Le Pen Vows to End Blank Checks to Ukraine


Posted  Originally on Sep 10, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Marine Le Penstatement About Situation Ukraine Editorial Stock Photo -  Stock Image | Shutterstock Editorial

2026.

Le Pen has finally said what European leaders are terrified to admit: there must be an end to this perpetual blank check for Ukraine. She has called for France to stop further military and financial aid to Kyiv if she comes to power and return to what statesmen were once supposed to do when wars became catastrophic: negotiate. Le Pen has called for a “major peace conference” aimed at bringing a diplomatic conclusion to what she rightly calls “this horrific war.” Naturally, the establishment immediately screams that stopping the money means helping Putin. That is their answer to everything. Anyone who dares suggest peace has sdenly become an agent of Russia.

France signs security pact with Ukraine, pledges 'up to €3 billion' in  additional military aid - France 24

The establishment insists that Ukraine’s security is France’s security. Édouard Philippe attacked Le Pen’s position and claimed ending aid would mean “serving Russia.” This is the childish mentality that has prevented any serious discussion of peace. There are only two choices in their world: keep paying for the war or you love Putin.

This is where these people have lost all sense of humanity. What good has perpetual war done for the Ukrainian people? Cities have been destroyed, families scattered across Europe, millions displaced, and an entire generation of men has been fed into a conflict that political leaders refuse to bring to an end. Ukraine has been forced to continually tighten mobilization because there are not enough men willing or available to keep this going forever. Men subject to military obligations have faced restrictions on leaving the country. Europe is now even debating how military-age Ukrainians abroad should be treated while Germany’s foreign minister has suggested sharing information that could allow Kyiv to contact Ukrainian men living there regarding military service.

You do not save a country by wiping out its youth. You do not save a nation by destroying its demographic future. You do not defend democracy by telling Ukrainian men they cannot leave while politicians safely sitting in Paris, Brussels, London, and Berlin demand that the war continue. Every Ukrainian killed is somebody’s son, father, husband, or brother. Yet these politicians discuss human beings like inventory. Another weapons package. Another mobilization. Another billion. Another year.

National Rally MP Laurent Jacobelli put it plainly: “We stand with Ukraine, but not at the expense of France’s financial health (…), of our debt and the taxes paid by the French people,” RN MP Laurent Jacobelli said on Saturday. “At a time when the French are being asked to make sacrifices on pensions and healthcare, when France is on the brink of bankruptcy, we cannot put our country’s future at risk.”

The European political establishment has spent years pretending that peace means surrender because admitting otherwise would require acknowledging the catastrophic consequences of its own policies. They believed sanctions would collapse Russia. They believed endless weapons would produce victory. They believed economic warfare would force Moscow to its knees. Instead, the war continues, Ukraine continues needing enormous outside financing, and Europe continues digging deeper into its own pockets.

Now Ukraine says it needs another €27 billion just to close a defense-funding gap in 2026, while it is also securing around 1,000 Patriot missiles with allied support and an EU loan. Where does this end? That is the question nobody wants to answer. Another €27 billion? Another thousand missiles? Another hundred thousand men? Another five years? At what point is someone permitted to say that perhaps diplomacy deserves as much effort as finding the next weapons package?

Le Pen is right to demand that France change course. France should be using whatever influence it possesses to drag both sides toward a negotiating table, not endlessly writing checks that perpetuate the battlefield. That is not pro-Russian. It is pro-French and, frankly, far more humane toward the Ukrainian people than pretending another generation can simply be sacrificed until politicians finally get the outcome they promised years ago. Peace is not weakness. The refusal even to pursue it while other people’s children die is cowardice.

Canada 51st State?


Posted  Originally on Sep 10, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Trump Takes North America
Canada Sign

QUESTION: I know you have said you disagree with the whole tariff war. I believe you also said when you were here in Calgary, there was no way even Alberta could or should become the 51st state. Would you comment on this latest post of Trump draping the American flag over all of North America?

