US legislators are fighting to prevent America from becoming involved in the Israel-Iran conflict, but it is too late. The war cycle cannot be stopped, and the next cycle will peak in 2026/2027 on target. Our computer warned that there was an elevated risk for a confrontation beginning in 2025 on a global scale.
US senators on both sides of the political spectrum are attempting to introduce legislation that would prevent Donald Trump from declaring war on Iran. The Bipartisan House War Powers Resolution has received support from the Republican Senator Thomas Massie, who is perhaps the most outspoken against declaring war on Israel’s behalf. “This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution,” Massie stated. The bill is not an actual bipartisan bill, as Massie is the only Libertarian leaning Republican championing such a measure. Many are now questioning the GOP as everyone seems keen to attack Iran. Yet, Donald Trump repeatedly promised that the US would not enter into any foreign wars under his command. In fact, Trump accused Obama of attempting to attack Iran back in 2011, but Obama had other priorities in the Middle East.
Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the No War Against Iran Act, which would prohibit the use of federal funds for military action against Iran without approval from Congress. The only exception would be if war was declared through the War Powers Act, or War Powers Resolution of 1973, which grants the POTUS the ability to send American troops into battle if Congress receives a 48-hour notice. The stipulation here is that troops cannot remain in battle for over 60 days unless Congress authorizes a declaration of war. Congress could also remove US forces at any time by passing a resolution.
The War Powers Act was last enacted under Barack Obama in 2011 when he sent troops into Libya. The resolution had not been enforced since 1998 when President Bill Clinton sent armed forces into Kosovo. Yet, Obama was able to bypass the law and the military remained in Libya for over 60 days without Congressional approval, marking the first time in US history that a president defied the War Powers Act. House Republicans attempted to block any federal funding, but their efforts were ultimately unsuccessful. Obama single-handedly dismantled the entire War Powers Act, as it did not matter what Congress did or did not do—the president had the sole authority to wage war.
There was a major ECM turning point on June 13, 2011. That marked the beginning of a new 8.6-year wave within the broader 51.6-year cycle. What happened right then? The Arab Spring, the destruction of Libya, and a sharp rise in geopolitical instability. That intervention was unauthorized and illegal by constitutional standards.
Senator Tim Kaine would also like to invoke the War Powers Act, but these people must understand that the act died in 2011 when the US entered Libya to overthrow Gaddafi. The government can say anything to propel a nation into war, and weapons of mass destruction are a tried and true premise. What makes this more dangerous is that we’ve since entered a cycle where unelected bureaucrats—Neocons, intelligence operatives, and shadow advisers—run foreign policy, not the American people or even Congress. Obama’s disregard for the War Powers Act helped solidify that shift.
Posted originally on Jun 18, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
This Middle East War is deeply connected with the war to destroy Russia, and it is all orchestrated by the NEOCONS. I have written before that I argued with Bill Kristol back in the ’90s, whose father helped start the Neoconservative movement. They wanted to remove all opponents of Israel under the pretense that this would bring peace to the Middle East. They targeted Saddam, Assad, and Gaddafi to remove these three leaders, who were dictators.
In 1963, Benjamin (“Bibi”) Netanyahu’s father, Benzion, moved himself and his children from Israel to Cheltenham, a suburb of Philadelphia. Benzion went to teach at America’s first center for post-doctoral Jewish studies. Bibi went to Cheltenham High. He joined the debate and chess teams, and played left wing on the soccer field. But Bibi didn’t even stay for the graduation ceremony, leaving to join the Israeli Defense Forces for the Six-Day War in June 1967.
William Kristol and Benjamin Netanyahu first met and formed an early friendship in Philadelphia during the early 1970s, when Bibi returned. Eventually, Bibi attended MIT (1972-1975) and Harvard (1975-1977) but frequently visited his older brother Yoni Netanyahu, who was studying at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.
