Is Government the New God? – The Religion of Totalitarianism

Posted originally on Rumble by Academy of Ideas  on January 5, 2022

The International Criminal Court

On December 6, 2021 the following case was summited to the International Criminal Court located in Hague, Netherlands



Subject of complaint:

Violations of the Nuremberg Code

– Violation of Article 6 of the Rome Statute

– Violation of Article 7 of the Rome Statute

– Violation of Article 8 of the Rome Statute

– Violation of Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute

Based on the extensive claims and enclosed documentation, we charge those responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the United Kingdom, but not limited to individuals in these countries.

Perpetrators: Prime Minister for the United Kingdom BORIS JOHNSON, Chief Medical Officer for England and Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government CHRISTOPHER WHITTY, (former) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care MATTHEW HANCOCK, (current) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care SAJID JAVID, Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) JUNE RAINE, Director-General of the World Health Organisation TEDROS ADANHOM GHEBREYESUS, Co-chair  of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation WILLIAM GATES III and Co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation MELINDA GATES, Chairman and Chief executive officer of Pfizer ALBERT BOURLA, Chief Executive Officer of AstraZeneca STEPHANE BANCEL, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna PASCAL SORIOT, Chief Executive of Johnson and Johnson ALEX GORSKY, President of the Rockefeller Foundation DR RAJIV SHAH, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) DR ANTHONY FAUCI, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum KLAUS SCWAB, President of EcoHealth Alliance DR PETER DASZACK


A PDF copy of the case is available here

<object class="wp-block-file__embed" data="; type="application/pdf" style="width:100%;height:600px" aria-label="Embed of <strong>icc-complaint-7icc-complaint-7Download

Those that are participating in these Crimes Against Humanity are following the discredited beliefs of Karl Marx and their goal is the total collapse of Western Civilization so that it can be Build Back Better. What that means is into a political system such as what Joseph Stalin created in Russia. If you don’t understand what that means read Volume One of the three volume set The Gulag Archipelago written by Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn between 1958 and 1967 based on his in the camps from 1918 to 1956. It takes a strong stomach to get though the book as its hard to believe that people can be this cruel. What is in this book is exactly what Klaus Schwab is bringing to us right now with his Great Reset. If you actual read volume one you will not want to read volume Two and Three.

This video by Dr. Robert Malone the inventor or the mRNA process used to make the Pfizer COVID-19 (also known as BNT162b2) vaccine is a must watch. Dr. Malone tells us all to PROTECT OUR CHILDREN!!!! by not allowing them to be vaccinated with the Pfizer experimental gene therapy vaccine that will have horrible effects on those that have not gone through puberty. But in general no one without a serious preexisting condition or under 50 should be vaccinated without being warned of the dangerous effects. This video is in support of the about case.

Below is an interpretation of the case with comments added by Martin Armstrong.

Part One

A team from the UK has filed a complaint with the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on behalf of the people. The report alleges that government officials, pharmaceutical executives, and others profiting from the pandemic have violated the Nuremberg Code, committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, as well as aggression against civilians. The 44-page complaint extensively lists the crimes committed by the following individuals:

The complaint states that the aforementioned individuals have committed the following crimes:

– Violations of the Nuremberg Code

– Violation of Article 6 of the Rome Statute

– Violation of Article 7 of the Rome Statute

– Violation of Article 8 of the Rome

– Violation of Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute

The document contains a lot of detailed information that I will summarize:

COVID Is a Biological Weapon – Gain of Function Research

COVID was created in a laboratory. Leo Poon. Dr. Li-Meng Yan and her team published a report (Appendix 4) claiming that the novel coronavirus was developed “as a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone.” ZC45 and ZXC21 were discovered between July 2015 and February 2017 in military research laboratories. Once the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre, a non-military laboratory, published a conflicting report and was quickly forced by the government to retract its statement. “The existing scientific publications supporting a natural origin theory rely heavily on a single piece of evidence – a previously discovered bat coronavirus named RaTG13, which shares a 96% nucleotide sequence identity with SARS-CoV-2.”

