The World’s Most Expensive Toll Booth?


Posted originally on Mar 26, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

Strait Hormuz 1

What is taking place in the Strait of Hormuz right now is not simply a disruption to shipping, but a transformation of a natural chokepoint into a political weapon, and this is exactly what history shows always happens when a strategic passage falls under the control of a single power during a period of war.

Iran has now effectively asserted control over the Strait, restricting access, threatening vessels, and even considering or reportedly imposing transit fees on tankers, with some reports indicating charges as high as $2 million per vessel for passage, which turns one of the most critical points of global trade into a toll route under geopolitical control rather than a neutral international waterway.

Roughly 20% the world’s oil supply passes through this narrow channel, along with a substantial portion of global liquefied natural gas, meaning any disruption immediately impacts energy markets, inflation, and ultimately the global economy.

What has unfolded is not just tension but a near shutdown, with ship traffic collapsing, vessels being attacked, insurance costs surging, and many operators refusing to transit altogether due to the risk of drones, mines, and missile strikes, while others only pass under specific conditions approved by Iran, often tied to political alignment.

Iran has made it clear that access is no longer unconditional, stating that only “non-hostile” vessels may pass. This introduces a new dimension in which global trade is filtered through geopolitical loyalty.

Now add the idea of a transit tax and you begin to see the real picture, because this is no longer just about restricting access but monetizing control, turning geography into revenue while simultaneously exerting leverage over nations dependent on energy flows. This is precisely how strategic chokepoints have been used throughout history from the Suez Canal to the Bosporus.

Events of this nature drives volatility, because when a critical supply route becomes unstable, capital begins to shift rapidly into safe havens.  Inflationary pressures build, hence why you are seeing immediate reactions across global markets as oil surges and bond yields follow.

The key point is that this is not temporary in the way the press tends to frame it, because once a chokepoint is weaponized, it never fully returns to neutrality, since the precedent has been set that access can be restricted, priced, or controlled based on political conditions, and that permanently alters the risk calculation for global trade.

This also exposes the fragility of the entire system. A single narrow passage can disrupt nearly a fifth of the global energy supply, showing how concentrated and vulnerable the system has become.

Controlling trade routes has always been one of the most powerful tools in geopolitical conflict, and once that tool is actively deployed, it indicates that the situation has moved beyond rhetoric into structural change.

Is This the End of the World?


Posted Mar 26, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

End Times Repent 1

QUESTION: I understand that Socrates is projecting the future from historical data. It is not your personal opinion and you do not incorporate prophecy since each religion also has different stories of end days. I am just curious, Socrates with all the arrays are projecting 2032 as does your Economic Confidence Model. It appears looking at the arrays across the board, they have predicted this war with amazing accuracy and they did in picking Ukraine more than a year in advance and the October 7 Hammas attack on Israel. You have Iran peaking out in 2027 and Israel looking rather grim post-2028. Since you see this Armageddon unfolding not as divine will, but deliberate human intervention, does that make 2032 the fulfillment of these prophecies?

Richard

ANSWER: This is a question that I have always found challenging. Can a prophecy be fulfilled because people deliberately attempt to force it to take place? History is filled with periods where the belief in an imminent, world-ending battle of Armageddon has surged, often during times of profound social crisiswar, or religious upheaval. These “rising beliefs” are usually not isolated but are part of broader apocalyptic and millenarian movements. However, the first record of such a final battle is not from the Bible, but from Iran – Persia.

Persian prophet Zoroaster

The core concept of a final cosmic battle has ancient roots. Many historians trace this worldview back to the Persian prophet Zoroaster (around 1500 BC), who spoke of a cosmic struggle between good and evil ending in a perfect new world. This idea deeply influenced Jewish thought during times of great oppression, such as the Babylonian exile and the persecution by Greek rulers. The Book of Daniel (written around 167 BC) is a key text from this period, promising that God would soon overthrow the evil kingdoms oppressing the Jews. Early Christianity emerged from this same apocalyptic Jewish context, with followers believing Jesus’s return was imminent.

