Why Did Democrats Become Pro-Illegal Immigration?


Posted originally on Jan 27, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

The Democrats completely flipped the position against illegal immigration mainly because they have to be the opposite of whatever Trump did, regardless of the issue. They hated Trump because he was not a politician, and how dare anyone think they could be elected and upset their cozy thiefdom. If Trump wants to build a wall, they must tear it down. This is what 2032 will be: a reset for the government, which is no longer for the people. It is for them only.

Confidential sources explained that Biden really thought opening the border as he did on day one would be his legacy. He thought he would go down in history as the next FDR and allow the country to be flooded with illegal immigrants regardless of skills or language.

This is why our computer is projecting 2032, and it is also projecting the collapse of the Democratic Party, for it will split like the Federalists, for there are conservative middle-of-the-road Democrats who simply do not agree with the completely opposite position the Party is taking. They MUST resist regardless of the issue.

The press is sealing their fate and the fate of Western Civilization. The Economist, the Guardian, the New York Times, and the Washington Post have opposed every single executive order Trump has issued simply because he issued it. Forget the substance. I do not agree with everything he has done. That does not mean I oppose every order simply because he issued it. This is WHY our governments in the West will fall – there is no other option.

Biden Stammer

Biden’s level of vindictiveness is off the charts. Biden struck a secret deal with the British Prime Minister to sign away the joint UK-US military base on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia, perhaps the most important military base in the Middle East, to create a geopolitical mess for Trump. Starmer and the outgoing Biden administration wanted to get an agreement to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Islands – including Diego Garcia – to Mauritius before President Trump could take his oath. Biden tried to screw our military just to be vindictive to Trump? Starmer was on board, but sources say the British Neocons stopped the secret deal. When history writes the account of Biden, he will go down, I believe, as the most corrupt and vindictive president in American history.

Biden’s Pardons are Unconstitutional


Posted originally on Jan 27, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Pardon Get Our of Jail Free Card

COMMENT: Dear Marty

I read your article about Fauci’s pardon being unconstitutional, but I have something to add.

The basis for pre-emptive pardons being unlawful can be found in ancient English constitutional law, see the Prince of Orange’s 1688 Declaration of Reason that preceded England’s 1688 Bill of Rights. This carries over to USA via the 9th Amendment “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” A pre-emptive pardon also violates due process of law, see 5th & 14th Amendment and can therefore only be done after conviction, see this passage from the Prince of Orange’s (Future King William IIIs) Declaration of Reason.”For though the King may pardon the Punishment that a Transgressor has incurred, and to which he is condemned; as in Cases of Treason or Felony; yet it cannot be, with any Colour of Reason, inferred from thence, that the King can intirely suspend the Execution of those Laws relating to Treason or Felony, unless it is pretended, that he is cloathed with a despotick and arbitrary Power, and that the Lives, Liberties, Honours, and Estates of the Subjects, depend wholly on his goodwill and Pleasure, and are intirely subject to him; which must infallibly follow on the King’s having a Power to suspend the Execution of Laws, and to dispense with them.”
Prince of Orange’s Declaration: 19 December 1688 | British History Online

This leads to Art.1 of the 1688 Bill of Rights:
“That the pretended Power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regall Authority without Consent of Parlyament is illegall.” King/President may pardon after conviction but only Parliament/Congress may suspend the law.”

This has similar meaning as Article II of the US Constitution that requires the President to ensure “that the Laws be faithfully executed”

This all goes back to due process of law, the President cannot interfere with due process through the prerogative of pardon or mercy.

