Uptick in US Manufacturing


Posted originally on Apr 3, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

manufacturing man 1

Companies are beginning to move production to the United States to avoid tariffs. “President Trump’s economic polices are simple: if you invest in and create jobs in America, you’ll be rewarded. We’ll lower regulations and reduce taxes,” Vice President J.D. Vance posted online. “But if you build outside of the United States, you’re on your own.”

Hyundai announced a massive $20 billion investment in the United States with plans to open plants in Georgia and Alabama. Around $5.8 million will go towards an updated steel plant that is expected to employ over 1,400 people. Hyundai believes it will soon produce over 1 million cars in America per year.

Eli Lilly is sending $27 million to the US economy as it enhances domestic pharmaceutical production, equating to a total of $50 billion in US manufacturing since 2020. Johnson & Johnson also plans to invest $55 billion in domestic drug manufacturing over the next four years and will build a new biologics facility in North Carolina.

GE Aerospace plans to invest $1 billion to “strengthen manufacturing and increase the use of innovative new parts and materials needed for the future of flight.” The company will increase operations across 16 states, with plans to hire 5,000 new employees.

Apple announced one of the largest investment plans to the tune of $500 billion over the next five years. The company plans to build advanced AI server manufacturing factory in Texas and will double the size of its Advanced Manufacturing Fund from $5 to $10 billion. Apple will need to fill over 20,000 new positions.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) is set to invest $165 billion into creating new plants and R&D centers. Nvidia also plans to begin manufacturing highly desired semiconductor chips in the US over the next four years.

Tariffs are not helpful overall, but US manufacturing was at a standstill. The Inflation Reduction Act promised to fund the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that was intended to expand American manufacturing, but regulation and an emphasis on clean energy initiatives drove business away. The Biden Administration had promised to add 1 million manufacturing jobs to the US but failed miserably. So far, there is a bit of success behind the push for US manufacturing and job creation, but the overall burden of tariffs will have a wider impact on the global economy. The latest ADP report shows a 21,000 increase in manufacturing jobs, but it is too early to know if the trend will continue.

Trump Tariffs & Liberation Day


Posted originally on Apr 2, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

ECM 2020 2028 R

President Trump announced a baseline 10% tariff on U.S. imports, with steeper reciprocal levies on goods from Europe, Japan, China, and more than 50 other nations. The problem is that he will be blamed for the recession/depression the world is headed into, which will not bottom until August 25th, 2028. Economists widely criticized tariffs for deepening the global trade collapse during the Great Depression. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs were targeting agriculture because they did not understand currency. I disagree with what Trump is doing with tariffs. Some are justified where the EU is very abusive, for they are still living in the days of Marxism. You keep high tariffs to protect local jobs at the expense of your living standards. Citizens must pay 20% more for goods made domestically because they are subsidized by blocking imports from other provinces, as inside Canada, or nations such as the EU.

924 ECM 11925.45 1934.05 Hitler

I believe Trump will have a PR problem because the economy is turning down because of global debt and warmongering, but the LEFT and economists, who are biased leftists in general, will blame Trump and his tariffs. I stated at the November WEC in 2024 that it did not matter who won economically, the world is in trouble, and we were headed into a recession by 2028.

MA War Cycle 2011 WEC

I was pro-Trump because of the war, and I knew he was anti-war. My computer warns that we are headed into World War III, and I stated that clearly at the 2011 WEC conference in Philadelphia. I understand that many hate my guts because they do not like the forecasts. These are NOT my personal opinions. My job is to present the forecasts that Socrates has put out. I have also said at our WEC events that I have tried my best to defeat my own model. I have consistently failed.

Trump announced that universal 10% tariffs on all imports into the US will go into effect on April 5th, in a key moment for global trade. Certain countries will be hit with steeper tariffs based on US trade deficits, as high as 50% – these begin April 9th. Insofar as the UK is concerned, Trump says the UK will have a 10% tariff on goods, but the EU’s rate will be 20% Theis will benefit the UK for what you will see is redeployment of goods being shipped from the AAEU to the UK and then sent to USA to skirt the tariffs.