William Kristol grew up in Philadelphia. His father, Irving Kristol, founder of the Neocons, was teaching at the University of Pennsylvania during this period. William was a teenager/young adult (born 1952) living at home. It was through their fathers’ overlapping intellectual circles that both Irving Kristol and Benzion Netanyahu became prominent conservative intellectuals, focusing on history and politics. This was likely facilitated by Yoni Netanyahu’s presence at the University of Pennsylvania. Bibi met the Kristol family during his visits to Philadelphia. This is the connection as to why Bibi is also a staunch Neocon. The removal of these three leaders, Saddam, Assad, and Gaddafi, was a Neocon objective from the ’90s. I heard this firsthand, not through third-party accounts or speculation.
I have staunchly disagreed with these objectives. Kristol, I believe, told me this would bring peace for Israel. Being a history buff myself, all my research was based on what my father told me. NEVER judge others by what you think. They will ALWAYS act based upon what they believe. The only way to understand history is to view events through their eyes, not yours. Some of these Neocons are obsessed with Russia and Communism. Others, like Kristol, are obsessed with the Middle East.
They took down Iraq because Bibi assumed that Saddam was really anti-Israel. Obama authorized the CIA to start covert operations to overthrow Assad in Syria. The Ben Gazi attack on the embassy that Hillary refused to explain when they attacked was because it was funneling in arms to overthrow both Gaddafi and Assad.
This was a Neocon operation, and it is still in play to overthrow Iran, all for Israel. They are operating against Donald Trump and have continued to usurp American foreign policy. You just had Lindsey Grachm in Ukraine tell Zelensky not to listen to Trump, that he would ensure there would be money for Iraq to continue this war endlessly. Dennis Fritz has exposed all the lies for the Weapons of Mass Destruction was a deliberate lie that was made up a year in advance to take down Saddam, KNOWING that there were no such weapons of mass destruction.
Dick Cheney even came out and endorsed Kamala to endure that the NEOCONS would continue to run the Foreign Policy of the United States. I was in the middle of their attempted regime change in Russia back in 2000. That cost me and my family a lot.
Former General Wesley Clark was told the same information I was told directly by Kristol back in the 1990s. This is NOT going to end well for the USA, Europe, the Middle East, or the rest of the world. Obama’s attempt to invade Syria was rejected by Congress, but he still funded the CIA’s covert operations.
That sent countless Muslims into Europe, and therein lies the destruction of Europe. While NEOCONS are entirely in charge of NATO and have indoctrinated all the various heads of state from Merz, Starmer, and Macron, just to mention a few, their myopic focus on war with Russia has overlooked that this NEOCON attempt to overthrow Iran, which supplies 80% of its oil to China, has also allowed waves of Syrian and other militants into Europe who are not assimilating. As war escalated against Iran, the greatest danger is that this becomes a Jihad – holy war against both Judaism and Christianity. I would NOT plan any vacation to Europe this summer.
This Middle East NEOCON War to eliminate all of the possible enemies of Israel is a disaster about to unfold. Pakistan has threatened to drop a nuclear warhead on Israel if Benjamin Netanyahu uses nuclear weapons against Iran, according to a top Iranian officer. General Mohsen Rezaee, a senior officer in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), said in an interview: “Pakistan has assured us that if Israel uses a nuclear bomb on Iran, they will attack Israel with a nuclear bomb.”
Posted originally on Jun 17, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
COMMENT #1: Marty, they are starting to listen to you. This resolution even mentions the Neocons for the first time.
Keep up the good fight
PH
COMMENT #2: Marty, Interesting bipartisan House resolution mentioning the neocons and saying no more. Your message seems to be getting through.
Well done
We shall see.
T
REPLY: At last, we are starting to hear the right words. Rep. Thomas Massie(R-Ky.), who is a libertarian-leaning Republican, came out to introduce a resolution against U.S. military intervention abroad, posted on the social media site X on Monday that he would introduce such a resolution on Tuesday. He said:
“This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution,” Massie said. “I’m introducing a bipartisan War Powers Resolution tomorrow to prohibit our involvement. I invite all members of Congress to cosponsor this resolution.”
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) also said that he would co-lead the resolution with Massie and that the resolution would be privileged, meaning that this designation circumvents the leadership thereby forcing a full House vote.
“No war in Iran. It’s time for every member to go on record. Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people?”Khanna said in a post on X. “I am proud to co-lead this bipartisan War Powers Resolution with Rep. Massie that is privileged and must receive a vote.”