Nero Bust

Some early Christians called Nero (54-68AD) the Antichrist because his brutal persecution of Christians as the scapegoat blaming them for the great fire of Rome in 64AD. After the Great Fire of Rome, Nero drastically reduced the silver purity of coins to fund reconstruction . This severe economic crisis and debasement fueled unrest and was interpreted by early Christians as a sign of a corrupt world power, fitting the profile of the “beast” from Revelation. There was even the claim that he would return from the dead, and a possible hidden code in the Book of Revelation (the number 666) made him fit the profile of the ultimate evil figure predicted in the Bible. Nero’s full Greek and Latin name was Neron Caesar. In Hebrew, it is written as נרון קסר (Nron Qsr). Adding the numerical value of the shorten name Nero with Caesar equaled 666. This was a popular among some early Christians.

For Redemption of Zion

The Jewish Rebellion 69-73AD saw Jewish silver coins issued displaying a chalice with the Paleo-Hebrew inscription “For the Redemption of Zion.” The reverse was a lulav (palm frond) and etrog (citron) used in Sukkot. They were minted during the Roman siege of Jerusalem, just before the Temple’s destruction. The inscription shifted from earlier coins reading “For the Freedom of Zion” to “Redemption,” reflecting a shift from political hope to a desperate prayer for divine, messianic salvation as the end drew near. “For the Redemption of Zion” coins are direct archaeological evidence of a population actively anticipating the end as they knew it.

End Of World Aethelred2 1000AD English Silver Penny

The Early Middle Ages (c. 400–1050 AD) Fall of the Western Roman Empire, rise of Islam, political instability A dominant force in politics and religion; belief in the coming Antichrist and Last World Emperor. Recent scholarship shows that apocalyptic expectation was a powerful part of mainstream political ideologies for centuries. There was a genuine expectation surrounding the first millennium after Christ. In 999AD, Pope Sylvester II presided over a dramatic midnight mass in Rome as pilgrims trembled, anticipating the end.

The “Agnus Dei” silver penny was a unique moment in English history—a king setting aside his own image to plead for heavenly help during a national emergency. King Æthelred II did issue the remarkable “Agnus Dei” penny that replaced his portrait with the Lamb of God, This coin is one of the rarest and most unusual in English history. Instead of a portrait of the king, the front side (obverse) depicts the Agnus Dei (Lamb of God), and the back (reverse) shows a dove, representing the Holy Spirit.

The Millennium Theory has been argued that people in 1000 AD feared the end of the world was approaching because who;le numbers often have psychological impact. Some religious scholars speculated on the date of a widespread religious anticipation. Æthelred’s coin was a practical and spiritual weapon. Yet it has also been argued that it was issued against a very real invasion by the Viking army of 1009. They speculate that the coin was minted around Michaelmas (September 29th) in 1009, nearly a decade after the year 1000. It was created during a moment of extreme national crisis when a massive Viking army led by Thorkell the Tall invaded England. That made it a “Heavenly” Call to Action: In response, King Æthelred and his council met in Bath and initiated a program of national penance and prayer. It is believed to have intended to invoke divine intervention, essentially asking God to help the English when earthly measures were failing. Removing the king’s portrait to feature only religious imagery was a radical sign of humility and desperation.

High & Late Middle Ages (11th–16th Century) Social upheaval, economic inequality, Crusades, plague Revolutionary movements led by “rootless poor”; belief they were the saints destined to destroy the Antichrist.

Luther Martin

Many Protestant Reformers, including Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Thomas Cranmer, identified the Pope as the Antichrist. This claim was a formal accusation rooted in their interpretation of Scripture and a reaction to what they saw as a systemic abuse of power within the medieval Church. The Reformers believed the papacy matched the biblical description of the Antichrist found in passages like 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, which speaks of a “man of lawlessness” who “exalts himself above all that is called God.

The famous claim that a pope fits the number 666, but unlike the case of Nero, this claim has been factually debunked and is based on prejudice.
The idea centers on an unofficial Latin title for the pope, “Vicarius Filii Dei” (Vicar of the Son of God). Here is the calculation that some Protestant groups, particularly Seventh-day Adventists. The problem is that in Latin “U” is written as a “V” and there is no “W” either. Thus they calculated:
V, I, C, I, V, I, L, I, I, D, I 5 + 1 + 100 + 1 + 5 + 1 + 50 + 1 + 1 + 500 + 1 666

Cycle of Religion 309.6

The Protestant Reformation (16th–17th Century) The splitting of Western Christendom. In the Modern Era (19th–20th Century) World wars, Cold War tensions, the founding of Israel Rise of new denominations (e.g., Seventh-day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses) focused on Bible prophecy and current events.

