern war evolves into economic warfare. I have warned repeatedly that World War III would not resemble World War II where armies simply lined up across borders. The entire economy becomes militarized. Banks, energy grids, payment systems, telecommunications, ports, railways, factories, and data centers all become targets because modern civilization itself depends on interconnected infrastructure.

Ukraine understands this perfectly. Their drone strategy has increasingly focused on striking oil facilities, energy infrastructure, logistics centers, and economic targets deep inside Russia because they know they cannot defeat Russia conventionally in a prolonged war of attrition.

What is extraordinary here is not merely the drone attacks themselves. It is the admission that the Russian state can no longer centrally defend everything. Moscow is effectively decentralizing air defense responsibilities and telling major corporations and financial institutions: defend yourselves. That is a major shift psychologically.

The Guardian even framed it bluntly: Russia is telling its banks to “shoot down drones yourself.”

Sberbank City Building - ANT YAPI

This is precisely how long wars transform societies historically. Civilian infrastructure slowly merges with military infrastructure until there is barely any distinction left. During the later stages of major conflicts, factories become military targets, railroads become military targets, ports become military targets, and eventually financial institutions themselves become military targets because war is ultimately about resources and economic survival.

Sberbank is not some small regional bank. It is effectively intertwined with the Russian state itself. Sberbank controls roughly a third of Russian banking assets and acts as a pillar of the entire domestic financial system. The Russian central bank likewise sits at the core of wartime financing, sanctions management, currency stabilization, and capital controls.

Russia has pushed aggressively toward cashless payments, digital financial infrastructure, and central bank digital currency experimentation through the digital ruble system. But centralized digital systems become vulnerable during wartime because they create concentrated targets.

The more governments centralize financial systems digitally, the more vulnerable those systems become to cyberwarfare, EMP threats, sabotage, drone attacks, and infrastructure strikes. This is one reason governments are quietly preparing for a wartime financial environment globally.

What people fail to understand is that once banks become strategic military infrastructure, governments will justify virtually unlimited control over the financial system in the name of “security.” That is how capital controls are born historically. War always becomes the excuse for expanded government power.

The United States did exactly this during previous wars. Europe did exactly this. Gold confiscation, capital restrictions, currency controls, surveillance, transaction monitoring, frozen accounts, and restrictions on moving money abroad all emerge in wartime environments because governments become desperate to maintain internal stability.

Russia is already heavily centralized economically due to sanctions. But this trend is spreading globally. Europe is discussing CBDCs openly. Governments worldwide are building real-time payment surveillance systems. Financial privacy is disappearing everywhere because governments increasingly view the banking system as part of national security infrastructure.

Now we are reaching the next stage where banks themselves require physical anti-drone defenses. Imagine if JPMorgan or the Federal Reserve announced rooftop anti-drone missile systems surrounding Manhattan offices. That sounds absurd today, yet this is exactly where prolonged geopolitical escalation leads eventually.

Canada Moves to Destroy Encryption – Demands Backdoor Access to ALL Available Dataoriginally onCanada Moves to Destroy Encryption – Demands Backdoor Access to ALL Available Data


Posted originally on May 28, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Canada is walking into extremely dangerous territory and most people do not understand the implications because governments always package surveillance laws as “public safety.” That is how this begins every single time historically. They sell fear first, then quietly expand state power behind the scenes while claiming only criminals should worry.

Now even Apple, Google, Meta, Signal, privacy experts, cybersecurity professionals, and members of the U.S. Congress are warning that Canada’s Bill C-22 could force technology companies to weaken encryption and build government access mechanisms directly into their systems.

Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown, defending Canada's new mass surveillance bill at committee this week: "For those with privacy concerns, my message would be: don't commit a crime." That's Bill C-22, the Lawful

People need to understand what encryption actually is. Encryption is not some toy used only by criminals. Encryption protects bank accounts, corporate systems, private medical data, government communications, journalists, dissidents, businesses, lawyers, and ordinary citizens. Every time you use secure banking, send a private message, or protect sensitive data online, encryption is standing between you and cybercriminals.

The government always frames these laws as targeting terrorists, child exploitation, organized crime, or national security threats. But the mechanism itself never stays limited. Once governments establish the legal right to force “lawful access” into encrypted systems, the infrastructure for surveillance already exists. The temptation to expand those powers becomes overwhelming.

Apple warned directly that Bill C-22 could allow Canada to “force companies to break encryption by inserting backdoors into their products.” Meta warned the bill could require companies to “break, weaken, or circumvent encryption” and potentially install government spyware capabilities directly into systems. Signal reportedly stated it would rather leave Canada entirely than compromise its encryption promises.

Bill C-22 - The Lawful Access Act

There is no such thing as a “safe backdoor.” Once you intentionally weaken encryption for government access, you create vulnerabilities that hackers, hostile states, cybercriminals, foreign intelligence agencies, and malicious actors can eventually exploit. Government itself is composed of malicious actors for that matter.

The bill reportedly includes provisions requiring providers to maintain technical capabilities enabling authorized access while also retaining categories of metadata for up to one year. People underestimate how dangerous metadata itself becomes. Governments love pretending metadata is harmless because it does not always contain message content directly. Nonsense. Metadata reveals social relationships, movement patterns, communication habits, financial behavior, political affiliations, and entire personal networks. Modern surveillance increasingly relies on metadata because it allows governments to map society itself.

What is happening in Canada is part of a much larger global trend. Britain attempted similar measures against Apple recently. Australia passed controversial encryption-access laws years ago. The European Union continues pushing expanded digital surveillance frameworks. Governments worldwide are moving toward centralized digital monitoring systems because the financial and political pressures building globally are enormous.

This is exactly what I have warned about regarding the transition toward CBDCs, digital IDs, centralized payment systems, and cashless societies. Once governments gain the technical ability to monitor communications, financial transactions, movement, identity, and digital behavior simultaneously, you create a system where privacy itself effectively disappears.

That is how free societies slowly normalize surveillance infrastructure they once would have considered unimaginable. Governments globally are conditioning populations to accept the idea that privacy itself is suspicious. If you want secure communication, they imply you must have something to hide.

People better pay attention because once these systems are built, they rarely disappear.