Prosecutors Threatened Cohen to Plead Guilty or They Indict his Family


Posted originally on May 20, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

Cohen Michael Police

Let me explain something. Threatening your family is standard operating procedure because the Supreme Court has given prosecutors ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY no matter what they do! That has corrupted our entire legal system. This is why you have all these prosecutors charging Trump, for they are ABOVE the law, as are judges.

Cohen asserted that he was pressured to accept a plead guilty to charges in 2018, including the hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.

“No one indicated you threatened to be guilty, correct?” asked Blanche, Trump’s lawyer.

“As I stated previously, I was provided with 48 hours within which to accept the plea or the Southern District of New York was going to file an 80-page indictment that included my wife, and I elected to protect my family,” replied Cohen.

“You do feel you were induced to plead guilty?” the Trump’s defense lawyer asked.

“I never denied the underlying facts, I just do not believe I should have been criminally charged for either of those two — or six — offenses,” said Cohen.

He stated that prosecutors never directly threatened to indict his wife and explained that he learned of this potential threat from his lawyers.

“I accepted responsibility,” said Cohen.

Prosecutors Immunity

The Supreme Court destroyed our legal system when it decided Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), which held that district attorneys/prosecutors have full ABSOLUTE immunity from civil suits resulting from their government duties of bringing cases that they even KNOW are false and for political or personal objectives. That should be overruled, and it has gutted our legal system, destroying due process of law and equal justice for all.

2021 Conviction Rate with Table 2

2021 US Sentencing Commission

It is STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE to threaten your family to force you to plead guilty to things you never did. Prosecutors have a 95-100%% conviction rate depending on the district. Your case is supposed to be randomly sent to a judge. Civilly, the clerk picks the judge in a closed room. The SEC had the clerks always assign their actions to Judge Richard Owen. Out of 100s of judges, they managed to always get the same one.

Owen Richard

Judge Richard Owen was a real notorious pro-government former prosecutor playing the role of judge. He had handled most of the high-profile SEC cases. Amazingly, every high-profile SEC case seemed to get him.  He took the lawyers away from Steven H. Schiffer in an SEC case and then tormented him, so he committed suicide all alone because, civilly, you are not entitled to lawyers. Then he would joke about it that he was never overruled because Schiffer didn’t know how to handle himself. This is far too often the character of people in the legal system who seem to be attracted because they love to hate people and hurt them and their families – it seems to make them feel powerful.

06-14-2000114MEMO-ENDORSEMENT on Emergency Ex Parte Application; Ex parte request for relief in Bankruptcy Court or, in the alternative, request for hearing on order to Show Cause before 6/8/00; this is filed as “on hold” due to Mr. Schiffer’s death on 6/9/00 ( signed by Judge Richard Owen) Copies mailed. (lam) (Entered: 06/21/2000)
Rosenberg Ethel
Sobell Morton

In the famous Rosenberg espionage case, where they also did not have the necessary evidence, they charged his wife to try to force a guilty plea. They went to trial, for it was clear that Julius Rosenberg did not have the information they thought he had to save his wife. It was April 5th, 1951, when Julius Rosenberg (1918-1953) and his 35-year-old wife Ethel (1915-1953) were sentenced to death using this Espionage Act. Today, everyone concedes that his wife’s crime was simply being married to Julius. The prosecutors charged her, thinking it would force him to give up his contacts, which he never did, most likely because he had none.

A co-defendant of Julius and Ethel  Rosenberg, Morton Sobell (1917-2018), admitted for the first time that he was a Soviet spy on his deathbed at 91 after serving 30 years in prison but also made it clear that Ethel was innocent. Sobell passed military secrets to the Communists in World War II when the nations were still allies, he told the New York Times. Sobell, who served 18 years for espionage, said Julius did pass secrets, but Ethel, executed with her husband in 1953, was guilty of nothing more than being Mrs. Rosenberg.

Heyl Dorothy

This is a standard tactic. When the government was threatening my family and taking my lawyers away, I wrote to Dorothy Heyl, who was the SEC prosecutor, and asked if this is how they win cases. I said if the object was to get me to commit suicide as they did in Schiffer’s case, I said I would commit suicide to protect my family, but I promised I would not go so quietly as Schiffer. She told all the other prosecutors to back off. She seemed to be the only one with a conscience in New York City.

