HUGE WIN: Jim Hoft Details the Missouri v. Biden Victory and the End of Government-Driven Social Media Censorship


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 25, 2026

JON SCHWEPPE: We All Want To Protect Kids Online. It’s Become A Dangerous Place, And Parents Need The Ability To Guide Their Children’s Online Experience


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 25, 2026

Joe Allen: Meta Found GUILTY — Big Tech Creates Horror for Parents, David Sacks Tells Parents to Trust Big Tech “Tools”


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 25, 2026

BANNON: These Tech Oligarchs Don’t Want ANY RESTRICTION. They’re Dangerous To This Nation, They’re Dangerous To The Citizens Of This Country, And They’re Dangerous To Homo Sapiens! DANGEROUS


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 25, 2026

BANNON: There Is No Substitute For Victory. As We’re In It Now. Just Understand. It’s Going To Get Really, Really, Really Ugly. Anybody Telling You Otherwise, All These People Going On FOX Blowing Smoke, They Ain’t Out On That Front Linehttps://rumble.com/embed/v75f8a8/?pub=4


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 25, 2026

SAM FADDIS: Whether We Take Kharg Island Or Don’t Take Kharg Island, The Iranians Will Never Export Another Barrel Of Oil As Long As The United States Navy Sits Outside The Gulf Of Hormuz


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 25, 2026

ERIC BOLLING: These Middle-Eastern Countries Say They Support Trump, But Higher Oil Prices Benefit Them. Their Calls To “Finish The Job” Mean A Longer Conflict, Which Leads To Higher Prices And Bigger Gains For Their Oil Industries


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 25, 2026

Seabed 2030 – The Globalist Project Beneath the Water


Posted originally on Mar 26, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Seabed 2030 is a global initiative launched in 2017 by the Nippon Foundation and GEBCO, operating under the International Hydrographic Organization and UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, with the stated goal of mapping the entire ocean floor by 2030 and compiling that data into a single global grid, drawing on governments, private industry, academic institutions, and international agencies to build what is effectively the most comprehensive database of the seabed ever attempted.

I discussed how China is actively mapping the ocean floor for wartime data. The funding for Seabed 2030 comes from a handful of powerful institutions, governments, and globalist agencies. The primary financial backing comes from Japan’s Nippon Foundation, which committed tens of millions of dollars to initiate the project and continues to fund its operations through structured payments distributed via the International Hydrographic Organization. Additional support comes from government agencies such as NOAA, international bodies like UNESCO under the UN Ocean Decade framework, and a growing network of corporate and philanthropic partners including Fugro, Schmidt Ocean Institute, and other private-sector contributors that provide vessels, technology, and data collection capabilities, creating a hybrid system where public, private, and international governance structures converge around a single dataset.

People are told this is about science, climate, and sustainability. Yet, when you follow the project’s structure and the concentration of funding and control, it becomes clear that this is not simply research. Still, the construction of a global information system managed through institutions that are not accountable to any single electorate, which is always how these initiatives are framed when they are intended to operate above national jurisdiction.

The scale alone should raise attention because this is not incremental research but a rapid buildout of strategic infrastructure, with ocean floor mapping increasing from roughly 6 percent at the project’s inception to over 27 percent by 2025, representing millions of square kilometers of newly mapped terrain in a short period, which demonstrates coordinated acceleration rather than passive discovery.

What is never emphasized is that seabed data is not neutral, because it has direct military application. China is conducting similar mapping operations specifically to prepare for submarine warfare, since understanding seabed topography, currents, and acoustic conditions determines submarine stealth, detection, and positioning, meaning that whoever possesses the most detailed mapping controls the underwater domain in any future conflict.

At the same time, nearly all global communications rely on subsea cables and critical energy infrastructure runs across the ocean floor, so mapping the seabed is also about identifying and potentially controlling the arteries of the global economy, which transforms what is presented as environmental mapping into strategic intelligence.

The structure of this project follows a familiar model where governments, multinational corporations, NGOs, and “philanthropic foundations” are integrated into a single framework, with data centralized into global repositories such as the GEBCO grid, which gradually shifts influence toward those who define standards, control access, and determine how that data is used, and history shows that once such centralized systems are established, their function expands beyond their original stated purpose.

I have said many times that global initiatives are rarely built for one reason, and this is no different, because the same data being marketed for climate modeling, biodiversity, and the so-called blue economy is also the foundation for military planning, resource exploration, and infrastructure control, and in a period where geopolitical tensions are rising into what the ECM has identified as a war cycle, it is naive to assume that mapping the entire seabed is purely humanitarian.

This is not simply about science or climate, but about building the informational foundation for the next phase of global power, where control of the seabed will influence military positioning, communications, energy systems, and ultimately economic dominance, and once that infrastructure is complete, the justification for how it is used will follow as it always has throughout history.