Again, all evidence discredits the notion that the COVID-19 virus developed naturally. “The National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the USA has admitted to funding gain of function research on bat coronaviruses at China’s Wuhan lab – despite Dr Anthony Fauci repeatedly denying this.” There is clear evidence that the NIH funded gain of function research between 2014 and 2019. A $3.1 million grant was awarded to EcoHealth Alliance for coronavirus studies on bats. Another grant of $599,000 was provided to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to also study COVID in bats.

Conclusion: The coronavirus did not develop naturally. Rather, the virus was deliberately created in a laboratory after years of government-funded research.

Experimental Vaccines

The vaccine received temporary authorization under Regulation 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations Act (2012). The report notes that mRNA vaccines have never been approved for human usage and the effects are completely unknown. “The long-term effects and safety of the treatment in recipients are unknown. It is important to note that the Corona Virus ‘vaccines’ are the world’s first introduction to the synthetic m-RNA technology and all previous immunisations [sic] worked in a totally different manner, by way of introducing a deactivated or weakened virus to the body to trigger a natural arousal of the immune system against it.”

The COVID vaccination should be categorized as a gene therapy as it does not meet the requirements for the term “vaccine.” In February 2021, Merriam-Webster changed the definition of “vaccine” to include the COVID-19 mRNA injection. Dr. Mike Yeadon stated in the report: “It’s not a vaccination. It’s not prohibiting infection. It’s not a prohibiting transmission device. It’s a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body somehow gets used to dealing with it, but unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune response, this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.”

Conclusion: The COVID-19 injection is not a vaccine, but rather a mass experimental form of gene therapy with unknown consequences.

Presence of Graphene Hydroxide in Vaccines

German chemist Dr. Andreas Noack was one of the EU’s top graphene and carbon experts who formulated his doctoral thesis by converting graphene oxide into graphene hydroxide. Dr. Noack examined the vaccines along with other experts and found that the vaccines contain graphene hydroxide. “On November 23, 2021, Dr. Andreas Noack released a video explaining what graphene hydroxide is and how the nano structures injected into the human body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of ‘vaccine’ recipients. Dr. Andreas goes on to explain how due to the nano size of the graphene oxide structures they would not show up on an autopsy as toxicologists can’t imagine that there are structures that can cut up blood vessels causing people to bleed to death on the inside so they would not be looking for them, given their atomic size.”

After speaking out about graphene hydroxide in vaccines on a live stream broadcast, Dr. Noack was arrested on film by German police. On November 26, 2021, Dr. Noack was attacked and murdered. His case remains unsolved.

Conclusion: There is graphene hydroxide in the vaccine, and Dr. Noack was assassinated for speaking the truth.

Part Two

Looking further into the complaint filed with the International Criminal Court, we find additional examples of human rights abuses.

PCR Tests

Oxford University has discovered that PCR tests are so sensitive that they can detect old infections by tracking fragments of dead viral cells. “Originally developed to detect the presence of DNA and RNA in biological samples, even its Nobel Prize-winning inventor Kary Mullis declared that PCR was never intended to diagnose a disease,” the complaint states. Dr. Kary Mullis said that the PCR test can find “almost anything in anybody.” The PCR tests repeatedly cycle to find traces of viral RNA and are chemically amplified with each attempt. Public Health England stated that the PCR test threshold should be set around 25.6, and anything above means there is not enough evidence of the virus to deem a person ill.

Conclusion: PCR tests are often run 40-45 times to artificially increase the chance of a positive result.


The World Health Organization (WHO) previously admitted that there is no evidence available to indicate masks as an effective method of protecting healthy individuals. “In addition to hypoxia and hypercapnia, breathing through facemask residues bacterial and germ components on the inner and outside layer of the facemask. These toxic components are repeatedly breathed back into the body, causing self-contamination.” Furthermore, there is actually evidence that face masks can cause toxic particles to build within the mask. “Rebreathing contaminated air with high bacterial and toxic particle concentrations along with low O2 and high CO2 levels continuously challenge the body homeostasis, causing self-toxicity and immunosuppression.”