I had one guy come to me and say they were threatening his daughter. I did not seem so disturbed by his story. He called me a cold-hearted bastard. I told him to go talk to anyone in here. It’s not personal. They do this TO EVERYONE. He came back and apologized after talking to others. No judge will listen because they are ONLY there to protect the government – not you.

Judge Rakoff Why Immocent Plead Guilty

The famous Federal Judge Jed D. Rakoff was so appalled at the depths to which our legal system has collapsed that he wrote a book entitled: “Why the innocent plead guilty and the guilty go free.” Anyone who thinks that our legal system is just or fair you better open your eyes. I believe that these prosecutions of Trump have pushed the reality of just how corrupt our legal system has become in front of the entire world.

Arrogance of Power

Once you hand ANY power to ANYONE in government, they will abuse that power and expand their authority, just as a small businessman tries to expand his business. The problem is we are dealing with the government, and the victim is ALWAYS the people. The American legal system has beaten the abuse of even Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.

Volksgerichtshof, Reinecke, Freisler, Lautz

Our own conviction rate, being nearly 95-100%, stands in contrast to even Adolf Hitler, who had a conviction rate of about 90% at his notorious People’s Court under Roland Freisler (pictured in the center). Roland Freisler was the most bloodthirsty of all the head judges to rule that court. Even Wikipedia writes:

“The number of death sentences rose sharply under Freisler’s stewardship. Approximately 90% of all proceedings ended with sentences of death or life imprisonment, the sentences frequently having been determined before the trial. Between 1942 and 1945, more than 5,000 death sentences were handed out, and of these, 2,600 through the court’s First Senate, which Freisler headed. Thus, Freisler alone was responsible, in his three years on the court, for as many death sentences as all other senate sessions of the court together in the entire time the court existed, between 1934 and 1945.”

Our conviction rate today of about 95-100% in federal court has surpassed the most notorious court Hitler maintained in determining if you were Jewish or any part thereof, which had a 90% conviction rate. That is not something we should be proud of. There can be no liberty when the government controls the courts. Socialism ends up being the excuse used to exert power and nothing more.

Queens bENCH Dublin

When 2032 comes around, this time, the government must be STRIPPED of its power to bring criminal charges in any matter where they are not the actual victim. None of this disturbing the king’s peace shit from Magna Carta to make money. There should be NO judge for life. Lawyers should have to be judges as a civil duty for brief periods – not life. There should NEVER be one judge in any criminal proceeding – only three.

Mill John Stuart Legal Persecution

John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), in his classic work, On Liberty, should be required reading in high school. Only then will people begin to comprehend that all governments are NEVER there for your benefit – only their own pursuit of power.

Dickens Suffer any Wrong

Even Charles Dickens (1812-1870) wrote about how corrupt the courts had become in England. His classic line in Bleak House published in 1853 from Chapter I, In Chancery, explained it all.

“Suffer any wrong that can be done you rather than come here!”

Gibbon on Commodus

Even Edward Gibbon (1737-1794) in his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire also observed that the legal system of Rome had become corrupt, and what is said then obviously applies to our system today – that a “distinction of every kind soon became criminal” as Bragg has done in New York to Trump with the nonsense of hush money, and “Suspicion was equivalent to proof; trial to condemnation” describes our legal system that has matched the conviction rates of the most notorious tyrant throughout all of history.

Armstrong legal system crumbles

Rep Harriet Hageman Outlines Rep Dan Goldman Connection to The New York City Trial Against Candidate Donald Trump


Posted originally on the CTH on May 16, 2024 | Sundance

Representative Harriet Hageman used the opportunity of the House Weaponization Committee hearing, on the Lawfare trial of Donald Trump in New York, to outline Rep. Dan Goldman’s (D-NY) conflict of interest.

Goldman has hired Judge Merchan’s daughter – a clear conflict of interest. Additionally, Goldman has admitted to coaching Trump witness Michael Cohen prior to his testimony. Harriet Hageman outlined the details of the issue, while Stacey Plaskett (D-VI) claimed an immediate point of order in order to hide the information. WATCH:

During the same committee hearing, Hageman also outlined the larger Lawfare attack as constructed by Judge Merchan to assist the Lawfare goals.

.