Any member who does not support this should be driven from office as a pawn of the military-complex establishment that benefits from wars.
QUESTION: Iran has been a revolutionary religious state that has sponsored terrorism. What do you think is the solution?
GR
ANSWER: This ideal situation would be a counter-revolution within Iran to remove this religiously dominated government since the 1979 revolution that overthrew the Shah and began with the American hostage crisis. There are a lot of Iranian businessmen who would love to return to Iran. It is a country that is twice the size of Texas and also has tremendous resources. I fear that this attempt at regime change runs the risk of (1) instigating a holy war that will tear Europe apart, and (2) it runs the risk of bringing in China and Russia.
We have to tread very carefully. Trump has said, “We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,” and he has called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender.” He has also stated bluntly that the United States knows “exactly where” Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is hiding—calling him an “easy target” but saying he would not be killed “at least not for now.”
The best possible outcome is a domestic revolution and the overthrow of the Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. Otherwise, our computer is warning that this can become a much larger problem. Our models are indicating rising volatility into July and a potentially severe Panic Cycle in August, which I hope does not signal the broader expansion of this conflict. For now, all air traffic has been shut down in Israel and Jordon. You cannot leave or come in.
Historically, wars can be settled by negotiation when the core issue is economic. Here, the Iranian government, since 1979, has maintained Death to America and Death to Israel. They have sponsored terrorism through their proxies, Hezbollah, Houthis, and Hamas. I am not confident that there will be an unconditional surrender. This could escalate into a religious war that will last into 2027. A civil uprising where the people of Iran take back their country that is INDEPENDENT, would be more difficult for Russia and China to ignore.
Posted originally on Jun 17, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
“WASHINGTON — President Trump told The Post Friday that he knew Israel would strike Iran if the theocratic regime didn’t quickly agree to a revised nuclear deal with the US.
“I always knew the date,” the president said in a brief phone interview. “Because I know everything. I know everything. I know everything.”
I believe that the Neocons have used Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu to achieve their end goal, and Trump may have been against the Neocons that they had stuffed into his cabinet, like John Bolton and people like Victoria Nuland, but they are clever and devious. Bibi, as I said, went to school in Philadelphia and was introduced to this Neocon agenda with Bill Kristol’s father, who started the whole Neocon movement. Bibi is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. I know that Trump was a genuine peacemaker, and as I said, I even had discussions with RFK, and he, too, asked me what I would do to stop the Ukraine War. So I do know where their hearts were. But they are not aware of the full extent of this Neocon movement and that Bibi is very much a part of that. Trump has mistakenly assumed he is the head of a state, but his approval rating as of June 2024 was only 29% in Israel, about the same as John Bolton’s in the USA.
This statement from Trump that he always knew the date implies that the meeting in Oman was a decoy for Israel. Trump may assume that Israel is only trying to eliminate the nuclear capability of Iran, but that is not true. This has been an attempt to create regime change in Iran, which came on target on our computer model for 2025. Trump ordered Bibi not to kill the Supreme Leader, but this was a deliberate decapitation of the top leadership in Iran, which is the regime change part of this operation.
Trump’s blunder in not realizing that the very Neocons who tried to assassinate him because he was anti-war are NOT purely domestic. Bibi, I know, is part of this same crew. Trump has been led into the risk of dragging the US into an unwinnable all-out war, not just against Iran, but one that will involve both Russia and China.
History warns us that if the US gets tangled up in a war with Iran, Russia, and/or China, they can see that as an opportunity to attack the USA. This scenario describes Japan’s invasion of Russian territories in 1904, leading to the Russo-Japanese War. Russia was engaged in another conflict very heavily, trying to suppress the Boxer Rebellion (1899-1901) in China, diverting significant military resources and attention to Manchuria. Japan perceived Russia as weak/distracted, and thus an opportunity. Japan invaded on February 8th, 1904, launching a surprise naval attack on the Russian fleet at Port Arthur in Manchuria and landing troops in Korea. This marked the start of the Russo-Japanese War. Japan decisively defeated Russia on land (Battle of Mukden) and sea (Battle of Tsushima). The war ended with the Treaty of Portsmouth (1905), mediated by the US.