Cohn Norman the Pursuit_of_the_Millennium

Norman Cohn’s classic work, The Pursuit of the Millennium, documents how, between the end of every millennium results in apocalyptic prophecies that merge with social revolt. Poor and disenfranchised groups formed revolutionary movements, convinced they were the saints destined to destroy the Antichrist and usher in a new, egalitarian world.

Miller William Reverende 1940
End Times TV

The 19th and 20th centuries saw a significant revival of end-times belief, often tied to world events that were interpreted as fulfilling biblical prophecy. In the 1840s, William Miller led a movement in America that predicted Christ’s return in 1844. When this “Great Disappointment” failed, it gave rise to the Seventh-day Adventist Church, which developed complex teachings on the end times and Armageddon.

During the 20th century Cold War, this provided a powerful fuel for apocalyptic speculation. The creation of Israel in 1948 was seen by many dispensationalist Christians as a key sign preceding Armageddon. The Cold War’s nuclear threat added a new dimension of plausibility, and publications like the Detroit Jewish News in 1983 noted that “prophets of doom” found a platform during these crises, with Armageddon “again on the agenda.

1 ECM 2032 Wave 157 Pi Turning Point 1 Annotated

Armageddon has remained a potent concept throughout history, surfacing powerfully during times of crisis when the existing order seems to be collapsing. We are in a global recessionary trend that varies. With this Iran War, the greatest impact on fuel will be Europe and Asia. The United States get about 3-5%  of all fuel consumed from the Middle East. This is also why Saudi Ariba is cutting deals with China. We see tensions rising and we are looking at a Sovereign Debt Crisis even in the Middle East and Iran has shut down the Strait of Hormuz. We also see a serious debt crisis in Europe and all of this is coming to a head economically into 2032. So is this Armageddon? The computer does NOT show that this is the end of the world. However, we are looking for the power shift from the West to China.

Israel vs Iran 1

When Allies Become Liabilities – Regime Change in Israel?


Posted originally on Mar 25, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

USA vs Iran

QUESTION: You were the first to say the US was going through Pakistan, and there was a 15-point plane. You also said no peace is possible. Iran just rejected Trump’s 15-point plan. You also commented that the markets were reflecting a protracted war. Do you see any hope whatsoever?

PD

ANSWER: Indeed, Iran said it rejected any US ceasefire proposal and maintained attacks on Israel and Gulf Arab states. They are in the driver’s seat, and they know it. Not just that they control the Strait of Hormuz, but aside from oil, 30% of the fertilizer goes through there, and as we move into planting season, Iran is also keenly aware that it can cause a food crisis.

Netanyahu whispering Trump 1

Look, I know the Neocon thinking process. They CANNOT think beyond the end of their nose and ALWAYS think they will win in a matter of days or weeks, simply because they control the largest military force. SIZE does not matter! They NEVER look at the other side. Iran would have to be insane to accept the 15-point plan, dealing a significant blow to Trump’s efforts to end a war that Netanyahu began suckering in Trump.

Trump’s 15-point peace plan stipulates that the Islamic Republic dismantle its main nuclear facilities and use a reduced missile arsenal in self-defense only, according to reliable sources, and Trump would lift sanctions. Tehran realizes that it cannot agree to a ceasefire when Netanyahu has any authority whatsoever. Iran wants guarantees that the US and Israel won’t resume their attacks, alongside reparations for war damages and recognition of its authority over the Strait of Hormuz.

In addition, Iran has REFUSED to even negotiate with Steve Witkoff or Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, both of whom are Jewish! For the life of me, why this dynamic duo would even dare to negotiate in the Middle is beyond me. This appears to be a very serious conflict of interest, regardless of whether it is true. Iran has insisted that it would deal only with J.D. Vance.

