President Trump Announces 30 Percent Baseline Tariff for European Union and Mexico


Posted originally on CTH on July 12, 2025 | Sundance

President Trump announced on Truth Social a baseline tariff rate of 30% for both the European Union and Mexico.  Other sector specific tariffs still apply.

The EU rate is interesting in that the 30% rate is lower than the Canadian rate of 35%, yet the EU rate exceeds the current ‘chicken tax’ rate historically applied to imported SUVs and Trucks.  Strategically, the 30% tariff rate on Europe is a major incentive for various EU sectors to shift manufacturing into the USA.

Without a formal declaration of the end of the Marshall Plan, the reciprocity rate of 30% for all EU imports also equalizes the transatlantic trade benefit.  It will be interesting to see how the EU responds, given any retaliation could be added to the existing baseline.

Canada is currently trying to organize a trade agreement with the EU, in the hopes of positioning themselves toward the transatlantic group as they were toward the transpacific group (vis-a-vis China).

The Canadian economic model, to position themselves as a gateway into the USA for Chinese component goods, previously served them well as they exploited a NAFTA loophole.  However, the new 35% rate impedes their ability to remain an assembly driven manufacturing model.   Similarly, the 30% USA rate toward the EU impedes the Canadian transatlantic approach.

The USA Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is currently 26 to 28 percent of the entire world’s GDP.  The USA is by far the most dominant consumer market in the world.  President Trump is leveraging access to the U.S. market within the global trade imbalance reset.

Additionally, Mexico also receives the 30% tariff rate applied.  Again, interestingly the Mexico rate is lower than the Canadian rate and reflects two distinctly different levels of economic importance.  Almost all of Mexico’s manufacturing base exists exclusively due to access to the USA market.

Hundreds of billions worth of investment dollars from both the EU and China have poured into Mexico for the single purpose of generating tariff-free goods for sale into the USA.

Neither Mexico nor Canada can respond to the tariffs as applied against the backdrop of their dependency on the USA market.  Both can try to sell their goods and resources to alternate nations, but the costs associated with the transfer of those goods to alternate countries negates the profit incentive to just streamline the internal process and offset the tariffs.

The big question for the EU and Mexico is one we see playing out in Japan, downward wage pressure.

The more a nation tries to offset the tariffs in order to maintain the industry, the less profit margin they have within their operation for wage rates to increase.  This is what the USA went through for four decades as the rustbelt took shape and all the manufacturing jobs were offshored.

The Japanese auto sector is now worried about declining wages, the same basic thing will roll forward into China, Mexico the EU, and to a lesser extent Canada.  Eventually tariff subsidies run into the natural bottom line of the production sector.

The EU is in the worst possible shape to deal with this wage and labor pressure.  Their collective demand toward green energy is extremely expensive and their manufacturing sectors are now facing serious increases in production cost due to the high cost of energy.

The scale of that EU energy problem when combined with the generous worker benefits within the EU creates a reality where they simply cannot take any more upward pressure on production costs, without opening themselves up to cheap Chinese goods.

The EU has massive self-imposed inflation as a result of energy policy.  As China maintains state subsidized production, those Chinese goods eventually get dumped into markets like the EU where the domestic suppliers simply cannot compete on price.  European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has been very vocal about this problem for almost a year.

President Trump is leveraging all of these global dynamics in our favor.  Cheap U.S. energy, cheap and abundant U.S. raw materials, reasonable open-market labor rates (deportation process assisting), in combination with the world’s #1 consumer base, makes the best bet for manufacturing to come to the USA.

All of that domestic USA economic activity drives expansion of the GDP, which pushes more money into the federal budget and offsets the cost of govt spending.  Add to that GDP growth the income from tariffs, and suddenly we start running a surplus to drive down debt and deficits.

Despite all the seemingly noisy distractions on other matters, on the economic front President Trump’s entire MAGAnomic policy agenda is exceptionally well structured and delivering great results.

