Antarctic Sea Ice Area Above Normal For 990 Consecutive Days


Well after this many days either the models or the satellites are wrong! So lets see observations or unproven theories s which could be wrong?

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

With Antarctic ice growing at record rates for the past 35 years, climate experts tell us that Antarctica is melting down. Sea ice extent has been above normal every day for the past 990 days and is growing at a rate of two Manhattans per day.

ScreenHunter_1888 Aug. 12 06.50ScreenHunter_1889 Aug. 12 06.56

arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.south.anom.1979-2008

View original post

What Part Of This Isn’t Clear?


Just like the Russian Matryoshka Doll’s except it cyber so there is no end to the ability to hide!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

NASA has altered their own data to hide the decline globally. The animation below shows changes to published NASA global temperature data from 1981 to the present.

NASAGlobalChanges1981-2001-2014

NASA has altered their own data to hide the decline in the US. The animation below shows changes to published NASA US temperature data since 1999.

NASA is hiding the decline the Arctic. The animation below shows recent changes to NASA published Iceland temperatures

View original post 128 more words

SNAP: ‘Data says global cooling, physical model says it has to be warming’


The bottom line is that they have no clue as to what or why is going on with the “climate”!

The Basic Physics of Global Temperature


Good summary of what is actually going on!

A Challenge for Bryan – The Solution

scienceofdoom's avatarThe Science of Doom

In A Challenge for Bryan I put up a simple heat transfer problem and asked for the equations. Bryan elected not to provide these equations. So I provide the answer, but also attempt some enlightenment for people who don’t think the answer can be correct.

As DeWitt Payne noted, a post with a similar problem posted on Wattsupwiththat managed to gather some (unintentionally) hilarious comments.

Here’s the problem again:

Case 1

Spherical body, A, of radius ra, with an emissivity, εa =1. The sphere is in the vacuum of space.

It is internally heated by a mystery power source (let’s say nuclear, but it doesn’t matter), with power input = P.

The sphere radiates into deep space, let’s say the temperature of deep space = 0K to make the maths simpler.

1. What is the equation for the equilibrium surface temperature of the sphere, Ta?

Case 2

The condition of case A…

View original post 1,915 more words

Bill Nye @TheScienceGuy and Al Gore, ‘not even wrong’ on CO2 ‘Climate 101’ experiment according to paper published in AIP Journal


Good Analysis

The debate about climate change takes a new form. One familiar yet disturbing.


Good points here!

Larry Kummer, Editor's avatarFabius Maximus website

Summary: The public debate about climate change has evolved, reverting to the standard form of American Politics. Fearmongering, relying on exaggerated and one-side evidence. No only does this chaff further confused the policy debate about this vital issue, it raises another question. We should worry why both Left and Right believe we are most easily influenced by appeals to fear. Perhaps they’re right. As AA tells us, recognition of a problem is the first step to solving it. Perhaps America’s greatest problem is this weakness of its citizens.

Civilization grows more and more maudlin and hysterical; especially under democracy it tends to degenerate into a mere combat of crazes; the whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary.

— H L Mencken, In Defense of Women

View original post 1,857 more words

Understanding How To Think Like A Professional Data Tamperer And Propagandist


This is all very real and I agree 100% with the preposition that there is massive data tampering.

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

ScreenHunter_1845 Aug. 10 07.19 In 1999, Hansen was concerned that the very high quality US temperature record showed 70 years of cooling, while his very low quality, cherry-picked, massively extrapolated global temperature record showed strong warming.

Science Briefs
Whither U.S. Climate?
By James Hansen … August 1999

Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath.

How can the absence of clear climate change in the United States be reconciled with continued reports of record global temperature?

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing…

View original post 56 more words

NASA Has Nearly Doubled Post-1940 Global Warming – Through Post-2001 Data Tampering


NASA and NOAA are very good at manipulating data to get the results they want! Back in the early 70’s when I was an engineer at GE I was using their system to do statistical work include multiple regression and while doing that work I found how easy it was to make the results what you wanted then to be; I’m not saying I did that but only that how you pick starting point and use or don’t use (out riders) for example can make all the difference in a plot.

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

My focus is normally on data tampering to the US temperature record, but our friends at NOAA and NASA have been equally busy tampering with the global temperature record. They did a huge amount of damage to global temperatures prior to 2001, but the graph below just shows the post-2001 tampering.

GISFigAChanges2001-2014 

Note that in the 2001 version, there was a little over 0.3C warming from 1940 to 2000, and now there is almost 0.6 warming during that same time period.

2001 version : wayback.archive.org/……./FigA.txt
2014 version : data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A.txt

They accomplished this spectacular feat of data corruption, through an impressive hockey stick of cooling the past and warming the present.

ScreenHunter_1866 Aug. 10 16.55

View original post

Government Scientists Explain Sea Ice


Well it won’t be long until even the kids in kindergarten will be able to see what a scam this is!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

The drop in sea ice area from 1979 to 2006 was caused by global warming melting the Arctic, and the rise back to 1979 levels since 2007 was also caused by global warming changing wind Antarctic patterns – and freshening the south polar seas through glacial melting.

ScreenHunter_1822 Aug. 09 17.29

So basically, the competing processes of global warming and global warming have cancelled each other out.

After hearing mindless crap like this from government scientists, useful idiots in the press nod their heads and imagine they are hearing cutting edge science.

View original post

Global Sea Ice Extent Aug 10 2014 – 253,000 sq km Above ‘Normal’


We are definitely into a cooler period!

sunshinehours1's avatarsunshine hours

Global Sea Ice Extent is 253,000 sq km above the 1981-2010 mean. Still higher than any year (for day 221) since 2000.

Global_Sea_Ice_Extent_Zoomed_2014_Day_221_1981-2010Global_Sea_Ice_Extent_2014_Day_221_1981-2010

View original post