I believe Vice President J.D. Vance may travel to Pakistan for talks with Iran this weekend. Trump has said he hopes to reach an agreement by the end of the week. I would not hold my breath. Just as Netanyahu assassinated the Ayatollah and acted unilaterally, attacking their gas field, he does not care about the world economy, and CANNOT be trusted in any future peace deal. The only security Iran could possibly have is regime change in Israel, meaning Netanyahu is gone from the government.

Netanyahu Israel Regime Change 1

When Allies Become Liabilities – Regime Change in Israel

What is perhaps more surprising and not yet in the press is that Netanyahu’s problems have intensified under the Trump administration, which was expected to provide unconditional support for his Iranian conquest. Recent sources report a deep frustration within Trump’s team regarding Netanyahu.

The question of Benjamin Netanyahu’s political survival and whether there is serious discussion about regime change in Israel represents one of the most sensitive and complex dynamics in current Middle Eastern geopolitics being discussed behind the curtain. The short answer is that there has been significant talk—both public and private—about the need for Netanyahu to be removed from power, and this discussion is coming not just from his domestic opponents but from surprising quarters, including elements within the American establishment, European governments, and even segments of the Israeli security apparatus.

But we must be precise about what we mean by “regime change.” This is not talk of military intervention or external overthrow. Rather, it is a discussion about using diplomatic pressure, conditioning aid and support, leveraging legal processes, and supporting domestic opposition to facilitate Netanyahu’s removal through ostensibly democratic means. The distinction matters, but the intention—removing a sitting leader perceived as an obstacle to broader policy objectives—is fundamentally the same.

Without Netanyahu’s removal, it is going to be extremely hard to convince Iran that Israel will not attack again or try to assassinate all of their leaders in another covert action.

Susan Kokinda Outlines the Shift in Strategic Alliances


Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2026 | Sundance 

The rebranded Lyndon LaRouche PAC has another good outline on the new strategic alliances assembled by President Trump as the ongoing conflict with Iran continues.

Susan Kokinda reviews how the United Kingdom and Europe have been sidelined as President Trump directly negotiates with key stakeholders in the middle east and Asia.  Kokinda correctly notes the messaging from Russia indicates a strategic awareness that old systems are fracturing and the potential for new strategic alliances is rising.

Susan Kokinda argues President Trump has opened a new diplomatic space to de-escalate the Iran conflict by working through a regional roster—Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, Gulf States, and back channels into Iran—while the U.K., EU, and NATO are absent and increasingly irrelevant. Citing reporting that ministers met in Riyadh and that Egypt, Turkey, and Oman carried messages, she says this “Board of Peace” architecture is isolating Iran and weakening its proxies, pointing to Lebanon’s move against Hezbollah, the Palestinian Authority’s condemnation of Iran, and Hamas considering disarmament. Kokinda links Europe’s exclusion to self-inflicted energy weakness from Green and anti-Russia policies, noting rushed LNG moves and a delayed Russian oil ban vote. She concludes Ukraine’s outlook darkens as Europe and Britain lack leverage, highlighting Zelenskyy’s scramble for support in London and Washington.” WATCH:

.

President Trump Summit with Chairman Xi Now Scheduled for May 14th and 15th


Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2026 | Sundance

This is good news from the standpoint of us wanting to see President Trump continue to make MAGAnomic progress on trade as well as geopolitical alliances.

It will be a very interesting summit against the backdrop of Venezuela, Iran, oil/gas energy shifts, the previous Alaska summit with Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, the renegotiation of the USMCA and the Chinese auto deal in Canada…

There are a lot of important topics within a Trump-Xi summit.

PRESIDENT TRUMP – “My meeting with the Highly Respected President of China, President Xi Jinping, which was originally postponed due to our Military operation in Iran, has been rescheduled, and will take place in Beijing on May 14th and 15th.”

“First Lady Melania and I will also host President Xi and Madame Peng for a reciprocal visit in Washington, D.C., at a later date, this year. Our Representatives are finalizing preparations for these Historic Visits. I look very much forward to spending time with President Xi in what will be, I am sure, a Monumental Event. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”  President DONALD J. TRUMP

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen Resigns Following Massive Election Losses in Left-Wing Coalition


Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2026 | Sundance 

The Trump curse is real.

