PRINCE: No Maritime Supremacy, No Safety in Modern War


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 29, 2026

PRINCE: Palm Sunday Blockade Breaks Centuries of Tradition


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 29, 2026

Prince: First Time Since Ottoman Rule Christians are Denied Mass


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 29, 2026

Prince: “Really Bad Look” as Cardinal Blocked on Palm Sunday


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 29, 2026

PALM SUNDAY COLD OPEN: Iran Strike Fallout, Nuclear Threats, and the Pressure to Escalate


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 29, 2026

BREAKING: Israeli Police Block Cardinal Pizzaballa on Palm Sunday


Posted originally on Rumble on Bannon War Room on: March 29, 2026

Finland to Audit US NATO Weapon Deliveries


Posted originally on Mar 30, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

PatriotMissile

The latest report underscores growing concern within NATO itself over whether weapons intended for Ukraine are actually reaching their destination, as Finland has now moved to audit deliveries amid uncertainty. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that Washington “is not redirecting NATO-purchased weapons for Ukraine to the Middle East,” but notably “stopped short of ruling out the possibility.” At the same time, Donald Trump offered a broader and more revealing explanation, saying the United States is “constantly moving weapons between different parts of the world.”

The question of why NATO is fully committed to Ukraine yet far more restrained when it comes to Iran is a window into how modern geopolitics actually functions beneath the surface. What you are witnessing is not about morality, democracy, or even alliances in the traditional sense. It is about capital flows, regional control, and the strategic priorities of those directing policy behind the curtain.

From everything I have written over the years, the war in Ukraine has always been about Europe, not Russia. The objective has been to isolate Russia economically while simultaneously forcing Europe into dependency. By cutting off Russian energy and pushing sanctions, the EU effectively destroyed its own industrial base. Capital began to flee Europe and flow into the United States. That was the real outcome. The war became a mechanism to redirect capital flows, and that is why NATO is “all in.” Ukraine is the lever being used to reshape Europe.

Iran is a completely different equation. A direct, unified NATO engagement against Iran would risk destabilizing the entire Middle East in a way that cannot be contained. You are dealing with the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of global oil flows. Any escalation there immediately impacts energy prices worldwide and risks triggering a broader regional war involving multiple actors. This is not Ukraine, where the conflict can be geographically contained. This is a choke point for the global economy.

Historically, NATO has always been strongest when operating within a clearly defined regional framework tied to Europe. Ukraine fits that model. Iran does not. Iran sits at the crossroads of competing interests involving not just the West, but also China, Russia, and regional powers. A unified NATO front against Iran would risk fracturing the alliance itself, particularly as Europe is already under severe economic strain. They simply do not have the capacity to sustain another major conflict.

NATO ECM A

There is also the issue of public tolerance. Europe can justify its involvement in Ukraine under the narrative of defending its borders and countering Russia. That argument resonates politically within NATO countries. Iran does not present the same narrative framework. A direct war with Iran would be far more difficult to sell domestically, especially given the economic consequences that would follow.

But the real underlying factor, as I have consistently explained, is confidence. The global system is being held together by confidence in governments, currencies, and institutions. Ukraine has been used as a controlled conflict to manage that system, to justify spending, to redirect capital, and to consolidate political power. Iran represents an uncontrolled variable.

Finnish Defense Minister Antti Häkkänen reinforced Europe’s role in undying support for Ukraine. “What has been promised to Ukraine must reach Ukraine,” Häkkänen stated. “We constantly assess how funds are being spent, and we believe the mechanism works. Of course, if problems arise, we will have to review this.”

Despite decades of the United States funding and effectively underwriting NATO’s military power, Europe has largely refused to join direct offensive operations against Iran. President Trump openly criticized NATO allies for failing what he called a “loyalty test,” pointing out that after trillions spent defending Europe, the alliance was “not there” when the United States needed support in the Middle East. The response from Europe has shown that NATO is not united.

