“Subject #1 Is The Israeli-Iran Conflict.” Glenn Live From Canada Ahead Of Trump G7 Carney Meeting


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: June 16, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

Have We Just Witnessed the Start of WWIII?


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Jun 013, 2025 at 7:00 pm EST

Can Israel’s Preemptive Strike on Iran Be Considered Self-Defense?


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Jun 013, 2025 at 6:00 pm EST

What is the America-First View on Israel’s Strike on Iran?


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Jun 013, 2025 at 5:00 pm EST

ThoughtCrime Hosts React Live to Israel’s Attack on Iran: What You Need to Know


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Jun 013, 2025 at 4:00 pm EST

How Will Israel’s Attack on Iran Affect America?


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Jun 013, 2025 at 3:00 pm EST

Israel Admits It Cannot Destroy Iran’s Nuclear Program


Posted originally on Jun 15, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Furdow Nuclear

Israel has asked the Trump administration over the past 48 hours to join the war with Iran to eliminate its nuclear program, according to two Israeli officials. Israel has admitted that it cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear facility, and only the USA has the power to do that. Israel simply lacks the bunker buster bombs and large bomber aircraft needed to destroy Iran’s Fordow uranium enrichment site. As shown here, it is built into a mountain and deep underground.

This is a reconstructed image purporting to show a central secret Iranian nuclear facility, based in part on information acquired by Israel’s Mossad in a famed 2018 operation. The website of the intelligence firm the Intel Lab has stated that the images of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant codenamed Al Ghadir were three-dimensional reconstructions put together with an analyst with the code name @Orion__int on Twitter. The firm said they are based on the Israeli-acquired and public documents, as well as photographs and video images. “This multi-disciplinary effort is based on Civil Engineering knowledge, Nuclear Fuel Enrichment Cycle basics, Intelligence Analysis, and advanced skills in realistic modeling and rendering,” the Intel Lab said.

The Trump administration has so far distanced itself from Israel’s operation and argued that it would be illegitimate for Iran to retaliate by striking U.S. targets. The problem here is that any direct UNPROVOKED attack on Iran will bring the US into conflict with both China and Russia. Directly attacking Iran, even if the U.S. involvement is limited to bombing a single site, would pull the U.S. directly into the war, and this could lead to WWIII.

The hard reality is that if the Fordow nuclear facility remains operational, assuming there is an end to this operation, it means that Israel will have failed in its goal to “eliminate” Iran’s nuclear program after all of this. What they may have inspired is that North Korea becomes the proxy to just hand a nuke to Iran.

Senate Intel Committee Chair Advocates for Expanded Israeli Conflict with Iran


Posted originally on CTH on June 15, 2025 | Sundance

SENATOR TOM COTTON (R-Arkansas): Thank you, Margaret.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So, I know you are staying on top of all these events.

When it comes to what President Trump has said publicly, he seems to be indicating not just that the U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, but he’s saying this is not America’s fight unless Iran hits the U.S.

Should it be such a bright line?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Well, what the president said in his overnight post was a clear message to the ayatollahs, that, if you hit America in any way, whether our troops or our citizens or our ships, for instance, then you’re going to feel the full force and strength of the U.S. military in a way no one’s ever seen.

That’s a clear deterrent message, setting aside the threat that the nuclear program poses to Israel and to the United States, because, let’s remember, the Iranian regime has been terrorizing Americans. It’s killed thousands of Americans. It’s taken them hostage. It still chants “Death to America.” And it’s building missiles that can strike not just our troops or our friends in the region, but soon enough here in the United States as well.

And that’s why President Trump has been consistent for his 10 years in political life that we cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. We cannot allow them to have a path to a nuclear weapon with uranium enrichment. That’s the deal that he was trying to negotiate for the last two months.

But, as he said early last week, Iran was simply too stubborn. They weren’t willing to come to the table and negotiate. And I have to disagree with the reporter who said that Israel strikes in Iran ended those negotiations. It was Iran’s – Iran’s stubbornness that ended them.

President Trump was clear about that. And he is still clear that there is time, if they want to come back to negotiate an end to the uranium enrichment program, that he would accept that. But he’s given them chance after chance, as he said.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But, in terms of the line he’s drawing on military force, should the U.S. involvement be purely defensive and deterrent, or should the U.S. be willing to be engaged in these military operations?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Well, I don’t think he’s drawn that line. He’s been very clear that all options remain on the table to defend our own people, to support Israel…

MARGARET BRENNAN: He hasn’t said that.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: But he – well, he said that for 10 years, and he said it for months leading up to this moment.

He said that Iran can make a deal and live happily without death, or there will be bombing. So, I think he’s appropriately kept all options on the table. He made clear in the early days of this conflict, on Thursday night and Friday morning, that we back Israel to the hilt. There’s almost 700,000 Americans in Israel at any time. So, of course, we’re going to protect Israel, and that we have the best military technology in the world.