LIVE: Federal agents conduct immigration operation in Camarillo, California


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 10, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

President Trump Announces 35 Percent Baseline Tariff for Canadian Goods Not Covered Under USMCA


Posted originally on CTH on July 11, 2025 | Sundance 

President Donald Trump has announced a 35% baseline tariff rate for Canada on all imported goods not currently covered under the soon-to-expire USMCA trade agreement.

“Instead of working with the United States, Canada retaliated with its own Tariffs,” President Trump shared on Truth Social. “Starting August 1, 2025, we will charge Canada a Tariff of 35% on Canadian products sent into the United States, separate from all Sectoral Tariffs.”

[LINK]

As noted by President Trump in his remarks during Prime Minister Mark Carney’s visit to the White House, Trump plans to renegotiate the USMCA and end the trilateral agreement in favor of two bilateral trade deals.

During the oval office meeting President Trump said, “as you know [USMCA] terminates fairly shortly. It gets renegotiated fairly shortly.” Then the biggest statement, “this was a transitional deal, and we’ll see what happens, we’re going to start renegotiating that”… “I don’t know if it serves a purpose anymore.”  …. “And the biggest purpose it served was, we got rid of NAFTA.” 

President Trump is going to exit the trilateral USMCA in favor of two distinctly different bilateral trade agreements between the U.S and Mexico; and the U.S and Canada.  The only consideration now is the timing.  President Trump is 100% focused on the BIG ECONOMIC PICTURE; it’s not about the politics, it’s all about the economics.

♦ BACKGROUND – Following the 2024 presidential election, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau traveled to Mar-a-Lago and said if President Trump was to make the Canadian government face reciprocal tariffs, open the USMCA trade agreements to force reciprocity, and/or balance economic relations on non-tariff issues, then Canada would collapse upon itself economically and cease to exist.  In essence, in addition to the NATO defense shortfall, Canada cannot survive as a free and independent north American nation, without receiving all the one-way benefits from the U.S. economy.

To wit, President Trump then said, if Canada cannot survive in a balanced rules environment, including putting together their own military and defenses and meeting their NATO obligations, then Canada should become the 51st U.S state.  It was following this meeting that President Trump started emphasizing this point and shocking everyone in the process.  However, in the emotional reaction to Trump’s statements, no-one looked at the core issues outlined by Trudeau that framed President Trump’s opinion.  {BACKGROUND HERE}

Trump Attempts to Slow the Inertia of War – Now Sending Weapons to NATO Instead of Ukraine


Posted originally on CTH on July 11, 2025 | Sundance

Everyone can see the play by President Trump. Essentially, the “coalition of the willing” (U.K, Germany, France) are not willing to go to war against Russia without the United States in front of them.  Giving the coalition the weapons puts the consequences of their use on the heads of NATO allies.

Despite the majority of Washington DC, specifically the Senate thirsting, pleading and demanding an expanded NATO war, President Trump does not want to go to war against Russia. However, simultaneously Trump has to try and steer the war machine controlled by DC, the Senate, USIC and NATO.

The INERTIA for expanded war is evident.  President Trump is now trying to split the baby regarding Russia, by sending patriot missiles and weapons to NATO as opposed to sending them directly to Ukraine.

In February Marco Rubio earnestly and honestly said, “The Ukraine conflict is a proxy war for the United States against Russia.”  President Trump has concurred with that statement and through his prior comments he attempted to extricate the U.S. from this dynamic.

The shipment of missiles to NATO instead of Ukraine is simply a way of trying to stop direct support, yet Trump is forced by the inertia toward war to maintain a footing of expanded conflict with Russia.

To be very clear, Russian President Vladimir Putin is clear-eyed on this situation with NATO, and he has been all along.

Putin has said repeatedly that NATO was/is in direct conflict against Russia despite Ukraine not being a NATO member.  This conflict with NATO well precedes Putin’s decision to conduct a ‘special military operation’ within Ukraine.

