Posted originally on Jul 24, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
FBI Director Wray has made it clear, and now we know why the snipers could not soot the assassin before he shot Trump. It is so obvious; why did we not understand this? The sniper was aiming at an area that is outside the Security Zone, but he was not allowed to fire until the shooter fired. Obviously, Tom Crooks might have just been duck hunting on the roof.
What if they had killed an innocent duck hunter? He may have paid the $25 for the permit. A possible innocent duck hunter. OMG. It all makes sense now, just like the cartoon about police protection in New York City. How stupid are we all? Obviously, he could have just been using the scope to look at Trump from a distance.
Now, the Secret Service has admitted they can’t protect anyone. They want Trump to cancel all rallies that are outside. Amazing.
Nixon declined Secret Service Protection after Telling the CIA Director – “I know who killed JFK.”
Hm. Interesting Indeed.
Centinel2012 
That cartoon you used would be very funny if it wasn’t true. I just recently had an incident with our ex-roommate where I went to the police asking for protection form him. He has a lot of guns, and was under a 72-hour M1 watch and was in a psych ward for a week. We were evicting him anyway, but I went to the police (because of other reasons initially) when I found out he was being released and told them the situation. Basically they told me there was nothing they could do. They shrugged their shoulders and more or less told me there was nothing they could do until he shot me. I came home and immediately changed all the locks to the house at $1400. I took the matter into my own hands. Fortunately, everything worked out OK, but what if it hadn’t?
LikeLiked by 1 person
My solution is very simple shot hom him and then hid the bdy wher it can;t be found … lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tempting. I evicted him instead. 🙂
LikeLike