Conclusion: There is no evidence that masks are effective against the transmission of COVID-19; however, there is evidence that wearing masks can be toxic.

Alternative Treatments

There are numerous treatments for the coronavirus that are not offered to the population at large.

  • Hydroxychloroquine – 50% reduction in hospitalizations and death
  • Ivermectin – 70% reduction in deaths
  • Favipiravir – Approved only in Japan
  • Corticosteroids – 87% reduction in hospitalizations; 30% reduction in deaths
  • Colchicine – 25% reduction in hospitalization and deaths

Conclusion: Safe and effective treatments for the coronavirus exist but are not readily available.

Part Three

The complaint filed with the International Criminal Court continues to provide a broad-picture view of the various ways governments have used the coronavirus to exploit the people.


Nurses and doctors from hospitals across the world have noted that nearly every death recorded is due to the coronavirus. The complaint notes that if an individual died for any reason within 28 days of receiving a positive COVID-19 diagnosis, their death is deemed a coronavirus casualty. The report notes that between March and June 2020, England and Wales recorded 4,476 deaths with no pre-existing condition.

Yet, deaths for the same period suddenly spiked to 49,607:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is englandwales2-300x259.jpg

The complaint alleges that governments have been artificially inflating figures and misbranding common flu, pneumonia, and other respiratory illnesses as COVID-19. To further show that the common flu has been mislabeled as COVID, data from the ONC shows that flu and pneumonia deaths in 2018 and 2019 came to 29,516 and 26,398, respectfully. In 2020, only 394 people died from the common flu and 13,619 passed away from pneumonia.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is englandwales3-300x156.jpg

Conclusion: The number of fatalities from the coronavirus has been drastically overstated. As mentioned in an earlier post, PCR tests were never meant to be used in their current manner, and often produce false-positive results. Anyone who dies within 28 days of a positive test result is deemed a casualty of coronavirus, even if the virus was not the cause of death.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Censored-300x196.jpg


Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, and countless social media platforms have removed any and all information regarding the coronavirus that does not fit the broader agenda. “. Authorities have blocked legitimate websites and ordered the removal of unwanted content. Officials have reinforced these controls by criminalising [sic] more categories of online expression and arresting journalists, activists, and members for public speaking about the government’s performance. To suppress unfavourable [sic] health statistics, critical reporting and other COVID-19 content the UK government has blocked websites or forced users, social media platforms, or online outlets to delete information,” the report states.

Furthermore, Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the RNA vaccine, has been removed from all social media platforms for speaking out against the vaccine. “Smear campaigns are being waged against any doctors and scientists who challenge the WHO narrative on Covid-19 and the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’. We are in a situation where governments and global NGO’s have seized control of the medical profession,” the complaint continues.

Conclusion: Media companies are directly filtering and altering public information. Even reputable medical professionals have been scrubbed from the internet. Governments around the world are using the pandemic as a reason to crack down on free speech and information.

Part Four

Clade X and Event 201

“In May, 2018, the WEF partnered with Johns Hopkins to simulate a fictitious pandemic  dubbed ‘Clade X’ (Appendix 12)  to see how prepared the world be if ever faced with a catastrophic pandemic.  A little over a year later, the WEF once again teamed-up with Johns Hopkins, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to stage another pandemic exercise called ‘Event 201’ in October, 2019 (Appendix 13). Both simulations concluded that the world wasn’t prepared for a global pandemic. A few short months following the conclusion of Event 201, which specifically simulated a coronavirus outbreak, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared that the coronavirus had reached pandemic status on March 11, 2020.”

The simulation covered the following scenarios:

  • Governments implementing lockdowns worldwide
  • The collapse of many industries
  • Growing mistrust between governments and citizens
  • A greater adoption of biometric surveillance technologies
  • Social media censorship in the name of combating misinformation
  • The desire to flood communication channels with “authoritative” sources
  • A global lack of personal protective equipment
  • The breakdown of international supply chains
  • Mass unemployment
  • Rioting in the streets

Conclusion: The accuracy of these “simulations” is more than a coincidence. The World Economic Forum (WEF) and its partners were planning for the release of a pandemic. After all of the above scenarios materialized, WEF founder Klaus Schwab said it was now time for the Great Reset.