Now, we see through Trump’s approach the dropping of pretenses.  Putin was correct.  With NATO directly providing the war weapons to Ukraine there is no pretense, no doubt. NATO countries are funding an offensive war against Russia using a non NATO proxy state, Ukraine.

As I have said, this western triggering has always been the inertia for war, and that war is now likely to expand as a result of NATO and even, unfortunately, President Trump’s approach.

The only thing that works in his/our favor is the cowardice of the U.K, France and Germany to fight Russia without the USA.

President Trump may try and distance himself and by extension the USA from this consequence of expanded conflict. But the consequence exists regardless of the obfuscation.  We are parsing terms.

The US is going to fund expansion of the conflict directly with arms to Ukraine or indirectly by sending arms to NATO to give to Ukraine. The destination and intent of the weapons is the same regardless of the procedural process.

I came to Russia this time to understand the nature of how western inertia to war can exist, despite the people of the west demanding the opposite. I wanted to see for myself exactly what Russia was preparing for, and exactly how the people of Russia were reacting to that preparation.

Russia is well prepared, both physically and psychologically to go to war against any adversary.  Russian President Vladimir Putin’s approval rating is between 70 to 80%, and despite what you might have heard in western propaganda media, the economy inside Russia is doing very well.  In addition to the two-year service requirement (18-20 years old), all men aged 25 to 35 have been refresher trained in preparation.

The psyche of the Russian military is ready to get rid of the Nazis.  Also, the sentiment of Europeans’ dislike of Ukrainian Nazis is easy to spot, albeit not well known outside the region.  Despite decades of Brussels and USA provocation and political manipulation (perhaps because of it), there’s not a lot of pro-NATO support for the west here.

I am not a big fan of Russia; nor do I agree with the way the government constructs societal life within it. There are a lot of negatives to daily life in Russia. However, I do have a complete understanding of the govt positions and reasons for them.

Western media have pretended that Ukraine was not a U.S/NATO proxy war against Russia. Now, those pretenses are dropped.  Conversely, Vladimir Putin never pretended.

Putin always accepted that Ukraine was, and long has been, a NATO proxy state for conflict against Russia; which is exactly the reason he ‘invaded‘ Ukraine in the first place.

President Trump may be trying to split the baby amid the retention of pretense, but it’s a pretense Russian President Vladimir Putin never held, he could not afford to.

Thus, the inertia of war and people asking “how did this happen?”

If I am accurate in his exit strategy, President Trump hopes to extricate himself from the Russia-Ukraine problem by putting the conflict directly into the lap of NATO, more specifically into the lap of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz; the so called “coalition of the willing.”

President Trump is giving the weapons to NATO, again Starmer, Macron and Merz, for transfer to their buddy in Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.  President Trump then stands back and draws distance from the consequence of what they do with them.  However, this is also a massive provocation because NATO is now essentially operating on behalf of a non-NATO state, Ukraine, against another non-NATO power, Russia.

President Trump cannot remove the fact that the USA is the lead in all things NATO.  As soon as France, Germany and the U.K start bombing Russia albeit from the geography of Ukraine, the conflict will expand.

NATO -thanks to President Trump- would then be baiting Vladimir Putin to attack France, Germany or the UK in retaliation, which would trigger Article 5; subsequently the USA is drawn into the conflict by agreement, and voilà a full expanded war between NATO and Russia commences.

But why?

If neither Russia or Ukraine are NATO members, why is NATO involved at all?

Good question.  Perhaps President Trump will answer that question on Monday.

President Trump told NBC News, “I think I’ll have a major statement to make on Russia on Monday.”

.

Live your very best life, but prepare for war.

Like a fat kid playing dodgeball, I’m out of here tomorrow (hopefully), and will hold an AMA on the topic of all things Russia next week.

