Posted originally on CTH on April 16, 2025 | Sundance
It’s not the first part of the 46-page ruling [SEE HERE] by Judge James Boasberg, threatening to hold President Trump and Main Justice in criminal contempt of court, that presents the biggest problem; it’s the second part where Boasberg is threatening to appoint an independent Judicial Branch prosecutor against the DOJ and Trump that makes a constitutional crisis tilt toward a near civil war between the branches.
Outlining his determination that President Trump defied a court order, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg states, “the Court ultimately determines that the Government’s actions on that day demonstrate a willful disregard for its Order, sufficient for the Court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the Government in criminal contempt.”
…”if the administration doesn’t rectify the issue, the judge said he may require administration officials to testify under oath so that he can identify the specific individuals responsible for violating his order. He would then request that those individuals be prosecuted.
The judge signaled he could appoint an outside lawyer to prosecute the contempt case if the Justice Department declines to do so.” (link)
I think we all know the very select group of “beach friend” people whom Boasberg would lean toward in appointing someone to prosecute Pam Bondi and DOJ officials representing President Trump.
High on the list of possible judicial branch appointments, who would be subject to review by the authority of Boasberg himself, would be his prior friendship with a previous appointee, Mary McCord. Or possibly Andrew Weissmann, Barry Berke, Norm Eisen, David Laufman or any other credentialed member of the Lawfare alliance.
The ruling somewhat reminds me of a prior situation where federal judge Andrew Hanen found the Obama DOJ also in contempt of a court order regarding the status of the “Dreamers” and the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) cases. {Background Here} However, unlike Boasberg, Hanen only demanded a DOJ corrective action plan.
Lawfare operatives in robes and out of robes are willing to create a constitutional crisis, because that’s how the Lawfare operatives operate when their grip on power is threatened.
Former President Barack Obama is urging Americans to resist Trump’s policies even if it means making “sacrifices.” “It has been easy during most of our lifetimes to say you are a progressive, or say you are for social justice, or say you are for free speech, and not have to pay a price for it…And now we’re in one of those moments when…it’s not enough just to say you’re for something. You may actually have to do something and possibly sacrifice a little bit,” Obama said.
Obama declared that universities were under attack by the Trump Administration. Trump has revoked funding for schools that permitted pro-Hamas rallies and deported international students who took part in those protests. There was clear evidence that many of these rallies were organized by powerful outside influencers funded by Democrat-backed super PACs and philanthropists like Soros. Worse, international terrorist organizations influenced these rallies. Sami Al-Arian, a known terrorist who was once deported, advised associates and his wife to camp out along with the college students.
Obama also called upon law firms to resist the current president, hoping for massive lawsuits to be brought against the current administration. Obama did not specify what “sacrifices” would be needed but his message is clear—raise hell.
“All of you have grown up in an international order that was created by America after World War II. … This is an important moment because in the last two months, the U.S. government has been trying to destroy that order,” Obama said. “Democracy is pretty recent in its vintage. An international order where you cooperate instead of fight is new. It’s fragile.”
The social justice warriors have already lost control. Tesla dealerships have burned to the ground, while every day citizens have had their vehicles vandalized with swastikas or worse. The left pushes for social unrest when they are losing. Obama is promoting the rhetoric that Trump is a threat to democracy, and as such, the people should continue to fight the current law and order. It should be the responsibility of politicians to pushback on policies. But since the people are not voting for politicians on the left, Democratic leaders want the public to protest and make headlines.
The left spent the last four years threatening anyone who did not accept Biden as their president. Now, we have a former president emerging from the shadows to urge his supporters to resist democracy and ignore the current administration’s policies that the majority of Americans voted for.
Posted originally on Mar 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong, Nobody has a computer that covers everything. Your forecast at the WEC that the Democratic Party would collapse is unprecedented. Nobody has even contemplated that such a thing could happed. Yet night now this is unfolding. The new polls from NBC News and CNN. The former poll showed that only 27% of Americans held a positive view of the party, with only 7% holding a “very positive” view. Both are record lows for the poll. Then, the CNN results found the Democrats’ approval at 29%, setting the record low for that poll as well.
Is there anything you can say as to how Socrates can forecast what nobody is capable of even thinking about?
Wm
ANSWER: My confrontation with the bankers who told the CFTC to shut us down after the forecast that Russia would collapse in 1998 was predicated on the assumption that the forecasts work only because I have more institutional clients than the NY crowd combined. What they never considered was that just maybe I discovered something profound that the New Yorker called the Secret Cycle.
What I discovered changed my life. There are two paths of research.
