Sunday Talks: Senator Graham Defends The Senate Role in Trying to Remove President Trump…


Senator Lindsay Graham appears on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo to profess his public outrage about the senate being lied to by the FBI in 2018. {Go Deep}

In essence what Graham is doing is establishing the defense of the Senate for their role in attempting to remove President Donald Trump. ie. Selective Outrage.

The simple way to identify Graham’s motive is this way:…  The SSCI was aware of this briefing in 2018 right?  So why didn’t any SSCI member step forth after the Horowitz report in 2019 and say they were mislead?… or at any time after the truth of the primary sub-source was evident?   It does not take the public release of briefing material, two years later, to initiate senate outrage if senate outrage was genuine.

Graham wasn’t outraged when the senate knew about it, he becomes outraged when the public knows about it.  See how the application of common sense works?

 

Methinks Graham doth protest too much. The more he spoke of his honor, the faster we counted the spoons.

Senator Lindsay Graham Releases FBI Talking Points for SSCI Briefing February 14, 2018 – Graham Positioned to Defend SSCI…


Today Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsay Graham released a set of talking points [full pdf below – AND here] from the FBI during a briefing on February 14, 2018 to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

The unknown FBI briefer is informing the SSCI about the reliability of Chris Steele’s primary sub-source, and whether he agrees with the Dossier content & conclusions:

At first blush the impression from the release; and indeed the expressed position as outlined by Graham in the release; is that some unknown entity from the FBI was misleading the SSCI in February of 2018 about Christopher Steele and the perspective of his primary sub-source. However, there’s a deeper story.

Within the release it must be noted the date of the briefing material is February 14, 2018. The unknown FBI briefer is saying, in essence, the primary sub-source doesn’t dispute the Dossier material. Obviously this position is demonstrably false given how the PSS said the Dossier was full of “rumor”, “gossip”, “innuendo” and “bar talk”.

The FBI briefer is misleading the Senate and so today we see the angry position expressed by Graham as he reveals this misleading briefing. However, five days prior to this briefing, on February 9, 2018, the text messages between SSCI Vice-Chairman Mark Warner and Chris Steele’s lawyer, Adam Waldman, were released. This frames the accurate context to consider the position of the SSCI and FBI briefer on Feb 14, 2018.

Yes, the FBI briefer was misleading the SSCI… However, the SSCI wanted to be mislead. This is how plausible deniability is built into the process. The SSCI was conducting an investigation of Trump-Russia; if we are honest the SSCI was participating in a process to weaponize the committee to advance a narrative against the interests of the Trump administration; therefore the SSCI and FBI briefer were aligned in common interest.

Lindsay Graham’s outrage over the misleading briefing is nothing more than an attempt to retroactively cover for the SSCI as they continued their role in the plot to remove President Trump throughout 2018 and 2019.  Graham is taking the purposefully built plausible deniability, assembled in 2018, and using it as a distraction today in 2020.

Graham knows the FBI lied, this is not a revelation. The FBI supported the DOJ letter July 12, 2018, that mislead the FISA Court five months after this misleading SSCI briefing. The current level of Graham outrage is ridiculous when considering he could have asked these same questions in April when the DOJ-NSD letter was released.

Who was the FBI official who reviewed the July 12th letter and supported its conclusions? The most likely answer is the same FBI official who did the SSCI briefing on Feb 14th. This is not rocket science dot-connecting.

The FBI Washington Field Office (WFO) conducted the interviews with Steele’s primary sub-source in Jan, March and May 2017. Yet I’ll bet you a donut it was not the FBI-WFO who was briefing congress…. there’s another layer of plausible deniability. This is how the system is set-up. Today, Lindsay Graham is playing an outrage game. Where was this outrage in April?

Here’s the full briefing material [Original pdf Here]

.

This is all connected back to FBI SSA Brian Dugan’s work.  The briefing was a way for the SSCI to establish plausible deniability five days after Vice-Chairman Mark Warner’s covert text messages were made public.

This is why the focus on the story behind SSCI Security Director James Wolfe is critical.  All of these granular machinations are connected to the objective to remove President Donald Trump.  The SSCI was supporting and coordinating with the special counsel.

