Democrats’ Favorability Plunges to New Low


Posted originally on Feb 3, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Democrat Donkey scaled

A new Quinnipiac poll revealed that the Democrats have completely fallen out of favor with the American people. Only 31% of voters see the party in a favorable light. The people look at the past administrations of Jefferson, Jackson, Kennedy, Clinton, Obama and Biden with a 57% unfavorable rating – a historic low.

Once they seized power under Biden in 2020, they reached at best 51% compared to Clinton, who had captured 58%. Biden attempted to implement new societal norms with woke ideology that completely backfired. The economy will always sway elections and favorability. Build Back Better and Bidenomics failed. The average American does not feel represented or seen by the Democratic Party. Not a single person can honestly say that they were better off under Biden.

Democratic Split

Yet, they cling to Marxism in hopes of reliving the glory days of Franklin D. Roosevelt. That was the only time that Americans welcomed socialistic messaging but the timing was on point and it also coincided with the state of the American economy. The Party of Jefferson split into the Democrats vs. Republicans (South vs. North) over slavery. The Democratic Party of today will soon be a relic of the past.

Even those on the far left like Bernie Sanders have admitted that their party is crumbling. “The business model, if you like, of the Democratic Party for the last 15 years or so has been a failure. People sometimes don’t see that because there was a charismatic individual named Barack Obama,” he once said. Moreover, he declared that Kamala LOST because the Democrats ABANDONED the public:

“It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them. While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.”

Bernie_Sanders_slams_Democrats_for_abandoning_working_class

Bernie has always been clear on his stance. Does anyone know what the overall Democratic Party stands for? We have the center liberals who condone the war in Gaza and Ukraine. Then we have those who support Ukraine but want to abandon Israel. This is no longer the party of peace who opposes war. Then we have the Democrats like Nancy Pelosi who are overtly profiting on their position in the public sector through lobbying and insider trading. Even AOC has come out and said that this overt corruption must end. The people see this as a massive slap in the face amid the cost of living crisis.

Younger Democrats under 35 are far more likely to sympathize with Palestine, as a Quinnipiac University poll from last February found that 69% disapprove of how Biden handled the war, but older Democrats (77%) did approve.

Kamala attempted to use abortion to sway undecided and one issue voters. A June 2024 Cygnal survey found that Americans are understandably more concerned with other issues plaguing the nation. No one is concerned with abortions when they cannot afford shelter or food. Illegal immigration was stated as the second highest priority for voters, with 19.7% of voters voicing concerns after inflation (27.9%). Immigration has become another issue that the Democrats are divided over. Countless sanctuary cities have realized that their budgets cannot handle these newcomers. Their voters are disgruntled and many Democrats now agree that that there must be some order at the border. But on the other side, we have the likes of California’s Gavin Newsom who said he will fight ICE at every step.

Everyone forgets that Donald Trump was once a Democrat. Countless members of his cabinet from Tulsi Gabbard to RFK Jr were also once Democrats. The party has spiraled into a disorganized mess that lacks any core values or strong platforms. They are divided and will break apart as voters continue to flee and the centrists and socialists collide.

Head of Russian Duma Accuses Biden of Attempting to Assassinate President Trump, Putin, and Others


Published originally on Rumble By The Gateway Pundit on Jan 29, 2024 at 6:00 pm EST

Why Did Democrats Become Pro-Illegal Immigration?


Posted originally on Jan 27, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

The Democrats completely flipped the position against illegal immigration mainly because they have to be the opposite of whatever Trump did, regardless of the issue. They hated Trump because he was not a politician, and how dare anyone think they could be elected and upset their cozy thiefdom. If Trump wants to build a wall, they must tear it down. This is what 2032 will be: a reset for the government, which is no longer for the people. It is for them only.

Confidential sources explained that Biden really thought opening the border as he did on day one would be his legacy. He thought he would go down in history as the next FDR and allow the country to be flooded with illegal immigrants regardless of skills or language.

This is why our computer is projecting 2032, and it is also projecting the collapse of the Democratic Party, for it will split like the Federalists, for there are conservative middle-of-the-road Democrats who simply do not agree with the completely opposite position the Party is taking. They MUST resist regardless of the issue.