EP

ANSWER: This whole 51st state nonsense is just unrealistic. If Alberta became the 51st State, it would disrupt politics for then they would get two senators and untold congressmen. The Democrats would demand Puerto Rico and Guam be allowed to become states along with Washington DC. If somehow all of Canada and Mexico became part of the United States, who knows what that would disrupt politically. I suspect it might benefit the Democrats more than the Republicans. I could threaten to flee to Aruba anymore.

So, is Trump just poking fun at Carney? If he spoke to the State Department, they would surely be screaming are you insane! I’m not sure this could be serious even on Trump’s part. The process for a territory to become a state is established by the U.S. Constitution and granted specifically to Congress, not the president.

The specific authority is found in Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution. This section is often referred to as the “Admissions Clause” and states that “no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State…without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.”

Therefore, Trump I believe is having fun and he has to know that his meme is absolutely impossible. It seems to be more of a dig at Carney, but it was Trump’s rhetoric of making Canada the 51st State that got Carney elected in the first place. This tariff war is absurd and there is NO RESOLUTION that will benefit both sides anymore. We do not know the demands that actually broke the deal since both sides point at the other. I can say that Carney’s claim that the deal would restrict Canada’s sovereignty by limiting its ability to strike trade deals with other countries is really dodgy. That is the #1 way people circumvent tariffs and trade restrictions. You cut off trade with a given country so they cut a deal with Canada and the products appear to then be Canadian.

Chinese companies have been setting up plants in Mexico, and this strategy is widely seen as a way to circumvent U.S. trade barriers. Mexico’s location and its trade agreement with the U.S. make it an attractive “nearshoring” destination for Chinese manufacturers. I helped Japan to reduce its trade surplus buying gold in NYC, exporting to London to resell and this revolving door worked.

If Carney really killed the deal claiming this impeded on Canada’s sovereignty, I cannot believe he really believed that when in fact that is the #1 way to circumvent trade issues used by everyone.

If we examine the numbers, Canada did have a trade deficit in 2025. The data shows that its merchandise trade deficit widened significantly over the course of the year. For 2025, the annual merchandise trade deficit was C$31.3 billion. This was the largest annual shortfall since 2020 and a substantial increase from the C$7.2 billion deficit recorded in 2024. Focusing on just the USA & Canada, in U.S. dollar terms, Canada had a trade surplus with the USA in 2025 of about $50 billion. This implies that others are importing goods into Canda creating their trade deficit overall, but are then selling then to the USA creating the trade surplus with the USA.

Chinese-made goods are shipped to Canada, relabeled as Canadian, and exported to the United States without sufficient processing to change their country of origin. This is customs fraud if it is done to evade U.S. tariffs. U.S. and Canadian authorities have both acknowledged that this occurs, although its overall scale is difficult to measure. Recently, U.S. officials have stepped up scrutiny of alleged transshipment. The White House has claimed that rerouting goods through third countries—including Canada—is costing billions of dollars in lost tariff revenue, and U.S. Customs has increased enforcement efforts using AI and other investigative tools.

Carney may think he is defending Canada on this issue, but an all out trade war with the USA will also reduced the imports from other countries to circumvent trade restrictions. This is part of the problem.

Trump’s taunting Canada as the 51st State does not help matters when it is impossible anyway. Then there is the very issue of tariffs and jobs. This is a Marxist philosophy but overpaying people to keep jobs means the people are subsidizing jobs overpaying people who should get another job. You do NOT grow a head of lettuce in the Saudi desert importing war and top soil so the cost is $10 a head when you can buy it from someone else got 50 cents. You do NOT make American Great Again by bringing back overpaid jobs.

1933 Detroit Boston Milwukee and Chicago Municipal Debt

Detroit destroyed its auto industry like Mandami assuming they had endless revenues that they could tax. Not one auto manufacturer was left by 1937 in Detroit. They did not leave because of cheaper labor. They left because of taxes.

NYC Port

NYC was once the largest port in the USA. Between taxes, regulation, and corrupt unions, they chased everyone out to other ports. Until we look at the REAL reasons manufacture left, you cannot bring these back to America and they are exploited by progressives like Mandami. JP Morgan now employs more people outside of NYC and the financial Wall Street is abandoning NYC all because of Mandami. NYC will be a shadow of itself by 2030.

