45 Days


Posted originally on the CTH on September 20, 2024 | Sundance

Reflection.   45 Days!

Are the next 45 days really about the political battles before us.  Or is it really a time of purposeful distinction. purposeful division.

Is it really about Donald Trump -vs- Kamala Harris, or is it really about choosing between good -vs- evil.

LUKE 12:51-56

(51) “Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. (52) From now on there will be five in one family divided against each other, three against two and two against three. (53) They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.”

(54) He said to the crowd: “When you see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, ‘It’s going to rain,’ and it does. (55) And when the south wind blows, you say, ‘It’s going to be hot,’ and it is. (56) Hypocrites! You know how to interpret the appearance of the earth and the sky. How is it that you don’t know how to interpret this present time?”

We can all sense it.  Even if we turn away to engage in busyness as a distraction, the sense will not subside.

There is a great urgency needed in our communication with our family, friends, loved ones and overall community.  Do not negate your righteousness, nor diminish your instinctual value.  Do not fear.

Do not fear.

45 days!

Those who speak out are targeted, ridiculed, belittled, alinsky’d and shouted down until they are proved right.

Again and again, and again, and again, we were made to watch, or to endure the crude, bullying tactics of the social playground. Reasoned debate and argument have long since gone over the hill into uncomfortable history.

Now, the next 45 days, we enter one long slugfest, in which the loudest, angriest and most effectively insulting voices will seek to win by volume alone, so often echoed by mainstream media who hold reasoned voices in contempt; apparently preferring to ridicule and diminish rather than provide genuine space for those who had simple questions in need of non-pretending answers.

However, again and again, those shouted down are revealed as having been right all along.

If you are a regular reader of this site, you are generally a person who engages in intellectual discussion on daily events and more than likely a root cause thinker.  You do not pretend.  Meaning, you are able to grasp events at their cause and not at their consequence.

The challenge for all of us now is getting those who understand the big picture dynamics to stop being comfortable and sticking their heads in the sand about “motive.”

Most people are still clinging to beliefs around a principle of ‘rule of law’ that applies to national leadership writ large.   We need to change that thinking quickly – or we will be left explaining ‘what happened’ again, far too late.

There is also an issue with conservative “ushers” guiding their audience into a state of tactical numbness.  A willful blindness within part of the American electorate, a chosen refusal to acknowledge the implications of the unAmerican and unconstititional actions we are seeing on a daily basis.

It can no longer be presumed to be a matter of, “I can’t see what’s happening”, because a whole lot of normal Americans are clean and articulate.  “I can’t see it”, just doesn’t cut it.

Perhaps we see what is happening, but it’s scary and complicated and confusing.  Worse still, if we admit that we can see it, we become responsible in a way that we are not if we keep pretending, we can’t see it or hear it, or maybe don’t understand it.

Be honest inside your prayers.

Are we a bit afraid that if we give up the willful blindness we will perhaps start screaming, releasing the pent-up anger, and not be able to stop?

Fear not! Do we think we have so little courage? Do we really believe that we have no resources to bring to the battle? Or nothing more to contribute to the turning of the battle?  I do not believe this to be true.

I believe in all of us.

My faith is strong. I believe in righteousness.  I believe in a loving and purposeful God, and I believe in our ability to win.

We cannot escape the choosing.  We must not escape the choosing. Trust me when I say your resolve, while extremely important now, is going to become even more important in the next 47 days.

Whether you want to accept it or not, we are all in this battle.

Believe me – no one gets to avoid this one.

We need to get hard now.

We need to fight like we are the third monkey on the ramp to Noah’s ark,… and brother, it’s starting to rain!

\

.

President Donald Trump will win, because we will win.

We are having ballot challenging successes in the specific areas that count most.

We will win.

All my deepest love and appreciation for your fellowship,

~ Sundance

Fox News Cuts Off Pundit for Outlining Opinion, “Democrat Party Want’s Trump Dead”


ant’s Trump Dead”

Posted originally on the CTH on September 18, 2024 | Sundance

Former Navy SEAL Johnathan Gilliam appeared on FOX News to discuss the latest assassination attempts against the life of President Trump.