Going back to the old world, citing Sir Edward Coke, The US Supreme Court stated in 1855 that The words, “due process of law” (in the 5th & 14th Amendments), were undoubtedly intended to convey the same meaning as the words, “by the law of the land”, in Art.29 Magna Carta 1297. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/59/272.html

The Scottish 1689 Claim of Rights states the same thing in different language in Art.1, “That all Proclamationes asserting ane absolute power to Cass annull and Dissable lawes… are Contrair to Law”” and it states in the pre-amble, “Wheras King James the Seventh… Did By the advyce of wicked and evill Counsellers (Secretaries of State) Invade the fundamentall Constitution of this Kingdome And altered it from a legall limited monarchy to ane Arbitrary Despotick power and in a publick proclamation asserted ane absolute power to cass annull and dissable all the lawes particularly arraigning the lawes Establishing the protestant religion and did Exerce that power to the subversion of the protestant Religion and to the violation of the lawes and liberties of the Kingdome”

Claim of Right Act 1689
legislation.gov.uk
apple-touch-icon.png

REPLY: Excellent research. The Common Law is supposed to apply in the USA.  I hope Trump’s team reads this. As the outgoing president, Joe Biden gave pardons to five family members literally minutes before Donald Trump was sworn into office. This was not just an abuse of power; it was to confirm the ultimate corruption of the Biden Crime Family. They have pocketed untold amounts of money laundered through Ukraine, and this leaves a stain on his reputation for all of history, even though they were unconstitutional. Assuming Trump criminally charges these people, it would still be decided by a jury of the people – not by Trump.

Biden’s Parting Words


Posted originally on Jan 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Divide & Conquer


Posted originally on Jan 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Why Biden’s Pardons Are Unconstitutional and VOID


Posted originally on Jan 23, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Burdick_v._United_States_236_U.S._79_1915_

QUESTION: YOu said that Biden’s pardons are probably unconstitutional. Please explain this since nobody in the press has taken that position.

Thank you for your insight

LD

ANSWER: The only pardon that has any real validity is that for Hunter. All of these “preemptive” pardons are not valid. The Supreme Court made this issue very clear. Granted, President Ford pardoned President Nixon. That was not really constitutional again as a preemptive pardon. However, nobody pressed the issue because it would have torn the country apart. So they let sleeping dogs lie, as they say. It is by no means precedent for Biden, but this showed that everyone he pardoned is, in fact, guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.

The Supreme Court explained very clearly in Burdick v United States, 236 US 79 (1915) that the acceptance and grant of a pardon is essential to its validity. The person must “accept” the pardon, for the court has no power to force it on him (see also United States v. Wilson, 7 Pet. 150).

Pardon vs Amnesty

The question before the court was whether the President of the United States may exercise the pardoning power before conviction. A witness may refuse to testify on the ground that his testimony may have an incriminating effect and assert the Fifth Amendment. The President can offer a pardon for any offense connected with the matters in regard to which he is asked to testify. However, he can refuse. It cannot be forced upon him.

Nevertheless, here is the issue. The Court made it very clear that there are substantial differences between legislative immunity (Amnesty) and a pardon. They explained that a PARDON carries an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it, whereas legislative immunity (Amnesty) is noncommittal and tantamount to silence of the witness.

There is a distinction between Amnesty and Pardon; the former overlooks the offense and is usually addressed to crimes against the sovereignty of the state and political offenses. That was the objective of Biden’s Pardons. However, a Pardon remits punishment and condones infractions of the peace of the state.

Jam 6th Committeee

Biden’s legal advice was desperate to cover up the crimes of his own family and protect the Democrats who abused their power with the January 6th Commission destroying evidence all part of this lawfare scheme to prevent Trump from ever taking the White House again. Milley to Liz Chaney and Garland to Kinzinger.

The 2020_Coup 2

Available for $10

Pelosi Son in law Jan 6th

The panel was comprised of seven Democrats and two Republicans, who House Speaker Nancy Pelosi appointed. She previously rejected several GOP members who had been originally selected for the panel by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy because they were not anti-Trump. Pelosi was behind the 2020 Coup, and that, with her “investing,” should have landed her in prison for inside trading and treason. Pelosi invoked COVID rules to prevent any challenge to 7 states that were in dispute. How she can even look at herself in the mirror and be proud is unfathomable. You can’t take it with you, honey.