Categories:Canada

Somebody is Listening


Posted  Originally on Sep 9, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

2026_09_09_21_25_07_Trump_says_Iran_war_will_end_after_the_midterms_and_gas_prices_will_fall_and_84_

COMMENT: Marty, you’ve been saying on these podcasts that Iran won’t wave the white flag, because they see a chance at reverse regime change with the midterms and Netanyahu in October. Trump has just admitted that gas prices won’t come down before the midterms and that Iran won’t surrender. He’s changed his tune. Somebody in the White House is listening and got him to change his tune.

You do have more influence than you realize.

GD

REPLY: Perhaps. I can’t believe nobody figured this out months ago.

Bessent & Sovereign Debt Crisis


Posted  Originally on Sep 9, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

2026_09_09_14_18_21_Treasury_poised_to_buy_up_to_6B_in_bonds_as_Bessent_looks_to_rein_in_debt_costs

QUESTION: Marty, Bessent is plainly no trader. As you’ve pointed out, he’s spent far too long in the company of market manipulators. I remember your warning that rolling debt into shorter maturities only deepens future fragility. And as you put it, it’s Groundhog Day on repeat. So the question is: does this bring us closer to Socrates’ prophecy of even higher rates?

SK

vultures circling the US Treasury

ANSWER: This is a dumb move. With war circling around like vultures waiting for the carcas to die for a free meal, the Bessent announced that the federal government will buy back up to $6 billion of its bonds this week three times its normal operations, which is really stupid, in a braindead theory that it will rein in longer-term borrowing costs.

maa wsj

This is OpEd I wrote for the Wall Street Journal back on April 19, 1995, was about the same gimmick where President Clinton (1993-2001) was able to balance the budge was (1) the economy recovered in 1994 with capital pouring into the United States as it fled South East Asia resulting in the Asian Currency Crisis in 1997, (2) US Interest rates rose sharply in 1994 attracting huge capital inflows including those from Japan, and (3) he shortened the maturity of the debt funding it short-term to cut interest expenditure.

The National Debt rose from $4,064.6 billion in 1992 to $5,807.5 billion by 2001. The rate of growth was slowed by the shift in funding. Interest rates at the Fed dropped by 6.5% in 2000 to 1.75% in 2001. When Clinton took office the Fed Discount Rate stood at 3.5%. The rise began in 1994 that helped to attract foreign capital, especially from Japan, and it peaked in 2000 with the Dot Com Bubble on the heels of the 1998 Long Term Capital Management debacle that followed the collapse of Russian debt.

Based on the most recent data available, the amount of long-term U.S. Treasury debt (20-year and 30-year bonds) outstanding was approximately $5.5 trillion as of July 31, 2026. This is little more than 13% of the total. Here is the problem. The more you shift the debt short-term, it becomes much more volatile and with war, the rates can explode and this will send the interest expenditures up dramatic crowding out other spending and when the Democrats get back in, they will demand raping anyone who earns more than the poverty level with higher taxes as if that is ever a long-term solution.

The debt instruments outstanding are:

Treasury Bills (T-Bills): Short-term securities with maturities of one year or less (e.g., 4, 8, 13, 26, and 52 weeks). They are funded by being sold at a discount to their face value; the investor’s return is the difference between the purchase price and the face value received at maturity, meaning they do not pay a periodic coupon. (outstanding $6.99 trillion).

Treasury Notes (T-Notes): Medium-term securities with maturities from 2 to 10 years (e.g., 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years). They are funded by paying a fixed interest rate (coupon) every six months until maturity. (T-Notes represent about 52% of all outstanding debt about $30.2 trillion).

Treasury Bonds (T-Bonds): Long-term securities with maturities of more than 10 years, currently issued as 20-year and 30-year bonds. They are funded by paying a fixed interest rate (coupon) every six months. (outstanding $5.5 trillion).

Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS): These are medium to long-term securities (5, 10, and 30 years). They are funded differently, as their principal is adjusted based on inflation (CPI-U). They pay a fixed interest rate twice a year, but the payment amount changes with the inflation-adjusted principal. (outstanding $39.8 billion).

Floating Rate Notes (FRNs): These are 2-year notes whose interest rate is not fixed. Their funding mechanism involves a variable interest rate that is reset weekly, based on the most recent 13-week Treasury bill auction rate plus a fixed spread. (outstanding $600 billion).


The Buy Back

US 30yr Rate Tech Y 9 9 26

Look, the buy back of $6 billion amounts to .001%. This is again a CONFIDENCE game attempting to manipulate the market with a lot of hot air. As I have said, the 30-year has formidable resistance at 5.5%. A failure to close about that level warns we can have a knee-jerk reaction to the down side, but this will be caused by a rush of capital inflows because of war as capital flees the geopolitical epic-centers. However, that will not last beyond 2027. Inflation will rise because the real crisis is not in crude oil but in the refined products thanks to the madman of Ukraine, Zelensky attacking Russian refineries. As debts become exponential post 2027, rate will rise and the prospect of war becomes a reality and governments NEVER have any intention of ever paying off what they borrow. Shifting debts short-term make the roll costs exceptionally higher. We do we borrow with no intention of paying anything back? This is the way ALL governments function with no rational reasoning behind this stupidity. The press loves to bash the US and ignore the sovereign crisis which has reach about $350+ trillion worldwide. This is what 2032 is all about.

The Arrogance of Bessent


Posted  Originally on Sep 9, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

IBJYUS Y Tech 9 9 26

QUESTION: Marty, care to comment of your old adversary Bessent and his latest boast “I am the house” warning traders not to bet against him? They called you Mr. Yen and Milton Friedman called you the World’s Ambassador. Socrates seems to take issue with Bessent. They never learn.

K

Influence

ANSWER: He is trying to use his position to manipulate markets as usual. This is why these people hated me because they judged me by themselves. I would say they would lose, and when they did, they claimed I had greater influence than all the bribes they could pay. They even had the CFTC file a subpoena demanding I turn over a list of all my clients so they could prove I was manipulating the world economy. My lawyer asked where is the statute that says I could not manipulate the entire world? The judge laughed and threw that out of court. They lobbied to to try to shut down our forecasting because they try to bribe everyone for the guaranteed trade when I was the only real trader.

Louvre Accord Plaza Accord

The dollar has risen against the yen for 15 years. Bessent thinks for trade purposes that he can talk the dollar down. Well, they tried that in 1985 and blew the world up when the G7 stood up and claimed that was it, the dollar fell far enough. As soon as the dollar fell lower, the world saw that the G7 could NOT dictate to the world what value a currency should be. When they even came out at the Plaza Accord, the trend had already turned on the dollar. They did NOT change its direction.

1987 Crash Brady Commission

I wrote to President Reagan and I warned that they would cause a crase within 2 years. They laughed because they had the power, or so they thought. When the crash came in 1987, they were forced to call me in. I had to keep the staff late so we could have advice for President Reagan and what to say. The capital flows went crazy and the Japanese dumped dollar assets when the dollar continued lower after the Louvre Accord pronouncement that the dollar had fallen far enough. They were wrong, and we got the crash.

Rubin Letter
Geithneir R

Robert Rubin was doing the same thing in 1997. I wrote to him on May 28th, 1997 and warned him he too would cause a crash. At least he responded to me. I wrote to Bessent but old grudges never die. He did NOT respond. They refuse to admit just maybe I created a computer that actually works and it was not my personal influence. Admitting that means they have been wrong for decades.

1997 Thailand Baht Crisis
MA China Diet r

The Asian Currency Crisis began on schedule a few weeks later. While they do not like me because they always prove to be wrong, China called me in and I flew to Bejing to meet with the central bank. They respected my computer and announced that they have adopted “capital flow analysis.” When I got back, people from the Treasury and the Fed called and wanted to know my opinion since I was the first American to be called in by the People’s Bank of China. I said it was interesting. Everyone I had met were TRADERS who had been sent to work on dealing desks in NY, London, Tokyo, and returned to run the bank. My comment was, they ONLY hired people with experience.