Categories:

Mortgage Demand Collapses as Rates Surge


Posted originally on Mar 26, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Cleveland_home_Westland_Mansion

The latest data confirms what we have been building toward for months, as mortgage demand has now dropped sharply with interest rates rising to their highest levels since October, with the Mortgage Bankers Association reporting that the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate climbed to 6.43% and total application activity fell 10.5% in a single week, including a 14.6% collapse in refinancing and a 5.4% decline in purchase applications, which reflects not just a slowdown but a clear contraction in housing demand.

This is not happening in isolation because mortgage rates are tied directly to the 10-year Treasury, which has surged alongside oil prices as the war environment intensifies, with crude rising from roughly $75 to $100 per barrel following the escalation with Iran and the disruption of flows through the Strait of Hormuz, which in turn has pushed yields higher and forced markets to abandon expectations of rate cuts this year.

What you are witnessing is exactly what I have warned about repeatedly, where geopolitical events drive capital flows and interest rates far more than domestic policy decisions, and the idea that central banks control the economy is once again being exposed as a myth because the Federal Reserve cannot lower rates when inflation pressures are being driven externally through energy markets and war.

The housing market is always one of the first places this shows up because it is the most interest rate sector of the economy, and when rates rise even modestly, affordability collapses, which is why we are seeing buyers step back and refinancing vanish almost immediately. There is no incentive to refinance at higher rates and no ability for new buyers to justify elevated monthly payments.

Americans aren’t defaulting on their mortgages in large numbers, but a surge in Google searches for “help with mortgage” — now at the highest level on record, even above 2008 — suggests growing financial anxiety beneath the surface.

At the same time, beneath the surface there are clear signs of stress building, as searches for “help with mortgage” have surged to levels even higher than the 2008 financial crisis, indicating that while defaults have not yet exploded, the concern among homeowners is rising rapidly due to higher costs across the board, from energy to insurance to taxes, which are all squeezing disposable income.

This is how a cycle turns because it does not begin with mass defaults but with declining confidence and rising anxiety, which then translates into reduced demand, slower transactions, and eventually price pressure as the market adjusts to a new reality.

Even when rates decline slightly, demand has remained weak because the underlying issue is not just rates but affordability and economic uncertainty, with housing activity already sluggish for years and home prices still elevated relative to income, meaning that the system has been stretched and is now vulnerable to external shocks.

The World’s Most Expensive Toll Booth?


Posted originally on Mar 26, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Strait Hormuz 1

What is taking place in the Strait of Hormuz right now is not simply a disruption to shipping, but a transformation of a natural chokepoint into a political weapon, and this is exactly what history shows always happens when a strategic passage falls under the control of a single power during a period of war.

Iran has now effectively asserted control over the Strait, restricting access, threatening vessels, and even considering or reportedly imposing transit fees on tankers, with some reports indicating charges as high as $2 million per vessel for passage, which turns one of the most critical points of global trade into a toll route under geopolitical control rather than a neutral international waterway.

Roughly 20% the world’s oil supply passes through this narrow channel, along with a substantial portion of global liquefied natural gas, meaning any disruption immediately impacts energy markets, inflation, and ultimately the global economy.

What has unfolded is not just tension but a near shutdown, with ship traffic collapsing, vessels being attacked, insurance costs surging, and many operators refusing to transit altogether due to the risk of drones, mines, and missile strikes, while others only pass under specific conditions approved by Iran, often tied to political alignment.

Iran has made it clear that access is no longer unconditional, stating that only “non-hostile” vessels may pass. This introduces a new dimension in which global trade is filtered through geopolitical loyalty.

Now add the idea of a transit tax and you begin to see the real picture, because this is no longer just about restricting access but monetizing control, turning geography into revenue while simultaneously exerting leverage over nations dependent on energy flows. This is precisely how strategic chokepoints have been used throughout history from the Suez Canal to the Bosporus.

Events of this nature drives volatility, because when a critical supply route becomes unstable, capital begins to shift rapidly into safe havens.  Inflationary pressures build, hence why you are seeing immediate reactions across global markets as oil surges and bond yields follow.

The key point is that this is not temporary in the way the press tends to frame it, because once a chokepoint is weaponized, it never fully returns to neutrality, since the precedent has been set that access can be restricted, priced, or controlled based on political conditions, and that permanently alters the risk calculation for global trade.

This also exposes the fragility of the entire system. A single narrow passage can disrupt nearly a fifth of the global energy supply, showing how concentrated and vulnerable the system has become.

Controlling trade routes has always been one of the most powerful tools in geopolitical conflict, and once that tool is actively deployed, it indicates that the situation has moved beyond rhetoric into structural change.