GARDNER: “We Need A Year Break To Separate Overall Tariffs From Machine Tools From Europe, From Consumer Goods”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 10, 2025, at 9:00 pm EST

Will Thibeau: This Is A Generational Opportunity For Conservatives To Permanently Redefine How The Military Functions


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 10, 2025, at 8:00 pm EST

American Citizens Outpace Migrants in New Hires


Posted originally on Jul 11, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Mass deportation efforts have led to a shift in hiring practices. American citizens are filling roles that were once reserved for migrants. Similar to the Civil War logic of the Democrats of that age, critics of deportation efforts claim that no one will be around to work for slave wages. Employers are now hiring American citizens to fill those same roles.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the number of foreign-born workers increased by 20% under the Biden Administration. Around 130.4 million native-born Americans were employed in May, the BLS reported, marking an astounding 4.5 million increase since May 2021, shortly after Biden opened the borders.  Around 30.9 million foreign-born held jobs in May, which is still up 5.1 million from May 2021 and 637,000 since May 2023.

Half of ALL hires for fiscal year 2024, which started on October 1, went to immigrants. Standard Chartered estimated that around 170,000 immigrants per month received employment documents from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services. They also stated that 64% of foreigners in America are currently employed, which translates to approximately 109,000 migrants per month. Last year, before Trump took office, foreigners held over 800,000 of the 3.1 million jobs created, accounting for more than 25% of new hires.

Only 16% of the US population is foreign-born. The number of jobs that went to those who crossed into the country is staggering. Since January 2025, over 2 million Americans have been able to find employment again, while 543,000 foreign-born workers have left the workforce.

Democrats are continuing to fight ICE and deportation efforts. This is one of the main reasons. Support for deportation remains high among American citizens, many of whom were struggling to find employment as they required higher wages. Without a doubt, the migrant crisis increased the level of unemployment for Americans, and it is a flat-out lie that employers would face a mass labor shortage without migrant workers.

President Trump Hits Brazil with 50 Percent Tariff Rate


Posted originally on CTH on July 10, 2025 | Sundance

Previously, President Trump lashed out against the government of Brasil led by Brazilian president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, saying, “Brazil is doing a terrible thing on their treatment of former President Jair Bolsonaro. I have watched, as has the World, as they have done nothing but come after him, day after day, night after night, month after month, year after year! He is not guilty of anything, except having fought for THE PEOPLE. I have gotten to know Jair Bolsonaro, and he was a strong Leader, who truly loved his Country — Also, a very tough negotiator on TRADE. His Election was very close and now, he is leading in the Polls. This is nothing more, or less, than an attack on a Political Opponent — Something I know much about!

President Trump then announces a 50% baseline tariff rate against Brazil.  This is a strategic gamble for President Trump in that Jair Bolsonaro is effectively banned from running in the next election, and leftist Lula da Silva could benefit from an increased surge in nationalistic sentiment similar to the Canada election.

.

To Retain Exports Japan Slashes Auto Prices 20 Percent, Now Face Problem with Wages


Posted originally on CTH on July 10, 2025 | Sundance

It’s the reverse rustbelt issue.  In order to retain their market share, Japanese automakers are slashing the prices of their export vehicles to the USA.  However, simultaneous with the anticipated drop in profits, the Japanese economists are worrying what impact this will have on autoworker wages.

Not accidentally this is exactly the problem U.S. workers suffered through during the era of offshoring our manufacturing. Apparently, Japan is heading into the dynamic the U.S. rustbelt previously suffered.  Imagine that.

The Straits Times – TOKYO – Japan’s automakers slashed the price of products exported to the United States at record pace, in a sign that companies are sacrificing profits to remain competitive as President Donald Trump’s tariffs hit cars.

In June, the export price index for vehicles shipped to North America plunged 19.4 per cent from a year earlier on a contract currency basis, the biggest drop in records going back to 2016, according to the Bank of Japan’s (BOJ) corporate goods price report on July 10.