It is all one team effort.

Let’s look at how the IG report frames the primary sub-source, and specifically notice the FBI contact and questioning took place in January 2017 (we now know that date to be January 12, 2017):

Those interviews with Steele’s primary sub-source took place in January, March and May of 2017; and clearly the sub-source debunked the content of the dossier itself.

Those interviews were a year before the Feb 14, 2018, FBI briefing outlined by Lindsay Graham today.

Those interviews were also 18-months, 16-months and 14-months ahead of the July 2018 DOJ letter to the FISC.   The DOJ-NSD says the sub-source was “truthful and cooperative” but the DOJ doesn’t tell the court the content of the truthfulness and cooperation.  Why?

Keep in mind this activity to support the Dossier and by extension the FISA application to the SSCI and FISC was written by AAG John Demers in July 2018 and briefed to congress in February 2018.  Jeff Sessions was Attorney General (firewalled), Rod Rosenstein was Deputy AG (providing no special counsel oversight); Christopher Wray was FBI Director, David Bowditch is Deputy, and Dana Boente is FBI chief-legal-counsel.

Why would the FBI mislead the senate intelligence committee?  Why would the DOJ-NSD not be forthcoming with the FISA court about the primary sub-source?

This level of disingenuous withholding of information speaks to an institutional motive.

In February and July 2018 the DOJ clearly knew the dossier was full of fabrications, yet they withheld that information from the SSCI and FISC and even went to far as to say the predicate was still valid.  Why?

It doesn’t take a deep-weeds-walker to identify the DOJ motive.

In Feb-July 2018 Robert Mueller’s investigation was at its apex.

This SSCI briefing and FISC letter, justifying the application and claiming the current information would still be a valid predicate therein, speaks to the 2018 DOJ needing to retain the validity of the FISA warrant.

My research shows it was the full control by the special counsel at play.  They needed to protect evidence the Mueller team had already extracted from their fraudulent FISA authority.  That’s the motive.

In February of July 2018 if the FBI, DOJ-NSD or special counsel had admitted the FISA application and all renewals were fatally flawed Robert Mueller would have needed to withdraw any evidence gathered as a result of its exploitation.

The FBI and DOJ in 2018 was protecting Mueller’s poisoned fruit.

If the DOJ had been honest with the court, there’s a strong possibility some, perhaps much, of Mueller evidence gathering would have been invalidated… and cases were pending.  The solution: mislead the court and claim the predication was still valid.

This is not simply a hunch, because that motive also speaks to why the FISC would order the current DOJ to release the July 12, 2018, letter.

Remember, in December 2019 the FISC received the IG Horowitz report; and they immediately noted the disparity between what IG Horowitz outlined about the FBI investigating Steele’s sub-source, as contrast against what the DOJ told them in July 2018.

Both the February FBI briefing and the July DOJ letter are transparent misrepresentation when compared to the information in the Horowitz report.  Hence, the FISA court ordered  the DOJ to release the July letter so that everyone, including congressional oversight and the public can see the misrepresentation.  Unfortunately the “congressional oversight” aspect was/is aligned with the scheme.

The FISA court was misled; the SSCI was willfully mislead; now everyone can see it.

The content of that FBI briefing and DOJ-NSD letter, and the subsequent disparity, points to an institutional cover-up; and as a consequence the FISC also ordered the DOJ to begin an immediate sequestration effort to find all the evidence from the fraudulent FISA application.  The proverbial fruit from the poisonous tree…. And yes, that is ongoing.

Lindsay Graham is still playing cover-up to protect the Senate.  Nothing more.

Graham could have demanded these same answers in April of this year.  He didn’t.

