I agree 100% with this as it goes along with my work on the manipulation that NASA does with the temperature data. But the irony to this is no matter how much they play with the numbers they can’t get the temperatures up to where the climate models say they MUST BE …
Thirty-nine percent of USHCN data is now fabricated, meaning that there is now 39% more monthly temperature data reported than measured, compared to less than 5% in 1990.
The fabricated data is warming 7°F/century faster than the measured data since 1990, when the data started disappearing.
In fact, the measured TOBS adjusted data shows no warming since 1990. All US warming since 1990 is due to data fabrication.
I am considered a heretic for excluding imaginary temperature data from my analysis, and simply averaging the thermometer data. It is now considered unacceptable by the orthodoxy to use actual measured data.


