45 Years Since All Scientists Agreed That Mankind Was Doomed By The Year 2000


This is why we have UN Agenda 21 which used CO2 as the lever to get what they want which is De-population as my Gates calls it!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

View original post

Understanding The Unprecedented Warming Of The 20th Century


Political noise trumps science every time!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

IceCores1

According to fake temperatures from NASA, the Earth has warmed an unprecedented 0.7C this past century, shown in green below.

ScreenHunter_5416 Dec. 21 07.23

Actual scientists would describe this as noise, but that isn’t who we are dealing with.

ScreenHunter_5417 Dec. 21 07.30

View original post

Arctic Sea Ice Continues At A Decadal High


So the only important thing for a Nobel is a PC message facts matter not!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Nobel laureate Al Gore predicted that the Arctic would be ice-free on December 10, 2014, but that doesn’t appear to have occurred, Arctic sea ice extent has been at or near a decadal high every day for the past two months.

 ScreenHunter_5409 Dec. 21 06.23

If you look closer you can also see that the Arctic was not ice-free on December 10, and that the forecast only missed by 170,000 Manhattans of ice.

ScreenHunter_5410 Dec. 21 06.25COI | Centre for Ocean and Ice | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

View original post

We can change GIGO?


Good Stuff here

Bob Greene's avatarJunkScience.com

High resolution models supposedly will usher in the golden age of climate science.  So “high resolution” fixes prediction problems and good data? 

View original post 311 more words

Model fail


I have been plotting this disparity since 2009 and it has been growing every year. The problem is that they are using the 1979 NAS report which stated that CO2 sensitivity was 3.0 degrees C +/- 1.5 degrees C for CO2 doubling and as the chart above shows the CO2 sensitivity is now considered to be closer to 1.0 degrees C per doubling. If you use the lower values then you are forced to consider other “natural” factors and if you do so you can build a model that works!

Bob Greene's avatarJunkScience.com

Knappenberger and Michaels quantify the mismatch between models and observations.

View original post 1,184 more words

1979 : Experts Warned Of Global Cooling If Antarctic Sea Ice Increased


They do know their “magic” and I bet a lot of them came from DreamWorks!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

In a classic Orwellian exercise, experts have gone from saying an increase in Antarctic sea ice would produce cooling, to saying that the observed increase in Antarctic sea ice is caused by global warming.

ScreenHunter_5367 Dec. 20 10.56

Since the experts made this warning, Antarctica sea ice area has steadily increased to record highs.

iphone.anomaly.antarctic (2)

Gavin Schmidt of NASA responded predictably, by simply altering the temperature record to show warming instead of cooling. As of 2004, he reported a strong cooling trend.

ScreenHunter_07 Nov. 04 15.52

SVS Animation 3188 – Antarctic Heating and Cooling Trends

Shindell and Schmidt 2004

Shindell, D.T., and G.A. Schmidt 2004. Southern Hemisphere climate response to ozone changes and greenhouse gas increases. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L18209, doi:10.1029/2004GL020724.

While most of the Earth warmed rapidly during recent decades, surface temperatures decreased significantly over most of Antarctica.

Pubs.GISS: Abstract of Shindell and Schmidt 2004

Two years later, NASA magically turned it into a warming trend.

ScreenHunter_08 Nov. 04 15.53

Disintegration:…

View original post 63 more words

IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism


Sven Teske is one of two things either a total fool or a shill promoting something he knows is not true!

— that is unless the worlds population was significantly reduced.

Run the numbers, its not hard, and you will quickly find that its physically impossible to build enough wind turbines and solar panels to meet that goal

— the real plan as promoted by Mr. MS Gates is DE-population as he states in his talks the only way to get to the numbers they want is if one of the numbers in his equation for CO2 comes close to zero and the only one that can do that is population. CO2 = P * S * E * C
P = population
S = services
E = energy per service
C = CO2 per unit of energy

Stephen McIntyre's avatarClimate Audit

nazca linesIPCC Lead Author Sven Teske, as alertly observed by Shub Niggurath, was one of the leaders of the vandalism of the Nazca lines during the recent Lima conference.

Several years ago, I had criticized Teske in his role as IPCC Lead Author, a criticism also taken up by Mark Lynas.

Like the Nazca vandalism, Teske, a Greenpeace employee and activist, had promoted the Greenpeace scenario in the IPCC special report on renewables. Teske had been Lead Author of the chapter responsible for critical assessment of the feasibility of the Greenpeace renewables scenario – an assessment that was not carried out in the chapter or report, despite expectations of policy-makers and the public.

The Greenpeace scenario was then equally uncritically promoted in the IPCC press release, from which the following statement was widely distributed:

Close to 80 percent of the world‘s energy supply could be met by renewables by…

View original post 72 more words

Nasa observatory reveals high CO2 concentrations in southern hemisphere


It would seem from the map that the US is not a major contributor to the imagined CO2 problem — that must be from shifting all the manufacturing jobs to China and Indonesia which now show very high!

Walt Meier Still Having Difficulty With Basic Mathematics


He’s a climate scientist fact are not important on the message counts!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

“There is no doubt that climate change is real,”says Walt Meier of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.

“The two poles are just responding in their own unique way to the same global phenomenon.”

He points out that Earth, taken as a whole, is losing sea ice. According to satellite measurements from NASA and the National Snow and Ice Data Center, the Arctic has lost an average of 20,800 square miles of sea ice a year since the late 70s.  Meanwhile, the Antarctic has gained an average of 7,300 square miles per year—not enough to balance loses at the other end of the planet.

The Yin-Yang of Polar Sea Ice – NASA Science

Earth to Walt. Earth to Walt. Is anybody in there? Global sea ice area is 4th highest on record for the date, and has been averaging above normal for the past two years.

iphone.anomaly.global (4)

iphone.anomaly.global.png (512×412)

Addition…

View original post 6 more words

The 0.01 Degree Shell Game


Facts hurt when you are a believer!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Gavin and the clowns at NCDC juggled fake temperatures to get a world record temperature by 0.01 degrees – ahead of the fake Lima climate talks. But regardless of their fake temperatures, it is all a distraction from the fact that temperatures are below Hansen’s zero emissions after the year 2000 Scenario C

ScreenHunter_778 Mar. 21 07.51

ScreenHunter_344 Mar. 06 17.11

And no, 2014 is not a record year by any stretch of the imagination.ScreenHunter_633 Dec. 19 15.13

ScreenHunter_635 Dec. 19 15.13

Whatever claims they make about “record heat” are far below what climate models predicted, and are just a distraction from the fact that even their own fake temperatures are not alarming.

View original post