WarRoom Live
Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: June 1, 2026
Google’s Debug Project — When Silicon Valley Starts Releasing Insects
Posted originally on Jun 2, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |
Nobody elected Google to manage the ecosystem. Yet here we are.
Alphabet, Google’s parent company, has quietly spent the better part of a decade developing what it calls the “Debug” project. The latest proposal seeks approval to release tens of millions of laboratory-bred mosquitoes across California and Florida. We are told not to worry because these are the “good” mosquitoes. We are assured they are male mosquitoes and therefore do not bite. We are told they carry a naturally occurring bacteria known as Wolbachia that will interfere with reproduction and reduce mosquito populations.
For generations, governments and corporations have repeatedly assured the public that interventions into nature would be harmless. DDT was once considered a miracle. Countless pesticides were approved before later being restricted. Entire rivers were polluted in the name of progress. Every generation is told that the experts have everything under control until something goes wrong.
What makes this case particularly remarkable is who is behind it. This is not a public health agency. This is not a university research department. This is one of the largest technology companies on earth. The same corporate structure that dominates online advertising, search results, artificial intelligence, data collection, mapping, cloud computing, and digital communications now wants to engineer mosquito populations on a massive scale.
The project itself is run by Verily, Alphabet’s life sciences division. Debug combines software engineers, robotics specialists, AI systems, automation experts, and mosquito biologists. They have spent years building automated mosquito factories capable of producing millions of insects per week. Computer vision systems sort male from female mosquitoes while robotic systems manage breeding and deployment. This is industrial-scale biological engineering that will now become a social experiment.
The problem according to Google: “Mosquitoes kill more people than every other animal combined. One species, Aedes aegypti, carries diseases such as dengue, Zika, yellow fever, and chikungunya which make hundreds of millions of people sick every year. And these diseases are spreading faster than ever.”
Their stated objective is to reduce mosquito populations without widespread pesticide use. Studies involving Wolbachia have shown reductions in mosquito populations and lower transmission of certain diseases. Singapore reported reductions in dengue risk exceeding 70% in areas where Wolbachia programs were implemented. The CDC has acknowledged that Wolbachia-based mosquito suppression can reduce target mosquito populations and notes that these mosquitoes are not genetically modified.
Why should the public automatically trust any institution that asks for permission to alter the natural environment on this scale?
This is not the first time modified mosquitos have been released on the population. Bill Gates has been involved in mosquito projects for years, long before Google entered the arena. Through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, he has funded research into both genetically modified mosquitoes and Wolbachia-based mosquito programs designed to suppress malaria, dengue, Zika, and other mosquito-borne diseases. Gates has openly championed the release of engineered mosquitoes, arguing that technology can be used to alter insect populations and reduce disease transmission. The Foundation supported projects involving biotechnology firm Oxitec, which developed genetically modified mosquitoes carrying self-limiting genes intended to collapse wild mosquito populations over time. Gates has also heavily promoted the World Mosquito Program, which breeds millions of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes and releases them into communities throughout Latin America, Africa, and Asia.
Whether one agrees with these programs or not, what is remarkable is the philosophy behind them. A handful of billionaires, technology companies, and global foundations increasingly view nature itself as something that can be engineered, modified, and optimized. Gates has praised facilities producing more than 30 million mosquitoes per week and has argued that mass releases are necessary to combat future disease outbreaks. Google is now pursuing its own large-scale mosquito deployment through Verily’s Debug project. The public is being asked to trust that these interventions will work exactly as intended, yet history is littered with examples of experts assuring everyone that there was nothing to worry about until unforeseen consequences emerged years later. The issue is no longer simply mosquitoes. It is the growing belief among technocrats that every aspect of the natural world can be redesigned from the top down by unelected institutions operating far beyond public scrutiny.
We are living through a period where public trust has collapsed. Governments concealed information during COVID and unleashed a deadly cocktail of mRNA vaccines on the global population. Pharmaceutical companies received legal protections that ordinary businesses could only dream about. Regulators routinely move through revolving doors into the industries they supposedly oversee. The public has been repeatedly told to trust experts who later turn out to be wrong.
Now the same population is expected to calmly accept the release of tens of millions of engineered insects because another collection of experts says everything is safe.
What could possibly go wrong?
America’s Fruit Has Become a Social Experiment
Posted originally on Jun 2, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |
Corporate agriculture turned food into a chemistry project. A recent consumer test of Driscoll’s conventional strawberries found 12 pesticide residues, including eight described as PFAS-linked “forever pesticides,” while the organic sample came back non-detect. Why are Americans expected to eat food treated with chemicals that other nations restrict or prohibit?