Sweden invaded Denmark during the Thirty Years’ War (1643-1645). Sweden was already fighting in Germany (part of the wider Thirty Years’ War), yet saw Denmark as weakened and vulnerable. The Swedish surprise invasion of Denmark in 1643 (known as the Torstenson War) was a pivotal conflict within the broader Thirty Years’ War. Sweden decisively won the war, which marked the definitive end of Denmark’s centuries-long dominance in the Nordic region (the Dominium maris Baltici). This then led to the rise of Sweden, which emerged as the undisputed great power in Northern Europe. The territorial gains secured its control over the Baltic approaches and strengthened its position on the Scandinavian peninsula. As always, the humiliation and territorial losses fueled deep Danish resentment, setting the stage for future conflicts between Sweden and Denmark-Norway, such as the Second Northern War (1655-1660).
These are just two examples that show how engaging in a war on one front can expose one to an assault from another adversary who perceives that rival as weakened or occupied, presenting an opportunity to defeat a long-standing rival. This is my concern that the US can be set up by these Neocons, who have lost every war since World War II, because they are myopic and focus on one element, and not the risk of a broader engagement from others seeing an opportunity ripe for the taking.
Bibi has placed Israel at risk. He is a Neocon focused on the destruction of Iran, not simply the termination of its nuclear capability, which even Tulsi testified before Congress that Iran was still perhaps 18 months away from creating a bomb. Israel’s Iron Dome is regarded as one of the cornerstones of Israel’s defensive system, but it does have limitations. The only successful strategy against Israel has to be to overwhelm the whole system with incoming attacks coming from multiple directions. This system is not a computer but a human monitoring a sophisticated radar system. This is why the US is helping to shoot down incoming missiles over Israel, which Iran sees as the US getting directly involved. If the incoming rocket is deemed a threat, the command center responds by launching a Matir missile to intercept it.
Will Russia, Turkey, and China provide support to Iran in its conflict with Israel? The three countries have condemned Israel’s actions. This is the real wildcard that Bibi thinks the US will intervene and protect Israel. What we do know is that Iran has also developed supersonic missiles. Evidence is pointing to significant indigenous effort but also likely external assistance, primarily from Russia. Russia is the most frequently cited source of potential aid, especially following the deepening military partnership since Russia’s setup by the Neocons to protect the Donbas since 2022, when Kiev started the civil war by the interim government in 2. Iran supplied Russia with large numbers of Shahed drones, and in return, is widely believed to be receiving advanced military technology.
Russia possesses some of the world’s most advanced hypersonic missile technology (e.g., Kinzhal, Avangard, Zircon). Transferring knowledge, components, or even designs related to scramjet engines, heat-resistant materials, or guidance systems for supersonic/hypersonic flight is considered highly plausible by Western intelligence and defense analysts. Iran’s unveiling of the “Fattah” and “Fattah-2” hypersonic missiles in 2023 intensified speculation about Russian technological input.
Iran and North Korea have also a well-documented, decades-long history of collaboration on ballistic missile technology, including engines, materials, and designs (e.g., Shahab-3 based on Nodong). North Korea has also tested its own hypersonic glide vehicles (e.g., Hwasong-8, Hwasong-12). While the extent of current collaboration specifically on supersonic/hypersonic tech is less clear than the Russian link, the established relationship makes technological exchange or parallel development based on shared past knowledge a distinct possibility.
China has advanced hypersonic capabilities and has historically been a supplier of missile-related technology and components to Iran. While direct evidence of China aiding Iran’s specific supersonic/hypersonic projects is less prominent in recent reports than the Russian link, China remains a potential source of critical dual-use technologies, materials science, or even indirect knowledge transfer. China might be more cautious than Russia due to its broader geopolitical interests and concerns about secondary sanctions.