“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future” — Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum

Mass Psychosis and Totalitarianism

This is a very good summary of where we are today and a MUST WATCH from Academy of Ideas

“Logic can be met with logic, while illogic cannot—it confuses those who think straight. The Big Lie and monotonously repeated nonsense have more emotional appeal in a cold war than logic and reason. While the enemy is still searching for a reasonable counter-argument to the first lie, the totalitarians can assault him with another.”

My latest work is using Science and Logic to Prove the Existence of God

Over the past 30 some years I have been studying about the various theories regarding how we exist. By that I mean that we can think and have Free Will; and that allows us to make choices in what we do — we can do what is right or we can do things that are wrong, its our choice. In my studies I found that science doesn’t allow for that to happen its called the Hard Problem!

The attached book contains an analysis of this problem this book is the result of decades of research and thinking. The only conclusion I could come up with is there has to be a God as its the only way we can actually exist. The following image is on the cover of the book and it represents creation. The picture was constructed with God shown as creating the universe, using the art concept discovered by CG Jung and described in his book, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Jung found that all cultures had common believes and those beliefs were represented in art. Many of the art works he showed in his book are similar to the one I created here, and they are called mandalas. 

Is the Mainstream Media a Threat to Freedom and Sanity?

Posted originally on Rumble by Academy of Ideas  on January 5, 2022 

Sheba Medical Center & Israel Ministry of Health Worker Study: Fourth Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Falters Against Omicron

Posted originally on TrialSite News by Staff on January 18, 2022

The preliminary results of a recent Sheba Medical Center healthcare worker study reveal that a fourth booster lacks the necessary protection against the Omicron variant of the COVID-19 vaccine. While the jab may afford select high-risk populations some benefit, most of the population receives little to no value from the boost. This raises serious questions about the direction of the global pandemic response centered on one dose of a vaccine after another. The implications of these preliminary results are profound if they hold up during final data, peer-review come publishing time. This implies that in just over a year, four vaccination doses were required and that didn’t even cover the entire population widely enough. With a virus such as influenza, an annual vaccine to reduce the risk of infection serves as a rational target benchmark for what these COVID-focused vaccines should be, governments and public health agencies should start stepping back and considering the most rational, economical, and importantly safe approach moving forward. While Pfizer projects another $33 billion-plus revenue year, government authorities need to start thinking about value-based payments associated with such mass vaccination schemes.

The Study

With over 150 medical staff participating in a study commencing in December 2021, the academic medical center, in partnership with the Ministry of Health, launched what is the only currently known investigation into the effects of a fourth Pfizer-BioNtech (BNT162b2 or Comirnaty) booster dose. A first-of-its-kind study conducted in alliance with the Health Ministry, the program proceeded despite the World Health Organization’s attempts to thwart such booster programs in favor of global vaccine equity.

Israel: Vaccination Nation Failing to Stop Omicron

Over the past half-year, TrialSite has been informed by multiple hospital executives in Israel that the American National Institutes of Health (NIH) looks to the Ministry of Health and various hospitals frequently as Israel has become a sort of canary in the mine for the COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. Well, that canary starts to stress, as the indicators of the global vaccination program don’t look great. Yes, the Ministry of Health reports the vaccines have reduced the levels of infectious disease and death, yet the price tag for the COVID-19 vaccination program mounts above and beyond what could have been expected by any rational point of view.

One of the most boosted nations, if not the most boosted nation on the planet, a month ago over 58% of the eligible population received a booster reported the Health Ministry of Israel.Subscribe to the Trialsitenews “COVID-19” ChannelNo spam – we promise

As can be reviewed by Our World in Data, Israel’s vaccination rates are sky high for high-risk elderly populations but increasingly, younger people became hesitant in the country. Perhaps, as more is learned about the virus and the risk-benefit analyses necessary for different cohorts, the inoculation of the entire population based on current unfolding results becomes even more of a shakier target.

