New York Times Says One Foot Of Sea Level Rise By 2016 “Appears Certain”


The thing is that back then it wasn’t a consensus now that it is it’s more certain then ever we only have 2 more years till it happens … lol

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

SIGNIFIGANT RISE IN SEA LEVEL NOW SEEMS CERTAIN
By ERIK ECKHOLM
Published: February 18, 1986

MANY scientists are so sure that the sea level will rise visibly in the coming decades that they are advising planners to adopt new strategies now. A predicted rise in sea level of one foot within the next 30 to 40 years willdrive much of the Atlantic and Gulf shoreline inward by a hundred feet and some of it by more than a thousand feet

SIGNIFIGANT RISE IN SEA LEVEL NOW SEEMS CERTAIN – NYTimes.com

View original post

SOLAR PLANTS SMOKING THOUSANDS OF BIRDS FROM THE SKY


Hey maybe we can sick the EPA on the DOE …

burstupdates's avatarBurst Updates

View original post

Smoking Gun Of Extreme Climate Fraud At NOAA


After what NOAA and NASA have done they should both be closed down there is no way to bring back there reputations now!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

According to this EPA document, only 50% of the US was unusually hot in 1936, and 60% of the US was hot in 2012.

ScreenHunter_2050 Aug. 17 15.15

High and Low Temperatures | Climate Change | US EPA

This document was derived from NOAA’s Climate Extremes Index (CEI.) It is trivial to demonstrate that the NOAA CEI is wrong.

In 1936, 78% of USHCN stations recorded 100 degree temperatures, compared to 58% in 2012.  Forty-four states had temperatures over 100 degrees in 1936. The CEI shows accurate numbers for 2012, but the 1936 numbers are massively understated. The average peak temperature of the 78% over 100 degrees in 1936 was an incredible 108 degrees.

ScreenHunter_2046 Aug. 17 14.33

But it is worse than it seems – the 1936 temperatures were not just over 100 degrees, but they were way over 100 degrees. In 1936, 24% of the US reached 110 degrees – compared to only 4% in 2012.

ScreenHunter_2047 Aug. 17 14.41

During the…

View original post 3,793 more words

As Radioactive Water Accumulates, TEPCO Eyes Pacific Ocean As Dumping Ground


This is a serious problem and should be getting more attention!

NASA Has More Than Doubled Hockey Stick Warming Since 1999


Its amassing what one can do with a computer and the license to lie!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

We are all familiar with this NASA graph, which forms the basis of the hockey stick. It shows about 1.2C warming from 1880 to 1998.

Fig.A (2)

Fig.A.gif (656×446)

But their graphs didn’t always look like this. In 1999 they showed no net warming from 1878 to 1978, and a total of 0.5C warming from the 1870’s to 1998. NASA has more than doubled hockey stick warming since 1999. Clever of them to hide the warm pre-1880 temperatures, in their current graphs.

ScreenHunter_1981 Aug. 16 08.48 web.archive.org/web/19990220235952/…… /GLB.Ts.txt

View original post

2001 Hansen Paper Highlighted The Spectacular Corruption Of The US Temperature Record


The cause justifies the means even if it destroys science in the process.

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Hansen’s 2001 paper exposed how NOAA and NASA massively corrupt the US temperature record. The image below shows the various steps of data tampering..

ScreenHunter_1967 Aug. 16 05.33ScreenHunter_1961 Aug. 16 04.30

pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2001/2001_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

Before they start tampering with data, 47% of US rural stations cooled from 1900 to 1999, and 42% warmed. But after NOAA and NASA were done hacking the data, only 22% of stations were cooling and 69% were warming. They effectively contaminated rural stations with urban data.

ScreenHunter_1965 Aug. 16 05.25

Similar story for urban stations. After adjusting for UHI, the US apparently gets hotter. Note that after contaminating the rural data with urban data, both rural and urban stations appear nearly identical at 67-69% warming.

ScreenHunter_1966 Aug. 16 05.25

As awful as this 2001 data tempering was, they have continued to tamper with it since the 2001 paper was written. This graph shows the additional hockey stick of data tampering. Particularly note the spike after 1990, and hiding the warmth of the 1930s and 1940s.

ScreenHunter_1969 Aug. 16 06.03.
2001 version : wayback.archive.org/……/FigD.txt
Current…

View original post 56 more words

A Climate of Despair – Climategate had more effects than we realized at first


To the progressives the belief in man made climate change is nothing more than their “religion” as most of them are secularists!

Holocene Conundrum


Way to small a number to mean anything and if we use K instead of C the percentage changes in “Heat energy” disappears.

Bob Greene's avatarJunkScience.com

A new study says warming for the last 10,000 years, contradicting other studies that say we have been cooling for the last 7,000 years until man changed the climate.

View original post 237 more words

Global Cooling Since 1997 – Worse Than It Seems


They are really not wrong they forget to tell us that the oceans would be eating the heat!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Crack government scientists announced 14 years ago that snow is a thing of the past.

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past

Monday 20 March 2000

Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”.

Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said.

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past – Environment – The Independent

Winter snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere has been rapidly expanding since 1997, and is at record levels. The snow line is moving further south every winter, due to Arctic air intruding further south.

ScreenHunter_1946 Aug. 15 05.51

Rutgers University Climate Lab :: Global Snow Lab

The IPCC predicted the exact opposite

ScreenHunter_136 Feb. 09 12.39

IPCC Third Assessment Report – Climate Change 2001

View original post

Why ‘Deniers’ are Always Wrong – Models can’t be falsified


Hey it sounds reasonable to me … lol