The press is sealing their fate and the fate of Western Civilization. The Economist, the Guardian, the New York Times, and the Washington Post have opposed every single executive order Trump has issued simply because he issued it. Forget the substance. I do not agree with everything he has done. That does not mean I oppose every order simply because he issued it. This is WHY our governments in the West will fall – there is no other option.

Biden Stammer

Biden’s level of vindictiveness is off the charts. Biden struck a secret deal with the British Prime Minister to sign away the joint UK-US military base on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia, perhaps the most important military base in the Middle East, to create a geopolitical mess for Trump. Starmer and the outgoing Biden administration wanted to get an agreement to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Islands – including Diego Garcia – to Mauritius before President Trump could take his oath. Biden tried to screw our military just to be vindictive to Trump? Starmer was on board, but sources say the British Neocons stopped the secret deal. When history writes the account of Biden, he will go down, I believe, as the most corrupt and vindictive president in American history.

Biden’s Pardons are Unconstitutional


Posted originally on Jan 27, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Pardon Get Our of Jail Free Card

COMMENT: Dear Marty

I read your article about Fauci’s pardon being unconstitutional, but I have something to add.

The basis for pre-emptive pardons being unlawful can be found in ancient English constitutional law, see the Prince of Orange’s 1688 Declaration of Reason that preceded England’s 1688 Bill of Rights. This carries over to USA via the 9th Amendment “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” A pre-emptive pardon also violates due process of law, see 5th & 14th Amendment and can therefore only be done after conviction, see this passage from the Prince of Orange’s (Future King William IIIs) Declaration of Reason.”For though the King may pardon the Punishment that a Transgressor has incurred, and to which he is condemned; as in Cases of Treason or Felony; yet it cannot be, with any Colour of Reason, inferred from thence, that the King can intirely suspend the Execution of those Laws relating to Treason or Felony, unless it is pretended, that he is cloathed with a despotick and arbitrary Power, and that the Lives, Liberties, Honours, and Estates of the Subjects, depend wholly on his goodwill and Pleasure, and are intirely subject to him; which must infallibly follow on the King’s having a Power to suspend the Execution of Laws, and to dispense with them.”
Prince of Orange’s Declaration: 19 December 1688 | British History Online

This leads to Art.1 of the 1688 Bill of Rights:
“That the pretended Power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regall Authority without Consent of Parlyament is illegall.” King/President may pardon after conviction but only Parliament/Congress may suspend the law.”

This has similar meaning as Article II of the US Constitution that requires the President to ensure “that the Laws be faithfully executed”

This all goes back to due process of law, the President cannot interfere with due process through the prerogative of pardon or mercy.

Going back to the old world, citing Sir Edward Coke, The US Supreme Court stated in 1855 that The words, “due process of law” (in the 5th & 14th Amendments), were undoubtedly intended to convey the same meaning as the words, “by the law of the land”, in Art.29 Magna Carta 1297. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/59/272.html

The Scottish 1689 Claim of Rights states the same thing in different language in Art.1, “That all Proclamationes asserting ane absolute power to Cass annull and Dissable lawes… are Contrair to Law”” and it states in the pre-amble, “Wheras King James the Seventh… Did By the advyce of wicked and evill Counsellers (Secretaries of State) Invade the fundamentall Constitution of this Kingdome And altered it from a legall limited monarchy to ane Arbitrary Despotick power and in a publick proclamation asserted ane absolute power to cass annull and dissable all the lawes particularly arraigning the lawes Establishing the protestant religion and did Exerce that power to the subversion of the protestant Religion and to the violation of the lawes and liberties of the Kingdome”

Claim of Right Act 1689
legislation.gov.uk
apple-touch-icon.png

REPLY: Excellent research. The Common Law is supposed to apply in the USA.  I hope Trump’s team reads this. As the outgoing president, Joe Biden gave pardons to five family members literally minutes before Donald Trump was sworn into office. This was not just an abuse of power; it was to confirm the ultimate corruption of the Biden Crime Family. They have pocketed untold amounts of money laundered through Ukraine, and this leaves a stain on his reputation for all of history, even though they were unconstitutional. Assuming Trump criminally charges these people, it would still be decided by a jury of the people – not by Trump.

Biden’s Parting Words


Posted originally on Jan 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Divide & Conquer


Posted originally on Jan 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Why Biden’s Pardons Are Unconstitutional and VOID


Posted originally on Jan 23, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Burdick_v._United_States_236_U.S._79_1915_

QUESTION: YOu said that Biden’s pardons are probably unconstitutional. Please explain this since nobody in the press has taken that position.