Cases Skyrocket

In the meantime, COVID-19 again surges in Israel despite a heavily boosted population. To put things in perspective, yesterday, the nation’s health authorities reported 33,505 new daily infections based on a 7-day average in this nation of 9.2 million people.

The previous record was 22,291 set on September 8th, part of the Delta variant surge from July through October of last year. Cases all but flatlined from late October through mid-December then rapidly ascended, breaking records daily now.

The good news continues to be that death rates are far lower than previous surges, with the deadliest surge occurring from December 2020 to March 2021. But the population becomes weary and increasingly suspect of endless vaccinations as the answer. In fact, much like the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the health authorities in this eastern Mediterranean nation cut the COVID-19 isolation time from ten to five days in recognition that the Omicron variant isn’t as severe as previous variants, reports multiple media including Haaretz.

Not Good Enough

The media in Israel, such as the Times of Israel, was abuzz with the story that the recent study failed to achieve the desired results. TrialSite links to Reuters and Thomson Reuters Foundation as one of the first sources to cover the hospital’s admission. Led by Professor Gili Regev-Yochay, the study team learned that the current mRNA-based vaccines fail to deliver the necessary value when measured against the goals of a population-wide, effective, and safe means of significantly reducing infection, serious illness, and death. The study investigators do indicate the vaccine still may provide some protection for high-risk cohorts.

But, when considered against the initial target of leading to herd immunity, the vaccines have, frankly, failed to achieve such an outcome. Rather, they are a useful medical regimen for high-risk populations. Based on an accurate risk-benefit analysis, for example, some populations such as the elderly, face higher risks for severe disease or death and consequently, may benefit from the vaccine. Also under consideration are the risks for long COVID. However, an objective, unbiased, and scientific point of view should now intervene and direct courses of action moving forward.

In the Times of Israel, Professor Regev-Yochay went on the record, “The vaccines, which were very effective against the previous strains, are less effective against the Omicron strain.”

Unfortunately, Regev-Yochay continued to the Times of Israel, “We see an increase in antibodies, higher than after the third dose. He continued, “However, we see many infected with Omicron who received the fourth dose. Granted, a bit less than in the control group, but still a lot of infections.”

The lead investigator concluded, “The bottom line is that the vaccine is excellent against the Alpha and Delta [variants], for Omicron it’s not good enough.”

Reports are preliminary, meaning the academic medical center-based study team has more work to do to finalize the study results. But the group had to share this information given the public interest and need for insight. 

Conflict over Messaging?

While the study team representing Sheba Medical Center shared the preliminary findings, this apparently angered the Health Ministry which didn’t want this information floating around the media at this point. With a growing vaccine hesitancy in Israel, the government continues to navigate the media toward a positive projection of vaccine results.

Consequently, Sheba Medical Center issued a statement hours after releasing the results calling for “continuing the vaccination drive for risk groups at this time, even though the vaccine doesn’t provide optimal protection against getting infected with the variant.”

About Sheba Medical Center

Ranked as one of the top 10 hospitals in the world by NewsweekSheba Medical Center was established back in 1948. Based in the Tel Aviv District of Ramat Gan, the 200-acre campus includes 159 medical departments and clinics, nearly 2,000 beds, and 75 laboratories. A major academic medical and research center, Sheba Medical Center research represents an elite research institution.

The center represents one of the top destinations to conduct research, including clinical trials not only in Israel but worldwide.

Lead Research/Investigator

Gili Regev-Yochay, MD, MSc, MPH, Head of the Section of Infectious Dis. Epidemiology at Gertner Institute of Epidemiology Research

Fully Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated COVID-19 Case Rates: An Exploratory Data Analysis

Posted originally on TrialSite New by Dr-Ron-Brown on January 15, 202220

Fully Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated COVID-19 Case Rates: An Exploratory Data Analysis

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.