Her son-in-law even proudly posted this picture. He, too was there with the other 1500 JanSixers who are in prison. I guess the DOJ looked the other way on this one, along with the hundreds of FBI people who were there in the crowd.

The recent interrogation of Trump’s nominee for Attorney General by Adam Schiff, demanding she say Trump lost the 2020 election, was part of Schiff’s ongoing cover-up of the 2020 Coup. Any dispute to any state MUST be debated before the full floor. Pelosi imposed her COVID rules, limiting only 53 people from being on the floor at any one time.

1 Dick Cheney

The two pretend impartial Republicans were Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzerger, who came out Republicalsn for Kamala because he is a vile NEOCON who claims we can invade and conquer Russia in 3 days. Cheney and her father, the man who was really acting president to start the Iraq War over lies, endorsed Kamala.  The RINOS Pelosi picked were pro-World War III and against peace and were selected to rig the committee to ensure they found Trump guilty on every count.

Thompson Bennie

The committee chairman, Bernie Thompson, introduced legislation to strip Donald Trump of all Secret Service protection as a Felon, which some view as trying to clear the way for his assassination.

I do not see under Burdick that Biden’s Pardons of this committee were constitutional since a Pardon is for a crime they must confess. His “preemptive” Pardons are NOT constitutional, for they are, at best, Amnesty, which he had no authority to grant.

Deep State

Trump should have the entire January 6th Committee arrested and put on trial and let WE THE PEOPLE judge their guilt or innocence. They are entitled to a trial where they must put on their defense. This is not Game of Thrones, where we can say off with their head. Next! Every single one of these people was out to deny the people any fair election and were selected to protect the corruption that has consumed Washington DC like cancer from within. It is time to clean house and take our country back. This is NOT retribution for Trump, it is a vindication of the Constitution and We The People.

Are Executive Orders Constitutional?


Posted originally on Jan 20, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Biden Executive Orders

QUESTION: You have been critical of an executive order by Biden. What will you say when Trump unleashes his flurry of executive dictated?

GV

ANSWER: The purposes of an executive order should be confined to running the government like any company CEO. Trump should withdraw the security clearance of all 51 people who falsely claimed the Hunter laptop was Russian propaganda. I believe that they are traitors to the country. I would fire each and everyone and strip them of all pensions. That would be a valid executive order, as would firing executive bureaucrats. The president is the CEO of the Executive Branch. He needs Congress’s approval to install judges in the Judicial Branch. When orders are confined to personnel inside the Executive Branch, that is within his Constitutional Power.

What I disagree with are executive orders that circumvent Congress. Biden outlawed gas water heaters. That is a question for Congress – not an executive decision any more than sending in troops or allowing Ukraine to use long-range missiles to target inside Russia. The Constitution gave Congress the power to declare war, not the president.

I will look at what Trump does, and my analysis will be eliminated on those lines. I disagree with FDR’s executive orders to confiscate gold and silver. I think Congress should have decided that.

The major case issued by the Supreme Court striking down a president’s executive order came about in 1952. In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, the court held struck down Executive Order 10340, issued by President Harry Truman, for seizing control of the steel manufacturers because of an anticipated union strike in the nation’s steel mills during the Korean War. The court held that President Truman lacked the constitutional or statutory power to seize private property.

The court focused on the fact that the Executive Order was not authorized by the Constitution or laws of the United States, and thus, it could not sand Pp. 343 U. S. 585-589. Moreover, no statute expressly or impliedly authorized the President to take possession of this property as he did here.

Using this criterion, Biden’s outlawing gas water heaters is arbitrary and absurd. It was unconstitutional, as many of his antics demonstrated that he assumed dictatorial power. Still, the Constitution never authorized such an exercise of power outside the administration of the Executive Branch. He has the Constitutional power to issue a pardon, but not pronounce someone guilty and imprison them without a trial in the Judiciary branch.