Thank you for your insight

LD

ANSWER: The only pardon that has any real validity is that for Hunter. All of these “preemptive” pardons are not valid. The Supreme Court made this issue very clear. Granted, President Ford pardoned President Nixon. That was not really constitutional again as a preemptive pardon. However, nobody pressed the issue because it would have torn the country apart. So they let sleeping dogs lie, as they say. It is by no means precedent for Biden, but this showed that everyone he pardoned is, in fact, guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.

The Supreme Court explained very clearly in Burdick v United States, 236 US 79 (1915) that the acceptance and grant of a pardon is essential to its validity. The person must “accept” the pardon, for the court has no power to force it on him (see also United States v. Wilson, 7 Pet. 150).

Pardon vs Amnesty

The question before the court was whether the President of the United States may exercise the pardoning power before conviction. A witness may refuse to testify on the ground that his testimony may have an incriminating effect and assert the Fifth Amendment. The President can offer a pardon for any offense connected with the matters in regard to which he is asked to testify. However, he can refuse. It cannot be forced upon him.

Nevertheless, here is the issue. The Court made it very clear that there are substantial differences between legislative immunity (Amnesty) and a pardon. They explained that a PARDON carries an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it, whereas legislative immunity (Amnesty) is noncommittal and tantamount to silence of the witness.

There is a distinction between Amnesty and Pardon; the former overlooks the offense and is usually addressed to crimes against the sovereignty of the state and political offenses. That was the objective of Biden’s Pardons. However, a Pardon remits punishment and condones infractions of the peace of the state.

Jam 6th Committeee

Biden’s legal advice was desperate to cover up the crimes of his own family and protect the Democrats who abused their power with the January 6th Commission destroying evidence all part of this lawfare scheme to prevent Trump from ever taking the White House again. Milley to Liz Chaney and Garland to Kinzinger.

The 2020_Coup 2

Available for $10

Pelosi Son in law Jan 6th

The panel was comprised of seven Democrats and two Republicans, who House Speaker Nancy Pelosi appointed. She previously rejected several GOP members who had been originally selected for the panel by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy because they were not anti-Trump. Pelosi was behind the 2020 Coup, and that, with her “investing,” should have landed her in prison for inside trading and treason. Pelosi invoked COVID rules to prevent any challenge to 7 states that were in dispute. How she can even look at herself in the mirror and be proud is unfathomable. You can’t take it with you, honey.

Her son-in-law even proudly posted this picture. He, too was there with the other 1500 JanSixers who are in prison. I guess the DOJ looked the other way on this one, along with the hundreds of FBI people who were there in the crowd.

The recent interrogation of Trump’s nominee for Attorney General by Adam Schiff, demanding she say Trump lost the 2020 election, was part of Schiff’s ongoing cover-up of the 2020 Coup. Any dispute to any state MUST be debated before the full floor. Pelosi imposed her COVID rules, limiting only 53 people from being on the floor at any one time.

1 Dick Cheney

The two pretend impartial Republicans were Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzerger, who came out Republicalsn for Kamala because he is a vile NEOCON who claims we can invade and conquer Russia in 3 days. Cheney and her father, the man who was really acting president to start the Iraq War over lies, endorsed Kamala.  The RINOS Pelosi picked were pro-World War III and against peace and were selected to rig the committee to ensure they found Trump guilty on every count.

Thompson Bennie

The committee chairman, Bernie Thompson, introduced legislation to strip Donald Trump of all Secret Service protection as a Felon, which some view as trying to clear the way for his assassination.

I do not see under Burdick that Biden’s Pardons of this committee were constitutional since a Pardon is for a crime they must confess. His “preemptive” Pardons are NOT constitutional, for they are, at best, Amnesty, which he had no authority to grant.

Deep State

Trump should have the entire January 6th Committee arrested and put on trial and let WE THE PEOPLE judge their guilt or innocence. They are entitled to a trial where they must put on their defense. This is not Game of Thrones, where we can say off with their head. Next! Every single one of these people was out to deny the people any fair election and were selected to protect the corruption that has consumed Washington DC like cancer from within. It is time to clean house and take our country back. This is NOT retribution for Trump, it is a vindication of the Constitution and We The People.