With what she perceived as strong domestic support following her confrontation with President Trump, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen decided to trigger an early election.  Frederiksen thought the timing was perfect; however, it backfired.

Mette Frederiksen’s political party suffered the biggest ruling party election defeat in 120+ years, and her coalition of left-wing parties now lost their majority.

As a result of the election, Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has resigned.

COPENHAGEN, March 25 (Reuters) – Danish Prime Minister ​Mette Frederiksen on ‌Wednesday submitted her government’s ​resignation to ​the king after her ⁠three-party coalition ​suffered a large ​defeat in a general election, the royal ​palace said ​in a statement.

Parties are ‌set ⁠to launch potentially tough and long negotiations ​to ​determine ⁠whether the next ​government will ​be ⁠formed by Frederiksen or another ⁠party ​leader. (link)

Via Washington Examiner – “[…] The Social Democrats’ left-wing bloc walked away as the ostensible winners of the Tuesday general election with 84 seats in the nation’s 179-seat parliament. But it was far from a majority, with their rival right-wing bloc securing 77 seats and the centrist Moderate Party walking away with 14.

[…] The Social Democrats remain the single largest party in the legislature with 38 seats and 21.9% of the vote, but it’s a hollow victory for the long-dominating juggernaut of Danish politics. The last time the Social Democrats did worse was in 1903 with 20.4%.

The Royal Palace confirmed on Wednesday that Frederiksen resigned and advised the sovereign to hold meetings with the leaders of the nation’s 12 major political parties — standard procedure after an election shifts the balance of power in the parliament. (read more)

The European Union didn’t think they needed to provide any support to their socialist candidate Mette Frederiksen; they were certain all the Danes would rally in support.  Major facepalm.

Domestic issues dominated the electorate, including immigration, the cost of living, welfare, energy policy and agriculture.

To understand just how filled with hubris they were going into the election, watch this video (prompted):

.

A Reminder and Note of Appreciation


Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2026 | Sundance 

I have posted this a few times. Each time serves a purpose. [SEE HERE] Here’s a friendly reminder to those who use CTH as a reference resource and research library.

CTH was founded because everyone seemed more comfortable pretending about the journey than admitting our predictable destination.  From the outset, and with a long view of the challenges we would face, I have repeatedly stated that everything on this website would be free for the taking.

The truth has no agenda; it just sits there -out there somewhere- waiting to be discovered. Our feelings about it are irrelevant to its existence. The core of our assembly is to look deeply at uncomfortable things, then accept them as they are and not as we would wish/pretend them to be.

We are in the middle of a fully Orwellian information control operation.  A DHS reconfiguration of the U.S. information communication network as we know it has already taken place. Every day people are discovering more ramifications.

As a direct result, the voices who put accurate context to our national challenge are targets; they are being siloed, and AI was/is designed to assist in this purpose.

Information is being categorized according to definitions by people who do not have good intents.  The blocking, censorship and categorization of information is intended to stop any/all information averse to the interests of a few powerful interests.

Now, perhaps people see why the CTH ‘free information’ cornerstone was set. The truth has no agenda!

Everything you read and review upon these pages is free for the taking.

Anyone, for any reason, can take any content I produce and use it to advance the honest effort of providing raw unfiltered truth to their audience.  Everything is available for use free, without any attribution or citation if necessary. 

All that I provide is free and can be modified, changed, enhanced in part or whole to meet your needs. Images, writing, research, analysis, all of it is provided, along with no expectation of citation or attribution dependent on your motives and intents.

Make the words your own; use them in part or modify to make a more intelligent or comprehensive outline. All the accompanying graphics are available to use as would suit your interests.

Heck, many people can write stuff a lot better than my calloused hands.

Importantly, all the research is cited and verifiable.  This includes all the pdf files, government documents, FOIA outcomes and uploads to the SCRIBD account.   Take anything you want; thanks, sincerely, but no need to ask permission.  [Ex. FBI ARTICLE]

We are not going to save this republic by demanding or restricting information via self-important perspectives on citation or attribution. I simply do not care about such issues. Make it your own in whatever manner or format fits your interests.