Categories:PoliticsRule of Law

Biden Pardons Fauci, Milley, and Whole Jan 6th Committee


Posted originally on Jan 20, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Biden pardon Fauci

To get a pardon, you are supposed to plead guilty and show remorse. I am not sure a preemptive pardon is even legal. Now, what I would do is subpoena these people to testify. They cannot be prosecuted now, so they have NO FIFTH AMENDMENT privilege against self-incrimination. I would then ask them to explain their crime and name everyone else who assisted them who is not pardoned. Let’s expose the whole shit. To accept these pardons CONFIRMS that they are guilty of high crimes against the United States. They may not be sent to prison, but they can now be interrogated like any criminal getting a plea deal.

QUESTION: Mr. Fauci, did you circumvent US law and send your gain-of-function to China to be released? Were you behind creating COVID-19? Do masks and lockdowns work?

QUESTION: General Milley, So you deliberately created the false accusations that Russia interfered in the US election, were you trying to create World War III with Russia?

Oh, the party can now begin.

How about the Small Business Association brings a class action lawsuit against Fauci for all the businesses he destroyed with his lockdowns? He has to testify now, and there better not be any lies in his testimony. Explain any conspiracy he was in with Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Health Organization, and Klaus Schwab. We can now get to the truth at last!!!!!!

They can be Prosecuted for Perjury post-these pardons.

Biden Medal of Honor for Soros

Biden just opened the door really wide. Otherwise, you would have had to prove Fauci was guilty; now he is Pardoned, so he is guilty of a crime to accept a pardon. Fantastic!!!! Thank you, Biden, for your final act of corruption. It may help to bring down the corruption more than anything else. Most billionaires are Democrats to pretend they care, but only the honest billionaires who support Trump based on common sense rather than WOKE are oligarchs. Ask Fauci if he was collaborating with George Soros or his son Alex?

The Biden Administration will go down in History as the MOST corrupt in American History!

Crime Family – Joe Biden Pardons His Brothers, James and Frank, along with his sister Valerie, and their spouses.


Posted originally on the CTH on January 20, 2025 | Sundance 

Literally minutes before he leaves office, Joe Biden just issued blanket pardons for his closest family.  Having previously pardoned Hunter Biden, the departing executive just pardoned his brothers, James and Frank, along with his sister Valerie, and their spouses.

The Biden family crime syndicate, those who engaged in the benefit of Joe Biden selling the influence of his office for financial gain, are attempting to preemptively pardon themselves from any investigation or prosecution of their criminal conduct.

White House – […] That is why I am exercising my power under the Constitution to pardon James B. Biden, Sara Jones Biden, Valerie Biden Owens, John T. Owens, and Francis W. Biden. The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that they engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense. (read more)

Recent legal debate has surrounded the issue of a prosecutor who may bring an indictment against a person after they have been issued a pardon. The state may present evidence of the crime. The defendant may (or may elect not to) present exculpatory evidence or a defense and also plead the pardon.

The court might (or might not) proceed to render a verdict or judgment. If convicted, the defendant may (or may not) invoke the pardon, which prevents any criminal sentence from being issued. (i.e., the defendant may prefer obtaining a verdict of “not guilty” to a pardon.)

The defendant may be called as a witness (in another forum; and interestingly but unclear, in the subject prosecution). Following a pardon, the defendant likely cannot invoke the 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, which is significant.

In the initial criminal court, it’s likely the defendant may be called as a witness, and then invoke the 5th Amendment at such trial, because the pardon has not been activated post-indictment. But this is an issue that would be contested; a lot of tactical decisions involved. I suspect that the evidence introduced at such trial (once re-authenticated) may be used in a civil trial and/or an impeachment of the defendant (despite the criminal pardon).

[SOURCE]

Confirmation Mania: Day 4 + AMA | Comer | 1.17.2025


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Jan 18, 2024 at 8:00 pm EST

How Did the Biden Family Get So Rich? Rep. James Comer Exposes the Treasonous Truth


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Jan 18, 2024 at 8:00 pm EST