Proponents of COVID-19 vaccination point out that the increasingly high number of COVID-19 cases in fully vaccinated people simply reflects the greater number of fully vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people in many populations. To form a more accurate estimation of vaccine effectiveness, the rate of cases within a population needs to be compared between the fully vaccinated and unvaccinated groups—that is, the number of cases in each group divided by the respective total number of people in each group should be compared. Here, I provide an exploratory data analysis, calculating and comparing fully vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 case rates, using an example from COVID-19 vaccination data in Ontario, Canada for January 15, 2022. COVID-19 vaccination data.Subscribe to the Trialsitenews “COVID-19” ChannelNo spam – we promise

COVID-19 cases were reported in Ontario on January 15, 2022 as follows:

Fully vaccinated cases: 8,223

Unvaccinated cases: 1,539

However, the total number of unvaccinated people in the Ontario population who are vaccine eligible (age 5+) is not reported, so that has to be calculated.

From the data, the fully vaccinated population is 11,530,464, and the percentage of fully vaccinated is 82% of the eligible population. 

Therefore, we can estimate the total vaccine eligible population of Ontarians, which is 14,061,541 (11,530,464 / 0.82).

Also from the data, the percentage of unvaccinated people is 12% of the total vaccine eligible Ontarians. 

Therefore, from the total number of eligible Ontarians we can estimate the total unvaccinated population, which is 1,687,384 (0.12 * 14,061,541).

Fully Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Case Rates

Now that we have estimates for the total number of fully vaccinated and unvaccinated Ontarians, we can easily divide the fully vaccinated and unvaccinated cases by their respective number of Ontarians who are fully vaccinated and unvaccinated, giving us the case rates in each group.

Rate of cases in fully vaccinated: 0.07% (8,223 cases / 11,530,464 vaccinated people)

Rate of cases in unvaccinated: 0.09% (1,539 cases / 1,687,384 unvaccinated people)

Absolute reduction of the case rate in fully vaccinated compared to unvaccinated: 0.02%. That’s a difference in case rates of only 2 one-hundredths of 1 percent!

Conclusion: Even though there are many more fully vaccinated people than unvaccinated people in Ontario, the case rate reduction in the fully vaccinated group in this analysis is a mere 0.02% compared to the unvaccinated group. 

According to the vaccine efficacy of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine clinical trials, the fully vaccinated group should show a 95% case rate reduction compared to the unvaccinated group: Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials.

The absolute case rate difference between groups based on vaccine status in this exploratory data analysis is negligible. 

Australian Ad Campaign Telling Kids to Ignore Parents Get Vaccines

Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Jan 19, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

The legal age is 14 in Australia to consent for sex to vaccines, while in the USA 17-year-olds sue for vast amounts of money claiming they didn’t know they should not be paid for sex. Here the Australian government is pushing 14-year-olds to get the vaccine and not even to tell their parents.

These vaccines are NOT like a polio vaccine — one shot and done. They do not work beyond two to three months. This is all becoming a major fraud and a money pot for Bill Gates/Pfizer to create endless profits by requiring never-ending boosters.

Even in Germany, “A complete vaccination consists of three doses,” said Health Minister Lauterbach of the “Bild am Sonntag.” He warned that despite the low numbers in intensive care units, there are still difficult weeks ahead. These vaccines do not offer permanent protection. They require endless boosters. This is nothing more than a political tool and unfortunately, governments will never investigate themselves and who has been bought to carry out this denial of freedom. Gates himself has admitted that the vaccines have not delivered what he promised. This will go down in history as the greatest fraud of all time. What they are counting on is that all the people who rushed out to get vaccinated will prefer not to admit that they were fooled. They count on their self-esteem to deny that they did not work.

Destroying the Supply Chain One Mandate at a Time

Armstrong Economics Blog/World Trade Re-Posted Jan 19, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) initially announced that it was eliminating vaccine requirements for truck drivers amid a severe supply and labor shortage. Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos decided that contributing to inflation by reversing the order was the “right thing to do,” and now unvaccinated truck drivers have “a right of return” but must quarantine for 14 days. So, although Canada cannot ban their citizens from re-entering the country, they can force drivers to submit to tests and quarantines.

Truck drivers gathered at the US/Manitoba on Monday to protest the absurd laws (see image above). Numerous truckers and advocates have stated that a two-week quarantine would ruin their finances and potentially cause smaller trucking companies to go under as it will lead to a labor shortage.

