Jack Smith’s Twisted, Machiavellian Lawfare Mindset Paints a Dystopian Future for the USA if Not Dispatched Quickly


Posted originally on CTH on January 1, 2026 | Sundance |

I don’t care if you support Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis or the Easter Bunny, any American who doesn’t realize the tenuous future of our union, after reviewing the information within this testimony, is going to forever live in a collapsed dystopian nightmare, if they vote for any political representative who supports it.

The House Judiciary Committee has released the [VIDEO] and [TRANSCRIPT] of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition.  What is outlined within it is alarming in the extreme.  I strongly urge anyone with any platform to review the details and quickly highlight the content therein.  There is no time to waste.

[TRANSCRIPT HERE]

Jack Smith appeared before the committee with three personal lawyers to support him.  The content of the deposition is chilling in the extreme.  While many will focus on the granular details of the testimony, I wish to highlight one of the more alarming aspects to the bigger picture.

The predicate for Jack Smith to prosecute President Trump for his efforts to “interfere in the 2020 election”, and thereby “challenge all democratic norms”, essentially boils down to Jack Smith accusing President Trump of participating in a fraud when he challenged the outcome of the 2020 election.

To get beyond President Trump’s first amendment right to free speech, Jack Smith claims Trump knowingly understood that Joe Biden had won the election; President Trump was told by senior Republican advisors that Biden had legitimately won the 2020 election; President Trump rejected the reality of the “truthful information” presented to him, and instead chose to launch a psychological operation against the American people, i.e. “fraud.”

It is the charge of “fraud” which underpins the entirety of the case against Donald Trump, as pursued by Jack Smith.   The charge itself is predicated on definitions of what constitutes truthful information, and within that subset of predicate you begin to realize just how important it is to professional leftists that they control information.

The case was dropped after the results of the November 2024 election, won by President Trump.  However, if President Trump had not won that election, the prosecution would have continued.

Jack Smith notes in his testimony, in the most Machiavellian way, that his primary prosecution approach was to present “Republican” witnesses like Mike Pence, who Smith cunningly said he could not discuss as he was restricted from revealing grand jury testimony.

Smith was prepared to present witness testimony from Pence and other political “Republicans” who told President Trump that Joe Biden had legitimately won the election, and Trump needed to concede.  This testimony then forms the baseline for the definition of “truthful information” that Trump rejected out of a malice mindset to continue clinging to power.

In essence, Smith defines what is “truth” (Biden won), then outlines how that truthful information was delivered and how President Trump dismissed it. Therefore, President Trump’s “mens-rea”, or state of mind, was one of promoting an intentional falsehood.  According to the Lawfare approach selected by Smith, this mindset is the predicate that blocks President Trump from using his First Amendment right to speech as a defense.

Intentional fraud is not allowed under the protections of “free speech.”   Jack Smith wanted to prove that President Trump was engaged in intentional fraud, and wanted to prove his mindset therein through the use of Republican political voices who delivered information to President Trump.

Jack Smith sought to define “truth”, and then counter the free speech defense by mob agreement on what constitutes the “truth.”  Under this predicate, President Trump was being prosecuted for a thought crime, and Jack Smith sought to legally prove he knew his thoughts.

The only way Jack Smith could prove fraud would be to prove that President Trump believed the information about Joe Biden winning the election.  Smith sought to prove Trump’s belief by presenting Republican voices who told President Trump he lost.

Whether you like or dislike President Trump, the issue here is alarming when contemplated.

A man tells you a chicken is a frog, you laugh.  The man then brings 15 of your family members to tell you a chicken is a frog. You reject the absurdity of the premise, but the man brings forth hundreds more people to tell you the chicken is a frog, and if you do not accept that Chickens are Frogs, you will be defined as mentally impaired, institutionalized and become a ward of the state.

[Insert any similar metaphor needed, including “what is a woman.”]

When we consider the current state of sociological, societal or government manipulation of information, and/or the need for government to control information (mis-dis-mal-information) as an overlay, you can quickly see where this type of legal predicate can take us.  Bizarro world becomes a dystopian nightmare.

Yes, it is also clear that Leftists, inside that closed-door committee hearing, are intending to impeach President Trump on these grounds if they successfully win the 2026 midterm election.  However, that is not the critical takeaway from this deposition.   Instead, the critical takeaway is how the Lawfare construct can be twisted and manipulated to create the legal means to the leftist ends.

Stop the Division! 

We cannot allow these communist, Marxist and leftist-minded control agents get back into power.

It’s not about Trump.  It’s about us.

Minnesota Killer Tells FBI Governor Tim Walz Hired Him to Kill U.S. Senator


Posted originally on CTH on June 21, 2025 | Sundance

This is weird.

According to direct reporting from the Minnesota Star Tribune, after his arrest Vance Boelter who went on a murdering rampage targeting key political officials told the FBI that Minnesota Governor Tim Walz hired him to kill U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar.

MINNESOTA – In a rambling, conspiratorial letter addressed to the FBI, alleged assassin Vance Boelter claimed Gov. Tim Walz instructed him to kill U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar so that Walz could run for the U.S. Senate, according to two people familiar with the contents of the letter.

The letter is the clearest evidence yet of Boelter’s mindset after the targeted violence against Minnesota politicians last week. It is incoherent, one and a half pages long, confusing and hard to read, according to two people familiar with the letter’s contents. It includes Boelter alleging he had been trained by the U.S. military off the books, and that Walz, who is not running for Senate, had asked him to kill Klobuchar and others.