The USDA will run out and tell you that over 99% of tested foods fall below EPA tolerance levels. That is the same bureaucratic trick they always use. They define the allowable poison, then congratulate themselves when the poison is within the legal limit. The average person does not eat one chemical in isolation. They eat strawberries, spinach, grapes, apples, processed food, contaminated water, and whatever else the industrial food machine has dumped into the supply chain.
The Environmental Working Group ranked strawberries third on its 2026 Dirty Dozen list, noting Americans eat about eight pounds of fresh strawberries per year and with them “dozens of pesticides.” When children are eating these berries, when pregnant women are eating these berries, when families are told fruit is healthy, then the burden should be on these companies to prove the product is clean, not on consumers to become chemists in the grocery aisle.
There are videos circulating the internet of consumers leaving fruit outside overnight only to find it untouched in the morning. The animals won’t eat these substances. Even the bugs are avoiding the very produce on American grocery shelves.
The deeper problem is the farming system itself. California grows around 90% of the strawberries in America. At the state level, strawberry production has relied heavily on fumigants such as 1,3-D and chloropicrin. These chemicals are not harmless fairy dust. 1,3-D has been treated as a cancer-risk chemical, and chloropicrin was once used as a choking agent in war. Reports have shown these fumigants are used near schools and farmworker communities, and regulators have permitted exposure frameworks that critics say protect production more than people.
There should be lawsuits. “FDA approved” means absolutely nothing. It is an absolutely useless agency that is beholden to corporations over the people. Consumers deserve to know what was sprayed, where it was sprayed, what residues remained, what the companies knew, what regulators ignored, and whether labeling created a false sense of safety. If a product is marketed as wholesome, natural, fresh, and safe while containing residues that would not pass standards elsewhere, then the public has every right to demand accountability.
This is about the industrial corruption of food itself. America was once the breadbasket of the world. Now we have allowed monopolized agribusiness, chemical companies, captured regulators, and political cowards to transform the grocery store into a legal poison aisle.
The government will not fix this voluntarily because it never does. The agencies protect the system first and the people second. The only thing that moves these people is exposure, lawsuits, boycotts, and public outrage. If companies want to sell food to American families, then make it clean, prove it is clean, and stop hiding behind tolerance levels written by the same regulatory empire that has failed the public for decades.
A sick population can be easily controlled. They make us sick, prescribe pills, and force a lifetime of prescriptions and medical treatments not covered by greedy insurance companies. Government and corporations profit off our pain. Globalist entities openly discuss controlling the food and water supplies. This is why the World Economic Forum suggested banning individuals from gardening and growing their own food. This is why the likes of Bill Gates and other psychopathic pretend philanthropists are buying farmland and creating synthetic meats that cannot be distinguished from natural meat. Fresh produce and real sources of protein are becoming harder to obtain. Small farms are struggling to stay afloat. What is happening to the food supply should be on the front page of every paper, but these articles make 30-second news clips before they are forgotten. Pay attention to what is happening with the food supply, for they are actively using this as a way to control the population.
The Fed’s Real Stress Test
Posted originally on Jun 2, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |
Jerome Powell is now warning that the Federal Reserve is undergoing a “stress test” and that political interference threatens public confidence in the institution. He stated that “the public would lose faith” if administrations could remove Fed officials over policy disagreements and argued that democratic institutions can be “torn down all too quickly.”
What is interesting is not what Powell said. It is what he did not say.
The Federal Reserve has spent years demanding independence from elected officials while simultaneously expecting the public to trust its judgment after one of the largest inflationary episodes in modern history. Powell himself admitted previously that the Fed was late in recognizing inflation, famously calling it “transitory.”
The real stress test is not whether politicians criticize the Fed. The real stress test is whether the public still believes central bankers know what they are doing.
Throughout history, central banks have always claimed they must remain independent. The argument is simple. Politicians think in election cycles. Central bankers are supposed to think in long-term economic cycles. There is truth in that. If every administration could simply fire central bankers whenever interest rates became politically inconvenient, monetary policy would become nothing more than an extension of campaign strategy. Powell warned that if one administration succeeds in removing Fed officials over policy differences, future administrations will follow the same path.
Governments borrow beyond reason. Debt accumulates for decades. Then central banks are forced into impossible choices. Raise rates and governments struggle to finance their obligations. Cut rates and inflation returns. Every major sovereign debt crisis throughout history eventually places the central bank in the crossfire because there is no solution that satisfies everyone.
The United States national debt continues to expand while interest costs consume an increasing share of federal revenue. Politicians want lower rates because debt service becomes too high, and they falsely believe lower rates will spur confidence. Markets want stability. Savers want protection from inflation and borrowers want cheap credit. Everyone deeply needs to believe in a better tomorrow, or they will panic and hoard for survival. These objectives conflict with one another.