The silo system is made up, in part, of: The National Security Council (10+ desks, 15 staff/analysts per), the National Security Advisor to the Office of the President, the Dept of Justice National Security Division [DOJ-NSD (foreign review section, counterintelligence export control section, cyber section, counterterrorism section)], Central Intelligence Agency [(CIA), National Intelligence Council, Directorate of Analysis], Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI (Counterintelligence, Counterterrorism, WMD Directorate, Directorate of Intelligence, Cyber)], the Office of the Director of National Intelligence [ODNI (Requirements, Analysis, Collection, National Counterterrorism Center, Mission Managers)], the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Dept of Defense [DoD, (Nuclear, Chemical, Biological, Industrial, International)], the National Security Agency [NSA (Operations, Technology, Cyber], and many more.

Each agency/office a silo, with distinct sub-silos, each with equity stakes in the information they gather, review and analyze; ultimately attributing classification level and intersecting analysis with each other agency as mission aligned.

Sound ridiculous? It probably is, yet I’ve merely scratched the surface of the IC networks and information flows that swirl around the Office of the President.

Now do you see why DNI Tulsi Gabbard is important?

Literally hundreds of embeds -across multiple silos- have been removed from the aggregate apparatus. The National Security Council has been taken apart, staff removed, desks shuttered. The National Intelligence Council was removed from the CIA with personnel fired. The Directorate of Analysis is now openly confronted. The ICIG is once again a watchdog.

This creates optimism that substantive change is possible. However, much more work lies ahead.

We maintain the voluminous reference library as a documented resource for everyone.  Please accept this thankful reminder with the expressed intent.

If you are brave enough to stand in front of the furnace, you have my full and unwavering support and appreciation.  You are simply considered my brother or sister.  It’s ok, just take it. Anything provided here at CTH is yours to take, whole or in part and make it your own.

This is how we ensure our small contribution to a much larger awakening.

Effective solutions require brutally accurate understanding.

…”There is no such thing as “disinformation” or “misinformation”.  There is only information you accept and information you do not accept.  You were not born with a requirement to believe everything you are told; rather, you were born with a brain that allows you to process the information you receive and make independent decisions.”… 

I will always work earnestly to be deserving of your fellowship. As new visitors attest every day, the fellowship in this commenting community is unique, aligned with a loving God, prayerful, insightful, articulate, intelligent and yes, funny.  I love you guys.

With humble appreciation and the warmest of regards,

Sundance

Remember, we are inside every facility, every institution, every meeting, every moment of their existence – and we notice everything. We are there when they do not expect, and we melt away before they notice our appearance. We see what they hide, we hear what they whisper, we decipher their codes, and we understand the complexity they create in their effort to conceal. We go to the places we know they will travel.  We have allies and resources inside the core of their machinery. We understand what and why everything is being constructed, and we share all the information we discover.  The truth isn’t mean; it’s just The Truth.  ~ Sundance

President Trump Supports an 18-Month FISA(702) Reauthorization


Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2026 | Sundance

With a heavy sigh and a great deal of resignation, while understanding how the prior open border issue compounded things, CTH had already mentally accepted that FISA (702) reauthorization was going to happen.

I don’t like it at all, but I understand it.

That said, I would prefer to see the FISA (702) reauthorization leveraged toward passage of the SAVE America Act, at least that way we get something out of it.

PRESIDENT TRUMP – “Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune have been working to pass a clean extension of FISA Section 702, a Law that was passed many years ago by Congress to collect Intelligence on Foreigners and Noncitizens.

When used properly, FISA is an effective tool to keep Americans safe. For these reasons, I have called for a clean 18-month extension, HOWEVER, the Critical and Common-Sense Reforms that were made in the last Reauthorization of FISA must remain intact to protect the American People from abuses.

Nobody understands this better than me, as I was a victim of the worst and most illegal abuse of FISA in our Nation’s History, by Radical Left Lunatics who lied to the FISA Court to spy on my 2016 Presidential Campaign in their attempt to RIG the Election in favor of Crooked Hillary Clinton.

That is why, since the first day of my already Historic Second Term, my Administration has worked tirelessly to ensure these Reforms are being aggressively executed at every level of the Executive Branch to keep Americans safe, while protecting their sacred Civil Liberties guaranteed by our Great Constitution.