After outlining the reality of President Trump’s perimeter proximity not being secured by Secret Service, Mr Gilliam expands the conversation to ask if this is continual mistakes or whether a systemic security issue exists.  Gilliam notes the rhetoric of the Democrat Party over the last several years that support the contention that “democrats want President Trump dead,” Fox News host Stuart Varney gets upset calling such a perspective “a conspiracy theory.”  Immediately thereafter the interview was ended.  WATCH:

While it may be a brutally truthful opinion based on current events, Mr Varney apparently does not want to entertain such thoughts and opinions.

At a certain point the pretending must stop.  I commend Mr Gilliam for his forthright position.  Quite simply, if the Democrats do not intend to stimulate anger and violence toward President Trump as a target, they would not be doing it.

Here’s just a few examples of Democrats using increasingly incendiary rhetoric against President Trump in the days, weeks, and months leading up to the two assassination attempts:

  • Kamala Harris — repeatedly: “Trump is a threat to our democracy and fundamental freedoms.”
  • Kamala Harris: “It’s on us to recognize the threat [Trump] poses.”
  • Kamala Harris: “Does one of us have to come out alive? Ha ha ha ha!”
  • Joe Biden: “It’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”
  • Joe Biden: “I mean this from the bottom of my heart: Trump is a threat to this nation.”
  • Joe Biden: “There is one existential threat: it’s Donald Trump.”
  • Joe Biden: “Trump is a genuine threat to this nation … He’s literally a threat to everything America stands for.”
  • Joe Biden: “Trump and MAGA Republicans are a threat to the very soul of this country.”
  • Joe Biden: “Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic … and that is a threat to this country.”
  • Tim Walz: “Are [Republicans] a threat to democracy? Yes. … Are they going to put peoples’ lives in danger? Yes.”
  • Gwen Walz: “Buh-bye, Donald Trump.”
  • Rep. Nancy Pelosi: “[Trump] is a threat to our democracy of the kind that we have not seen.”
  • Rep. Jasmine Crockett: “MAGA in general — they are threats to us domestically.”
  • Rep. Dan Goldman: “He is destructive to our democracy and …  he has to be eliminated.”
  • Disgraced Harris staffer TJ Ducklo: “Trump is an existential, urgent threat to our democracy.”
  • Top Harris surrogate Liz Cheney: “Trump presents a fundamental threat to the republic and we are seeing it on a daily basis.”
  • Rep. Steve Cohen: “Trump is an enemy of the United States.”
  • Rep. Maxine Waters: “Are [Trump supporters] preparing a civil war against us?”
  • Rep. Maxine Waters: “I want to know about all of those right-wing organizations that [Trump] is connected with who are training up in the hills somewhere.”
  • Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Trump is an “existential threat to our democracy.”
  • Rep. Adam Schiff: Trump is the “gravest threat to our democracy.”
  • Rep. Gregory Meeks: “Trump cannot be president again. He’s an existential threat to democracy.”
  • Rep. Dan Goldman: “Trump remains the greatest threat to our democracy.”
  • Rep. Jake Auchincloss: “What unifies us as a party is knowing that Donald Trump is an existential threat to Democracy.”
  • Rep. Abigail Spanberger: “Trump is a threat to our democracy … the threats to our democratic republic are real.”
  • Rep. Annie Kuster: “Trump and his extreme right-wing followers pose an existential threat to our democracy.”
  • Rep. Becca Balint: “We cannot underestimate the threat [Trump] poses to American democracy.”
  • Rep. Jason Crow: “Trump is an extreme danger to our democracy.”
  • Rep. Raul Grijalva: “Trump is an existential threat to American democracy.”
  • Sen. Michael Bennet: Trump is “a threat to our democracy.”
  • Rep. Stacey Plaskett: Trump “needs to be shot.”
  • Rep. Steven Horsford: “Trump Republicans are a dangerous threat to our state.”
  • Rep. Gabe Vasquez: “Remove the national threat from office.”
  • Rep. Mike Levin: “Donald Trump is a threat to our nation, our freedom, and our democracy.”
  • Rep. Eric Sorensen: “He is the greatest threat to law and order we have in our country.”
  • Rep. Greg Landsman: “The threat is not over.”
  • Rep. Pat Ryan: “Trump is an existential threat to American democracy.”
  • Rick Wilson, The Lincoln Project: “They’re still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump.”
  • Former Harris-Biden staffer Kate Bedingfield: Democrats should “turn their fire on Donald Trump.”
  • .

No, no, no… Varney decries.  That’s “crazy conspiracy theory”…