9 REASONS JOE BIDEN’S MENTAL FITNESS MUST BE TESTED IMMEDIATELY


It’s Illegal & Immoral to Run a Mentally Incompetent for Public Office

Kelly OConnell image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesAugust 6, 2020

9 REASONS JOE BIDEN'S MENTAL FITNESS MUST BE TESTED IMMEDIATELY

SIGN PETITION TO DEMAND JOE BIDEN BE TESTED FOR COGNITIVE FITNESS

It’s illegal to run a mentally incompetent candidate for office since it’s a nomination based on fraud, a bait and switch, for someone who can’t lead. If Joe were nominated, he’d be removed before the vote. Therefore, the Democrat Party will choose his replacement. Currently, the DNC is run by the farthest Left radicals, so will choose a far leftist replacement, unelectable in normal times.  But Joe is not competent to even run a Scouting troop. So why do Democrats insist he’s fit enough to lead America?

WHY WE MUST DEMAND BIDEN BE TESTED FOR MENTAL COMPETENCE NOW!

  • Joe Biden is Running for US President in Less Than 90 DaysWe will choose a president on November 3rd, 2020. It matters if a candidate is incompetent.
  • Biden Stated August 5th He’s Not Been Tested & Won’t Allow Cognitive ExamBiden asked Black journalist who mentioned mental fitness test he was a drug junky. Biden must be tested to protect America! Does Biden have racist ideas influenced by dementia?
  • Biden is 77 Years Old Now – He’ll be 85 in Second Term.Biden’s public events are a treasure trove of errorBiden gaffes. “Truth Over Facts.”
  • Biden is Mostly in Basement, Reading Scripts for Heavily Edited Taped StatementsJoe Biden hardly ever leaves his basement with the excuse of “Covid Protection.”Is it fair to hide loony Joe??? Biden gaffes. “Truth Over Facts.” Even edited, Biden screws up.

SIGN PETITION TO DEMAND JOE BIDEN BE TESTED FOR COGNITIVE FITNESS

CONCLUSION: SIGN PETITION DEMANDING BIDEN’S MENTAL FITNESS BE TESTED

 

COVID Is No Reason To Empty Prisons


Our country’s priorities are completely out of order

Jeff Crouere image

Re-posted from the Canada Free press By  —— Bio and ArchivesAugust 9, 2020

COVID Is No Reason To Empty Prisons

In America today, millions of churchgoers are not allowed to practice their faith in their place of worship and certain business owners are not allowed to welcome customers, but hardened criminals are being released from prison. This insanity is producing predictably deadly results.

Under the guise of protecting prisoners from the spread of Covid-19, large numbers of dangerous criminals are being freed from custody. This is creating a horrific situation that is endangering the public and has now led to the death of a witness in a rape case.

Rape, Sodomy, Abduction, Strangulation and Burglary

In Alexandria, Virginia, rape suspect Ibrahim E. Bouaichi was released from prison in April because of concerns that he would contract Covid-19. Even though Bouaichi was indicted on serious charges such as rape, sodomy, abduction, strangulation and burglary, former presiding Circuit Court Judge Nolan Dawkins ordered his release on a $25,000 bond.

Despite the warnings from prosecutors that Bouaichi was a danger to the community, Dawkins released him to home confinement. This was an incredibly unwise decision because he was a danger to not only the community at large, but also to an especially vulnerable individual, Karla Elizabeth Dominguez Gonzalez, who accused him of rape last December and testified against him.

Sadly, on July 29, Ms. Dominguez was found shot to death. Local law enforcement authorities identified Bouaichi as her murderer. This week, he was spotted by police, a chase ensued leading to a car crash. Bouaichi shot himself before he could be apprehended by police. He is currently in critical condition in the hospital.

None of this tragedy needed to happen. If Bouaichi would have been kept in prison, where he belonged, his accuser would still be alive, and taxpayers would not be paying for the medical care of a murder suspect in critical condition.

This disturbing trend of releasing prisoners and endangering the public has been going on all over the country since the beginning of this pandemic. Liberals are using the fear of Covid-19 to accomplish their goal of emptying the prisons.

Priority should not be the health of prisoners, but the safety of the public

There has been an undue concern for the health of prisoners during this pandemic. In fact, the priority should not be the health of prisoners, but the safety of the public.

It is extraordinarily reckless to release hardened criminals from prison, regardless of the spread of Covid-19. Our nation’s public health officials are constantly recommending masks as a way for the American people to stay safe. Thus, prison officials should distribute masks to all inmates, keep them socially distant whenever possible and liberally provide hand sanitizers. If this strategy works for the law-abiding public, it should work for prisoners as well.