Iran strongly emphasizes that its supersonic and hypersonic missile programs (like the “Fattah” and “Haj Qasem” missiles) are the result of domestic research and development by organizations like the Aerospace Force of the IRGC. They showcase local scientists and engineers. It’s likely a combination: Iran has built substantial domestic missile expertise over decades (often reverse-engineering or adapting foreign designs). External assistance, particularly recent potential transfers from Russia, could provide critical breakthroughs in specific challenging areas like hypersonic propulsion or thermal protection, accelerating existing programs. Developing these missiles is a key strategic goal for Iran to enhance deterrence, penetrate advanced air defenses (like those of Israel, the US, and Gulf states), and project regional power.
While Iran credits domestic development, Russia is currently viewed by Western intelligence and analysts as the most probable major source of advanced technological assistance for Iran’s supersonic/hypersonic missile program, particularly following the Ukraine war. North Korea remains a potential contributor based on its long history of missile collaboration. China is a less prominent but still possible source of some technology or components. The exact nature and extent of foreign help remain classified and subject to analysis. There remains a serious risk that this war is just the beginning, and the end will not arrive, engulfing more nations until 2030.
Posted originally on CTH on June 17, 2025 | Sundance
I post the direct statements from President Trump on the calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin because if you read the background, both before and after the Israel strike operation, you can clearly see the strategy. [Check Dates]
President Trump is doing what modern U.S officials never did, showing respect to the aligned nuclear powers and positioning any action for the least amount of geopolitical collateral damage. President Trump knows one of the key geopolitical influences upon Iran is the Russian Federation.
You do not have to be pro or anti-Trump to understand how executive level respect and diplomacy works. This is why the leadership of the Russian Federation respect Trump (firm but thoughtful), even if they are in opposition to his positions.
Remember the statements yesterday in Canada, at the G7, specifically about the Russian sanctions. These statements above should be read with the context of before and after the strikes in Iran began; then overlay the statements yesterday about the sanctions. There is a very clear message conveyed.
President Trump does not want a targeted problem to escalate into a regional geopolitical conflict. So, he takes proactive and ongoing steps to ensure containment. This is the part that French President Macron (doofus) cannot intellectually conceptualize; hence, President Trump’s curt remarks.
Even before the Israeli operation against Iran began, President Trump draws safe proactive perimeters that all traditional agents of governmental influence can understand.
Like you, I completely do not want expanded conflict that could potentially draw the U.S. into something far more dangerous. However, I also don’t see that as a likely outcome. President Trump is in the support position to eliminate the threat of nuclear weapons from Iran; let him work without our dark imaginings injecting something that does not exist.
Don’t buy clicks and hype. Just focus on the prudent approach evidenced in the honest analysis of Trump’s considerations. He’s not shooting from the hip. If you understand this, if you can see this in Trump’s words and deeds, then contrast with Macron.
KANANASKIS, Alberta — French President Emmanuel Macron on Tuesday opposed bringing down the Iranian regime violently as he warned of potentially destabilizing effects across the Middle East.
“The biggest mistake today would be to try to do a regime change in Iran through military means because that would lead to chaos,” Macron told reporters on the last day of the G7 summit in Canada, warning that “no one can say what comes next.”
“We never support actions of regional de-stabilization,” he added.
Macron’s remarks come as fears snowball over the U.S. potentially joining Israel’s military campaign in Iran, which began late last week and has crippled Iranian nuclear sites and killed top regime officials.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Tuesday that U.S. President Donald Trump was indeed considering that option. On his way back to the U.S. yesterday evening, Trump said he wanted a “real end” to the conflict and that he was “not too much in a mood to negotiate.”
Macron mentioned forced regime changes carried out by the U.S. and NATO allies in Iraq and Libya as past mistakes that should not be repeated, given they had birthed subsequent deadly political instability. (read more)
As we watch how President Trump is navigating this, I can see a strong, thoughtful leadership position within the big picture. A politician like Emmanuel Macron could never fathom calling an ‘adversary’ (Putin) to talk about a potential conflict with a positioned ally (Iran) of that adversary.
President Trump has taken that proactive action with Putin specifically to avoid the ‘expanded conflict’ outcome that is driving the fear wedge within MAGA. These conversations with Putin are EVIDENCE of Trump’s intent not to create collateral conflict, and it looks like Vladimir Putin understands him.