ScottBessent

So here we go again. The support on the yen for the close of 2026 lies at 154.20 while closing resistance stands at 160. The yen can move to 366 against the dollar by the Panic Cycle for 2030. The mere fact that Bessent is trying to talk the dollar down against the yen PROVES the underlying trend in motion. Like the Louvre Accord, making a public statement like this when you are the Treasury instead to manipulating markets with a herd of hedge funds back then is substantially different. When he is proven wrong, the world will lose confidence in his or any government’s ability to manipulate society, which is why they are all at least worship Marx in the closet who knighted them as the mover and shakers of the world at will endorsed by Keynes.

A 3rd Time Will Not Be the Charm

Categories:Japan

Perhaps Marco Rubio’s Most Consequential Press Remarks Ever on the Western Hemisphere and Security Operations


Posted originally on the CTH on September 9, 2026 | Sundance | 

This is one spectacular impromptu presser by Secretary of State Marco Rubio following discussions with Ecuador’s President Daniel Noboa at Carondelet Palace.  All of it is direct, deliberate, targeted and without any reserved remarks held back due to regional sensibilities.

Secretary Rubio emphatically outlined how the United States is going to work with Latin-America officials to remove narco-terrorism in all its forms from the region like “cutting out a cancer.”  Rubio walks through the issues and the importance of direct confrontation, including the use of the U.S. military, the U.S. intelligence agencies and every element of power at our disposal to help leaders like President Daniel Noboa fight the corrupt gangs and domestic terrorist networks within the region.  Rubio’s strength of statements is exceptional.

These remarks come on the heels of the State Dept today designating corrupt Ecuadorian officials as facilitators of Foreign Terrorist Organizations [SEE HERE]. He also praised the government of Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa as being “the most involved and aggressive partner” the US has had in its work dismantling criminal networks and “bringing people to justice that have never been brought to justice before”.  Rubio outlined all of it, soup to nuts. This is a must watch presser:

STATE DEPT – […] Pablo Ramírez Erazo, former director of Ecuador’s Prison Authority; Wilman Terán Carillo, former judge on Ecuador’s National Court of Justice; and Ronaldo Xavier Guerrero Cruz, former criminal judge on Ecuador’s Judicial Council, each significantly abused their former government positions by accepting bribes from gangs linked to narco-terrorist organizations.  In exchange for bribes, these officials interfered with judicial, electoral, or public processes on behalf of Ecuadorian gangs linked to designated FTOs Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG), Los Choneros, and Los Lobos.  

Pablo Bolívar Muentes Alarcón, former member of the Ecuadorian National Assembly; María Fabiola Gallardo Ramia, former President of the Guayas Provincial Court; Johann Marfetán Medina, former criminal judge of the Guayas Provincial Court; and Mayra Carolina Salazar Merchán, former public relations officer of the Guayas Provincial Court, each abused their former public positions by accepting bribes in exchange for interfering with judicial processes to benefit narco-terrorist organizations like Los Choneros and the Sinaloa Cartel, and their criminal facilitators. (SOURCE)

Posted in Communist, Deep State, Donald Trump, Economy, Marco Rubio, media bias, Military, Patriotism, President Trump, Secretary of State, Terrorist Attacks, Uncategorized, USA

2026 Republican Midterm Convention – Day 1 Livestream


Posted originally on the CTH on September 9, 2026 | Sundance |

A historic Republican midterm convention is being held in Dallas, Texas, to be headlined by a President Trump address later today.  The livestream links to the event are below. President Trump is anticipated to take the stage during the final hour of the convention, specifically from 8 to 9 p.m. Central Time. The event’s schedule indicates that the programming will run from 3 to 9 p.m. CT each evening.

Vice President JD Vance will deliver his speech at the conclusion of today’s events.  Links Below:

.

.

.