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, formally known as the Tariff Act of 1930, was signed into law by President Herbert Hoover on June 17, 1930. This protectionist legislation significantly raised U.S. tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods, aiming to shield American industries during the Great Depression. However, it exacerbated global economic tensions by prompting retaliatory tariffs from other nations, further reducing international trade. The act is often cited as contributing to the severity of the worldwide economic downturn in the 1930s.

Galbraith Great Crash

That is because the economists were all LEFTIST Marxists. I had to read in high school The Great Crash by Galbraith and I came to understand everything I was being taught is school was a lie – just LEFTIST propaganda. Galbraith never mentioned that all of Europe defaulted on its debt. Even Canada defaulted. That is what pushed the dollar to historic highs and that is what led to the protectionism. It was all currency.

Hoover Quote

If Galbraith told the truth, then FDR’s New Deal was wrong – the problem was not greedy capitalists, but greedy politicians. Nevertheless, just as they still lie every day in economics classes around the globe, selling covertly Marxism/Keynesianism, nobody mentions the Sovereign Defaults of 1931 that led to the collapse of 9000 banks.

1931_GB Abandons Gold 1

Canada suspended the gold standard in 1931, following the United Kingdom’s decision to abandon it in September of that year. The move was part of a broader response to the economic pressures of the Great Depression, which led many countries to exit the gold standard to gain more flexibility in monetary policy. Canada’s suspension occurred shortly after Britain’s, aligning with its economic ties to the British Commonwealth. The exact timing is often cited as October 1931, marking a critical step in Canada’s efforts to mitigate financial instability during the crisis. This decision differentiated Canada from the United States, which retained the gold standard until 1933.

1931 Dow 1927 37 Dollar

The US share market, based on the Dow Jones Industrials, fell 89%. However, the dollar rose 41%. That means in real terms of international value, the Dow Jones declined by only about 47% – not 89%. Nobody understood the capital flows, and nobody understood currency.

Trump will be blamed for the Tariffs

Just as they blamed the Capitalists rather than Governments in the 1930s

President Trump announced sweeping global tariffs on Liberation Day — a risky move that he vowed would lure manufacturing back to the United States. Sorry – it’s the taxes, not tariffs!

This will upend the global economy mainly because Europe is HIGHLY Marxist. We are talking about culture shifts, not just economic

Sorry. I cannot be Partisan. I have to call the Shots as they are fired

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Outlines Details of President Trump Tariff Plan


Posted originally on CTH on April 3, 2025 | Sundance

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discusses President Trump’s tariff plans, federal deficit negotiations and the efforts to extend the 2017 tax cuts with Annmarie Hordern on “Balance of Power.”

Bessent walks through a strong, focused and deliberate outline while warning other nations not to assemble any retaliatory effort, or else the tariff ceiling currently outlined is likely to go much higher.  WATCH:

SEGMENTS:
00:00- Bessent says of tariffs, “this is the number barring retaliation”
01:20- China tariff rate, potential rate
03:13- Bessent on markets: “A mag seven problem, not a MAGA problem
05:07- Potential timing of reconciliation bill
07:00 – US on Debt ‘Warning Track’ for May or June
07:45 – Bessent on raising revenues through tariffs
09:18 -Bessent discusses US soft data, sentiment
10:25 – Government agenda for the remainder of 2025, Ukraine progress, and Iran

USTR Jamison Greer Discusses Tariffs and Trade Policy with Senior White House Team


Posted originally on CTH on April 3, 2025 | Sundance 

Senior White House Officials Taylor Budowich, Stephen Miller, and Karoline Leavitt have a discussion on Tariffs with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

President Trump’s trade and tariff policy is a complete restructuring and reset of the U.S. economy and manufacturing base.  The former presidential administrations (both parties) from Jimmy Carter to Ronald Reagan, to George HW Bush, to Bill Clinton, to George W Bush, to Barack Obama and forward to Joe Biden, all of them purposefully and with specific intent taking apart the U.S. manufacturing base through trade and economic policy.

The discussion below is familiar to those who have watched the MAGAnomic policy unfold.  However, for those who are only beginning to understand just how impactful these policies will have on the life of your family, this conversation begins the journey.  WATCH:

.