This is where the future of NATO itself comes into question. If the United States continues to shoulder the financial burden while Europe selectively participates only when it serves its own interests, then the entire premise of the alliance begins to break down. Trump has already made it clear that alliances must provide tangible benefits, not just political symbolism. If Washington concludes that NATO is no longer a mutual defense pact but a one-sided obligation, then the pressure to reassess or even exit will intensify. Alliances do not collapse overnight, they erode when confidence disappears and when one side no longer sees value in maintaining the relationship. Should that realization take hold in the United States, the possibility of stepping back from NATO is no longer unthinkable.

Categories:War

Virginia Permits ADULT MIGRANT MEN to Attend High School


Posted originally on Mar 30, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Reports emerging out of Virginia confirm that migrants, including those in the country illegally, are being allowed to remain in high schools up to the age of 22, placing adult individuals into classrooms with minors. What is being justified under the banner of “education access” has effectively created a loophole where grown adults can legally sit alongside teenage students. Yet another example of Democrats prioritizing open borders above all else.

We now have a situation where individuals far beyond what any reasonable person would define as “school age” are being kept inside high schools, funded by taxpayers, and justified under a complete distortion of the law. The 1982 Supreme Court decision was meant to ensure that children, not adults, would not be denied a basic education. It was about minors, about protecting kids, not opening the door for fully grown adults to sit in classrooms with 13- and 14-year-olds. Yet that is exactly what this has become. Virginia Code § 22.1-5 was intended to help non-English-speaking students integrate. Meanwhile, American youth legally must leave public school by the age of 20, or an extra two years after traditional graduation. Policymakers have twisted a child-protection measure into a loophole that now places adult migrants, including those here illegally, into environments designed for minors. You now have 12-year-olds sitting in classrooms alongside adult men from entirely different backgrounds and cultures, and we are told this is normal. It is not. This is a fundamental breakdown in the purpose of the law and a reckless abandonment of the very students it was meant to protect.

Virginia Code § 22.1-5(D) explicitly states: “School boards may accept and provide programs for students for whom English is a second language who entered school in Virginia for the first time after reaching their twelfth birthday, and who have not reached 22 years of age on or before August 1 of the school year. No tuition shall be charged such students, if state funding is provided for such programs.”

What could go wrong? In Fairfax County, a 19-year-old migrant has been accused of sexually assaulting multiple female classmates. These young girls were assaulted in the confines of their school, a place that should be a safe haven. Our children are no longer protected by the law. In fact, this new legislation outright puts children in danger and denies students the ability to learn in a safe environment. Even unvetted migrants who do not have proper documentation are permitted to attend high school in Virginia so long as they claim to be under 22. Any grown, able-bodied, working-age man can now collect government benefits under the guise of desiring a high school diploma.

Virginia lawmakers are actively moving to codify policies that ensure access to public education regardless of immigration status. The state receives funding for ESL programs, and open border policies are emboldened. Despite the molestation charges and obvious risks, lawmakers in Virginia are not concerned about the safety of children.

Parents cannot pick up their children from school without presenting proper ID and signing waivers. They cannot even walk inside the school without going directly to the main office where they are vetted. Now, schools are being asked to simply accept stated ages and backgrounds at face value while permitting ANY semi-youthful presenting individual to attend classes. You are effectively placing unverified adults into daily contact with minors and hoping nothing goes wrong. These migrant students will likely be older than the teachers in many classrooms. No serious institution would operate this way, yet this is now being normalized by the far-left who are using children as political social experiments.

Schools are supposed to be controlled environments where minors learn among peers. Now, children will be placed in proximity to adults whose backgrounds, histories, and intentions are completely unknown. No parent sends their child to school expecting that the system has quietly redefined who belongs in that environment. The Democrats are effectively weaponizing public schools, endangering children, and forcing taxpayers to foot the bill. What horrors must occur before this law is repealed?

Parents send their children to school under the assumption that it is a controlled, safe environment. You cannot maintain a functioning society if people no longer trust its institutions to provide basic safety.