Instead, menacing criminals like Bouaichi are being released and innocent people like Ms. Dominguez are being killed. The authorities involved in this tragedy, such as Judge Dawkins, have blood on their hands.

In the past few months, thousands of criminals have been discharged from prison, needlessly endangering the public at large. It is one of the reasons that crime has been increasing in America recently.

For example, in mid-March, Joseph Williams was one of 150 inmates released from prison in Hillsborough County, Florida because there was worry that inmates would become infected with Covid-19. Several days later, local sheriff deputies arrested Williams for his involvement in a homicide that took place one day after his release from prison. He was charged with second degree murder.  According to Chad Chronister, the Sheriff of Hillsborough County, “There is no question Joseph Williams took advantage of this health emergency to commit crimes while he was out of jail.”

Push toward mail-in ballots, shutting down the schools and the economy and the non-stop health warnings

In April, a convicted child molester, Rudy William Grajeda Magdaleno, was released from prison in Orange County California. The reason for the release was concerns relating to the Covid-19 pandemic. Not surprisingly, just two weeks later, Magdaleno was arrested again after exposing himself to others at a parole resource center.

By the end of August, California will release 8,000 inmates from incarceration to lessen the spread of Covid-19 within their prison facilities. Supposedly, prison officials are releasing only those offenders who are non-violent or near the end of their sentence. Unfortunately, it seems these criteria are being expanded at the expense of public safety.

In July, California prison officials released Tereba Williams, who still had 64 years left on her sentence. She was convicted of murdering Kevin Ruska in 2001. In this gruesome case, Williams held Ruska at gunpoint, forced him into a car trunk, shot him, drove him 750 miles away, tied him up and left him to die in a motel room in the state of Washington. He was dead before he was eventually found.

Her release was not well received by Mr. Ruska’s family. His cousin, Karri Phillips, said that “It’s appalling to me everything that’s been allowed to happen. I don’t think for one second she’s going to walk out there a changed person, she’s not.” Unfortunately, all of Mr. Ruska’s family now must worry about this irresponsible release. Since she was convicted of murder, Williams should not have been released under any circumstances.

Along with the push toward mail-in ballots, shutting down the schools and the economy and the non-stop health warnings, another consequence of the over-reaction to Covid-19 has been the incredibly reckless release of violent criminals from prison. It has put the public at unnecessary risk while besmirching the memory of innocent victims and injuring their family members once again. To say the least, our country’s priorities are completely out of order.

9 REASONS JOE BIDEN’S MENTAL FITNESS MUST BE TESTED IMMEDIATELY


It’s Illegal & Immoral to Run a Mentally Incompetent for Public Office

Kelly OConnell image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesAugust 6, 2020

9 REASONS JOE BIDEN'S MENTAL FITNESS MUST BE TESTED IMMEDIATELY

SIGN PETITION TO DEMAND JOE BIDEN BE TESTED FOR COGNITIVE FITNESS

It’s illegal to run a mentally incompetent candidate for office since it’s a nomination based on fraud, a bait and switch, for someone who can’t lead. If Joe were nominated, he’d be removed before the vote. Therefore, the Democrat Party will choose his replacement. Currently, the DNC is run by the farthest Left radicals, so will choose a far leftist replacement, unelectable in normal times.  But Joe is not competent to even run a Scouting troop. So why do Democrats insist he’s fit enough to lead America?

WHY WE MUST DEMAND BIDEN BE TESTED FOR MENTAL COMPETENCE NOW!

    1. Joe Biden is Running for US President in Less Than 90 Days

      We will choose a president on November 3rd, 2020. It matters if a candidate is incompetent

    1. Biden Stated August 5th He’s Not Been Tested & Won’t Allow Cognitive Exam

      Biden asked Black journalist who mentioned mental fitness test he was a drug junky. Biden must be tested to protect America! Does Biden have racist ideas influenced by dementia?

    1. Biden is 77 Years Old Now – He’ll be 85 in Second Term.

      Biden’s public events are a treasure trove of errorBiden gaffes. “Truth Over Facts.”

