Iran Their Proxy War Against USA


Posted originally on Mar 8, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

WSJ US Supplies Ukraine Targets inside Russia
Russian gives Targets yo Iran

COMMENT: Marty, you should be advising Trump. I am shocked Luna is not taking you by the hand into the White House. She is your representative aftercall. You warned that they would turn this into a proxy war against the USA just as the West is using Ukraine. These Neocons are dangerous and are destroying our country and Western civilization. They are now freaking out that Russia ia providing Iran with intelligence to target US forces and West’s economic sites.  You said this would become their proxy war. Iranians destroyed the U.S. THAAD Radar in Jordan. Israel is getting pummeled.  Satellite images reveal that $500 million system was wiped out in inflicting a major blow to american missile defense. Netanyahu is constantly flying in the air because they targeted his office as they did to the Ayatollah.

While everyone is focuses on the Strait of Hormuz, only you have warned that Iran, already an enemy of most other Middle East states, would target refineries and even ships while still in their ports. For the Strait, take out the refineries and you will then bring the West to its knees. The fact that the Neocons were providing targeting to Ukraine to strike Russian refineries is somehow OK but when Russia does the same for Iran – that’s not fair.

BB

Nerocon Every Administration

ANSWER: Those in Congress are scared to death of the Neocons. I do not know anyone willing to stick their neck out to take me to the White House. They are fulfilling the computer’s forecast. I have heard that the Neocons were pisted off that I was called in to write a peace plan that I thought Putin would accept and have been intimidating some on Capitol Hill not to listen to anything that comes from my firm. I have warned, these people have hijacked our Foreign Policy and have circumvented not just the Constitution and Congress, but they have infiltrated ever Whit House Administration since Clinton that I know of personally.

What these people have done to Russia is coming back to haunt us. They do not care about the country or the people they send to die for their ruthless agenda. They should be dragged out of their offices and charged with treason. But there is NOBODY with the guts to stand up for America or humanity in Washington. All they care about is the next election. I think Trump is being sheltered and they are destroying his legacy just as they did to Bush, Jr. I created a computer that has done more than anybody when it comes to geopolitical forecasting, Because the Neocons want war, they intimidate people not to listen to our model’s forecasts and now they will try to manipulate the oil market to cover up what they have done.

I warned they would go directly for the refineries not single ships in the straight of Hormuz. Iran is NOT an Arabic country. They are ethnically Persian. Persians were  “Caucasian” or “West Eurasian” family. From a very broad anthropological standpoint, both ancient Greeks and Persians belong to the larger grouping of peoples from Europe, the Middle East, and South Asia that are distinct from, say, people from East Asia or Sub-Saharan Africa.

For centuries before the rise of Islam, various Arab tribes lived throughout this vast region—in the harsh interior deserts (like the Najd), along the fertile southern coast of Yemen (ancient kingdoms like Saba and Himyar), and in the northern borderlands bordering the Byzantine and Persian empires (like the Nabataeans with their capital at Petra, and the Ghassanids and Lakhmids who served as client states).

They were a mix of nomadic Bedouins and settled populations in oasis towns and trading centers. The most significant of these trading cities was Mecca, a religious and commercial hub.

The “takeover” of the Middle East happened primarily in the 7th century AD, following the advent of Islam. The Prophet Muhammad began preaching in Mecca around 610AD. By the time of his death in 632AD, he had united most of Arabia under the new religion. This unification was the crucial first step, providing the ideological fervor, political unity, and military momentum for the conquests that followed.

Etruria African

Fromt a historical perspective, it’s crucial to understand that the idea of RACE as we know it today—dividing people into categories like “white,” “black,”  “Red,” and “Yellow,” is a social and political construct that only developed primarily in the 17th-18th centuries, largely to justify colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade. People in the ancient world did not think of themselves or others in these terms. They defined themselves by culture, language, city-state (polis), empire, and ancestry, not by skin color. Here we have a coin showing an African on one side and an elephant on the other. The Africans would train elephants and sell them like war tanks.

Mithridates II Parthia

For example, the Greeks did categorize people, famously dividing the world into “Greeks” and “barbarians” (anyone who didn’t speak Greek). When they some, it sounded like ba, ba, ba. This was a cultural and linguistic distinction, not a racial one based on skin tone. Herodotus, the “Father of History,” whom I have written about before, wrote extensively about the Persians. He noted cultural differences but didn’t describe them as being a different “race” based on color. He did, however, comment on physical characteristics in other contexts, famously noting that the Colchians (from the Black Sea region) had “dark skins and woolly hair,” suggesting they were Egyptian. This shows he was aware of physical differences, but it wasn’t his primary framework. Here is a coin depicting Mithridates II ruler of Parthia (Persia) (124-91BC).

Wolfowitz Doctrine

Their thirst for war to them is just like some video game. They have to win at any cost.This is the Wolfowitz Doctrine and this is their creed – WORLD DOMINATION. It was James Madison who insisted that ONLY Congress has the power to start a war. The Neocons constantly use a loophole that allows the President to respond to a threat for up to 60 days.  Madison’s statement demonstrates how these people have infiltrated the Executive Branch with the full knowledge that they are acting UNCONSTITUTIONALLY in the very manner that the Founding Fathers feared. Madison wrote in a letter to Jefferson on April 2nd, 1798:

…”the Executive branch of power is the most interested in war, and most prone to it.”

They just like to claim they are responding to an immediate threat. In Iraq, it was weapons of mass destruction that was a deliberate lie. This time it is the same lie, Iran will have a nuclear weapon in just weeks, and they will then have a missile that reach the United States. There is absolutely no evidence to support those claims. Here is John McCain in 2008 saying Iran will have a nuke by 2009.