Iran Introduces 10 Million Rial Banknote


Posted originally on Mar 30, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

r/economicCollapse - Iran central Bank has introduced a 10 million rial banknote

What Iran is doing right now is something we have seen repeatedly throughout history whenever a currency begins to die. Governments start issuing larger and larger banknotes because the existing denominations no longer function in daily life. This took place in the Weimar Republic hyperinflation, where trillion-mark notes were printed, and again in Zimbabwe hyperinflation, where 100 trillion dollar notes became commonplace. The pattern is always the same. The currency loses purchasing power, prices rise uncontrollably, and instead of fixing the underlying problem, governments simply add more zeros. Iran introducing a 10 million rial note is the same historical signal that the currency is worthless.

The introduction of a 10 million rial banknote, now the highest denomination in the country’s history, is being presented as a practical measure to “facilitate transactions.” In reality, it is an admission that the currency itself has failed. When a nation must print larger and larger notes just to keep commerce functioning, that is not stability, it is a monetary breakdown.

The new 10 million rial note is reportedly worth roughly $7 USD at current exchange rates. A “million” denomination has become meaningless. People no longer think in terms of value but in terms of survival. The numbers grow larger, but purchasing power collapses.

The reality on the ground confirms this collapse in confidence. The Iranian rial is now trading around 1.4 to 1.6 million per US dollar on the open market, levels that reflect a dramatic erosion in trust. At the time of the 1979 revolution, the exchange rate was roughly 70 rials per dollar, meaning the currency has lost tens of thousands of times its value over time. Even in the past year alone, the decline has accelerated, showing that this is not a slow deterioration but a rapid phase of collapse.

Official figures place inflation near 48–50%, with food prices rising even faster. This is where the destruction becomes visible to the average person. Prices rise faster than wages, savings are wiped out, and the middle class disappears. When you combine a collapsing currency with inflation approaching 50%, what you are really seeing is purchasing power being annihilated. People are not becoming poorer because they earn less. They are becoming poorer because their money no longer holds value.

What is even more telling is the government’s response. Before introducing the 10 million note, they rolled out a 5 million rial note worth only a few dollars. First, the denominations increase incrementally, then they accelerate as confidence disappears. These are all clear signs of a failed currency.

There have long been reports of people rushing to withdraw cash, fearing further currency weakness and potential restrictions. The public knows their currency is worthless. People have withdrawn whatever they could, spent it quickly, or converted it into hard assets or foreign currency.

The underlying cause here is not mysterious. Iran has been financing deficits through money creation for years while facing sanctions and internal corruption. This combination destroys confidence in both the government and the currency. Printing money does not create wealth. It simply dilutes what already exists.

When governments lose control of their finances, they always turn to the printing press. But printing money does not solve the problem. The introduction of a 10 million rial note is not a solution. It is a symptom. Iran is now in a phase where the currency is no longer trusted, and  the entire economic system is at risk.

CENTCOM Announces 3,500 Marines Arrive in Ready Position


Posted originally on CTH on March 29, 2026 | sundance |

As the ongoing Operation Epic Fury military engagement continues, CENTCOM announces the arrival of 3.500 Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit into forward position.

[SOURCE]

As negotiations with Iranian leadership are reported to be ongoing, it would appear that options are now present for President Trump to make a decision on the potential seizure of Kharg Island, a crucial oil export hub off Iran’s coast.

(Via Wall Street Journal) – The Pentagon is looking at sending up to 10,000 additional ground troops to the Middle East to give President Trump more military options even as he weighs peace talks with Tehran, Department of Defense officials with knowledge of the planning said.

The force, which would likely include infantry and armored vehicles, would be added to the roughly 5,000 Marines and the thousands of paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division who have already been ordered to the region.

It is unclear where precisely forces will go in the Middle East, but they will likely be within striking distance of Iran and Kharg Island, a crucial oil export hub off Iran’s coast.

Trump has repeatedly said he will open the Strait of Hormuz, with or without the help of U.S. allies. (read more)

[SOURCE]

[SOURCE]