BANNON: DANGEROUS FANTASY OF USING NUCLEAR WEAPON AGAINST TEHRAN, THIS I NOT SOME GAME


Posted originally on rumble on War Room on: June 20, 2026

MIKE LINDELL FOR GOV POLLING #1 IN MINNESOTA


Posted originally on rumble on War Room on: June 20, 2026

WarRoom Live


Posted originally on rumble on War Room on: June 20, 2026

POSOBIEC: Keane And Thiessen Are Floating Using Thermonuclear Weapon Against The Iranian Regime


Posted originally on rumble on War Room on: June 20, 2026

RUDY GIULIANI: CONCERTED EFFORT TO TAKE US OVER – PUT THE RADICAL AGENDA ON TRIAL


Posted originally on rumble on War Room on: June 20, 2026

PAMELA EVETTE (GOV FOR SC): WE NEED SOLUTION AS AN OUTSIDER, WE NEED FRESH PERSPECTIVE. POLLS OPEN TUESDAY


Posted originally on rumble on War Room on: June 20, 2026

RUDY GIULIANI: Marxism And Islamic Extremism Both Them Dedicated To The Destruction Of Us


Posted originally on rumble on War Room on: June 20, 2026

Your Car Was Never the Target


Posted originally on Jun 22, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

This Company Will Add Phone, AirPod, and Smartwatch Trackers to License  Plate Readers

For years, governments assured the public that license plate readers were simply tools to catch stolen vehicles, fugitives, and dangerous criminals. That was always the sales pitch. Now the mask is coming off. According to reports, a new surveillance platform called SignalTrace is being marketed to law enforcement and government agencies that goes far beyond reading license plates. The system can collect identifiers from smartphones, smartwatches, Bluetooth devices, vehicle infotainment systems, Wi-Fi hotspots, tire pressure sensors, RFID devices, AirTags, and even pet microchips. They are no longer interested in tracking your car. They are interested in tracking you.

The frightening part is how openly this is being discussed. The stated goal of the technology is to “bridge the gap between vehicle and occupant.” In other words, the authorities no longer want to know where a vehicle traveled. They want to know who was inside, where they went, who they met, and how often they traveled together. The system creates a unique electronic fingerprint based on the collection of devices surrounding a person. Your phone, your watch, your headphones, your car, and even your dog’s microchip become pieces of a digital identity that can be followed everywhere you go.

This is exactly how governments always expand surveillance. They begin with a limited purpose that sounds reasonable. Then the technology advances and suddenly the scope becomes limitless. License plate readers were sold as crime-fighting tools. Then they became databases of vehicle movements. Now they are evolving into systems that can reconstruct an individual’s entire pattern of life. Privacy advocates have warned that these systems can reveal where people work, where they worship, where they seek medical treatment, and who they associate with. Once that information exists in a searchable database, every government agency will want access.

What is unfolding is part of a much broader trend. Governments around the world are building digital identification systems, expanding financial surveillance, monitoring communications, and centralizing personal data. At the same time, law enforcement agencies are seeking nationwide access to license plate reader networks that provide near real-time tracking capabilities across the United States. The infrastructure is being assembled piece by piece. Most people only see each individual step. They fail to recognize the larger picture until the system is fully operational.

The argument will always be security. It is the oldest justification in history. Every expansion of government power is presented as necessary for public safety. Yet once these surveillance systems are built, they are rarely scaled back. Instead, new uses are constantly discovered. Today the target is criminals. Tomorrow it may be political opponents, protesters, journalists, or anyone deemed suspicious by those in power. History has repeatedly shown that governments never surrender tools that enhance control over the population.

The greatest threat is not the technology itself. Technology is neutral. The danger lies in believing that governments, corporations, and bureaucracies can be trusted indefinitely with unlimited access to information about every citizen’s movements, associations, and daily life. When your phone, your vehicle, your wearable devices, and even your pet become tracking beacons feeding a centralized surveillance network, we are no longer talking about crime prevention. We are talking about the creation of a digital leash attached to every individual. Once that infrastructure exists, the temptation to abuse it becomes inevitable.

England: Where the Police Investigate Babies


Posted originally on Jun 22, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Baby's Jailbird Convict Prison Inmate Costume (With images) | Baby costumes for boys, First ...

