Jack Smith Resigned from DOJ


Posted originally on the CTH on January 11, 2025 | Sundance 

As noted by Politico, Special Prosecutor Jack Smith has officially resigned from his position in the DOJ targeting effort of President Trump.

Smith was enlisted by Joe Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland to lead the first ever criminal targeting of a former U.S. President.  The Lawfare that underpinned the efforts of Jack Smith was created by current and former DOJ officials who weaponized the justice system.

Names like Norm Eisen, Andrew Weissmann, Barry Berke and Mary McCord rest in the margins of every lawfare filing and approach deployed by Jack Smith and his insufferable team of political ideologues.

Jack Smith departs the DOJ having succeeded in fabricate labels for President Trump, “first ever indicted” … “first ever tried criminally” etc.  However, Smith failed to deliver on any of the prosecutorial hopes of those who followed the fabrications, because the constructs were only framed to deliver labels.

WASHINGTON DC – Special counsel Jack Smith has completed his work on two criminal investigations of President-elect Donald Trump and resigned Friday from the Justice Department.

Word of Smith’s departure came in a footnote to a court filing Justice Department officials submitted to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon Saturday afternoon, urging her not to extend a court order she issued last week temporarily blocking the release of the final report Smith submitted to department leaders on Tuesday. (read more)

Biden May Blanket Pardon Those Who Targeted Trump and Those Who Weaponized Government


Posted originally on the CTH on January 11, 2025 | Sundance 

Joe Biden was asked yesterday if he would pardon anyone else.  He couched his response“it depends on some of the language and expectations that Trump broadcasts in the last couple days here as to what he’s going to do,” Biden told reporters at the White House. “There’s still consideration of some folks, but no decision.”

Now, think carefully about that response to the question.  Biden handing out more pardons depends on what Donald Trump says he is going to do.

What exactly is the negotiating factor here?  If Trump says he will hold people accountable for the weaponization of government, then Biden will preemptively pardon them.  However, if President Trump does not say they will be held accountable, then no preemptive action is needed.

No where in that type of thought process is the weaponized targeting and behavior a factor, only whether they will be held accountable for it.  Put another way, the activity is admitted as corrupt, the decision now rests on whether they can avoid accountability for their corruption.

There will be more pardons.  It doesn’t matter what President Trump says or does not say.  Psychologically, they are admitting to the wrongdoing. The issue is now about how to avoid the consequences.  There will be more pardons; they are simply negotiating who gets them.

Hans Mahncke Breaks Down His Book That Exposes The Russiagate Fraud ‘Swiftboating America’


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Dec 28, 2024 at 8:00 pm EST

Julie Kelly On President Trump’s Sentencing: “The Entire Conviction Is Tainted”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 10, 2025 at :7:00 pm EST

Bannon: “They Have Fought Trump, They’ve Come After Trump, These People Are Criminals”


Bannon:

ght Trump, They’ve Come After Trump, These People Are Criminals”

“They Have Fought Trump, They’ve Come After Trump, These People Are Criminals”

Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 10, 2025 at :7:00 pm EST

Bannon: “It’s Revolting To Me SCOTUS Had The Back Of This Kangaroo Court In NYC”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 10, 2025 at :1:00 pm EST

“She’s An Absolute Disgrace And People Are Infuriated Because They Fought So Hard For Her.”: Julie Kelly On Amy Coney Barrett Siding With Court Leftists On Major J6 Decision


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 10, 2025 at :1:00 pm EST

Mike Davis On SCOUTS Rejection Of Trump New York Sentencing Halt: “You Have 3 Partisan Hacks On The Supreme Court Along With A Law Professor With Her Head Up Her Ass.”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 10, 2025 at :1:00 pm EST

David Zere Live Outside New York Courtroom: President Trump Takes On Lawfare Head-On


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 10, 2025 at :1:00 pm EST

Core and Central: The Surveillance State, FISA and the Value of Liberty


Posted originally on the CTH on January 11, 2025 | Sundance 

There is nothing reconcilable about American Liberty when contrast with a looming surveillance state. There is no facet of American values, the essential core of what we define as Americanism, that can exist without true liberty.

While the Declaration of Independence is long regarded as the greatest written declaration of purpose, the latter created Bill of Rights, the first Ten original amendments to the U.S. Constitution, is just as important. The first declared our intent; the second defined how our founders intended to retain the intent during our collective assembly. Together they outline what set the course to make America great.

We have allowed the foundational intent of both sets of documents to be compromised, because, well, simply we were lazy and complacent. Now we are engaged in a time of great consequence that will determine whether or not the purpose of our assembly can continue.

We are, in factual reality, now deep inside a debate carried out in the world of politics. The stakes have never been higher.

In nine days, President Donald J Trump is scheduled to be sworn in as President of the United States. In my non-pretending world, this is likely to be the last time in our lifetime to drag the conversation of how we define liberty into the American psyche. All of my research in the past two decades indicates this likelihood is not hyperbole. We have one shot at this, and our time is now.

Liberty, the fundamental decision to retain it or lose it, is the context for all other contexts that have preceded it. The principles of liberty that we have defined for generations cannot exist in an American surveillance state. Thus, the secretive courts, the unlawful usurpation of the 4th Amendment, the short-sighted ramifications of the Patriot Act, the weaponization of our federal law enforcement and police agencies, all of it, must be reviewed through this fundamental core issue, Liberty.

I have traveled throughout the East and West to gain perspective on what makes us different, and what I can assert with clarity is that if we lose the Liberty argument, then the ideological representatives behind Barack Obama will have succeeded, the fundamental transformation will be irreversible.

This frames the cornerstone of my viewpoints on all of the characters in politics.  It is not a matter of debate that on these core issues of Liberty and the stopping of the Surveillance State, everything else is a downstream consequence.  The tiered system of constitutional protections for particular categories of personage must be rebuked.  On this matter there cannot be compromise, because every outcome that impedes our way of life is a derivative of this value.

I will oppose all interests who refuse to confront the Surveillance State.  I will draw bold attention to those who are willingly creating it, and I promise you I will call out every operational interest that is willfully blind to its creation.

This is my hill.

Love to all,

Sundance