Everything You Need to Know About the Prosecution’s Star Witness, Michael Cohen, in Trump Trial


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: May 14, 2024 at 5:30 pm EST

5.6.24: TREASON, 4thPsyop vid, MSM admit V@X injuries, SHAM TRIAL exposed, SOROS EVIL plans, Pray!


Posted originally on Rumble By And We Know on: May 8, 2024 at 12:01 pm EST

Julie Kelly Gives Update On What Is Happening In The Classified Documents Case


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: May 8, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Judge in Trump Classified Documents Case Suspends Trial Indefinitely


Posted originally on the CTH on May 7, 2024 | Sundance 

Judge Aileen Cannon has issued an order [SEE HERE] canceling the original trial date and suspending the trial proceedings pending resolution of multiple pre-trial issues.  Lawfare is big mad.

[Source]

(Via Politico) – […] The date had been widely expected to move amid a tangle of pretrial conflicts between special counsel Jack Smith and Trump’s attorneys. Smith had urged Judge Aileen Cannon to reschedule the trial to begin on July 8, but an order from the judge on Tuesday afternoon suggested that she is unlikely to even decide on a new trial date before late July.

[…] “[F]inalization of a trial date at this juncture — before resolution of the myriad and interconnected pre-trial and [classified evidence] issues … would be imprudent and inconsistent with the Court’s duty to fully and fairly consider the various pending pre-trial motions,” Cannon wrote in the five-page order.

That reshuffling further clouds the picture for Smith, who is also awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity that could determine whether his other case against Trump — charges in Washington D.C. for attempting to subvert the 2020 election — can move forward this year. (read more

Jack Smith’s Lawfare Scheme Under Scrutiny and Fraying


Posted originally on the CTH on May 7, 2024 | Sundance 

Those who understand the construct of Lawfare understand the purposes and intents. Lawfare is an outcome of a radical activist pivot point that happened during the Obama administration.

Prior to the Obama-era the radicals tearing down government defended the transparently guilty, their allies and fellow traveling communists. Those who were arrested for violence the radicals supported, were defended, excused and their activity justified.

After the election of Obama, as noted first by author Jack Cashill, something changed; the radicals reversed their position. Instead of defending the transparently guilty, the Obama aligned usurpers -now with actual power at their fingertips- began accusing the transparently innocent.

In the “anger games” era of Barack Obama, the radicals began attacking the innocent and using their allies in media as part of the attack narrative. George Zimmerman, Darren Wilson, the Baltimore-six, etc. The list is long; we tracked them all with detailed research; however, the theme amid every story was the same. Isolate, ridicule and marginalize the transparently innocent target and make them appear guilty.

When you think about the construct during the 2016 election and the entirely fraudulent Trump-Russia collusion narrative, you see the same theme continued. Stand back and elevate yourself and you see this era of using completely false accusations transposed over the election.  Essentially, accuse the target, Donald J Trump, of something he was transparently innocent of doing.

After they lost the 2016 election, the radicals did not stop.  They continued constructing entirely false Lawfare stories with the intention to frame the transparently innocent.  This approach had two benefits; (1) radical Lawfare maintained the attack position blocking any reversal of Obama policy, and (2) the Lawfare process covered up their unlawful activity.

Using Lawfare constructed by Main Justice and the FBI, the Crossfire Hurricane investigation became the special counsel Mueller investigation, which became impeachment investigations, which became the Durham investigation, which became the J6 investigation, which became the Jack Smith investigation.  All of it was/is one long Lawfare operation.

In the classified documents case, Florida federal judge Aileen Cannon has noted the Lawfare construct of this fraudulent legal case.  In practice “Lawfare” is about manipulating the narrative of a manufactured legal controversy or premise, and sometimes actual laws themselves, to change public opinion about the target of the Lawfare action.  Judge Cannon clearly sees this playing out in the background of the case.

(Via NBC) – Judge Aileen Cannon has granted Donald Trump a delay in the classified documents trial by pushing back a court deadline in the case.

On Monday, Judge Cannon temporarily stayed a May 9 deadline for Trump and his two co-defendants in the federal case to submit court filings.  It relates to Section 5(a) of the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA), which would disclose what sensitive materials Trump intends to use at the trial.

[…] Cannon submitted court filings on Monday “temporarily staying” the CIPA request regarding what classified materials the defendants intend to use in the trial and what expert witnesses Trump’s legal team intends to call at the trial in Florida.