There are moments when a society reveals just how far it has fallen. This is one of them. According to figures from Kent Police, a one-year-old baby girl was recorded as a crime suspect after allegedly causing a minor injury to another child. The same figures included 6 two-year-olds, 11 three-year-olds, and 20 four-year-olds. In what was once the nation that gave the world Magna Carta and the foundations of common law, police are now compiling crime statistics on babies.

Kent Police defended the practice by explaining that they want to understand what causes children to become involved in crime. We are not talking about teenagers. We are not talking about young adults. We are talking about toddlers and infants who, much like the Kent Police, have not yet developed the cognitive skills for advanced thought.

Welcome to the new reality where every incident from birth to death must be logged, categorized, measured, and entered into a database. Governments continue to build systems that collect more information while common sense quietly disappears. Instead of concentrating on violent crime, organized gangs, terrorism, or the growing social tensions facing Britain, officials are recording playground disputes involving children who are not even old enough to attend school.

So even babies are not immune to the two-tiered justice system. The authorities seem perfectly capable of recording a one-year-old baby as a crime suspect, yet when serious crimes involving violent offenders make national headlines, the public is often told there is insufficient evidence, investigations take years, or victims are ignored until it is too late. People look at cases like Henry Nowak who was arrested for racism after a migrant stabbed him to death. Dangerous individuals are permitted to terrorize the public, and the police are warned to turn a blind eye. Police resources are being used to classify toddlers as suspects when there are hundreds, if not thousands, of open rape cases against one particular subset of the population.

r/ConservativeMemes - London has fallen

That is why confidence in government is collapsing. The average citizen cannot understand how a government can find the time to build police records on babies while repeatedly failing to address the crimes that genuinely threaten public safety. It is impossible to take the British legal system seriously, let alone maintain the belief that the law is there for the benefit of society.

Britain has become obsessed with monitoring, tracking, and documenting everything. Everyone, including your baby, mother, and grandmother, is considered a criminal. They will create whatever evidence they believe they need. Thousands are arrested over online communications, surveillance powers continue to expand, and government agencies increasingly treat ordinary citizens as subjects to be managed rather than people to be served. Recording toddlers as crime suspects may seem ridiculous, but it is simply another symptom of a system that has lost all sense of proportion.

The problem is the mindset that believes a one-year-old belongs in a police database. Every empire eventually reaches a stage where bureaucracy expands beyond reason. When police are officially recording babies as criminal suspects, perhaps it is time to ask whether the system itself has become the absurdity.

r/ConservativeMemes - Having grown up there it's a real shame.

Categories:BRITAIN

California’s Hunt IPO Taxes


Posted originally on Jun 22, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

These Are The California State Tax Rates And Tax Brackets For 2023-2024

California never seems to learn. Instead of asking why companies are fleeing the state, politicians immediately look at a successful IPO and see a new tax opportunity. The latest excitement surrounds the massive SpaceX public offering and the possibility that thousands of California employees and investors could generate billions in capital gains taxes for Sacramento. State officials have openly acknowledged that these gains could help plug budget holes and support spending programs that have become increasingly dependent on volatile tax receipts.

This is precisely the problem. Governments begin to treat one-time wealth creation events as recurring revenue streams. California has built a fiscal structure that relies heavily on a small percentage of wealthy taxpayers. When the stock market is booming and IPOs are plentiful, tax collections surge. Politicians then expand programs and spending commitments as if the money will continue forever. When the cycle turns, revenues collapse and deficits explode. We have seen this movie repeatedly, from the dot-com bubble to the technology boom of recent years.

Elon Musk moved both Tesla and SpaceX headquarters out of California because of the state’s hostile business climate, regulations, and taxes. Yet California still hopes to collect a substantial windfall because many employees remain in the state and will owe capital gains taxes when shares are sold. Instead of recognizing that entrepreneurs are escaping, politicians are celebrating one last opportunity to reach into their pockets.

California is simultaneously debating a billionaire wealth tax that could impose a one-time 5% levy on the state’s richest residents. Supporters claim it could generate roughly $100 billion, while critics warn it would accelerate capital flight and ultimately reduce future tax collections. The very fact that such proposals are being seriously considered tells you everything about the mentality in Sacramento. They see wealth not as something to encourage and cultivate, but as a resource to be harvested whenever government spending gets out of control.

Governments never solve fiscal problems by raising taxes on success. They simply encourage capital to move elsewhere. California became an economic powerhouse because it attracted innovators, entrepreneurs, and investment. Now the state increasingly views every successful company, every IPO, and every wealthy resident as another source of revenue. That mentality marks the transition from encouraging growth to hunting wealth.