  1. Biden is Mostly in Basement, Reading Scripts for Heavily Edited Taped Statements

    Joe Biden hardly ever leaves his basement with the excuse of “Covid Protection.”

    Is it fair to hide loony Joe??? Biden gaffes. “Truth Over Facts.” Even edited, Biden screws up.

    1. But When He Leaves…Live Statements Show Shocking Biden Incoherence

      Joe Biden looks like a drugged prisoner when “broadcasting” from home basement “studio”. Watch evidence: Biden forgets Declaration of Independence. Incoherently calls young student a “Lying Dog-Faced Pony Soldier”. Called a critic a fat liar claimed “too old to vote for me”, told an activist “vote for someone else,” mistook sister for his wifeBiden gaffes.

    1. If Biden is Even Mildly Unfit, He Can’t Be Allowed to Run

      Early Dementia symptoms include: Memory lossdifficulty concentratingImagining false eventsstruggling to follow a conversationfinding right wordsconfusion over time and placeangry mood swingslashing out at others – Biden Swears & Threatens Union member.

  1. Incompetent Biden’s VP Becomes De Facto President, Without Vetting

    Don’t slip Marxist into US presidency! Japan Times: Remove Demented Biden

SIGN PETITION TO DEMAND JOE BIDEN BE TESTED FOR COGNITIVE FITNESS

    1. Biden’s Handlers Now Seek to Stop Any Debates with Trump!

      Joe, Don’t Debate! Alarmed Leftist Trump haters shake with fear over Biden brain tests!

  1. Promoting Mentally Incompetent Candidate Not Just Illegal, But Immoral Trojan Horse

    NBC admits: Biden Demands: You prefer Liar Rice, Kamala Harris, Marxist Bass for Prez?

CONCLUSION: SIGN PETITION DEMANDING BIDEN’S MENTAL FITNESS BE TESTED

Senate Majority Whip John Thune Positions to Support National Mail-In Ballots…


One of the more challenging facets to awakening the general public on the scale of corruption within Washington DC is the need for people to drop party designations. This is never more true than within the U.S. Senate where the “us -vs- them” mentality reigns supreme.

The system is created to self-sustain regardless of party affiliation. The Senate is one club with one perspective. Within that club rule #1 dominates: none of the members will ever expose another member. So when there is corrupt activity within the Senate no-one from within the institution with expose another. This is the way of the Senate and how it operates.

(L-R) Barrasso, Blunt, McConnell, Thune and Ernst.

Current Senate Leader Mitch McConnell has a leadership group who carry out the institutional objectives of the upper chamber as a body, they include: Senator John Thune (whip); Senator John Barrasso (conference chair); Roy Blunt (committee chair); Todd Young (NRSC chair); Jodi Ernst (conference vice-chair); and Chuck Grassley (president pro tempore). None of these senators make a move publicly without approval from Leader McConnell.

Today Senate Whip John Thune rebuked the mail-in ballot concerns expressed by President Trump. Thune does this because ultimately the objectives of the upper chamber are more favorably aligned if President Trump is removed.

WASHINGTON DC – […] Asked if he agreed with the president’s repeated charges that mailed-in balloting will lead to a “rigged election” and “massive voter fraud,” the Senate majority whip told reporters, “I don’t.”

“Mailed-in voting has been used in a lot of places for a long time and, honestly, we’ve got a lot of folks that, as you know, they’re investing heavily in trying … to win that war. It’s always a war too for mail-in ballots. Both sides compete, and it’s always an area where I think our side, at least in my experience, has done pretty well,” Thune answered, adding: “I think we want to assure people it’s going to work, it’s secure and if they vote that way it’s going to count.” (read more)

.

Foreign Press is Seriously Questioning Biden’s Cognitive Ability


 

Is Joe Biden’s Lack of Cognitive Skills a Democrat Diversionary Tactic?


Only God Almighty and in-person voting will stop that from ever happening

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesAugust 3, 2020

Is Joe Biden’s Lack of Cognitive Skills a Democrat Diversionary Tactic?