President Trump Remarks at Make America Wealthy Again White House Event


Posted originally on CTH on April 3, 2025 | Sundance

President Trump delivers a speech at the White House outlining a global trade reset established on the principle of trade and tariff reciprocity.  [Primary Executive Order Here]  – [Executive Order Here]

The post-war international economic system was based upon three incorrect assumptions: first, that if the United States led the world in liberalizing tariff and non-tariff barriers the rest of the world would follow; second, that such liberalization would ultimately result in more economic convergence and increased domestic consumption among U.S. trading partners converging towards the share in the United States; and third, that as a result, the United States would not accrue large and persistent goods trade deficits.”

“Put simply, while World Trade Organization (WTO) Members agreed to bind their tariff rates on a most-favored-nation (MFN) basis and thereby provide their best tariff rates to all WTO Members, they did not agree to bind their tariff rates at similarly low levels or to apply tariff rates on a reciprocal basis.  Consequently, according to the WTO, the United States has among the lowest simple average MFN tariff rates in the world at 3.3 percent, while many of our key trading partners like Brazil (11.2 percent), China (7.5 percent), the European Union (EU) (5 percent), India (17 percent), and Vietnam (9.4 percent) have simple average MFN tariff rates that are significantly higher.”

.

Country-specific ad valorem rates of duty as specified in Annex I to the main Executive Order.

The tariffs generally target completed goods, not the imported chemical or component materials needed to by industry to manufacture the products domestically.  Annex II are the exemptions to the Executive Order.

I have been going through the details and will have much more soon.

White House Message: “Happy Liberation Day, America!”


Posted originally on CTH on April 2, 2025 | Sundance 

President Trump and the White House posted the following message to begin “Liberation Day.”

President Donald Trump is scheduled to end the U.S Marshal Plan for Europe, eliminating one-way tariffs eighty years after the Marshal Plan began.  President Trump is now planning to institute global reciprocal tariffs, by matching all tariff and non-tariff trade barriers and restrictions.  WATCH:

[SOURCE]

Putin Explains America’s Ongoing Position on Greenland


Posted originally on Apr 2, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

2023_02_21_Putin_Speech 2

Vladimir Putin is one world leader who has studied history thoroughly. In a recent address, Putin discussed America’s plan to annex Greenland and explained that it is not some “extravagant plan” that Trump imagined. In fact, the United States had plans to annex Greenland going back to the 1860s.

Secretary of State William H. Seward was keenly in favor of annexing Iceland and Greenland in the 1860s as part of American expansionism. Not only was Greenland abundant in minerals, fish, and game, but it provided a strategic military base. Denmark was willing to listen to the proposal and considered selling Iceland and Greenland for $5.5 million in gold. There was no formal offer and President Andrew Johnson along with Congress refused to approve of a treaty, as it was considered wasteful by Republicans at the time.

America believed Canada may consider joining the United States if they acquired Greenland. The Trump Administration’s ideas may seem absurd but this geopolitical strategy spans over 150 years.

The Alaska Purchase of 1867 was immediately met with backlash. The media mocked the purchase of Alaska as “Seward’s icebox” or “Seward’s folly,” angered that the $7.2 million purchase should have been spent elsewhere. The media claimed the “polar bear garden” had nothing of value and relentlessly mocked the acquisition. The unpopularity of the Alaksa Purchase is one of the reasons the Greenland proposal failed back then.

America’s ambitions in the Arctic continued. In 1919, Denmark, Germany, and the United States discussed territorial disputes, and had the deal passed, the United States would have acquired Greenland. During the next World War, Denmark permitted the United States to establish military bases on Greenland to prevent the Nazis from capturing it. The United States offered to buy the land after the war ended but it fell through.

Alaska_purchase

Putin explained that the United States will continue to “systematically pursue its geostrategic, military, economic, and political interests in the Arctic.” He said that this is a matter between two specific countries and “has nothing to do with us [Russia.” However, Russia is extremely concerned that “NATO views the Arctic as a potential staging ground for conflict,” noting that NATO is actively training troops to fight in Arctic conditions. They are taking troops from Sweden and Finland, “countries with which, I should note, we had no issues until very recently.”