The data adds to signs that Japanese automakers are trying to avoid a major price increase to remain competitive in the US, even after Mr Trump began to impose 25 per cent auto tariffs in early April. The flip side of the move is it raises concerns over companies’ profitability and whether they can continue to keep raising wages – a key component of the Bank of Japan’s sustainable inflation goal.

The report also showed producer prices overall rose 2.9 per cent from a year earlier in June, slowing from 3.3 per cent in the previous month as the price of oil and steel declined.

BOJ governor Kazuo Ueda said last week he is closely watching whether the wage-inflation cycle will be maintained in the face of the US levies, in order to determine the timing of the next rate hike. In addition to the auto and steel tariffs that are already in place, Mr Trump announced on July 7 that the across-the-board tariffs on Japan will be raised to 25 per cent starting Aug 1.

While Japanese automakers including Subaru have announced some price increases, Japan’s strategy of not raising prices too much has shown up in other data. Car exports to the US, which make up about a quarter of US-bound shipments, declined 24.7 per cent by value in May, but only 3.9 per cent by volume. (link)

A Significant Geopolitical Problem for President Trump and Us


Posted originally on CTH on July 10, 2025 | Sundance

Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on the sidelines of a meeting of foreign ministers from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in Kuala Lumpur today.  Against the backdrop of multiple questions to him about the outcome of their discussion, let us first discuss the problem being avoided.

In the mind of President Putin, and in the growing awareness of the American electorate, the President of the United States does not control the Intelligence Community. It is entirely possible for the USIC to take America deeper toward war despite the President and people of America not wanting that to happen. Putin is simply prepared for that outcome.

This reality explains a dynamic where President Trump engages with President Putin in an effort to stop the war in Ukraine, yet President Putin continues the war in Ukraine; because ultimately he knows President Trump does not control the elements that facilitate the Ukraine military.

People struggle to accept this dynamic. However, I would remind everyone that right now YOU are paying for the entire government of Ukraine to exist. Including the Ukraine govt payrolls, retirement benefits, healthcare and operational budget of Ukraine overall.

Americans do not want to pay for that. President Trump does not want to pay for that. Yet, here we are, paying for that.

The same inertia process applies to the literal Ukraine war and conflict with Russia.

You might not want it. President Trump might not want it. Yet, here again we are providing weapons, intelligence, satellite communication, personnel and systems for the war.

This is the reality of the situation regardless of your/my willingness to accept it. This reality is what President Vladimir Putin discusses and accepts.

The problem for President Trump is not that this reality exists; the bigger political problem for President Trump is that people are increasingly becoming aware of this reality.

Now, many people are recently arguing against this reality. However, these are the same voices who previously stated President Trump could unilaterally declassify information within the same silo process that is designed to control his declassification authority. Empirically, and in reality, these voices are wrong.

Something needs to change. That something is generally that President Trump has to either: 1. admit publicly he does not control the U.S. Intelligence Community (very ugly); or 2. take control of that intelligence community (even uglier).

In this element of consideration you would be well served to insert the recent experience of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard; who, intentionally or not, opened the pandora’s box containing this issue, and look what happened to her.

There was a reason DNI Tulsi Gabbard sat silently recently in the very public Cabinet meeting. I will return to this in a moment.

[SIDE NOTE: Those who deny this reality are likely of a disposition that reconciled advice by those who said COVID-19 virus could attack you standing standing at a bar, but would not approach you sitting down. The COVID virus would attack you in the paint section at WalMart, but not in the grocery aisles, etc.

Every COVID-19 mitigation pronouncement was ridiculously silly, yet people not only believed it, they followed it. The non-pretending tribe did not.  For whatever reason you might attribute, the reality of that COVID-19 experience highlighted that the non-pretending tribe within American is in the minority.  The pretenders included politicians, healthcare workers, most doctors, police, law enforcement and most Americans (70% vaccinated). END NOTE]

♦ President Trump does not have control over the USIC activity in Ukraine. If he did, he would have been fully aware of the drone strikes against the Russian strategic bomber fleet before it was carried out. By his own admission he did not know.