And he said that he has proudly provided Israel with those weapons, both in his first term and in this term as well. So, we back Israel to the hilt all the way. But he’s appropriately keeping all options on the table.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But he’s emphasizing again and again, this isn’t us. This isn’t America. This isn’t an American operation.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: So, so far in this operation, we have not been involved in offensive strikes. We’ve been involved in other ways, through our provision of Israel with weapons over the years or our defense of Israel and its citizens and our citizens in Israel.

Now, he has said his objective remains the same, which is Iran’s nuclear disarmament. And he has said that that can happen still through a deal. I don’t think…

MARGARET BRENNAN: He prefers diplomacy.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: And he would like Iran to come back to the table, I think, now that Iran sees that Israel and America mean business…

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: … and surrender its enrichment capabilities voluntarily. If that doesn’t happen, though, I think these strikes are going to continue.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But to the point, if it’s really about destroying the nuclear program that Iran has, you know this very well, that there’s this underground facility at Fordow, very deep, under a mountain.

It’s long been assessed that only the U.S. has the capability with a bunker-buster bomb to take it out. Should the United States offer that kind of massive ordnance penetrator to Israel to finish the job?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Well, I’m not going to speculate about the methods that the United States or Israel might use…

MARGARET BRENNAN: But should they?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: … to protect our own interests.

I will simply say this. It is, as you say, widely known that Israel does not have heavy bombers. It doesn’t have those 30,000-pound penetrating munitions. But, as we saw with Hezbollah last fall, as we saw in Iran on Thursday night, when the Mossad had infiltrated officers and agents and manufactured drones in Iran, Israel has more than a few tricks up their sleeve.

And I wouldn’t be surprised if Israel has other cards yet to play.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So, when it comes to differences in intelligence assessments, the U.S. intelligence that was made public in March said at the time the U.S. does not assess Iran’s building a nuclear weapon and that the supreme leader has not reauthorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended back in 2003.

Was there more recent U.S. intel sharing or intel indicating that there was some kind of sprint for a bomb?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Well…

MARGARET BRENNAN: Because that seems a very different assessment from what Israel’s claiming.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Well, unfortunately, Iran enriched a lot of the uranium to near weapons-grade over the four years of the Biden administration. And they…

MARGARET BRENNAN: But that’s not weaponization. You know that.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: They are – they are close to having enough pure weapons-grade uranium for several weapons.

Now, that’s not the only step to having a weapon. You also have to have the weapon design. We’ve seen indications that Iran is once again exploring those weapon designs. And then, if you want to use a missile, obviously, you have to marry up the warhead to the missile. But Iran has other delivery methods as well, through terrorist proxies.

So I think that’s one of the reasons why both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu thought we – things that were coming to a head. A second reason is, Iran is rapidly producing ballistic missiles, both medium-range to target Israel and short-range to target our troops, and they add substantially to those stockpiles every single month.

And at a time when Iran is both continuing its work on its nuclear program and trying to rebuild its offensive missile capacity, that the window to actually stop Iran from entering that zone of immunity was rapidly closing.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Right, but why Thursday night?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Well, as President…

MARGARET BRENNAN: There seems to be a difference in this idea of a sprint.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Well, as President Trump – well, as President Trump said on Friday morning, that he had given Iran 60 days to make a deal.

That was day 61.

MARGARET BRENNAN: And he scheduled talks on day 63. You know that.

I mean, this was a – this wasn’t really a hard deadline.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: He gave them 60 days. On day 61, the strikes began.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Day 63, Steve Witkoff wanted to meet with them.

But if this was a covert race to weaponize, though, it – it raises questions here, because it appears President Trump’s offer is to negotiate with the existing regime that is in place in Iran.

Do you support a deal with the existing regime in Iran to stay in place? Do you support his push for diplomacy?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: President Trump has always said his goal is to end Iran’s nuclear weapons program…

MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: … which means the surrender of its uranium enrichment capability.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But this would be offering them a lifeline, wouldn’t it?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Well, it would be protecting our interests and securing Israel’s interests as well in Iran not having a nuclear weapon.

We’ve seen what happens when they don’t have nuclear weapons. They’re deliberately targeting civilian areas in Israel. We’ve seen their campaign of terror against Americans over the decades. That’s why we can’t allow them to have a nuclear weapon.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: And presidents have said – for 20 years, presidents have said that. George Bush said it, didn’t act on it. Barack Obama and Joe Biden, frankly, aided and abetted Iran’s nuclear program. Only Donald Trump has drawn that line and is willing to enforce that line.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But he’s not enforcing that line. It is Israel that’s bombing. As you just said, the United States is not involved in these offensive operations.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: But, in – in Israel, we are helping – we’re help…

MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you – but do you share the president’s assessment that the way to finish this is through negotiating with the existing regime that the Israelis have called for the Iranian people to rise up against?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: I think there’s multiple ways to eliminate Iran’s enrichment capability. They are today what they were Thursday morning, before these strikes started. As the president has said repeatedly, they can make a deal, or there’s going to be bombing.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to move to some domestic issues, but, very quickly, I know in the past, you have said that former officials who have a direct threat against them from Iran should continue to receive security. President Trump pulled it.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: I think we should…

MARGARET BRENNAN: Should they get it now?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: We should probably revisit the threat that all persons face – remember, President Trump faced assassination threats from Iran as well – in this moment of tension, to ensure that no one who worked for President Trump in the first term or works for him now could be the target of Iranian agents.