“They are creating these problems with their own hands. Why? That’s entirely unclear,” Putin said in his address, noting that Russia would “respond accordingly.”

“I want to emphasize Russia has never threatened anyone in the Arctic, but we are closely monitoring the situation and building the appropriate response, enhancing the combat readiness of our armed forces and modernizing our military infrastructure. We will not allow any infringement on our sovereignty. We will reliably defend our national interests,” the president stated, continued by saying Russia will promote peace in the region and support Greenland’s economic development. Putin said he would be interested in investing in the Arctic and collaborating on projects with “friendly nations, and possibly even Western countries if they show interest in cooperating.”

History always repeats, but few bother looking through the scrolls of time to understand why the world is unfolding at its current pace. The United States has always desired control over Greenland, and this issue of acquiring the island reemerges every few decades. The concern here is that the world is not at peace. The neocons, historically, have wanted to confiscate Russia for itself and began arranging the current proxy war in Ukraine long ago to use as a stepping stone to enter Russia. They are not well-versed in history, as plans to conquer Russia have failed countless times.

Merz Prepared to Punish Hungary for Anti-War Policies


Posted originally on Apr 2, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Merz Friedrich

Incoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz believes it is time for the European Union to begin punishing Hungary for voting against pro-war policies. The Social Democrat Party of the last administration, along with Merz, is forming a coalition to ensure that any remaining vestige of a democracy in Brussels dies.

“Existing protective instruments, from infringement proceedings and the withholding of EU funds to the suspension of membership rights such as voting rights in the Council of the EU, must be applied much more consistently than before,” negotiators from Merz’s conservative bloc and the SPD wrote in a draft coalition agreement on EU politics.

Now, the European Commission blocked Hungary from receiving €22 billion in aid back in 2022. Orban attempted to meet with Putin directly to act as a peacekeeper of sorts, deeply angering the EU as their agenda does not permit a de-escalation. The EU has been battling Viktor Orban for years and most recently decided the “new norm” would be to void the need for any unanimous vote among member states since Orban does not want to send endless funds to Ukraine.

shutterstock_495258091

The new German government plans to “advocate an expansion of qualified majority voting in the Council of the EU, particularly on certain issues of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), such as the imposition of sanctions.” This basically means that Hungary will have absolutely no say in policies that it must abide by under the authoritarian rule of the EU.

Germany, France, and Poland are looking to strengthen their alliance, the Weimar Triangle, and use their strength to shape future EU policies. Germany is the breadwinner for the alliance, followed by France who is also taking the strongarm position and offering nuclear protections for Europe. Then you have Poland who has agreed to contribute more to defense than ever before and is positioned as a stepping stone to Ukraine.

“In the Weimar Triangle, we will seek close coordination on all relevant European policy issues in order to act more united in the service of the EU as a whole,” reads the draft agreement, echoing previous statements made by incoming chancellor Merz.

The entire union was created unfairly, and certain member states have always benefitted more than others. Now, the top economies in Europe are ready to strongarm the others. They will dictate policies and determine how other nations are to operate, while only thinking of the best interests of Brussels. The demise of the European Union is certainly on the horizon.

Half of American Parents Financially Support Adult Children


Posted originally on Apr 2, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Family Feud Dispute

Half of American parents with adult children are supporting them financially, according to a report by Savings.com. The number of adult children dependent on their parents continues to tick higher, up from 47% in 2024 and 45% in 2023. In fact, the average parent is spending $1,474 monthly per child to make ends meet amid the cost of living crisis.

Around 83% of respondents reported contributing to their adult children’s monthly grocery bills, 65% assist with cell phone plans, 44% are paying off auto payments, and 45% are paying for student loans. For those who are not living at home, 63% of parents admitting to helping pay toward rent or mortgages.

This is causing stress for a generation that should be planning for retirement, with 60% admitting they are living a more frugal lifestyle to support their adult kids. Half of respondents said that they have had to pull money from their savings and/or retirement accounts, and another 31% have taken on debt to continue supporting their kin. As for retirement, 35% believe they will need to push back on retirement plans.