Prior to the increased attacks, Russian President Vladimir Putin correctly noted that Ukraine does not have the military capability, the satellite communication and guidance systems to continue carrying out strikes deep into Russia. Therefore, from the perspective of Putin, as these strikes continued they were facilitated by NATO. Ergo, NATO was factually attacking Russia, albeit using Ukraine as the proxy for it. Again, Putin with clear eyes on reality.

Into this pretending/non-pretending world, in a remarkable statement of candor we also saw Secretary of State Marco Rubio accurately -and honestly- say five months ago the Ukraine conflict was a proxy war for the USA against Russia.

Now, fast forward to today. The reality is the proxy war, Rubio outlined so eloquently, continues. Simultaneously, neither he nor President Trump has any control over the USIC that is carrying it out. Yet, Secretary Rubio has to sit down with Foreign Minister Lavrov and either (a) be honest, or (b) pretend.

Following the meeting, here is Rubio’s remarks. You decide:

[Rubio brought up a good point. Germany, UK, France and Spain all have Patriot battery’s they can spare. However, they are refusing to give them to Ukraine. I wonder why.]

Back to the point – Again, President Trump and Secretary Rubio seem to have two options: 1. Admit their lack of control, or 2. Take control.

♦ The first option is obviously the easiest, admit the President of the United States does not have full control over the U.S. Intelligence Community.  However, that comes with severe ramifications.

Flip it. Look at the dynamic from the outside. Imagine Emmanuel Macron or Abdel Fattah al-Sisi saying they no longer have operational control over their intelligence agencies, and those agencies have gone rogue. What would you think of France or Egypt?

Now imagine if the President of the USA made such a statement. How would the world react?  What would happen to the dollar?  How weak would President Trump look?

Thus, there is extreme pressure to maintain a premise.

Think about the recent experience of DNI Gabbard, and accept those types of consequences are exactly what the USIC rely upon to maintain their power and control.  Open, even briefly, the Pandora’s Box that hides reality and massive alarms are immediately triggered to isolate, ridicule and marginalize the truth teller.

The people around President Trump have a vested interest in keeping that Pandora’s Box closed.  Which brings us to the second option….  ‘Take control.’

♦ Factually, no one knows what “taking control” would look like.

Who exactly would enforce compliance and bring the USIC to heel?   Tulsi was burned just nibbling around the edge of it. What would be the reaction from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and more importantly what would be the response from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence; ironically the former silo chaired by Rubio.

Would President Donald Trump reach the same fate as President John F Kennedy?  Perhaps not, if a very public process was instituted where President Trump said exactly what the situation was.  However, that approach simply goes back to point #1.

See the problem?

Let’s talk about Tulsi Gabbard’s silence at the cabinet meeting, and role play for a moment as a Gordian Knot cutter.

Imagine a journalist who says: “Mr. President, thank you for the transparency you provide in allowing us to be with you and your cabinet during these meetings.  If I may ask a question with a brief follow up?

Question: “Mr President, do you feel you have full control over the intelligence agencies of our government?

[Anticipated Response]: “I think so, at least I would hope that is the case” (or something similar).

Question: “Thank you.  With that in mind, what specifically provides you with the sense of assurance you do have full control over the USIC?” … AND… “Would you also permit DNI Tulsi Gabbard to answer that question?

Imagine what would follow that brief line of questioning.  If the imaginary journalist were so inclined, he/she could also follow up with simple examples, like President Trump having no prior knowledge of the Ukraine drone strikes into Russia etc.

My point is that absent of President Trump taking some action that begins the process -against the interests and advice of his protective advisors- it is going to take an external element in this dynamic to trigger a change in the situation; for better, for uglier, or for worse.

The people around the office of the President are not going to want to touch this issue…

….Just ask Tulsi.