Mikey is severely math challenged, but shows off an important point.

You can’t extrapolate temperatures across ocean/land boundaries like NCDC does. The Gulf Stream is warm off of Massachusetts, but Massachusetts itself is frozen. There is a sharp dividing line at the coast.

GISS extrapolates 1200 km, which is like making the Liverpool weather forecast based on the weather in Nice, France.

The climate fraudsters are all over the Internet today claiming that they are adjusting raw temperatures in a way which reduces warming. Let’s check that claim out.

The US has the only decent long term temperature record covering a large area of this planet. Temperatures here are being massively adjusted to increase warming, the exact opposite of what the fraudsters claim. Older temperatures are being adjusted down, and newer temperatures are being adjusted up.

The data tampering accounts for almost the entire claimed warming trend in the US.

21 degrees above normal? The water is 39 degrees. Apparently  Mikey believes that the normal temperature of the water is 18 degrees F, 10 degrees below the freezing point of seawater.

The highest anomaly in the region is about 3C.  The man is a genius.

Mikey’s link shows the water just south of Cape Cod slightly below normal.

Paul Driessen sure does a good job on this one on incest in the enviro gov and non gov elements.

Paul, a moral humanist and humanitarian, stands up for good science and against the negative impact of government agency overreach and excess regulation on the little people.

People delving into GHCN’s temperature homogenization keep coming up with evidence that the adjustments provided biased results. 

On January 20, President Obama took credit for a drop in gas prices which he didn’t want to see and did everything he could to prevent.  Since then, gas prices have shot upwards in a hockey stick.

GasBuddy.com – Find Low Gas Prices in the USA and Canada

Earlier today I showed Gavin’s spectacular data tampering before 1980, to create the lower half of the hockey stick.

1981 version : 1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
1999 version : 1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
Current version : Fig.B.gif (407×678)

But that is only half of the hockey stick. Some of Gavin’s finest tampering is done in the 1990’s data.

Hansen 1999 showed no net warming during the 1990’s

pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1999/1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

In 2001, the GISS website also showed no net warming during the 1990’s

NASA Goddard Institute: Surface Temperature: Graphs

But GISS now shows the 1990’s as the fastest warming decade.

They built the rest of the hockey stick by simply making up data.

This image shows how the 1990’s station data has been altered since Hansen 1999.

The animation below shows the spectacular alterations to GISS 1990’s surface between 2001 and 2015, tripling the warming during the decade.

2001 : FigA.txt
Current : Fig.A.txt

We also know that the post 2000 warming is fake, because none…

In 1981, Hansen reported high temperatures at the Northern Latitudes (23.6N – 90N) around 1940, followed by a strong cooling. But that didn’t support the theory, so NASA’s finest simply made the 1940’s blip disappear through repeated data tampering.

1981 version : 1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

1999 version : 1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

Current version : Fig.B.gif (407×678)

They climategate team didn’t like the 1940’s blip, so they disappeared it.

From: Tom Wigley <wigley@ucar.edu>
To: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <santer1@llnl.gov>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

After the announcement of hottest year ever, the reason given to ignore satellite temperatures was because “we don’t live in the troposphere.” Apparently we must be fish, because the land temperatures were not the hottest ever. And I am pretty sure that we do actually live in the troposphere.

 Climate at a Glance: Time Series | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

But it is much worse than it seems. 58% of the land temperatures reported by NCDC for December were completely fake – as shown in the animation below which has ocean temperatures masked out.

Land-ocean 201412.gif (990×765)

Land 201412.gif (990×765)

The graph below shows the pixel counts of measured and published land temperatures. As you can see, the vast majority of fake pixels have positive anomalies. Their algorithms (which “work as designed”) skew fake data towards high temperatures..

The reported December land anomaly was 1.36C, but the…