CROWLEY: The America 250 Celebration Will Culminate July 4th On The National Mall. Beginning At 7 P.M., The Event Will Tell America’s Story Before Trump Delivers An Address Looking Back On The Nation’s First 250 Years And Ahead To The Next 250


Posted originally on rumble on Bannons War Room on: June 29, 2026

BANNON: Mullin Is Telling The Haitians, “Hey, Take Your Time Now And Fill Out Your Application To Apply For Permanent Status.” Unbelievable. Where Are The Planes To Take Them Back To Haiti??


Posted originally on rumble on Bannons War Room on: June 29, 2026

Rare Earths in Kazakhstan


Posted originally on Jun 30, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Geography of Kazakhstan - Wikipedia

The United States is now chasing critical minerals because Washington finally realized that outsourcing everything to China was national suicide. Tungsten is not some luxury commodity. It is used in missile warheads, fighter aircraft, semiconductors, and defense technology. Kazakhstan has one of the largest undeveloped tungsten deposits in the world, and the project could eventually produce around 12,000 metric tonnes per year, roughly equal to America’s entire annual imports.

But here is where the story begins to stink. According to India Today, before the Kazakhstan deal was finalized, the Trump administration was prepared to back the project with up to $1.6 billion in federal financing. Within weeks of negotiations, companies linked to Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s family acquired financial interests in entities connected to the mining project.

Documents reviewed by The New York Times, as reported by India Today, show that Dominari Securities, an investment firm based in Trump Tower and partly owned by Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, joined investors in acquiring a 20% stake in a company tied to the Kazakhstan venture. Around the same time, Cantor Fitzgerald, formerly led by Howard Lutnick and now overseen by his sons Brandon and Kyle, helped ASP Isotopes raise $210 million. Those transactions can generate millions in fees for an investment bank.

This is exactly why people no longer trust government. They are told every deal is about national security, then the same political families and connected banks somehow appear near the money. The article reports that companies connected to the Trump or Lutnick families have financial interests in at least 14 mining ventures pursuing projects backed by the U.S. government, involving more than $8.9 billion in federal financing or regulatory approvals. That does not prove illegality, but it absolutely raises the question every taxpayer should ask, who benefits?

The White House denied wrongdoing, saying, “The only special interest guiding the Trump administration’s decision-making is the best interest of the American people.” Eric Trump said he was “a passive investor with absolutely no management role.” Fine. Then disclose everything. If taxpayer financing is involved, if federal approvals are involved, and if the sons of the president or commerce secretary are financially positioned around the deal, the public has every right to demand full transparency.

This is how empires rot. Strategic resources become political prizes. Government financing becomes a pipeline for insiders. The public is told it is all for national security while the connected class quietly buys into the projects before the money flows. I have no problem with America securing tungsten. I have a problem when those close to power appear positioned to profit from government-backed deals.

The deeper trend remains clear. The world is moving from globalization into resource nationalism. Critical minerals are the new oil. China controls too much of the supply chain, and the United States must rebuild access to strategic materials. But if Washington turns that necessity into another insider enrichment scheme, then it will only accelerate the collapse in confidence. The resource war has begun, and the political class is already circling the spoils.

One Million Obamacare Filers Lack Social Security Numbers


Posted originally on Jun 30, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Social Security Cards

How many times have politicians stood before the American people claiming Social Security is “running out of money?” That is the biggest fraud of all. I have said for decades that Social Security is nothing more than a Ponzi scheme. Your payroll taxes are not sitting safely in an account waiting for retirement. They were spent by Washington years ago. The so-called Social Security Trust Fund is filled with government IOUs, not real assets. Every administration kicked the can down the road while pretending there was a trust fund. There never was. They borrowed every dime and spent it on everything except what workers were promised.

Now look at what has surfaced inside Obamacare. According to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., more than one million Obamacare enrollments lacked Social Security numbers. Kennedy stated, “The Obamacare marketplace is plagued by fraud in large part because the Biden administration dismantled basic program integrity guardrails.” He then asked the question every taxpayer should be screaming at Congress: “Why are we paying people we don’t know if they actually exist?” The administration says it has already removed roughly 2.8 million improper enrollments after reviewing eligibility and broker activity, yet they estimate over one million broker-assisted enrollments were submitted without Social Security numbers. That should terrify every American who pays taxes.

Want a quick look at the scope of Obamacare fraud and zero-claim  enrollment? These two charts give an overview of the numbers: ? Improper  enrollees ? Zero-claim enrollees ? Automatic renewals ?

