Are Biden’s Executive Orders Valid When Signed by a Machine?


Posted originally on Mar 9, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Biden Signing Executive Orders

The Oversight Project has examined all the executive orders signed supposedly by Joe Biden. It turns out most were all autopen—a machine. This raises serious questions about whether they were legal in the first place, for we do not know if someone else was writing these executive orders and feeding them into the machine to be signed. Is an Executive Order valid if the President did not actually sign the decree?

Biden Signing Executive Orders X

The Oversight Project shared what it had found regarding Biden’s use of an autopen. This raises concern that when his mental capacity was in question, these executive orders were issued by someone else and signed by the machine. To be legal in a commerce sense, that person needs express consent of the contracted party to sign on their behalf.

As we have moved from paper to digital formats in business records and contracts, federal lawmakers passed the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (E-SIGN) Act in 2000. The E-SIGN Act reinforces the legality of digital signatures in business contracts. The law means electronic contracts and signatures are legal as long as the consumer consents. E-SIGN also allows individuals to choose a paper format instead.

Akkadian_Cylinder_Seals_Ancient_Signatures

The Hammurabi Legal Code required clear contract law around 1650 BC. We have Akkadian cylinder signature seals that emerged during the fourth millennium BC, coinciding with the dawn of writing. One would sign a contract with such a seal.

Roman Signature Ring

The Romans used signature rings to validate contracts and agreements. So, the idea of an autopen is not unknown in history. However, these signature seals or rings did not allow someone e else to authorize such a contract.

When a law is issued that could carry criminal penalties for violating it, this raises a fascinating legal question if it is an autopen rather than a bonafide signature. Can the president delegate his authority to someone else to issue a law? I would have to say NO WAY!

Democrat Approval Rating At An All Time Low: Why Trump 2.0 is Winning Over the Country


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Feb 25, 2025 at 3:00 pm EST

Dave Brat Details The Collapse Of American Manufacturing And The Job Crisis


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Feb18, 2025, at 7:00 pm EST

“You Don’t Want A Hijacking Or Riot At 40k Feet.” Bensman On The Need For Migrants To Be Shackled Following Plane


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Feb18, 2025, at 3:00 pm EST

INSURMOUNTABLE EVIL: Mike McCormick Details How Obama’s Deep State Defiled The Catholic Church


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Feb17, 2025, at 9:00 pm EST

WEAPONIZATION: Phillip Patrick On How Biden Created A 5-Fold Increase In Central Bank Gold Buying


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Feb15, 2025, at 2:00 pm EST

Pelosi on the hard feelings the Biden’s have for her


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Feb 8, 2025 at 12:00 am EST

Egg Prices in 2025


originally on Posted Feb 4, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Chicken of Egg

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to an inquiry on rising egg prices by blaming the prior administration. Leavitt was correct when she stated that the Department of Agriculture was directed to kill over 100 million chickens, leading to a mass shortage. Prices steadily rose throughout Biden’s term, as an average dozen cost only $1.60 in February 2021.

Egg prices increased by 20% to $1.93 during Biden’s first year in office. We saw the avian flu outbreak in 2022, which along with other factors brought egg prices up another 30% on a yearly basis to $2.51. Egg prices continue to rise in 2023, reaching around $3.50 per dozen during February but slightly decreasing by year-end of $2.50. We saw egg prices surge significantly by 60% from 2023 to 2024. The Agriculture Department believes that egg prices will rise by another 20.3% in 2025.

As reported by the USDA:

“Retail egg prices increased by 8.4 percent in December 2024 and continue to experience volatile month-to-month changes. An outbreak of HPAI that began in 2022, with recent detections in January 2025, contributed to elevated egg prices by reducing the U.S. egg-layer flock. HPAI continued to drive egg price increases in 2024. Egg prices in December 2024 were 36.8 percent higher than in December 2023 but still below peak prices in January 2023. Egg prices are predicted to increase 20.3 percent in 2025, with a prediction interval of 0.1 to 45.3 percent.”

The bird flu is certainly a main factor here. The USDA stated that 108 million chickens have died since 2022, but an additional 13 million have died in recent MONTHS. The Animal Health Protection Act permits the USDA the authority to kill off infected herds and flocks. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claim that chickens have at best a 10% survival rate after contracting the bird flu.