This growing trend is altering society. Every generation is feeling the burden of the cost of living crisis. Rentals have never been higher and it is increasingly difficult for adults with entry-level jobs to find housing. In fact, one in three adults aged 18 to 34 still live with mom and dad. Autos, groceries, health care—every aspect of life has increased dramatically for the younger generations. This is one of the reasons why we see a declining birth rate as the cost of living is costing Gen Z and younger Millennials the opportunity to pave their own way.

Are States & Provinces Destined to Default by 2034?


Posted originally on Apr 2, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

socialism.meme_

You have to wonder why we have the most incompetent people in government, perhaps in history. While there is not a single leader in Europe who I would even want to have a drink with or shake hands, we see the same on the LEFT in the United States. No matter how often they want to rob anyone who produces and works for a living, they seem incapable of learning from experience. What is this? The triumph of hope that Marxism will work one day?

Seattle_mayor_Bruce Harrell

The mayor of Seattle, founded on November 13th, 1851, of this fictional land they call the Emerald City, admitted that the city collected $47 million less in payroll taxes last year as large companies continue to flee this Marxist waterhole. According to the Seattle Times, he said that the expected the tax per head to bring in over $400 million in revenue instead brought in only $360 million in 2024, leaving a deficit of $47 million payroll tax deficit that is added to a $260 million budget deficit pushing Seatle over the dge.

Citizens Bank LA 1830 Broken Bank Note

Retailers understand that they sell less if they raise prices without improving quality. The LEFTIST Marxists REFUSE to look at human nature because they are too busy stuffing their pockets. DO NOT BUY DEBT from Seattle. We are sliding into a Sovereign Default once again, as in the 1840s, which was a period known as the Hard Times because of the Sovereign Defaults of the States. That was set in motion by Andrew Jackson, founder of the Democratic Party, who shit down the central bank and that led to every state allowing banks to issue their own money. That led to fraud and Wildcat Banking. It was 1866 when the U.S. Government levied a 10% tax on the bank notes of state and private banks, effectively forcing them to retire their currency. Jackson also demanded only gold for the purchase of federal land, which also undermined the private currency.

While everyone points to the Federal Reserve and the Federal Debt, the Feds also have the authority to create money. The states DO NOT!!!! While in theory the Feds can monetize their way out of a debt crisis, states CANNOT! We have just witnessed here in Seattle the mindset of Blue states and how dangerous they have become when we look forward in time. Recent analyses that we have undertaken up to 2023 have revealed that several U.S. states face significant fiscal stress that could elevate their risk of default.

As seen in Seattle, states are confined to adjusting budgets and raising tax revenues. Key factors contributing to risk include high debt burdens, unfunded pension liabilities, structural perpetual budget deficits, weak economics as the great migration from high-taxed states to lower-taxed states dominates post-2020, and the demographic trends of reduced population. Young girls are told to enjoy life, and the world has too many people, so we see the birth rates collapsing throughout the West. The states that are often highlighted as having elevated default risk:

Pension Liabilities: Illinois, Kentucky, and New Jersey have the worst-funded pension systems.

Debt Load: Connecticut and Massachusetts lead in per-capita debt.

Economic Volatility: Alaska, Louisiana, and Hawaii face sector-specific risks (oil, tourism).

Demographics: Illinois and West Virginia struggle with population loss and shrinking tax bases.

1937 Provbince default Canada

We are told that default is unlikely. However, the states’ tools to avoid default, namely tax hikes, have reached their limits. People and companies are migrating. While they like to say no state has defaulted since the Great Depression, the city of Detroit suspended its debt payment in 1937 and finally made good with the devaluation thanks to inflation in 1963. This was NOT confined to the United States. Canada also defaulted on its national debt in 1931. By 1937, they were also concerned about a widespread default by the provinces.

The Democrats are still in denial about the cause of losing the election to Trump. They are not reforming or surrendering their WOKE agenda. This is what guarantees that we are headed toward a massive state default on debts. We are looking at a complete default by 2034.

As I wrote recently about how states are trying to seize power from municipalities, this is also about lining their pockets with more money.