(1) The Max Path: You start with a theory and cherry-pick facts to claim you are right
(2) The Adam Smith Path: You observe to figure out how something functions.
You cannot discover what you already know.
The complexity that exists is remarkable. But the precision of how and when events will take place is also astonishing. All economic theories from Marx onward began with the same assumption: that the business cycle is random and that, therefore, the government, via its central banks, can manipulate it to create perpetual prosperity.
I had a nice discussion with Paul Volcker, and he agreed. The business cycle was about 8 years. Both Volcker and Burns concluded that the business cycle always wins. All the theories that try to manipulate society to eliminate the business cycle are out of mind. What I bumped into was not mere complexity but precision that I never expected to discover.
This is Not the First Political Party to Collapse
A significant factor in the collapse of the Federal Party was the anti-state view in favor of centralized federal power. Additionally, there was the War of 1812. For a long time, the Federalist party supported peace with Britain and war with France, whereas the Democratic-Republican party had the exact opposite position. Eventually, British behavior towards the US during its war with France caused anti-British and thus anti-Federalist sentiment. The Democrats have sought to exert power in Washington and dictate policy to the states on issues such as abortion. They have also supported Ukraine and fostered the war against Russia, which was why the Neocons swung to the Democrats.
The Hartford Convention of 1814-1815 was essential in the Federalist party’s collapse. This mostly Federalist convention in New England suggested some constitutional amendments. Still, it was alleged to consider New England’s secession from the Union and a separate peace with Britain, not unlike California. After the war, the convention was widely viewed as an act of treason and a black mark on the reputation of the Federalist party.
What is also overlooked is that the Federalists were essentially a mercantilist party compared to the South, which was agrarian. Alexander Hamilton, along with most Federalists, was trying to raise the status of the United States internationally while still fighting the last war. Thus, the Federalists were pro-industrialization, which was still in its infancy. They say that industrialization would make the United States a more powerful nation in the eyes of the international community. Many wrongly assume that the Federalists were a “conservative” party in the modern sense. Yes, Hamilton was pro-bank and pro-business.
Hamilton also established the National Debt to raise the United States’ credit standing in international eyes. However, he was foremost a federalist, building the United States into a significant power. What is overlooked is that the Federalists were the ancestors of not just the Whigs but also FDR insofar as they saw the federal government had a role in regulating, managing, and controlling society and the economy.
Don’t forget that during the Whiskey Rebellion, a tax revolt in Pennsylvania, George Washington sent troops to kill those who rebelled. That was the essence of the Federalists: dictatorial power from a central command. The Federalists, like Roosevelt, believed in a positive role for the federal government. That is the place the Democrats have occupied today. Biden tried to hire 75,000 IRS agents who would be armed.
Then came the War of 1812, disrupting manufacturing imports to the United States, which led even the Jeffersonian Republican Party to relax its policies toward industrialization. The Federalists had supported Britain for business. But many manufacturers found the laissez-faire of the Republican Party to be more beneficial than the Federalists, whose policy was if it moved, tax it. If it stopped moving, kick it. The War of 1812 killed the Federalists, and more industrialists moved to Jefferson.
Instead of the War of 1812, when the British burned Washington, DC, and the Federalists had supported the British, today we have the Neocon Proxy War in Ukraine against Russia, and some idiots on Capitol Hill wanted to commission a marble bust of Zelensky to stand in the US Capitol next to Washington and Jefferson.
The Democratic Party still refuses to admit that, just perhaps, their radical fringe proposing sex changes in prison for illegal aliens just might have gone too far. Producing comic books on equality and handing them to the Taliban for $$20 million. In the real world, you have to have a feasible business plan. In Washington, the crazier the idea, the more money you get.
Here are the two computer forecast arrays from 2018 and 2024. 2024 was a significant target in 2018, yet the 2021 target was the strongest with a Panic Cycle. That was Biden. That was all she wrote, folks, for the Democrats. They will not exist by 2033.
This chart plots as a percentage of total seats combined in the House and Senate. They peaked out before slavery, and each rally produced a declining trend. Sorry, but this is a bear market. It will be time to turn out the light for the Democrats, and their wacky WOKE agenda is loved only by the extreme fringe. My father was a Depression Democrat. He would never have voted Democrat today.
I am starting with a book on the Economic Confidence Model that I promised I would do to leave for society. I will probably print the first edition myself, for it will be well illustrated and formal publishers don’t like that because it is too expensive to produce. The second edition can be stripped of the illustrations they do not want to print. But I tend to be a perfectionist. It has to be right to put my name on it. I don’t sell advertising here because I do not want to appear to endorse any product.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America