Dr. Mehmet Oz exposed another layer of the scandal. “Some of these agents refuse to follow basic rules like providing their clients’ Social Security number. That, my friends, is a huge red flag.” CMS officials say certain brokers enrolled people without their knowledge simply to collect commissions from taxpayers. Once again, Washington’s answer is never accountability. Billions disappear, fraud flourishes, nobody goes to prison, and then politicians return to the microphone demanding more money from the productive class.

Meanwhile, they continue claiming Social Security is going broke because Americans are living too long. Give me a break. In 2025 alone, Social Security paid roughly $1.6 trillion in benefits to more than 73 million Americans. Workers continue paying 12.4% of wages into the system through payroll taxes, yet every surplus collected for decades was loaned directly to the federal government and spent. Today, the Trust Fund holds Treasury securities, promises from a government already drowning in over $40 trillion of federal debt. They stole from one pocket, stuffed an IOU into the other, and now expect everyone to pretend the money is still there.

This is what governments do when they reach the end of the sovereign debt cycle. They waste trillions overseas, finance endless wars, expand every bureaucracy imaginable, tolerate massive fraud, and then have the audacity to tell retirees they must sacrifice because “the system isn’t sustainable.” No, Washington isn’t sustainable. Social Security did not fail because retirees collected too much. It failed because politicians treated workers’ retirement savings as their personal checking account.

Do not expect this to improve. Governments never admit failure. They always look for someone else to blame. First, it was the rich. Then it was retirees. Tomorrow, it will be anyone with savings left. As confidence in sovereign debt continues to erode into the next phase of this crisis, every entitlement program becomes another political weapon. The real crisis has never been Social Security. The real crisis is a government addicted to debt that has spent future generations into oblivion while pretending every promise can somehow be honored.

Understanding the World Economy Free Download


originally on Posted Jun 29, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Understanding the World Economy

For this July 25th Conference for the Next Generation, I have written a book that those attending will be able to get if the printer finishes it on time. This will be the first edition of knowledge I and trying to pass on. We won’t be able to live stream this event because are trying to keep costs to a minimal so that anyone can join. I am including the the first 86 pages here as a preview, which you can download. I won’t be doing this again. We are trying to keep this at cost. Even renting a room these days is $10,000.

NEXT Generation-F Part I

Understanding the World Economy Index 1
Understanding the World Economy Index 2

President Trump Gives Remarks and Opinion on Three Supreme Court Decisions


Posted originally on CTH on June 29, 2026 | Sundance 

During an oval office event to highlight President Trump signing three executive orders informing all agencies of government that federal officials will not be enforcing any rule that blocks citizens from repairing or modifying their own vehicles, President Trump took questions from the media on today’s Supreme Court rulings.  WATCH (prompted):

.

Supreme Court Rules 6-3 That President Can Remove Any Agency Head in Executive Branch


Posted originally on CTH on June 29, 2026 | Sundance 

Now the good news. As noted by Justice Thomas, this decision when contrast against the Lisa Cook decision does not find alignment.

By a vote of 6-3, the justices struck down a federal law that bars the president from firing members of the Federal Trade Commission except in cases of “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” [PDF Ruling Here] That law, a majority of the justices ruled, violates the constitutional separation of powers between the three branches of government.

This lengthy 108-page decision supports the Unitary Theory of government in that the President can remove any agency head within the Executive Branch through plenary power, and the Legislative Branch and Judicial Branch cannot interfere.  This is a major win for President Trump and beyond.

(6-3) Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ALITOGORSUCHKAVANAUGH and BARRETT joined, and in which THOMAS joined as to all but Part III–B. [GORSUCH filed a concurring opinion.] Justice SOTOMAYOR filed a dissenting opinion, in which KAGAN and JACKSON joined.

SCOTUS Blog – […] “Monday’s decision was a major victory for proponents of the “unitary executive” theory – the idea that the president should have complete control over the executive branch. Under this theory, the president should be able to fire any member of the executive branch, and laws – like the one that the court struck down – that restrict his ability to do so violate the separation of powers. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts contended that “the President must have the assistance of officers he can trust. Although it is up to the Senate to decide whether to confirm those with whom the President would prefer to work, neither Congress nor the courts may saddle him with those with whom he cannot work. Subordinates who exercise the President’s power are subject to removal by him. Then, and only then, can they remain accountable to the President, and the President to the people.” (more)

Supreme Court 5-4 Ruling Creates Fourth Branch of Government – Trump v Cook


Posted originally on CTH on June 29, 2026 | Sundance 

At issue in Trump v Cook is not whether Lisa Cook can appeal her removal, but rather where her position rests while the appeal is underway.  Does she work for the govt? Or is she technically removed from govt, pending appeal?

