EPA Says That Winter 2014 Wasn’t Cold In The US


Hey I don’t understand — Why can’t you have it both ways?

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

The propagandists running the US government are really pushing their luck with this one. The EPA claims that the past winter wasn’t cold in the US.

ScreenHunter_959 Jul. 12 09.42

High and Low Temperatures | Climate Change | US EPA

The Commerce Department says that contraction of the economy was due to the unusually cold winter, which the EPA says didn’t occur.

The U.S. economy contracted much more than previously thought during the first quarter of this year, revised estimates show. Rather than the 1 percent growth the Commerce Department reported last month, gross domestic product fell by 2.9 percent, the worst performance in five years. That brings total growth down by 3 percent since the government first reported its estimates in April. ….  the economy’s woes have been largely blamed on an unusually cold winter

U.S. Economy Contracted Almost 3 Percent in First Quarter – NBC News.com

Nobel Peace Prize winner President Obama has destroyed all credibility…

View original post 7 more words

Very Slow Melt Season In The Arctic Basin


WOW, maybe the hated ‘flat-earthers’ are right and the “progressive’ believers are wrong … lol

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Temperatures in the Arctic Basin have been cold again this summer, and there is little melting occurring. The map below shows ice loss from July 10 to July 11 in red.

There are only a few weeks left to the melt season, which is shaping up to be a complete disaster for people who make their living promoting fear about the Arctic.

ScreenHunter_954 Jul. 12 08.13

View original post

Wind Power Barely Registers In June


This is the core problem with Wind and also Solar; as any competent engineer will tell you that it is basically impossible to go much above the 10% level of Wind or Solar for Grid level power. Using very optimistic values of 30% up time means you need three times the generating capacity if you even hope to get to a output equivalency of other forms. Hot backup is also required so the entire system makes no sense at any level.

Big Green’s Lethal Agenda


The limits that the “believers” want to put on Carbon Dioxide will, if enacted as they envision, could bring down western civilization and usher in a new Dark age. Wind and Solar are just not capable of ever replacing Carbon! There is more than enough for the present which gives us time to come up with a real replacement not dreams like believing in fairies and unconscious.

PA Pundits - International's avatarPA Pundits International

Sustainability and climate claims limit energy access and living standards for the world’s poor

Driessenprofile2By Paul Driessen ~

snowgore300The outstanding presentations at this Ninth International Conference on Climate Change clearly demonstrate that activist climate science is increasingly devoid of evidence … increasingly removed from the scientific method – and yet is increasingly being used to devise, justify and impose policies, laws, and regulations that govern our lives.

Indeed, rules formulated on the basis of “dangerous manmade climate change” allegations control the hydrocarbons that power America and the world, improve and safeguard our lives, lift billions out of abject poverty, and allow us to achieve technologies and dreams never before thought possible.

Put simply, those who control carbon control our lives … our livelihoods, liberties, living standards, and even life spans. It is therefore essential that climate science reflects the utmost in integrity, transparency, and accountability.

Sadly, the opposite is true

View original post 1,777 more words

Increases in CO2, witch is the main plant food, is good for Biodiversity and Crop Yields


By my calculations CO2 accounts for at most 50% of the climate changes over the past century. The rest is a result of natural process that move the planets temperature up and down over a thousand some year cycle. We are current near the peak of the current cycle which bottomed out around 1650. Those of us that do not believe that CO2 is a pollutant do not believe that it has no effect on the Climate, for it does, its just not as much as the IPCC and their minions think!

Re-Post from Breitbart by Robert Wilde 10 Jul 2014

According to The Economist, The Heartland Institute is “the world’s most prominent think tank promoting skepticism about man-made climate change.” On Wednesday, several scientists gathered at the institute’s 9th International Conference on Climate change to address a variety of issues including the biological effects of increased CO2 on the planet due to human activity.

Dr. Craig Idso, the founder, former president, and current chairman of the board of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, provided a plethora of information on exactly how CO2 affects the environment. Global warming alarmists should be comforted that they have a lot more to be happy about and should not be fretting that global catastrophe is knocking at the door.

Idso pointed out that there is a huge body of literature on the biological impacts of rising temperatures and atmospheric CO2 levels that the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) ignores. He emphatically stated that atmospheric CO2 is not a pollutant. In fact, increased levels of CO2 reduce the negative effects of a number of plant stresses including: high salinity, low light, high and low temperatures, insufficient water, air pollution, and protects against herbivores i.e. being eaten by animals and insects.

Notably, Dr. Idso emphasized that the increased CO2 levels allow plants to produce the same amount of crop yield with less water. Moreover, plants are able to grow in dry areas where it had been previously too dry to exist. A collateral benefit to this is that the increased vegetation reduces the effects of soil erosion.

Perhaps Idso’s final conclusion should make all those who fear that global warming and increased CO2 is adding to the demise of the planet that everything is going to be OK: he claimed it is far more likely that CO2 proliferation will increase regional biodiversity and will contribute to the expansion and proliferation of animal habitats.

100% Of US Warming Over The Last 20 Years Is Due To Adjustments


Not to worry NASA would never lie — so I’m sure Bush did it! … lol

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Measured US temperatures show no warming over the past 20 years, while the temperatures published by NCDC show 3.4F/century warming during that period.

ScreenHunter_928 Jul. 10 08.48

The graph below shows the difference between the average final USHCN station temperature, and the average raw USHCN station temperature. All reported warming in the US since 1994 is due to highly subjective adjustments by government scientists who personally benefit from global warming alarmism.

ScreenHunter_927 Jul. 10 08.41

View original post

Words Fail Me!!


Hey what’s the problem that payback is better then most …lol

Curbing CO2 is futile, according to study


We know for a fact the the dangerous limit that was set of 2 C or 2,000 Gt of carbon, if I remember it correctly, was a pull it out of your butt number according to the climategate leaked emails from Mann. So why should we believe any of this dribble!

EPA misleads on benefits


Without seeing the details and the assumptions the EPA uses I would be reasonable to state that it falls in the same category as ‘homogenized’ temperature date from NASA!

Bob Greene's avatarJunkScience.com

The EPA’s benefits on the proposed power plant GHG reduction rule are misleading.

View original post 109 more words

Another Reason To Not Use Raw Data


Obviously the score keepers should be using the NASA homogenization program … lol

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

View original post