The United States has decided to contribute to the supply chain crisis by implementing a vaccine mandate for truckers as well. As of January 22, all drivers entering from Mexico or Canada must be fully vaccinated. As mentioned in an earlier post, over two-thirds or C$650 billion ($511 billion) of trade between Canada and the US occurs via road, and any disturbance would have significant consequences. The Canadian Trucking Alliance (CTA) estimates that the vaccine mandate will force up to 10% (16,000) of Canadian truckers off the road. “There isn’t one aspect of the supply chain that won’t be impacted,” warned CTA President Stephen Laskowski.

Mexico’s drivers will be less affected by this law as the US typically does not allow trucks to pass the border.

Only 55% of US truck drivers are currently vaccinated; 9% plan to take the vaccine, but 36% refuse. The Supreme Court’s ruling to end Biden’s vaccine mandate for private corporations did not expand to border laws. The US Department of Homeland Security is already warning travelers to expect border crossing delays once this mandate goes into effect. This will have a negative chain reaction — driver shortages will lead to supply shortages, which will lead to higher prices for both businesses and consumers. If these mandates continue, expect the supply chain crisis to continue as well.

The CDC Admits Cloth Masks Are Ineffective

Armstrong economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Jan 19, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has admitted that cloth masks have never been effective. For over two years, the CDC has been forcing both children and adults to cover their faces to participate in an altered version of society. Rand Paul has previously said that these mandates are intended to teach the public to comply with government authority, and he was right.

The CDC’s announcement comes shortly after CNN’s Leana Wen admitted that “cloth masks are not appropriate for this pandemic.” So for over 22 months, the public has been walking around with a useless piece of fabric over their faces to blindly comply with a completely useless mandate. The CDC previously stated that surgical N95 masks were appropriate “when supplies are available,” but has since updated that guidance to say “wear the most protective mask you can that fits well and that you will wear consistently.”

I will not blindly follow a new mandate and allow N95 masks to become a part of our “new norm” for a virus with an extremely low death rate. The CDC knew cloth masks were ineffective but hid that information from the public because governments did not have the resources to provide N95 masks. They also likely knew people would be less willing to comply if they had to wear an even less comfortable mask. In fact, they did not even have enough N95 masks to provide to health care workers. Governments do not want to lose the power this virus has provided them. As I reported, Democratic lawmakers are proposing a $5 billion bill to distribute N95 masks to every American household as they assume we will comply indefinitely.

Look what these mandates have done to children. The picture above has been shared on the internet of a child who views their mask as part of their identity. Even children in preschool have been forced to wear face coverings all day, with some schools permitting “mask breaks.” All of this was done for show.

WE OBEYED THE CDC WITHOUT REASON. How many times will we allow the CDC to change the narrative and comply? The agency has lost all credibility as its lack of ethics is altering our reality for the worse.

White House Baffled by How Colleyville Terrorist Gained a Visa Despite Being on Terrorist Watch List

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 18, 2022 | Sundance | 161 Comments

Malik Faisal Akram, who was known as Faisal Akram, had a well known Islamic extremist history to British and American intelligence. Akram ranted, prior to his travel to the U.S, that he wished he had died in the 9/11 terror attacks. He was a regular visitor to Pakistan, and reportedly a member of the Tablighi Jamaat group set up to ‘purify’ Islam. To say the U.S. intelligence system knew Faisal Akram would be an understatement.  The FBI knowledge of Akram has now been confirmed by The Daily Mail.

Today, the White House was asked how it was possible for him to get a visa and travel into the United States.  White House spokesperson Jen Psaki, says they have no idea, but they’re looking into it.  They’ve put their best men on the review.  For more details, ask the Dept. of Homeland Security. WATCH:

I’ve Already Given My Opinion – HERE

Psaki – Quick, The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 18, 2022 | Sundance | 394 Comments

Pay no attention to gas prices, massive inflation, COVID mess, empty shelves, economic crisis, oil prices, vaccination mandate crisis, testing boondoggles, collapsed polling support, terrorists on the loose, the unprotected border, the legislative mess or creeping socialism folks.