Culling has been a standard practice that cannot be avoided if we are to believe the flocks were indeed infected. Alarmingly, bird flu has been detected among cattle and depopulation efforts are underway, which will raise the prices of milk and beef. The USDA believes milk prices, which are already up 11.7% on the yearly, will rise by an additional 1.3% in 2025. Beef prices, up 4.9% annually, are expected to rise by 1.5%. Food prices have been on the rise for years, and I have long warned to stockpile food in case of supply shortages.

Our models do not indicate that food inflation will ease in 2025. In fact, I have repeatedly warned that people may want to stockpile food for the next two years as there will be weather events and supply chain shortages. Our model warns that we may see another severe drought, probably between 2025 to 2027, in both the US and Canada. The drought conditions are already beginning, which is in line with our model, which warns it will expand into 2025-2027.

Illegals Riot Over Deportations ReeEEeE Stream 02-02-25


Posted originally on Rumble By The Salty Cracker on: Feb 2, 2025 at 7:32 pm EST

Big Pharma Lobbying


Posted originally on Feb 3, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Lobbying.Votes_

Medical insurance and pharmaceutical companies are predatory. The number one cause of bankruptcy in the United States is health care. This is a growing concern as our population ages. Unfortunately, we have all lost someone to cancer. A troubling but important statistic from the American Journal of Medicine explains that 42% of cancer patients will lose their entire life savings within the first two years of treatment.

The total cost of cancer care in America reached an estimated $183 billion in 2015. Ten years later, that figure is set to rise by 21% to $222 billion. Different cancers require different treatments. The US currently allows Big Pharma and insurance companies to charge and cover what they see fit. CAR T-cell therapy, for example, treats lymphoblastic leukemia but can cost up to $475,000 per patient. Kimmtrak treatment for melanoma could cost $975,520. T-cell lymphoma patients could pay $842,585 for Folotyn treatments. The costs are simply astronomical, as are the profits for Big Pharma.

Turning back to the study by the American Journal of Medicine, around 85% of cancer patients will be forced to leave the workforce at no fault of their own. Within the first two years, 42.4% of patients empty their entire life savings on treatments, with the average net worth declining by $92,098. By year four, 38.2% deplete all their assets and are forced to pay $51,882 on average.

I am not advocating for universal health care where the quality of care drastically declines. I am advocating for measures on the pharmaceutical and insurance companies that have free reign over the lives of millions. Few politicians on the right or left speak out against this mass injustice because these same organizations line their pockets.

The Inflation Reduction Act allowed Medicare to negotiate the price of certain drugs based on what Big Pharma sees as a “maximum fair price.” Part D drugs will be subjected to this law in 2026. Donald Trump, in his first term, demanded transparency from hospitals and required them to list the prices of procedures, but that has not been adopted on a large scale basis.

New Norm Bribery Big Pharma Politicians

Look at the most recent election. Eli Lilly under the Lilly PAC donated over $180,000 to politicians running for the House and Senate on the right and left. Then individual CEOs donated the maximum individual contribution permitted by law. CEO David Ricks paid off Republican Congressman Brett Guthrie from Kentucky and donated to two PACs, including the Carolina Victory Fund, which donates solely to Democratic candidates.

Johnson and Johnson has the J&J PAC that paid out $500,000 from 2023 to 2024 to both Republicans and Democrats. AbbVie has its own super PAC as well, and CEO Robert Michael pays into the PAC monthly. Merck & Co. has the Merck PAC and paid out over $300,000 to members of the House and Senate. CEO Robert Davis shelled out the maximum personal contribution to candidates on both sides. Amgen has the Amgen PAC and a CEO who also donates to candidates but favors Republicans. Pfizer, of course, has become a Democratic-leaning organization. The Pfizer PAC donated 63% of funding to Democrats compared to 37% to Democrats.

America permits pharmaceutical super PACs from outside the US to influence our politicians. Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, and AstraZeneca all donated to candidates during the 2024 election period. Yet, everyone was concerned about foreign interference.

Two wings on the same bird, Washington is filled with corrupt individuals who serve their own private interests. These companies could charge a fair amount for procedures and still make a profit. There is absolutely no reason for people in the richest nation in the world to face bankruptcy when they fall ill. Who will be brave enough to tackle Big Pharma and the insurance companies? Or should I say, who cannot be bought?