Posted in Donald Trump, Election 2026, President Trump

President Trump Holds Impromptu Presser Departing Joint Base Andrews


Posted originally on the CTH on September 9, 2026 | Sundance |

President Trump holds a tarmac press availability as he prepares to depart for Dallas, Texas, to attend the Republican midterm convention.

.

Posted in President Trump, Press Secretary – Trump

Interesting, Albeit Disputed Report of CIA Director John Ratcliffe Being More Involved in Russia-Ukraine Negotiations


Posted originally on the CTH on September 9, 2026 | Sundance | 

Within media reporting there is usually a ring of truth, albeit spun into a fake news narrative. President Trump famously said, “the reports are real, the news is fake.” I suspect this report today about CIA Director John Ratcliffe being more involved in the Ukraine-Russia conflict negotiations is a prime example.

We’ll start here: “CIA director John Ratcliffe is preparing to take a bigger role in U.S. negotiations with Russia and Ukraine, U.S. officials have told their European counterparts, in a bid to jump-start moribund diplomatic efforts to end the four-and-a-half-year-long war,” the Financial Times reports.

“The move comes as the White House is considering paring back the involvement of U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who have been leading the talks with Moscow and Kyiv.” {Source)

I suspect the first paragraph is accurate, and I suspect the second paragraph is entirely fake news.  That opinion seems verified by the White House refuting the Financial Times report.  Pay attention to what they actually refute:

“This entire story is totally fake news attributed to low-level, anonymous ‘sources’ who have no idea what they are talking about. None of these supposed conversations are happening. Special Envoy Witkoff and Jared Kushner continue to work incredibly hard towards a peace agreement, and the President trusts them fully to lead negotiations on behalf of the United States. It’s a shame that Financial Times has devolved into a left-wing gossip rag that has zero interest in reporting accurate information.” ~White House, Anna Kelly

I have a theory on this, and generally I don’t get out in advance of things – preferring to wait, assemble data, and then citing the backstory in the full context outline.  However, this story is different. There’s a geopolitical clock ticking and I suspect events will unfold rather quickly, so it’s worth peeking around the corner in advance of the picture emerging.

To start, understand the Russian psychology and how the Kremlin specifically presents their positions.  Russians don’t do small talk at all. If a Russian has nothing to say, if they perceive no value or transactional purpose in words, they stay quiet.

Russians speak when there is value in the conversation. Russians do not do small talk; that’s a western attribute.

That’s why when the Kremlin quickly broadcast video of Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner immediately meeting with Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin and top aide Ushakov, it seemed odd.  Letting the cameras roll while Witkoff, Kushner and Putin himself engaged in small talk diplomatic introductions was very odd. Beyond odd.  That’s the thing that interested observers noted was unusual.  Something was different.

Then came the follow-up.  President Trump speaking with President Putin for an hour, and the specific wording used by Ushakov to describe the conversation itself.  There were several points of interest in how the readout was worded, with particular interest to these paragraphs:

[…] “Clearly, the conversation centered on Ukrainian settlement. Donald Trump directly communicated the desirability of bringing the conflict to an end as soon as possible, as it would immediately open up prospects – impressive and far-reaching ones at that – for the ​full restoration of relations between the U.S. and Russia. In his view, this would have a particular impact on trade and economic ties, promising huge ‌benefits for ⁠both nations. Donald Trump is keen to see a breakthrough achieved during his presidency.

President Putin supported this approach in the context of potentially building a constructive partnership between the two great powers and praised the mediation efforts by the US and Donald Trump personally with respect to finding solutions to the Ukrainian conflict. An objective and extensive analysis of the current developments in the special military operation was provided, along with our vision of the overall progress on the battlefield and achieving the goals and objectives of the special military operation. Speaking of which, actual tangible actions that the Americans could take to expedite the cessation of the hostilities were outlined.”… {source, Kremlin}

I am very confident that President Trump is looking at Russia as a mechanism to solve the Iran conflict and beyond. {GO DEEP} That’s why the “trade and economic ties, promising huge benefits for both nations,” directly attributed to President Trump, is part of the readout.