Posted originally on CTH on June 17, 2025 | Sundance
First reported on CNN, several outlets are now confirming that Dept of Homeland Security Director, Kristi Noem, was rushed to the hospital in Washington DC for an apparent allergic reaction. She is recovering without issue.
WASHINGTON DC – Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was taken to a hospital due to an allergic reaction on Tuesday, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told POLITICO.
“She was transported to the hospital out of an abundance of caution,” McLaughlin said in a statement. “She is alert and recovering.”( LINK )
Posted originally on CTH on June 17, 2025 | Sundance
Hopefully these are the political stunts that will force the reluctant hand of Attorney General Pam Bondi to intervene. Criminal arrests and federal prosecutions of politicians pulling these stunts are needed.
New York City Comptroller Brad Lander locked arms with an illegal alien as immigrations officials were removing the target for deportation. Lander purposefully interfered in a federal apprehension of a criminal alien, and should be prosecuted.
The media are selectively showing a portion of the video after Lander is handcuffed by police. However, in the earlier segment below you can clearly see Mr Lander intentionally locking arms with the target in an effort to stop ICE enforcement from taking custody. WATCH:
Judicial warrants are not required to apprehend and deport illegal aliens.
NEW YORK — New York City mayoral candidate Brad Lander was handcuffed and detained by federal agents Tuesday afternoon while escorting migrants from immigration hearings in Lower Manhattan.
Footage and video of the hectic incident is firing up the third-place candidate’s suddenly energetic campaign, as he shows himself taking on an issue that’s central to President Donald Trump’s political agenda.
“I’m not obstructing, I’m standing right here in the hallway. I asked to see the judicial warrant,” the candidate says in the video.
Lander, the New York City comptroller, was at 26 Federal Plaza in downtown Manhattan on Tuesday morning to observe an immigration hearing when he walked out of the courtroom locking arms with a Yoruba-speaking immigrant, according to Lander’s wife, Meg Barnette. (more)
Posted originally on CTH on June 17, 2025 | Sundance
I cannot give all the particulars to backstop my perspective, however, Vice President JD Vance has traditional training and perspective on leadership within massive organizations, enhanced by his military service. Essentially, ‘never compromise your leadership‘.
Vice President JD Vance would not publish the following message on social media, without previously approving the entire statement through President Donald Trump. If Vance did not discuss this with Trump, Vance would stay quiet. That said, here is themessage from JD Vance:
“Look, I’m seeing this from the inside, and am admittedly biased towards our president (and my friend), but there’s a lot of crazy stuff on social media, so I wanted to address some things directly on the Iran issue:
First, POTUS has been amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Over the last few months, he encouraged his foreign policy team to reach a deal with the Iranians to accomplish this goal. The president has made clear that Iran cannot have uranium enrichment. And he said repeatedly that this would happen one of two ways–the easy way or the “other” way.
Second, I’ve seen a lot of confusion over the issue of “civilian nuclear power” and “uranium enrichment.” These are distinct issues. Iran could have civilian nuclear power without enrichment, but Iran rejected that. Meanwhile, they’ve enriched uranium far above the level necessary for any civilian purpose. They’ve been found in violation of their non-proliferation obligations by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is hardly a rightwing organization.
It’s one thing to want civilian nuclear energy. It’s another thing to demand sophisticated enrichment capacity. And it’s still another to cling to enrichment while simultaneously violating basic non-proliferation obligations and enriching right to the point of weapons-grade uranium.
I have yet to see a single good argument for why Iran needed to enrich uranium well above the threshold for civilian use. I’ve yet to see a single good argument for why Iran was justified in violating its non-proliferation obligations. I’ve yet to see a single good pushback against the IAEA’s findings.
Meanwhile, the president has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military’s focus on protecting our troops and protecting our citizens.
He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president. And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.
But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue. And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people’s goals. Whatever he does, that is his focus.” (source)
Accepting what JD Vance is saying here (emphasis mine) the most Occam’s razor implication is that President Trump is going to authorize U.S. bunker busting bombs, the 30,000/lb deep penetrating bombs [GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)] that only the USA has in the arsenal.
This approach takes the USA activity from “support”, to active operational engagement. Hence Vance saying “take further action,” and the following message from President Trump, “nobody does it better.”
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
