Left Stays Silent After Attack on Pregnant Tesla Driver


Posted originally on Apr 14, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

LeftistViolence

The violence against Tesla owners has gone too far. Left-leaning politicians have done nothing to stop the ongoing attacks by deranged individuals who believe they are “activists.” Nazi swastikas are appearing on Teslas throughout the world, while other vehicles are being set on fire. Now, these psychopaths have resorted to attacking people while driving.

pregnant woman in Vancouver was driving a Tesla when a large rock shattered her front windshield. The rock was thrown so hard that it went through the windshield and hit the pregnant woman. “We are working to determine whether this was a criminal act, and if someone intentionally targeted this Tesla,” said Vancouver police spokesman Sgt. Steve Addison. “This very serious incident could easily have resulted in someone’s death, but for a few inches.” There have been over 28 attacks on Teslas in Vancouver alone since Trump took office on January 20.

The woman was taken to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Police declared that she and her unborn baby, a life not recognized by the left, could have died as a result of the attack. Other drivers on the road could have been injured. What more will it take for politicians on the left to WAKE UP and DEMAND A STOP TO THE VIOLENCE!

Instead of condoning the violence, politicians are asking the people to raise hell to mislead the world into believing that the people do not support Donald Trump or those in his administration like Elon Musk. No politician on the left will declare these attacks an act of terrorism. Yet, bomb squads have been called to homes and businesses. Fire departments have been on high alert. There have even been cases of gunshots fired into office buildings.

Pelosi Schumer Black Lives

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) spent years condemning January 6. She accused Trump of stoking continued violence” and enticing a terrorist mob into a “violent assault” that left her with “physical scars and emotional trauma.” Yet, as we know from her own daughter’s documentary, Pelosi herself called off the National Guard that day to encourage the riot.

A reporter recently asked Pelosi to comment on the Tesla attacks.  “I’m so sorry, I’m a little bit late here right now,” was her only reply. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) also refused to provide a comment to reporters that day, but later issued a statement on his website to condemn the victims. “There are legitimate ways in a civilized society to express strong disagreement with far-right extremists who are trying to dismantle the American way of life. Violence is never acceptable,” Jeffries wrote.

rioters_tipped_car_300_clr_12700

Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) has refused to call the attacks “violent.” Bernie Sanders is perhaps the only Democrat to call the attacks violent, but refuses to declare them acts of terrorism. “I don’t know what domestic terrorism is in this context. It’s outrageous. People have the right to protest [Elon] Musk and Tesla, but no one should engage in violence, period,” Sanders said. “Boycotts are common, but violence must cease. It should not be part of our national dialogue.”

The Oxford Dictionary states “terrorism” is defined as “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.”

In Canada where the aforementioned incident occurred, terrorism is defined as the following:

“In Canada, section 83.01 of the Criminal Code defines terrorism as an act committed "in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause" with the intention of intimidating the public "…with regard to its security, including its economic security, or compelling a person, a government or a domestic or an international organization to do or to refrain from doing any act."

The US FBI defines terrorism as:

“Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.”

The ongoing viciousness toward Tesla owners are TERRORISM by every definition—politically motivated acts of violence.

Living on the Edge


Posted originally on Apr 14, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Trade War 2

The U.S.-China trade war is an ongoing economic conflict that began in January 2018, characterized by the imposition of tariffs and trade barriers by both countries. Recently, tensions escalated as the U.S. raised tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%, prompting China to retaliate with tariffs of 125% on U.S. imports, affecting global supply chains and market stability.

Trump’s decision not to grant China the same reprieve as other nations explained: “China wants to make a deal, they just don’t know how quite to go about it.” I disagree. If I were China, I would do a full embargo, and the Achilles’ heel in this trade war is more than just the manufacture of values for municipalities – the big ones, steel and aluminum, but also medicines. Personally, I would put a full embargo on everything, and without the medicines, people would be screaming, and their lives would be put in danger. I have dealt with Asia for some 40 years. You do not do this sort of thing publicly. It is an insult and a loss of face that forces China not to yield.

The developing U.S.-China trade war keeps ratcheting up. China has suspended exports of rare earth minerals. Meanwhile, Commerce Secretary Lutnick said that the electronics the Trump administration exempted from reciprocal tariffs could be subject to different levies in the future. This is not good. You do not air your dirty laundry in public.

Beijing’s perspective is dramatically different. Xi Jinping has taken the view that his country would lose face if it simply capitulated to what it calls America’s “unilateral bullying.” The danger with this trade war is that publicly, it only supports fervent nationalism, and that feeds into what will become World War III. China has been quietly preparing for a trade war for quite some time. Trump’s actions may spark negotiation in Western circles, but in Asian circles, they create the image that the US doesn’t want to negotiate. My concern is that Xi is brilliant. This trade war is playing into his domestic approval of anti-Americanism. Like the Russian sanctions that boosted Putin’s approval rating calculation, sources say, China is also seeing a rise in popular support to strengthen its position by preparing not just to fight back. Trump’s trade war with China is definitely strengthening Xi’s own position.