Powell said democratic institutions take years to build and can be destroyed quickly. He is correct. However, public trust is earned through performance. The Federal Reserve’s credibility was damaged not because politicians criticized it. Credibility was damaged when inflation exploded after years of assurances that price pressures were “transitory.”
The larger cycle is what matters. Around the world, confidence in institutions is declining. Governments, courts, media organizations, universities, and central banks are all facing challenges to their authority. Powell himself acknowledged that the Fed is merely one institution among many now facing scrutiny.
Powell sees political pressure as the Fed’s stress test. I would argue the greater stress test is whether citizens still believe the people running these institutions deserve the trust they once commanded.
President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu at Odds Over Lebanon Strikes Creating Problems for Negotiations with Iran
Posted originally on CTH on June 1, 2026 | Sundance
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu representing Israel, and President Donald Trump representing the United States, apparently had a testy telephone call about ongoing Israeli strikes against Hezbollah attacks from Lebanon.
Iran, essentially IRGC control officers who now control the government, had previously said their terms for negotiation required Israel to stop strikes into Lebanon against their allies in Hezbollah. However, under the cover of that term, Hezbollah restarted rocket attacks from Lebanon against Israel. Yesterday, Israel began counter-attack operations against Hezbollah, which led to Iran saying the terms of the negotiation were now violated, and they would stop discussions with the USA.
[NOTE – This overall dynamic is very similar to Saudi Arabia coming under fire about a month ago, and their anger toward the USA for essentially saying Saudi had to accept the attacks so that diplomatic talks could continue. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salmon rejected the expectation and challenged President Trump with Saudi allied base cooperation.]
Apparently, President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu had a strong discussion, some have leaked a very angered and open exchange, about Netanyahu launching strikes into Lebanon again.
On social media, it looks like this. Netanyahu put’s the Israel position via X:
[source]
President Trump responds to Netanyahu’s intentions with a phone call and then a follow-up on his Truth Social Account:
From leaks of the background conversation, a very testy narrative appears:
AXIOS – “President Trump lashed out at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Israel’s escalation in Lebanon in an expletive-laden call on Monday, two U.S. officials and a third source briefed on the call told Axios.” {source}
♦ ♦ ♦
NY Post – President Trump reportedly tore into Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, demanding the leader resist strikes on Hezbollah in an expletive-laden phone call.
The tense call came after Iran threatened to withdraw from negotiations with the US after Israel ordered strikes on terrorists in southern Beirut — with Axios reporting the president at one point asking, “What the f–k are you doing?”
“You’re f–king crazy. You’d be in prison if it weren’t for me. I’m saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this,” a US official told Axios, summarizing Trump’s comments.
Another source described Trump as sounding “pissed,” and claimed the president “steamrolled” the Israeli prime minister on the call. “Bibi said, ‘OK, OK, just make sure everything is taken care of,’” the second official said.
The president was reportedly aware Hezbollah had been firing on Israeli troops but concerned that Netanyahu was disproportionately escalating the situation — and potentially hurting US negotiations with Tehran.
Shortly after the call, Trump wrote in a post to Truth Social: “I had a very productive call with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, of Israel, and there will be no Troops going to Beirut, and any Troops that are on their way, have already been turned back. (read more)
It is easy to see both sides in this dynamic.
It is also easy to see how Iran can manipulate the Hezbollah third-party aspect against Israel, as Iran previously did directly with attacks against Saudi Arabia. Iran demanding Israeli attacks against their friends in Hezbollah must stop in order to negotiate. When the attacks stop, Iran then tells their friends to attack Israel.
This is the duplicitous evil within the approach of Iran that Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States have previously said makes negotiations with Iran impossible.
Brent crude surged as much as 7.1% above $97.50 and WTI climbed over $94.50 per barrel on Monday, reversing recent declines. The rally was driven by fears over the Strait of Hormuz and potential closure of Bab el-Mandeb, both critical to global oil flows. Analysts warn that even with a deal, supply relief would be gradual, while disruptions could keep prices elevated despite weak demand in China and Europe.
Analysts outline two scenarios: a credible peace deal could trigger an immediate $20 per barrel drop as Gulf shipping resumes, or prolonged deadlock could push prices toward historic highs if chokepoints remain blocked. Iran’s leverage over Hormuz and demands for larger concessions suggest talks could drag on. With inventories falling and reserves depleting, a mid-year supply crunch looms if diplomacy fails {source}
Death by Political Correctness – British Police Release Bodycam Footage Showing Cops Handcuffing and Arresting Innocent Stabbing Victim as He Dies
Posted originally on CTH on June 1, 2026 | Sundance
The case of murdered victim Henry Nowak is horrific, and representative of just how far the United Kingdom has fallen.
