Nancy Pelosi.L indsey Graham

Posted originally on CTH on October 8, 2025 | Sundance

From the moment your daughter is taught to read and write – you, her family, her teachers, peers and all of society tell her she must keep a diary of everything she thinks, does, believes and ponders.

You tell your daughter this dairy, along with her checkbook and banking ledger, must be kept in your family safe, and only you know the combination.

You promise her that despite the rule that you retain custody, you will never look at her diary or check register, and it will always be private, just hers – only hers.

Every day she writes the details of the day, as do all her friends and everyone else in society. It is normal and no one thinks much about it. Each day you put the diary back into the safe until she needs it again.

Many years of journaling and record keeping later, she finishes college, begins a job and starts to have an expanded social life. She falls in love.

Her boyfriend is considering a marriage proposal and asks you -her record custodian- for her diary so he can ensure to love her correctly, focus on her deepest concerns and desires and establish the trust in their bond.

You let him read the journal.

Your daughter finds out and feels deeply betrayed. The promise was “forever privacy” without compromise.

Now, everything has changed.

The relationship between you and your daughter is damaged. The relationship between your daughter and her boyfriend is damaged; she never wants to see him again.

Everything changed.

In an attempt to heal the damage, you tell your daughter the sincerity of motive behind the broken promise and the reason why – for her forever happiness.

Painfully, with a life of destroyed safety reflecting in her eyes, she looks at you and says, “but trust lost can never be reestablished.”

You propose new rules.

The next fiancé can only look at certain pages. He will have to ask for specific dates for review, and only the information from those dates will be reviewed. There will be restrictions on what the next boyfriend will be permitted to see.

You remind her, she cannot stop using the diary.

This is your life under FISA(702)!

Posted Oct 8, 2025 by Martin Armstrong |

Journalist Savannah Craven Antao was expressing her First Amendment rights, articulating her Christian viewpoint on abortion, when she was punched in the face by an angry interviewee. The assailant fled; Antao went to the emergency room, where she received stitches for her injuries. Unfortunately, the incident occurred in New York, where the corrupt court system sides with violent criminals. The entire incident was caught on film, but Soros-appointed DA Judge Alvin Bragg found no instance of criminal wrongdoing.

The video of the attack went viral on social media. Similar to Charlie Kirk, Savannah is merely a citizen interested in engaging in thought-provoking discussions with people who may not share her viewpoint. The New York court system reaffirmed that conservative voices may be met with violent rage. Brianna Rivers, the assailant, did not even receive a slap on the wrist. Bragg’s office first downgraded her felony charge to a misdemeanor. The office then failed to meet a critical discovery deadline, which resulted in the case being completely dismissed.

Rivers maintains innocence and claims Savannah antagonized her into a violent rage. It is a common excuse by the left– “I disagree with your viewpoint, but I cannot articulate my own, so I must resort to violence.”

Thomas More Society attorneys are now imploring to repackaging the case as a felony hate crime. “District Attorney Alvin Bragg has an opportunity to show his office is truly sorry for putting Savannah, and every woman witnessing her faith in New York, at risk,” said Christopher Ferrara, Senior Counsel at Thomas More Society. “Or is Bragg just sorry because his bungled case is now making national headlines?”

“This is Bragg’s moment of truth,” Ferrara continued. “Actions speak louder than words. Reviving the felony charge and pursuing a hate crime charge would show real accountability and send a message that political violence has no home here. We believe there is a reasonable legal basis for doing so.”

Alvin Bragg was installed to perpetuate the message that the government is protecting chaos carried out by the left. Bragg campaigned solely on a promise to take down Trump, but failed over 100 times, and has made a mockery of the US legal system. His office turned a blind eye when migrants violently attacked police officers. Five young men were arrested and immediately released without bond, back into the public, where they could re-offend without consequence. He turned a blind eye to the pro-Hamas protests at NY universities, even when actual members of terrorist organizations were found to be among attendees. “Soft-on-crime” is code for controlled anarchy. The courts have been compromised as tools of the political elite.