Will Iran be Their Proxy War Against USA?


Posted originally on Feb 24, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Aircraft Carrier Deck

There is a deep division within the Trump Administration with a pro war and anti-war groups. The anti-war group are VP Vance and Tulsi Gabbard. The pro war group are Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and theemdless war moner Senator Lindsey Graham. Both Israel and the Neocons are consistently pushing for US action, viewing the current moment as an opportunity to deal a decisive blow to Iran to end the Islamic Republic. White House Press Secretary (Karoline Leavitt) stated publicly that “there are many arguments one can make in favor of a strike against Iran.”

The current Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, has clearly and repeatedly cautioned President Trump about the significant risks associated with potential military action against Iran. Recent reports from multiple news outlets detail his private warnings to the President and other top officials. While they lacked approval power to go to war, what was the Joint Chiefs’ do provide private advice regarding the invasion. Scholarly analysis indicates that most senior military officers, including those on the Joint Chiefs, had significant reservations about using force in Iraq. Their primary worry was that an invasion would result in a costly and open-ended commitment for the United States

President Trump took the significant step of replacing the top military leadership, including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shortly after taking office in 2025. This was part of a broader and unprecedented shakeup of the Pentagon’s senior ranks. The most prominent change was the replacement of the sitting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The changes extended well beyond the Joint Chiefs. The dismissals were part of a “rare and major shakeup” that began shortly after the new administration took office not unlike we are seeing in China. Critics argued that the firings were part of an effort to ensure the military is led by individuals loyal to the president rather than being solely focused on their duty to the Constitution.

Them Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a key figure in the overhaul, had previously criticized former General Brown and Admiral Franchetti, questioning whether their promotions were tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. He stated the goal was to install new leadership focused on the military’s core mission of “deterring, fighting and winning wars.”

Caine John Dan Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

The new Chairman, General Caine, was a retired three-star general whose nomination required a waiver. By law, the Chairman is typically required to have previously served as a four-star general in a role like a service chief or combatant commander. Because Caine retired as a three-star lieutenant general, President Trump had to sign a national interest waiver, allowed under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, for him to be eligible for the position. He was then promoted to four-star general upon his return to active duty

Last year, Rubio has characterized Iran’s leadership as being at its “weakest point in decades,” citing economic collapse and public protests. However, he also warned of Iran’s military capabilities, noting they have amassed “thousands and thousands” of long-range ballistic missiles.

In June 2025, following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities (referred to as “Operation Midnight Hammer“), Rubio defended the action in a television interview. When pressed on the intelligence behind the strike, he dismissed the question as “irrelevant,” arguing that Iran had all the necessary components to build a weapon, including 60% enriched uranium.

During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in January 2026, Rubio stated that the U.S. must have a force posture in the Middle East that could, “if necessary, preemptively prevent the attack against thousands of American servicemen and other facilities in the region and our allies.” He explicitly noted that “The President always reserves the preemptive defensive option.

Iran Regime Change

REGIME CHANGE:

When questioned by Senator John Cornyn about what would happen if Iran’s Supreme Leader were removed, Rubio admitted, “I don’t think anyone can give you a simple answer,” describing the situation as “far more complex” than other recent geopolitical events and something that would require “a lot of careful thinking

This is the same problem that surfaced from the Iraq War. They never consider anything beyond what is in front of their nose. They removed Saddam and NEVER considered that (1) he kept the crazies in check so we got ISIS, and (2) he was the #1 enemy of Iran. Removing him was to the benefit of Iran.

Removing the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei with such a huge military, will most likely lead to some military general and they are cut from the same religious cloth so there is by no means a guarantee that this will change anything.

Boris_Johnson_We_are_in_a_proxy_war_against_Russia_

A PROXY WAR AGAINST THE USA?:

Britain, NATO, EU and the American Neocons have used Ukraine as a proxy war to weaken Russia for the EU thinks it can conquer Russia, get the $75 trillion in assets. That’s why the head of NATO came out and warned these EU leaders if they think that they can defeat Russia without the USA, they are dreaming.

China_YLC8B_radar_system 2

Flights from China and Russia have been arriving in Iran regularly. It is believed that China has not only provided access to their satelites for targeting, but they may have provided their YLC8B Radar system to detect stealth fighter jets and bombers. China’s YLC-8B Radar Transfer to Iran Could Rewrite Middle East Airpower and End Stealth Dominance. The reported deployment of China’s long-range YLC-8B anti-stealth radar in Iran signals a strategic shift in Middle Eastern air defense architecture, directly challenging U.S. and Israeli reliance on fifth-generation stealth aircraft and reshaping regional deterrence dynamics.

This escalation in Beijing’s military-technical support to Tehran, is very significant for this can track stealth fifth-generation aircraft at long range, and appears to have been deployed since the bunker busting of 2025. This is fundamentally reshaping regional airpower assumptions in the Middle East and provides the theatre for China to test its advanced weapons using Iran just as we have used Ukraine against Russia.

Aircraft Carrier 3

This risk here is that with advanced targeting from China, Iran has increased its chances to at least damage an aircraft carrier rendering it inoperable. This can become a proxy war to weaken the United States just as Ukraine has been used to weaken Russia.

A mentioned, then there is this “nuclear ambiguity” where Iran could have nuclear capability just as the early-stage development of countries like Israel or Pakistan during their initial programs where there were no public tests hiding their development. The US has been claiming Iran is close and that was their view in 2007 as then expected they would achieve that by 2009 as John McCain said that in this interview.

Attacking Iran may be the worst idea ever. This is the FISRT adversary with formidable defense capability unlike Iraq, Afghanistan, or Venezuela.