During much of the 2016 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton fell up and down stairs, including losing a shoe when she was tossed into a waiting van when she was purportedly overcome by heat while attending a Sept. 11, 2016, 9/11 Memorial event.

Hillary Clinton wobbling outside a van

“During the presidential campaign, cameras caught Clinton leaving the 9/11 memorial in Manhattan and collapsing into the arms of Secret Service agents as she got into a waiting van. She later announced she’d been diagnosed with dehydration and pneumonia.” (RealClearPolitics, Sept. 11, 2016)

“Raw video from the scene in New York showed Hillary Clinton wobbling outside a van before she falls and is assisted into the vehicle. Clinton abruptly left a 9/11 memorial event due to the heat, according to her campaign.

“MORE ON #HILLARY per witness: “unexpected early departure”; she stumbled off curb, “knees buckled”, lost a shoe as she was helped into van
— RickLeventhalFoxNews (@RickLeventhal) September 11, 2016

“Alternate angle shows a close-up of Clinton falling down:

NEW VIDEO HILLARY COLLAPSES SEIZURE FALLS SEPT 11 MEMORIAL

“A closeup shows a piece of metal falling out from her right pant leg”.

In the 2020 Election campaign, media attention focuses on presumptive Democrat Joe Biden’s apparent lack cognitive skills

“Perhaps most infamously, Clinton fell inside her home in 2013 on the eve of testimony before a Senate committee investigating Benghazi. She got a mild concussion and was treated for a blood clot near her brain. (Daily Mail, March 13, 2018)

“When she appeared in Congress to testify, she was wearing special prism eyeglass lenses, which are used to assist people experiencing double vision.”

Much ado was made by the media over Clinton’s seemingly unstoppable stumbling—which curiously ended with the beginning of the televised 2016 presidential debates.

In the 2020 Election campaign, media attention focuses on presumptive Democrat Joe Biden’s apparent lack cognitive skills.

Scads of online videos show Biden struggling to finish sentence he began, rhyming off incorrect states he’s visited and even seeming not to know what day it is.

Biden’s verbal misspeaks have called for his cognitive testing.

“Not a joke and not hyperbole – I’m hearing from people close to the situation that Biden’s cognitive decline is rapidly worsening and is becoming increasingly difficult to mask. The Democrats are going to have to make a decision soon.” (@dbongino, Aug. 2, 2020)

Cunning Democrats will do anything to replace Donald Trump with Joe Biden as president.

Maybe the Dems have already filled out their mail-in vote election ballots, Mr. B.

But what if both Clinton’s falls and Biden’s confusion are part of a Democrat political tactic called diverting the attention of the public?

Back in 2016 when Clinton was falling, millions were speculating about the state of her health. No one was talking about her Benghazi and email scandals anymore.

Cunning Democrats will do anything to replace Donald Trump with Joe Biden as president.

Taking advantage of the public’s fear of the pandemic, they are calling for a universal mail-in vote,  and at last count, were well on their way to achieving it.

They have other dangerous games at play.

You can’t make this stuff up:

“Democrats are contemplating secession and potential civil war as they game out possible scenarios for a closely contested election, according to a report by Ben Smith in a New York Times column Sunday. (Breitbart, Aug. 2, 2020)

“The bulk of Smith’s column is devoted to the question of how the media will handle Election Night coverage, given that the result may not be known for weeks. Vote-by-mail, which many states have only recently adopted — ostensibly, to prevent the spread of coronavirus in polling places — could lead to an uncertain result.

“However, buried near the end of Smith’s column is a report that Democrats have participated in a “war game” in which they considered several possible outcomes of the election.

The result: the threat of secession by the entire West Coast, followed by the possible intervention of the U.S. armed forces

“In one scenario, John Podesta — the former chair of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, and a leading figure in party circles — played former Vice President Joe Biden, and refused to concede the election.

“The result: the threat of secession by the entire West Coast, followed by the possible intervention of the U.S. armed forces:

“But conveniently, a group of former top government officials called the Transition Integrity Project actually gamed four possible scenarios, including one that doesn’t look that different from 2016: a big popular win for Mr. Biden, and a narrow electoral defeat, presumably reached after weeks of counting the votes in Pennsylvania. For their war game, they cast John Podesta, who was Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, in the role of Mr. Biden. They expected him, when the votes came in, to concede, just as Mrs. Clinton had.