Then you get to the more surprising part. “[Russia’s] vision of the overall progress on the battlefield and achieving the goals and objectives of the special military operation. Speaking of which, actual tangible actions that the Americans could take to expedite the cessation of the hostilities were outlined.”  President Putin outlined tangible actions “Americans could take.”  Putting that in a readout of a call between Trump and Putin is quite remarkable.

I suspect that Russian President Vladimir Putin and President Trump had a very honest conversation about the overall conflict, and when President Trump brings up the restoration of the economic relationship as well as the removal of sanctions, Putin then challenged Trump.

Russian President Putin doesn’t believe that President Trump or any other U.S. President actually controls the mechanisms of government.  This opinion is underlined and emphasized when it comes to the U.S. Intelligence Community and the CIA.

Putin has long stated that no U.S. President controls the CIA, and Putin has said while he never views the U.S. President or the people of America as his enemy, the CIA are the problem.  Putin views the CIA as the real control mechanism within the U.S. government.

America is not Russia’s enemy, the CIA is.  That’s Putin’s perspective in a nutshell.

When it was revealed how the FBI, ODNI and CIA had targeted candidate Donald Trump and later President Trump, Vladimir Putin used this reference point in all of his statements about “Russiagate” as an I-told-you-so point of emphasis.  Putin has a long-held belief that U.S. intelligence agencies operated outside the framework of government, and the “Russiagate” operation against Trump proved it. At least that was his public perspective.

There is nothing evident to sway Putin’s perspective and opinion toward President Trump in term-2.  Putin doesn’t believe Trump controls the intelligence agencies, and Putin certainly doesn’t believe Trump controls the CIA.

Now, put that Putin-Trump phone call (use the readout as a reference) together with the report today that CIA Director John Ratcliffe will take a “greater role in Russia-Ukraine talks.”

I suspect that President Trump discussed the benefits to Russia of rejoining the world economy, the removal of sanctions, the financial benefits from the sale of Russian oil and gas and the geopolitical benefits of Russia and the United States forming a strategic relationship.  However, I also suspect that Putin returned that outlook by telling President Trump he was not in control of USIC and as a consequence really not in control of the U.S relationship with NATO.

Obviously, President Trump would counter that he was in control of the USIC and all the downstream institutions, but Putin would be incredulous to the possibility.  History is on the side of Putin and DNI Gabbard could only achieve so much.

[‘Sure, if you are really in control – then do XXXX’] which in a readout becomes “actual tangible actions that the Americans could take.”

“CIA director John Ratcliffe is preparing to take a bigger role in U.S. negotiations with Russia and Ukraine, U.S. officials have told their European counterparts, in a bid to jump-start moribund diplomatic efforts to end the four-and-a-half-year-long war,” the Financial Times reports.

.

[Support CTH Here]

Posted in Big Government, CIA, Deep State, Donald Trump, European Union, media bias, NATO, President Trump, Russia, Ukraine, Uncategorized, USA

Volkswagen Will Turn Closed Car Plants into Military Manufacturing Plants


Posted originally on the CTH on September 9, 2026 | Sundance |

Unfortunately, if my memory is correct, this did not work out too well the last time.  The irony thickens when you look at the brand name Volkswagen, and how they got their start.

[SOURCE]

GERMANY – Volkswagen (VWAGY) has agreed to sell its Osnabrück plant in Germany to Israeli investor Aurelius Capital and the state of Lower Saxony, paving the way for the factory to shift from car production to defense manufacturing.

Vehicle production at the plant is scheduled to end in summer 2027. Aurelius would become the majority owner alongside Lower Saxony, with the aim of preserving the site and a large part of its workforce.

The new owners plan to develop the site gradually into a competence center for security and defense solutions. Aurelius and Lower Saxony are planning an initial anchor project with Israel’s Rafael Advanced Defense Systems in air defense, with further industrial partnerships and projects expected to follow.

The project could involve producing air-defense systems and components for Germany and Europe. About 1,400 of the plant’s 1,800 jobs could be preserved, according to labor officials. {source}

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO General Secretary Mark Rutte

Posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, European Union, Germany, Military, NATO, Russia, Ukraine