North and South Carolina Report Ballot Issues


Posted originally on the CTH on October 19, 2024 | Sundance

When you consider the probability that both govt and private sector are generating ballots, then you evaluate ballot centric issues accordingly.  County level ballots from two different feeder sources can present a problem at the scanning and tabulation stage, if there is any variance to them.

South Carolina – Berkeley County issued a statement Wednesday, Oct. 16, announcing certain voters are receiving duplicate absentee ballots. The announcement included that the county’s Department of Elections and Voter Registration is in contact with the state election commission about the incidents.

[…] “There were 246 absentee voters that were affected and did receive two ballots from the vendor that we use,” said Berkeley County elections director Rosie Brown. “I spoke to the state election commission, and they said there was a clerical error. But, doing our processes, all of our numbers matched, so I am not understanding the clerical error.” (link)

If you understand the lead-in paragraph, then you understand the “clerical error” perfectly.

North Carolina – NEW HANOVER COUNTY, N.C. (WECT) – Elections officials in New Hanover County say a mechanical issue that developed at the one-stop, early voting location in Carolina Beach did not interrupt the voting process.

WECT reached out to Rae Hunter-Havens, the county’s Elections Director, after being notified about an issue at the Carolina Beach Town Hall site. Alex Riley, the Communications and Outreach Coordinator with the county, responded by saying a piece of equipment, the DS200 that scans ballots, had temporarily malfunctioned and was swapped out. (read more)

If the scanner is aligned to only one format of ballots, and more than one format are floating around (depending on county) then temporary malfunctions are likely.

Do not distress yourself with dark imaginings.  Do the thing you can control, put aside the thing you cannot.

Each person can vote. Do it!   Make sure your voice is heard.

The RFK Jr Impact on Ballots


Posted originally on the CTH on October 18, 2024 | Sundance 

There is a lot going on behind the scenes in the final weeks.  Most political observers are now keenly aware of the difference between “ballots” and “votes” as they pertain to key counties:  Fulton County, Georgia; Wayne County, Michigan; Philadelphia and Allegany counties, Pennsylvania; Clark County, Nevada; Milwaukee and Marquette counties, Wisconsin, and Maricopa County, Arizona.

These are the specific counties and cities (Philadelphia, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Detroit) where the process of mass-mail/distribution of ballots, in combination with the assembly/harvesting therein, meets the process of “ballot scanning” at county level tabulation centers.  However, there’s another facet, “ballot making.”

Many people, including Robert F Kennedy Jr himself and his legal team in court filings, have presented the 2024 situation and asked a question. Essentially:

Why did the DNC apparatus sue to keep RFK JR’s name off certain state ballots and simultaneously sue to keep him on certain state ballots?

It just didn’t make sense….

… Until now.

County-level ballots were contracted for localized printing by those who intended to use blank ballots for fraudulent purposes; essentially “ballot making.”

RFK Jr’s name ON or OFF ballots, changes the dynamic of the paper format and the physical alignment in the scanner.

The county tabulation scanners need one ballot format per county to scan for vote tally.

In states where they preprinted/made the fraudulent county level ballots *without* RFK Jr’s name, the DNC sued to keep him off.

In states where they preprinted/made the fraudulent county level ballots *with* RFK Jr’s name, the DNC sued to keep him on.

That’s the answer.

That also helps put context on how long this localized mass ballot printing and tabulation plan has been in place. WATCH:

The key location for 2024 ballot fraud detection…. are the tabulation centers! 

.