18-year-old Henry Nowak was violently attacked and brutally stabbed by an Indian man named Vickrum Digwa. When police arrived the attacker claimed the victim called him racist names. The police then handcuffed the bleeding victim and told him he was under arrest.
Henry Nowak continually told police he had been stabbed by Digwa and could not breathe. The police didn’t believe him, and fraught with political correctness that demands they protect the minority rights of the Indian attacker, the U.K. police read the victim his rights and dragged him over the ground. Henry Nowak bleed to death and died as a result of his stab wounds.
The police laughed at the white male victim and mocked Henry Nowak while he died.
Eventually, the police realized the Indian man Vickrum Digwa was -indeed- the attacker and video evidence showed young Nowak was attacked and stabbed at random. Digwa was arrested and forced to stand trial. With overwhelming evidence against him, he was convicted of murder. Following the conviction Henry Nowak’s father gave a press statement. WATCH:
When the public found out during trial that police had actually handcuffed the victim and ignored his pleas for help, outrage grew.
The entire case is stunning in just how messed up Great Britain really is. The police never even handcuffed the attacker, even after they found out he was guilty of murder. Then, adding salt to the wound of the entire matter, Digwa’s defense team sought to shift blame for the murder from their violent client to the politically correct police.
The Nowak family was barred from speaking about the murder and the police conduct during the trial. However, as evidence in the trial was shown, the public found out about it. Demands for release of the officer’s body camera footage were made. No one could believe what they were hearing. The police and courts refused to release the footage until public and political pressure became just too much.
The body-cam footage is below.
Colombia Nationalist Candidate Abelardo de la Espriella Wins First Round Presidential Election
Posted originally on CTH on June 1, 2026 | Sundance
In a remarkable come from behind victory, Colombia’s nationalist presidential candidate Abelardo de la Espriella has won the first round in the election. Mr De la Espriella is a MAGA-aligned nationalist. His opposition, Ivan Cepeda is a leftist aligned globalist.
Mr De la Espriella, a lawyer and political outsider, won nearly 44 percent of the vote while Iván Cepeda won around under 41 percent, according to Colombian media. This was a surprising victory for the upstart politician who gained support from the people in Colombia who want a strong leader to eliminate corruption, gangs and criminal cartel activity.
Mr De la Espriella (pictured left) has to make all campaign appearances behind a bulletproof shield due to criminal cartels who target him.
Espriella has aligned himself with President Trump, El Salvador President Nayib Bukele and Argentina’s Javier Milei. A resurgence of nationalism and anti-corruption in the Americas. Interestingly, ever since Marco Rubio dissolved USAID there has been a return to national sovereignty throughout Latin America.
VIA NBC – […] Neither candidate had more than 50% of the vote in the first round of the election Sunday. With 100% of votes tallied, de la Espriella — running as a candidate for Defensores de la Patria, a party he founded — was leading with more than 43% of the vote. Cepeda, of the incumbent party, Pacto Histórico, was trailing at just over 40%.
President Gustavo Petro, who endorsed Cepeda, said he would not accept the preliminary count released by the country’s electoral authority, claiming that some of the software private companies used to count votes was flawed and that the results were not binding.
[…] The country’s electoral body, the National Civil Registry, reveals preliminary results in advance of final, official results. The chief of the office, Hernán Penagos, said in March that the preliminary count of this year’s congressional elections reached 99.8% precision — a historic high — compared with the final results.
Juanita Goebertus, the Americas director of Human Rights Watch, said Sunday on X that Colombia’s electoral system was “independent and trustworthy.”
“It is regrettable that the president is sowing unjustified doubts,” Goebertus wrote.
“De la Espriella and Cepeda will proceed to the second round. The election results must be respected,” she added, calling on the international community to rally around the National Civil Registry.
Sunday’s results set the stage for a showdown between Cepeda, a left-wing senator who helped negotiate Colombia’s historic 2016 peace deal, and de la Espriella, a lawyer and political outsider who has positioned himself as an ally to U.S. President Donald Trump and has vowed to crack down on crime. (read more)
Because neither candidate reached 50 percent, the runoff election will be held on June 21.
“For the Trump administration, a Colombia that recommits itself to security cooperation, counternarcotics efforts, and stronger democratic institutions would be a major win and an important step forward towards restoring stability across the Western Hemisphere,” Melissa Ford Maldonado of the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) told Fox News Digital from Colombia.” {source}
Colombia is divided into 32 departments. The Capital District of Bogotá is the country’s largest city hosting the main financial and cultural hub. Other urban areas include Medellín, Cali, Barranquilla, Cartagena, Bucaramanga, Pereira, Santa Marta, Cúcuta, Ibagué, Villavicencio and Manizales. It covers an area of 1,141,748 square kilometers and has a population of around 52 million.
Centinel2012 