Cannon did not offer any explanation as to why the May 9 CIPA deadline has been indefinitely postponed, only stating that an “order setting second set of pretrial deadlines/hearings to follow.”  (read more)

NBC may pretend not to know why Judge Cannon has changed the hearing date and purpose; however, CTH, you and journalist Julie Kelly can clearly see why Cannon is slowing down the process simultaneous to her putting increased sunlight on the case.

Recently, the special counsel was forced to admit they staged the pictures they gave to the media during the raid on Mar-a-Lago.  Again, the purpose of Lawfare is to create the optics of unlawful action to manipulate public opinion; therein, lies the motive for “staging” images under false pretenses.

[VIA Julie Kelly] […] Jay Bratt, who was the lead DOJ prosecutor on the investigation at the time and now is assigned to Smith’s team, described the photo this way in his August 30, 2022 response to Trump’s special master lawsuit:

“[Thirteen] boxes or containers contained documents with classification markings, and in all, over one hundred unique documents with classification markings…were seized. Certain of the documents had colored cover sheets indicating their classification status. (Emphasis added.) See, e.g., Attachment F (redacted FBI photograph of certain documents and classified cover sheets recovered from a container in the ‘45 office’).”

The DOJ’s clever wordsmithing, however, did not accurately describe the origin of the cover sheets. In what must be considered not only an act of doctoring evidence but willfully misleading the American people into believing the former president is a criminal and threat to national security, agents involved in the raid attached the cover sheets to at least seven files to stage the photo.

Classified cover sheets were not “recovered” in the container, contrary to Bratt’s declaration to the court. In fact, after being busted recently by defense attorneys for mishandling evidence in the case, Bratt had to fess up about how the cover sheets actually ended up on the documents.

Here is Bratt’s new version of the story, where he finally admits a critical detail that he failed to disclose in his August 2022 filing:

“[If] the investigative team found a document with classification markings, it removed the document, segregated it, and replaced it with a placeholder sheet. The investigative team used classified cover sheets for that purpose.”

But before the official cover sheets were used as placeholder, agents apparently used them as props. FBI agents took it upon themselves to paperclip the sheets to documents—something evident given the uniform nature of how each cover sheet is clipped to each file in the photo—laid them on the floor, and snapped a picture for political posterity. (more)

While it is always best to prepare for the worst while hoping for the best, there are a lot of reasons to be optimistic that Judge Cannon will eventually dismiss this ridiculous Lawfare case.  If she does not dismiss the case, one of the reasons she may elect to keep the case going is simply to allow more sunlight on how the case was constructed.

The use of Lawfare requires lies, manipulation, dishonesty, deceit and a lying press.  Once you put honest sunlight on a Lawfare operation, the fraud starts to collapse…..  Just ask George Zimmerman, Darren Wilson and the Baltimore Six.

Read the Indictment Against Henry Cuellar to Understand Why Congress Never Challenges the Intelligence Community


Posted originally on the CTH on May 6, 2024 | Sundance 

There is a rather remarkable indictment against congressman Henry Cuellar (D-Texas, CD-28) that everyone should read.  You might remember that Cuellar was openly critical of the Biden border crisis in the latter half of 2021.  Approximately a few weeks after Cuellar was openly and strongly criticizing Biden, FBI agents raided his home {BACKSTORY}.

At the time of the FBI raid (January 2022), everyone noted the visible connection between Cuellar’s criticism of Biden and the launch of the DOJ investigation against him.  The timing was just too convenient.

Last Friday an indictment was unsealed.  Representative Cuellar and his wife are each charged with two counts of conspiracy to commit bribery of a federal official and to have a public official act as an agent of a foreign principal, two counts of bribery of a federal official, two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, two counts of violating the ban on public officials acting as agents of a foreign principal, one count of conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering, and five counts of money laundering.

Interestingly, the charges and the activity date back to 2014 and continue over the next ten years culminating in the indictment a decade later.

I would strongly urge people to read THE 54-PAGE INDICTMENT.

What you realize when you read the indictment is exactly what we have talked about on these pages for well over a decade, the business end of American politics.  Cuellar and his wife are a case study in how the average federal politician gets wealthy from selling their office.