MARGARET BRENNAN: And that security detail was pulled by the president himself.

On immigration, the Trump administration has decided to pull back its policy a little bit. They are pausing raids on farms, hotels and restaurants. Arkansas has a lot of agricultural business in your state. Do you support this decision?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: I think we need to have robust worksite enforcement.

I don’t think ICE is going to show up at one or two restaurants where they have an illegal migrant working. Usually, it’s unscrupulous employers who have large numbers of illegal immigrants working in their worksites. And whatever worksite it is, whatever industry it is, ICE has to be able to go and enforce our immigration laws and remove illegal immigrants.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But the president has pulled back from that. That was the change in policy last week when it came to farms, in particular.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: I don’t – I don’t think we should – I don’t think we should pull back to any – on any kind of enforcement at all.

I think worksite enforcement in all industries needs to be able to move forward. And I think ICE agents on the front lines need the support of political leadership.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You would want more enforcement, including in manufacturing, including in construction, where it could impact the economy?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: We – we – we should – we should not – we should not declare any industry or any worksite that uses large numbers of illegal immigrants off-limits for enforcement of federal law.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I also want to ask you about the enforcement to date.

As you know, there has been outcry. We’ve seen protests across the country because of the enforcement policies. You wrote an op-ed supporting President Trump’s decision to send in federalized National Guard troops and active-duty Marines to California.

You referred to it as “the threat from the radical left, an overwhelming show of force to end the riots,” and talked about communities being terrorized.

Given the amount of tension in the country right now, is that really the language to use?

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Yes, when you see left-wing street militias who are throwing bricks and frozen water bottles at police officers and shooting them with fireworks.

And, unfortunately, you have mayors and governors in some places that won’t allow police to maintain order. The next step is to call in the National Guard. And if the governor won’t call on the National Guard, then the president has to federalize them.

We always hope that the local police are allowed to do their job and have sufficient numbers to do their job to maintain order and protect innocent life and property. But, if they can’t, or they’re not allowed to, the National Guard has to be on scene to restore civil order.

MARGARET BRENNAN: LAPD says they were handling when things turned violent yesterday. They fired rubber bullets, but they said they had it under control.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: The L.A. police chief said last weekend that his forces were overwhelmed, and they couldn’t manage the situation.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Cotton, thank you very much for your time today.

SENATOR TOM COTTON: Thank you.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Face the Nation will be back in a minute, so stay with us.

Sunday Talks – Bret Baier Interviews Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu


Posted originally on CTH on June 15, 2025 | Sundance 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu knows he needs the support of the United States government if he is going to succeed in his war against Iran; intended to forever eliminate the potential for Iran to ever gain a nuclear bomb.

As details of the ongoing operations inside Iran continue to collate, it is becoming clear that Israeli intelligence has long-term embeds deep inside the Iranian government and security apparatus. Apparently some of these deep intel agents have been inside the Iranian national security system for decades; this seems to have shocked the upper tiers of the Iranian government.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears on Fox News with Bret Baier today to walk through the intentions of the ongoing operations and the overall goals and objectives. WATCH:

.

The Middle East War Escalating into European Civil Unrest


Posted originally on Jun 14, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Neither side is listening to international calls to back down. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel said on Saturday that Israeli strikes had “paved a path to Tehran” and that the Israeli air force would soon be seen flying over the Iranian capital. Speaking to the nation in a video, just hours after several barrages of Iranian missiles sent millions of Israelis into bomb shelters and killed three people, Netanyahu said, “We will strike every site and every target of the ayatollahs’ regime.”

He added: “What they have felt until now is nothing compared to what they will feel from the might of our forces in the coming days.”

Cycle of Religion 309.6

The half-cycle turning point was 2015.2 on our models for the confrontation of religions, which coincided with the very issue we face today. That marked the relations between Iran and Israel, which became a major and highly contentious issue in 2015, primarily due to the finalization and signing of the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA – Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action). The JCPOA Negotiations and Signing (Finalized July 14, 2015) was an agreement between Iran and the P5+1 (the US, UK, France, Russia, China, and Germany) aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Israel, under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was vehemently and vocally opposed to the deal. This is not the big one on a religious front, but increased conflicts and tensions will mark the second half of this 309.6-year cycle.

Islam vs West

This conflict is expanding, and Europe is at extreme risk of civil unrest in just about all major cities, as many will see this as the West vs Islam. Here is the PEW Research on this confrontation between the West and Islam. The real problem is that terrorism creates the FALSE image that this is all Muslims vs Non-Muslims, Jewish or Christian. A small group can alter the image of a majority. Prosecutors in New York would ensure that a black youth charged with gun possession would get an all black jury. The problem was that the Black community was biased against these Black people, seeing that their actions created discrimination against all Black people. The militant Arabs will do this in Europe, making the false image that this is all Muslim vs non-Muslim.

This conflict will likely escalate, and some may turn it into a religious issue. We must understand what is unfolding here. The image on a religious front is more than 50% in Germany, France, Britain, and Spain.