No Victory without Extirpating Terror Sponsors


I was Boots on the ground in Vietnam and an officer and we could never figure out why we were not aloud to win that war. The supply lines were harassed in Laos and Cambodia but never cut and if that had been done even as late as 67 when I was there the war would have been over in 68 and Tet would never have happened. Instead ten’s of thousands of men were sacrificed to the politicians political careers.

teajr ✓كافر 🇺🇸's avatarConservative Free Thinkers

A basic rule of war is not to permit one’s enemy safe harbor in which to retreat, regroup, resupply, and plan new attacks. That was our main handicap in the Vietnam War – the U.S. never allowed itself to take out Ho Chi Minh’s safe havens and Chinese supply lines.  Our complete victory at the end of World War II was never handicapped that way, and in the upshot, Germany and Japan are non-aggressive and prosperous countries today.

Anthony Codevilla, the well-known military strategist, has just pointed out that the Islamic State has two crucial allies who constantly evade retaliation.  The tiny Gulf regime of Qatar provides money and arms to IS, and Turkey runs protected supply lines to a fast-expanding Islamofascist empire.

Until a few months ago, the Obama administration boasted that Recep Erdoğan, the Islamist ruler of Turkey, was “Obama’s best friend in the Middle East.”  Erdoğan is…

View original post 527 more words

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.