“But Mr. Podesta, playing Mr. Biden, shocked the organizers by saying he felt his party wouldn’t let him concede. Alleging voter suppression, he persuaded the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan to send pro-Biden electors to the Electoral College.

In that scenario, California, Oregon, and Washington then threatened to secede from the United States if Mr. Trump took office as planned

“In that scenario, California, Oregon, and Washington then threatened to secede from the United States if Mr. Trump took office as planned.

“The House named Mr. Biden president; the Senate and White House stuck with Mr. Trump. At that point in the scenario, the nation stopped looking to the media for cues, and waited to see what the military would do.

“Notably, on Election Night in 2016, Podesta publicly refused to concede the election to President Donald Trump.”

Meanwhile, it suits the power-crazed Democrats if Joe Biden has serious cognitive problems—because if elected it won’t be Joe Biden but his vice president, Barack Obama and other Democrats running the White House.

Only God Almighty and in-person voting will stop that from ever happening.

Can Truth and Reconciliation Prevent the Crash & Burn?


QUESTION: Hi Marty,

After Apartheid, South Africa assembled the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Do you think there is any chance that in five or so years that we could have a similar commission where politicians, business leaders, scientists and media figures admit their crimes and lies in exaggerating the virus? In such a commission victims can also give statements about the lives and livelihoods lost due to the fake lockdown.

SMD
ANSWER: I seriously doubt that will happen near-term. Perhaps it will occur after they have destroyed everything post-2032, and those who thought the left would be Utopia discover that they too will surrender all their freedom. We are in such a political crisis where the right just wants to be left alone and the left demands they are subjugated and reduced to economic slaves. This is certainly not the country I had thought I lived in. My family has fought in every war since the American Revolution. My cousin still has the musket on the wall from the Revolution. All I can do is hope for is the breakup of the United States to be able to live in peace or be forced to leave. Perhaps this is the choice many of our ancestors had to make to leave Europe in search of freedom.

This political crisis has devolved into such hatred it is unimaginable. It began with Hillary calling anyone who voted for Trump “deplorable” and this has escalated into not just class warfare, but race, political warfare, and an all-out war against the history and the past. Even the US military base in the Indian Ocean is under attack because the USA leases it from Britain and they are calling this colonialism. We are declining into the collapse of Western Civilization as we have known it. There is nothing that will stand the test of time. Everything offends someone and civilization requires cooperation where everyone benefits by coming together. This rising tide of hatred is tearing everything apart. Perhaps now you will understand why Socrates’ forecast that the United States and the European Union will break apart. Our civilizations cannot be maintained with such hatred and confrontation.

You cannot allow one philosophy to subjugate everyone else. That is NOT what a free society is all about. You cannot allow even religion to take control of government (i.e. Iran). What if that Muslim Shiye philosophy took hold in the USA and Congress then enacts laws that women must wear hijabs, niqab veil burqas, jilbabs, or face covers to uphold Islam tradition? Whatever the philosophy or religion one group has, they have no right to impose it upon everyone else. We have reached the point where the United States is no longer a free society. There is no respect for human rights, which includes the right to be left alone to pursue your life, liberty, and happiness. What you earn is not respected and you can no longer try to build wealth for your family to leave behind, for even that is subject to confiscation under inheritance taxes.

Sally Yates Testifies to Senate Judiciary – Main Justice Deflects, Pointing Fingers At FBI…


The Senate testimony of former Deputy AG Sally Yates is ongoing. So far the Yates responses to questioning are predictable in the extreme.  [The Mistresses of Mirrored Halls – 2017 ]

It was always visible that when the Main Justice small group would be questioned they would deflect accountability by pointing blame toward the responsibilities of the FBI. That is exactly what Sally Yates is doing.

Senate Judiciary Livestream – Fox News Livestream – Fox Business Livestream

.

I will have more on this later…. busy, busy.

.