All of the DC politicians participate in this type of influence selling.  There are ZERO federal elected officials who do not participate in this process.  And within that dynamic, we find the answer to how the Intelligence Community exists to control all of the DC political systems without any checks in their authority.

One of the primary reasons the Intelligence Community was so fast to join the effort to eliminate the threat Donald Trump, represented in 2016, was specifically due to the lack of corrupt activity (IC blackmail) that could be leveraged against him.  Absent the ability to control the target, the IC must create leverage.

The intelligence institutions, in collaboration with the weaponized justice institutions, created the fourth branch of government.  It was this system that was fine-tuned by Barack Obama and Eric Holder to target their political opposition.

Representative Henry Cuellar is a warning to the other compromised people in Washington DC not to challenge the administrative state.  The “six ways to Sunday” groups will focus on anyone who threatens the system or breaks the code of Omerta.

Don’t read anyone else’s interpretation of it; instead, read the indictment [SEE HERE].   Then ask yourself if the DOJ/FBI knew this stuff for so long, why did they wait? 

“I want to be clear that both my wife and I are innocent of these allegations. Everything I have done in Congress has been to serve the people of South Texas,” Cuellar said in his statement, later adding: “The actions I took in Congress were consistent with the actions of many of my colleagues and in the interest of the American people.” (LINK)

Trump Company Comptroller Testifies He Alone Determined to Classify Cohen Payment as “Legal Expense” Never Had Conversation with President Trump About It


Posted originally on the CTH on May 6, 2024 | Sundance

In a normally functioning democracy (constitutional republic), the testimony today by Trump corporate comptroller Jeff McConney would end the ridiculous “hush money” case.  McConney testified he alone was the one who instructed the accounting department to classify payments to Michael Cohen as “legal expenses.”

This entire premise of the silly NY City case against Donald Trump is predicated on the claim candidate Trump had the payments classified as legal expenses to hide the hush money payment.  If Trump didn’t determine the classification, the case should collapse.  Alas, we all know what this Lawfare is really about.

[CITATION]

Activist Judge Juan Merchan Threatens to Jail President Trump for Gag Order Violations as Part of Political Lawfare Strategy


Posted originally on the CTH on May 6, 2024 | Sundance

So far, these ridiculous Lawfare attacks against President Donald Trump have backfired and generated more support.  The reasoning for this reaction from the polled public is simple; the more the weaponized state and judicial system attacks President Trump, the clearer the dynamic of the 2024 election becomes.

The radicals amid the Lawfare operation consistently disregard the intelligence of the average American; however, it should be noted talking down to people is a common trait amid most leftists who consider themselves more intelligent than the people they talk about.  As the operatives use transparently ridiculous Lawfare to attack President Trump, the dynamic of the race changes.

2024 is no longer about Republicans vs Democrats.  The 2024 race is now framed as ‘truthful voting Americans fighting against a corrupt and weaponized government supported by a corrupt political UniParty system – Republicans and Democrats alike.

As Mary McCord, Andrew Weissmann and Norm Eisen design the Lawfare narrative executed by District Attorney Alvin Bragg and NYC activist Judge Juan Merchan, the Lawfare crew underestimate the intelligence of the American electorate. Today, Merchan threatens to jail President Trump [SEE JUDGEMENT HERE] for violating the gag order they need in order to continue their Lawfare attacks.

Today Judge Merchan held President Trump in contempt for one of four statements prosecutors claimed were gag order violations. The ‘infraction’ was a comment Trump made about the jury, April 22 on a radio show called “Just the News, No Noise.”  President Trump responded to a question saying, “That jury was picked so fast — 95 percent Democrats.”  This retort, the judge claims, is a violation:

“Defendant violated the Order by making public statements about the jury and how it was selected. In doing so, Defendant not only called into question the integrity, and therefore the legitimacy of these proceedings, but again raised the specter of fear for the safety of the jurors and of their loved ones.”  [Page 4, pdf]

According to Politico the judge also said: “It’s important to understand that the last thing I want to do is to put you in jail. You are a former president of the United States and possibly a future president, as well. … There are many reasons why incarceration is truly a last step for me,” the judge said.

“I also worry about the people who would have to execute that sanction,” Merchan added, referring to jail personnel, the Secret Service and others. “At the end of the day I have a job to do — part of that job is to protect the dignity of the judicial system.” (LINK)