Move along, move along, nothing to see here folks.  Look, over there, shiny things, move along quickly now to see the Russians are coming.  The Russians are coming folks, swear, the Russians are coming.

It takes a lot of water on the floor to make the landlord believe the bathtub overflowed, and not the leaking fish tank in your apartment.

Gas Prices on the Rise Again, Biden Corporate Media Concerned About Political Impact

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 18, 2022 | Sundance | 105 Comments

One of the biggest and most frequently stated lies in American media and financial punditry; motivated entirely by their alignment with the hoax of global climate change; is that a United States President can do nothing about gasoline prices.  This is an oft familiar claim by the political left, media pundits, financial media and leftist economists.  It is one of the more transparently false assertions in their arsenal of deceit.

CNN reports that gas prices are rising again as the White House occupant’s inflation and supply chain crises persist, during a segment on CNN’s “New Day” with John Berman and Brianna Keila.  WATCH:

So, what can a U.S. President and administration specifically do?  We have abundant U.S. energy resources.  Quite literally the strongest in the entire world.

  • Permit the use of preexisting approved leases in ANWAR (Alaska) to put more volume into the Alaskan oil pipeline that is severely underutilized.
  • Finish the Dakota access pipeline.
  • Re-approve the preexisting energy leases in New Mexico, Arizona, NE Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico.
  • Retract the stoppage of the Keystone pipeline to permit efficient oil transport shipments from Canada.
  • Stop blocking the expansion of coastal oil refineries in Texas, Louisiana and Alabama (regulatory issue), as well as Northwest, Northeast and Southeast Seaboard.
  • Continue to develop natural gas as a clean burning fuel.
  • Drive Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as an export.

Unfortunately, this would mean reversing the entire energy policy of the current administration.  The existing energy inflation and high prices of oil, natural gas and gasoline are a direct and intentional part of Joe Biden policy.  That policy is driven by the leftist demand for a “green new deal.”


Signal Flare, CNN Asks if Government Should Take Over Food and Gas Prices

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 18, 2022 | Sundance | 202 Comments

History may not always repeat, but it rhymes.   As seen in just about every situation where socialism and government intervention in the market economy of any nation is triggered, eventually you get to the point where government solutions to their created crisis take center stage.

We have seen this exact scenario repeated in the former Soviet Union, Poland, Europe, Cuba and more recently Venezuela.  The triggers are the same, and the outcomes are identical. Now, as unbelievable as it may seem, Joe Biden’s socialist policies have triggered the discussion in the United States.

CTH warned this was going to become a narrative; and we saw the first signs of it at the White House podium on January 12th.

WASHINGTON – People are paying a lot more for food, gas, cars and services, and inflation isn’t over yet as the pandemic continues to distort the economy. So, should governments consider setting the price of essential goods?

It’s been done before, typically during times of crisis, but for most mainstream economists, the answer to this question is a resounding “no.” Limiting how much companies can charge will distort markets, they argue, causing shortages and exacerbating supply chain problems while only temporarily reducing inflation.

“Price controls can of course control prices — but they’re a terrible idea,” David Autor, a professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, remarked in a survey published earlier this month by the University of Chicago. Asked whether price controls similar to those used in the United States during the 1970s could reduce inflation over the next year, less than a quarter of economists surveyed said they agree while nearly 60% said they disagree or strongly disagree.

[…] with annual inflation running at a four-decade high of 7% and midterm elections approaching, price controls could feature in future debates about how to reduce prices, particularly if actions taken this year by the Federal Reserve fail to tame inflation. (read more)

See that emphasis of mine in the above paragraph.  Yeah, the same University of Chicago at the epicenter of Alinsky crowdsourcing.

Accepting socialism in the United States does not come easily.  To use the lingo of the Marxists, it comes as an outcome of a “larger conversation” where we begin to “reimagine a nation of greater equity.”   Every nudge begins with the opening of a conversation…

Create the crisis.  Fuel the crisis. Then offer government solutions for the crisis.  Use the crisis to advance the goal.

[Barack Obama and crew are smiling at CNN right now.]