With the ongoing successful Military activities against the Terrorist Iranian Regime, it is more important than ever that we remain vigilant, PROTECT our Homeland, Troops, and Diplomats stationed abroad, and maintain our ability to quickly stop bad actors seeking to cause harm to our People and our Country.

The fact is, whether you like FISA or not, it is extremely important to our Military. I have spoken to many Generals about this, and they consider it vital. Not one said, even tacitly, that they can do without it — especially right now with our brilliant Military Operation in Iran. Thank you for your attention to this very important matter!

President DONALD J. TRUMP

CTH is relatively sure the military component surrounding FISA-702 relates to the advanced AI system target tracking that is currently active as part of the Palantir surveillance software suite.

Let’s get all of these illegal aliens the heck out of our country, and then maybe we can have a discussion about returning to a more constitutional approach that doesn’t include the ability of government to interface with privately created electronic metadata.

Hey, a guy can hope, no?

Ouch, I Haz FISA Accept… 

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Holds a Press Briefing – 1:00pm ET Livestream


Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2026 | Sundance 

Today at 1:00pm ET, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt will hold a press briefing from the Brady Room at the White House.  Livestream Links Below:

UPDATE: VIDEO ADDED

.

.

.

.

Big News – House Intel Committee Releases Hidden Transcript of Inspector General Michael Atkinson


Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2026 | Sundance

For the past several years I have been advocating for ‘sunlight as the best disinfectant.’ Since September of 2025 I have been working through a painfully slow and convoluted process to share research, assist truth tellers and guide those who have the authority to deliver the sunlight. Today, I can happily report on progress.

In 2019 an impeachment effort against President Trump was triggered when a member of the National Security Council named Alexander Vindman coordinated with a member of the National Intelligence Council named Eric Ciaramella to fabricate a false claim that President Trump leveraged his power and authority to demand Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy release information on Joe and Hunter Biden’s corrupt financial dealings in Ukraine.

At the time of the 2019 impeachment construct Eric Ciaramella was working for the CIA as an analyst within the National Intelligence Council (NIC).

Two years prior to the 2019 impeachment construct, in January 2017, the same CIA analyst, Eric Ciaramella, had worked on the fraudulent Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) at the behest of CIA Director John Brennan.

[SIDEBAR: In 2025 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, working with CIA Director John Ratcliffe, removed the NIC from inside the CIA.  To provide greater overall transparency within the intelligence community, the National Intelligence Council was moved into the purview of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)].

Key point: Eric Ciaramella was one of the key analysts who constructed the fraudulent ‘Russian interference ICA’ (2017) and later the fraudulent impeachment effort (2019).  Eric Ciaramella became the “anonymous CIA whistleblower” in the 2019 impeachment effort.

Before 2019, CIA analysts weren’t allowed to anonymously make claims against political officials. Because of the sensitive information they handled, any allegation of wrongdoing based on intelligence had to be made with their name attached.

Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson changed or modified the ICIG rules permitting Ciaramella to remain anonymous and make a claim that ultimately led to an impeachment effort.

Eric Ciaramella allegedly fabricated intelligence information, shared it with Congress and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), and then remained anonymous. HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff was said to have assisted him.

On October 4, 2019, as part of the House impeachment inquiry, Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson gave closed-door testimony to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of their impeachment investigation. One of the key questions to ICIG Atkinson surrounded the authority of his office changing the CIA whistleblower rules that permitted Eric Ciaramella to remain anonymous.

During later questioning by then-Congressman John Ratcliffe, as part of the House impeachment effort, it came to light that Inspector General Michael Atkinson testified CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella, the anonymous ‘whistleblower’, had lied about key details when questioned by Atkinson. WATCH VIDEO: 

[The look on Dan Goldman’s face during that questioning was both priceless and insufferable. John Ratcliffe is now CIA Director]

Because the anonymous whistleblower complaint by Ciaramella was the cornerstone of the impeachment effort, Chairman Adam Schiff sealed the transcript of ICIG Atkinson testimony, classifying it under the guise of national security interests and burying it in the HPSCI control system.

It’s worth reemphasizing that Eric Ciaramella was both the analyst behind the disputed 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment for Director Brennan and, later in 2019, involved in the contested impeachment effort. Both operations involved impeding and targeting President Donald Trump.