Asked to comment about the letter, Hennepin County Attorney spokesperson Daniel Borgertpoepping said the office cannot comment on an open investigation but “due to the seriousness of the allegations it contains, we will state only that we have seen no evidence that the allegations regarding Governor Walz are based in fact.” (read more)

Boelter is accused of posing as a police officer and fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. Authorities say he also shot Sen. John Hoffman, a Democrat, and his wife, Yvette; both injured at their residence about 9 miles away.

Apparently Amy Klobuchar was on his target list.

The whole story is bizarre…

Who does this guy think he is…  Hillary Clinton?

A Very Revealing Moment – Weird Statement by VP Nominee Tim Walz After Debate Question About His Impulsive Lying


Posted originally on the CTH on October 2, 2024 | Sundance 

During the Vice-Presidential debate Minnesota Governor Tim Walz was asked about his repeated false statements where he claims to have been in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests in the spring of 1989.

While it was surprising that an ideologically aligned CBS team including Margaret Brennan actually asked Governor Walz about these lies, his response to the direct question was even more surprising. Within his response Tim Walz essentially reveals he is an impulsive liar, prone to making up fictitious statements about events seemingly only to elevate his own sense of value.

Each of us likely knows a person who holds a similar disposition to Tim Walz; there are many impulsive liars in our modern world; however, to see his publicly broadcast attempt at covering up for his history of repeated lies is really something else. WATCH and decide for yourself:

.

Apparently, Barack Obama, Eric Holder and James Clyburn selected the exact perfect match for Kamala Harris when they choose Tim Walz.  Remember, former AG Eric Holder vetted all of the potential VP candidates, and as a consequence the long history of make believe that surrounds Walz must be known by those who are currently handling and controlling Kamala Harris and her campaign.

The only thing that makes sense, is that those who control Harris consider the flaws of Walz to be a feature or benefit to them.  Both Harris and Walz represent a false front, a Potemkin village manufactured from nothing to present as something very useful.  What Walz makes evident in the captured moment above, is that very dark forces are at work in the background. If there was no dangerous intent, he would never have passed muster.

Everything around the Kamala Harris campaign is manufactured, fake, astroturf and fraudulent, even the event venues and participants.  Perhaps in selecting Walz as a companion for this effort, the Minnesota governor’s propensity for lying was considered an asset.   Regardless, we can well imagine that those who control the levers of real power in Washington DC, have a very thick black file to use as compliance leverage.

This was a stunningly revealing moment.

Tim Walz Appointed Member Of Political Party ‘Loyal’ To Chinese Communists To State Board


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 13, 2024 at 10:00 pm EST

Walz’s Collusion With The CCP Is Much Bigger Threat To National Security Than Putin Planting Stories


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 7, 2024 at 01:00 pm EST

Four Veterans Speak Out About Tim Walz’s “Stolen Valor” & Truth About Pre-Iraq Deployment Retirement


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 2, 2024 at 08:00 pm EST

Rep. Burchett: [Tim Walz] Connections To The Chinese Scares The Daylights Out Of Me


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Aug 28, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Tim Walz Praises Communism


Posted originally on Aug 21, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

MaoCommunismHammer

An old article from Tim Walz resurfaced, and it once again indicated that he was against democracy. In 1991, two years after the Tiananmen Square massacre, Tim Walz explained to students in his social studies class that communism “means that everyone is the same and everyone shares.”

Walz told the class that everyone receives “food and housing” under communism. He praised the One Child Policy by stating that China’s population was simply too large for the government to support everyone. He even explained the system that was in place for academia where students who did not pass a certain test were removed from school and put into the workforce. Communism is a happy utopia where everyone benefits!

Bloomberg recently reported that Tim Walz specifically chose to wed on the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. His wife Gwen said that Tim “wanted to have a [wedding] date he’ll always remember.”

MaoChinaStarvation

Forget that millions of children, predominately girls, were murdered under the One China Policy. Forget the millions who starved and the blatant two-class system of the haves and have nots that emerged. Walz would like to be the second-in-command in the United States, a nation founded on democracy and liberty, yet he does not believe that democracy is the best form of government.

One of Walz’s former students joined him on a trip to China, where Walz was in awe of the CCP. “It was almost a daily revelation of how much he adores the communist regime,” the student said, calling Walz “a Maoist to the core.” The student claims he has been trying to explain that Walz is a true believer in Maoist ideology but no one will believe him. “At night, we’d go out, we’d walk the street fairs. We’d be buying souvenirs and Tim was always buying the Little Red Book. He said he gave them as gifts … I saw him buy at least a dozen on the trip.”

It is no coincidence that Walz supports communist ideals such as price controls, reporting on one’s neighbor, eliminating free speech, population control, and other measures that have never led to an abundant society.

Walz.Harris

Mao Zedong killed more people than Adolf Hitler. Mao’s policies claimed the lives of around 80 million people, but the true death toll is unknown. The Great Leap Forward famine wiped out up to 45 million citizens who were worked to death or died of starvation. The Cultural Revolution claimed up to 3 million lives, and his land reform campaigns killed around 2 million. Around 20 million Chinese died in forced labor camps under Mao. Praising Mao is no different from praising Kim Jong-Il, Adolf Hitler, or any dictator who destroyed his own country in the quest for power.