Posted originally on Jun 18, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

The firestorm that has erupted since Tulsi Gabbard testified on March 25, 2025, that WikiLeaks had released on X June 14th, 2025, that the Supreme Leader of Iran had suspended the nuclear bomb development back in 2003, and that it was the Intelligence Community that made that assessment. Gabbard’s March 25 testimony before the US Senate Intelligence Committee stating plainly: “The intelligence community continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon,” has exposed with a Neocon plot for another weapon of mass destruction, or the Intelligence Committee intentionally falsified information they handed to Tulsi to discredit her in hopes Trump would get rid of her.

Gabbard’s remarks, now resurfacing as Israel intensifies its offensive, have some casting doubts over the legitimacy of the IAEA’s findings and the geopolitical motivations behind the strikes. A report by Al-Jazeera suggested that the timing of the attack, amid ongoing US-Iran nuclear negotiations, may indicate a strategic effort by Washington and Tel Aviv to mislead Tehran, expecting ongoing negotiations to enable Israel’s surprise attack.

Keep in mind that the Neocons also control the “IC” that Tulsi is informing Congress about their assessment. Tulsi did not pull this out of thin air. This is starting to smell more like a plot to get rid of Tulsi, whom they hate. If what she told Congress were true, then why does the Supreme Leader not say he had suspended the development in 2003 and offer UN inspectors to verify? Something does not smell right here.