If congress, or more importantly the American public, had known CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella was both the key author of the fraudulent 2016 ICA and the later 2019 CIA complaint, it’s doubtful any impeachment effort would have moved forward.

Inside the Intelligence Community oversight system, the Ciaramella connection to both IC operations could have been made.  His anonymity as a whistleblower served a purpose.  [DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s 2025 decision to remove the National Intelligence Council from behind the curtain of the CIA is additionally supported with this hindsight.]

The transcript of Inspector General Michael Atkinson’s testimony becomes a key document to release because at its core we know that Atkinson testified that Ciaramella lied.  The Ciaramella lie is at the heart of the impeachment attempt.

Don’t get lost in the details or the politics of this.  When you peel back all the layers of DC, at its epicenter this was an operation to impeach a sitting President that came from within the CIA, and it almost succeeded. {GO DEEP}

When a top administration intelligence official, holding what I believe to be the best possibility of making a difference, reached out, I began the assist by citing specific documents that would reveal a much bigger story.  The Atkinson transcript was one of those documents.

I have outlined how the silo system is constructed to intentionally impede or stop review. Adam Schiff isn’t stupid. He knew what he was doing and how to use the separation of powers for his purposes.  The executive branch would not easily be able to reach into the legislative branch and extract information.  That’s why then HPSCI Chairman, Impeachment Chairman and now Senator Adam Schiff buried the Atkinson transcript in the vault of the House Intelligence Committee.

The process.

♦ First, you need a republican President in the White House √. Second, you need an aligned Intelligence Community DNI √, and third you need a Republican controlled HPSCI √:

[¹] • To extract the transcript the Executive would first need to understand its value. • Then the Executive would need to know where it was. • Then the Executive would need a qualified stakeholder, with appropriate clearances, to request to review the transcript in the HPSCI secure compartmented intelligence facility (scif).  • If the HPSCI approved, the Executive would be given an appointment date to read it (no notes, no copying, just reading).  • Then, after reading, the Executive stakeholder would then need to request the HPSCI Chair and Ranking Member for a classified copy.  • The Chair and Ranking Member would need to agree to the value of the sunlight on the Legislative Branch controlled information. • To get a copy the entire House Intelligence Committee would need to vote on the release to the Executive.  • The vote would need to be scheduled on the committee calendar.  • A HPSCI vote would then take place:

[SOURCE]

WASHINGTON, D.C.— Today, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence held a business meeting to consider multiple Committee actions. During the business meeting, the Committee voted in favor of releasing two transcripts from 2019 hearings with the former Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson. The hearings were held to examine Atkinson’s role in an alleged whistleblower complaint, which ultimately led to Democrats’ first impeachment efforts against President Trump in December 2019. One transcript would be released to the ODNI for classification review, and then subsequently released to the public by the Committee with the second unclassified transcript.

“The great deal of widespread speculation about the Atkinson classified hearing transcript is indicative of the American people’s complete and warranted mistrust of the Intelligence Community,” said Chairman Crawford. “In far too many instances, the IC hides behind the veil of overclassification. Sometimes sunlight is the best disinfectant. As part of the Committee’s continued effort to balance the transparency the American people deserve and the need to protect sensitive national security information, we hope that the release of these transcripts allows the American people to make their own determinations. As Chairman, I remain committed to ensuring this Committee, where possible, is transparent as the IC works to rebuild trust with the American people.”

The transcripts will be posted on the Committee website once they undergo the standard classification review with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.  (source)

The HPSCI has voted to release the Atkinson Transcript.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard will now walk the unhidden transcript through the declassification process. The fastest way is through President Trump’s office.   Hopefully the redactions will be minimal.  Then we will all get to see it.

This has been a long, frustrating and complicated process – but we have succeeded.

[SUPPORT The Ongoing CTH Effort HERE]

.

[¹] FINAL POINT: You can tell this is a long arduous process. However, once the process begins, you’ll note that certain tripwires are crossed, and people in/around DC find out what you are doing.  Yes, DC ‘interests’ realized months ago that Tulsi Gabbard was on the trail of this transcript.

Now do the recent attacks against DNI Tulsi Gabbard gain context?