The Global Warming Scam Was Explained Almost 20 Years Ago


And he was right on!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Bookmark this classic 1995 article in the Canberra Times. This guy had the entire scam nailed from day one.

To conclude that CO2 emissions are a threat to the environment would be doubtful and premature. Only a closer examination of the atmosphere over a long period and further detailed studies will decide the matter,” Barrett said in a recent scientific paper which caused frissons of anger among scientists.

Barrett, from Imperial College’s chemistry department, pours thinly veiled scorn on the arguments of the “warmers”, saying they are based on unreliable data, misunderstand the self-correcting nature of the earth’s atmosphere and represent science-by-committee. He says IPCC scientists based their theories on the fact that the earth’s temperature has increased by 0.8°C in the 20th century.

“This is within the expected margins of error for such a study,” he says. “A hard scientific view would be that there has been no discernible change…

View original post 350 more words

Great moments in climate prediction: ‘World will warm faster than predicted in next five years, study warns’


When up is down and black is white and left is right there is no limit to what you can say.

Government To Regulate Groundwater For 1st Time As California Drought Becomes “Race To The Bottom”


Maybe this will wake them up —-but I doubt it will change their views. They will probably just demand that we build a water pipeline from the Great Lakes to them!

Understanding Why They Wanted To Get Rid Of The Blip


We just need to keep reminding everyone!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Climategate scientists said they wanted to get rid of the 1940’s blip, and they did. They don’t want people to know what the climate was like in the past, because it wrecks their story and exposes their graphs as complete nonsense.

ScreenHunter_2440 Sep. 01 09.26

21 Jul 1932 – A Warmer World.

View original post

NOAA Data Tampering – Always Worse Than It Seems


Make the data fit the result that you want is what they do — the new science!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

I changed my environment to use the identical set of 1,218 stations for GHCN HCN daily data, as are used for the  USHCN monthly data.

We are of course familiar with the hockey stick of data tampering being done between raw and final USHCN monthly data.

ScreenHunter_2426 Aug. 31 15.10

 But it is worse than it seems. Before they even to get to “raw monthly” data, they have already cooled the past by 0.1ºF relative to their raw daily data.

ScreenHunter_2427 Aug. 31 15.11

There seems to be no limit to the amount of cheating being done with the temperature record.

View original post

Climate Science Explained In One Simple Graph


Its amazing what you can do with data today! We could prove just about anything today even climate change I bet … lol

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

ScreenHunter_2417 Aug. 31 06.29 Climate is complicated, but climate science isn’t.

US winter temperatures plummeted from 1950 to 1979. Scientists reacted to this with the global cooling scare, as reported by Science News in 1975

ScreenHunter_2418 Aug. 31 06.31

NASA warned of a new ice age by the year 2020.

ScreenHunter_36-Feb.-07-00.051 (1)

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/

After 1979, temperatures got much warmer, so NASA’s James Hansen began the global warming scare.

ScreenHunter_2417 Aug. 31 06.29

But after the year 2000, temperatures began to plummet again. So NASA and NOAA responded with the  only sensible solution. They altered the data to eliminate the earlier warmth and the current cooling.

But the data tampering wasn’t enough to keep up with cooling temperatures – so a few years ago they renamed “global warming” as “climate change”

ScreenHunter_2417 Aug. 31 06.29

You might be tempted to think that the practice of climate science is a complete fraud, and if you did, you would be correct.

View original post

The Primary Driver Of Climate


Apparently we have forgotten a lot. We knew more a hundred years ago it would seem. I have been working on this aspect for almost a decade now and I agree this is more right than any of the believers at NOAA, NASA as well as the British counter parts and the IPCC.

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

ScreenHunter_174 Aug. 31 16.35

The Cause Of An Ice Age

It has been known for over 110 years that the primary driver of climate on Earth is variations in the planet’s orbit and rotation. Because the Earth’s orbit is elliptical, some seasons are longer than others. Depending on which way the planet’s axis is tilted at any given time, this can either mean either long summers, or long winters.

Precession of the Earth’s axis over time produces alternating cold and warm periods, and opposite in the opposite hemispheres.

ScreenHunter_173 Aug. 31 16.33

Long before climate science went completely brain dead under the stewardship of James Hansen, this was well understood, and was also understood to be the cause of the MWP – which the Climategate criminals  have since tried to erase.

ScreenHunter_175 Aug. 31 16.43ScreenHunter_176 Aug. 31 16.43

31 Jan 1903 – CLIMATE AND HISTORY.

View original post

Geothermal Heat “Key Factor” In Melting Thwaites Glacier


Hey they found the missing global warming heat — its under the glacier!

Visualizing The Spectacular Stupidity Of The New York Times


Maybe the moon is going to move closer to the earth because of all the CO2 in the atmosphere?

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

While levels worldwide are expected to rise an average of two to three feet by 2100, they could surge more than six feet along the Atlantic seaboard. The study named Boston, New York, and Norfolk, Va., as the three most vulnerable metropolitan areas.

Rising Seas – NYTimes.com

Fortunately, Manhattan has had a tide gauge for the past 150 years. which shows a small linear rise in sea level, due almost entirely to land subsidence. There has been no acceleration as CO2 has risen, indicating no correlation.

The graph below plots the New York Times prediction in red, and the measured data in blue. It gives a good indication of the mindless stupidity going on at the New York Times.

ScreenHunter_2341 Aug. 26 23.46

Data and Station Information for NEW YORK ( THE BATTERY)

View original post

Analysis: energy storage cannot solve the problem of intermittency of wind or solar power


Its not hard to run the numbers and find that this is true — i spend the time and did this a number of years ago it wind and solar just do not work.