Blinken_warns_China about sanction 4 26 24_over_support_for_Russia_s_war_efforts

All of my sources have said that Xi fully understands that China has entered a period of protracted struggle in both trade and geopolitics with the United States and Europe. This became painfully obvious, and Europe and the Biden Administration confronted Russia. Xi has taken the position that China needs to prepare for these confrontations ever since the Biden Administration put sanctions on Russia and then threatened China if it dared to help Russia. The Neocon Antony Blinken expressed “serious concern” about China’s support for Russia’s defense industry. He went as far as to threaten Xi that he would impose sanctions if China helped Russia.

BRICS 2

The Neocon Antony Blinken threw down the gauntlet and views the world only in his desire for imperial power. He never understood the economy, and this insanity of threatening China and removing Russia from Swift undermined the economy and split it in half, with the formation of BRICS for geopolitical security. I don’t believe Trump understands the damage that the Biden Administration inflicted upon the entire world. Now, go after China with a trade war to bring back manufacturing to America; this is pushing China over the edge.

China holding US Debt 4 11 25

China previously owned 10% of the US national debt. This is what Trump has not considered. Before this trade war began, in January, foreigners sold a net $13.3 billion of U.S. notes and bonds that had more than one year to maturity. As we approach sovereign debt defaults, I have warned that it may start with Japan and be followed by Europe. We saw almost $50 billion was sold in December 2024 in anticipation of a Trump trade war. Last November saw almost $35 billion dumped following the election.

Canada was the largest net seller in January. The UK needed the cash and was the biggest seller last December. I know some have made the outrageous claim that Japan sold US debt, and that made Trump pause the tariffs for 90 days. These people have ZERO understanding of the markets and even less about Trump. The tariffs over 10% are political, and it is part of his art of the deal. Japan is in economic trouble with its own debt crisis, and selling US debt had nothing to do with the tariffs – this is about creating a real debt crisis.

That said, China has the capacity to dump US debt in a big way, and that would send US rates higher on the long-end. U.S. stocks rallied with Trump pausing the tariffs, yet this was cyclically on point, which our computer had forecast months in advance. People just try to come up with some fundamentals to explain each move in a market, whether true or false. Our computer is projecting that 2025 will be the low in Chinese interest rates both on the 2-year and 30-year.

While stocks rallied, Treasury yields rose so much that lower rates benefited stocks. China has been quietly selling U.S. debt, which began over a year ago. This was not something new out of the blue in response to new tariffs. Bond markets were flashing warning signs based on the hidden risks behind the entire dynamics of trade and geopolitics.

Behind the scenes, U.S. Treasury yields have been rising during the overnight sessions, indicating foreign market selling. Nevertheless, the prospects of war in Europe are reflected in our models, for they do not support a collapse in the bond markets, implying that war will bring still capital inflows.

Baltic_Dry_Index Y Combined 4 11 25

When we look at the Baltic Freight Index, 2025 was a Double Directional Change, indicating that we would have this trade war. We have a Directional Change in 2026 and a Panic Cycle in 2027, with the culmination of this war extending into 2028. This might also be influenced by the war starting in Europe.

Wisconsin Teen Allegedly Murdered Parents in Deranged Plot to Assassinate Trump


Published originally on Rumble By The Gateway Pundit on Apr 12, 2025 at 11:00 pm EST

Debased Democrats Cheer MS13 Gangbanger’s Return to US Soil


Published originally on Rumble By The Gateway Pundit on Apr 12, 2025 at 1:00 pm EST

White High School Student Killed By Black Student: But Was It Self-Defense? Here’s What We Know


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Apr 11, 2025 at 1:00 pm EST

SOLOMON: NSA Director Told FBI Pulitzer-Winning WaPo Story On Russian Collusion Hoax Was ‘Wrong’


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 11, 2025, at 10:00 pm EST

BT⚡️TV-17: Joe Allen – Has The Singularity Already Happened?


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 10, 2025, at 9:00 pm EST

“Steve Jensen’s Hands Are Dirty On Jan 6th” Julie Kelly On Controversial FBI Promotion


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 10, 2025, at 8:00 pm EST

KELLY: Judge Boasberg’s ‘Coincidental’ Contempt Timeline


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 10, 2025, at 8:00 pm EST

Todd Bensman Gives Recommendation Of Accountability For DHS Officials Over Migrant Invasion


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Apr 10, 2025, at 7:00 pm EST