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Lisa Cook remaining in her position as a member of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors whom President Donald Trump had attempted to fire. By a vote of 5-4 [PDF HERE] [the court says Cook can continue to remain in her job while her challenge to Trump’s removal moves forward.

Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court, and SOTOMAYORKAGANKAVANAUGH and JACKSON concurred.

Justice Clarence Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. ALITO filed a dissenting opinion, in which GORSUCH joined, and BARRETT also filed a dissenting opinion.

This is a rather goofball decision when you consider the previous issues with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the high court prior ruling that President Trump can remove the head of the agency.

Additionally, if Lisa Cook does not work for the President of the United States, meaning if she doesn’t work for the Executive Branch, then who exactly is she working for?  She doesn’t work for the legislative branch, and she doesn’t work for the judicial branch. Therefore, a de facto mysterious 4th branch of government is created.

Writing the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts said if the Trump administration were correct, it “would in effect transform the Federal Reserve’s for-cause protection into at-will employment, an leap out of step with the statute Congress enacted and our Nation’s tradition of central banking protected from political interference.”

Justice Clarence Thomas said the 5-4 ruling was “incorrect.” “Although the Court expresses concern that the President removed a Board member for ‘the first time in the Federal Reserve’s 111-year history, it expresses no such concern that it today upholds an injunction [here] against the President’s removal of an executive officer for the first time in the Constitution’s 237-year history.”

If the Federal Reserve Board of Governors are not subject to the plenary power of the executive branch, then who controls it?  If no one, then the Federal Reserve Board (FED) exists to control the American economy without any oversight from any mechanism within the U.S. Constitution.

The federal reserve is a fourth branch of government?

This decision seems rather weird….. Especially when the next ruling is considered.

Supreme Court Rules States Can Decide How Long After Election Day Ballots May Be Received


Posted originally on CTH on June 29, 2026 | Sundance

The Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 in favor of Mississippi -vs- RNC that state legislature can decide how long after election day that qualified election ballots cast may be received.  [PDF HERE] Essentially, federal election day is election day, but ballots can be received after election day for the length of time determined by state law.

Justice Barrett delivered the majority opinion, joined by RobertsSotomayorKagan and Jackson.

Justice Alito dissented along with ThomasGorsuch and Kavanaugh.

The Hight Court outlined that congress could change the ability of the states by changing the statutory language of the federal election law to require ballots be received by election day.  As long as federal law does not outline the deadline for ballot reception, states can extend that process at their legislative discretion.  THIS IS A HOT MESS FUBAR!

[5-4 Ruling Here]

“The federal election-day statutes do not prevent Mississippi from counting absentee ballots postmarked by election day but received up to five days thereafter; nothing in the federal election-day statutes requires ballots to be received by election day.”

As noted by Samuel Alito in his well-written dissent, even during the U.S. civil war, soldier ballots had to be counted on “election day“, not days and weeks after.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Amy Coney-Barrett have once again betrayed the foundational principle within constitutional language.  It is infuriating.

U.S. and Iran Schedule Deconfliction Meeting in Doha


Posted originally on CTH on June 29, 2026 | Sundance 

At the conclusion of the discussions in Switzerland, Secretary of State Marco Rubio spent time emphasizing the two groups attained a very important objective. Putting all other issues aside, they had formally mapped out a communication strategy for deconfliction between U.S. and Iranian leadership.

Meaning, if everything starts to go sideways both the USA and Iran agreed to the mechanism for immediate talks.  Even if fighting and hostile action was taking place, the deconfliction agreement laid out the process to keep both sides in direct communication.  This is not like the “red phone” approach toward nuclear deconfliction, even if both sides were in the midst of red zone brutality against each other.

This urgent deconfliction assembly is exactly what appears to have been triggered, when earlier today President Trump announced via Truth Social that U.S. and Iran delegations were going to meet in Doha.

[SOURCE]

Both President Trump and Secretary Rubio well understand that as long as a direct communication process is in place, all of the various regional escalations can be managed safely.

Some element within Iran attacks a ship; the USA retaliates and takes out critical infrastructure. The conflicted point does not disrupt the communication process.  This is the optimal solution approach.

(Via NBC) – […] There was no immediate reaction from Tehran. Hours earlier, a senior Iranian official denied any technical discussions were scheduled to take place.

Technical teams working on the implementation of the initial agreement between the two sides are scheduled to meet in Doha in the coming days, a source with knowledge of the talks told NBC News.

Communications channels created to de-escalate any incidents are in place and technical talks are set to continue, the source added.

This follows a series of escalating reciprocal strikes over the weekend that threatened to unravel efforts to secure a permanent end to the war. (read more)

P