Watch Your Pocket – Hansen’s About!


There are no free lunches!

The Truth About Davey’s Energy Savings


Most of the saving from reduced energy usage have already been realized and any additional benefits are not economically justified even at higher prices. If you have a car that gets 40 MPG and you drive 5,000 miles per year buying a car that gets 50 MPG will only save you 100 gals. At $10 dollars per gal you save only $1,000 so if you keep the car for 5 years you save $5,000 and if the car costs more than $5,000 more than a car that gets 40 MPG then its not worth it. the same logic applies to all uses of energy and after decades of looking at reduced energy the additional sames are now minimal — unless you give up performance!

“Caught Red-Handed”: German Scientists Expose GEOMAR Institute “Conscious Deception Of The Public” On Arctic Sea Ice Trend, Misleading International Media


There are many of us that think the ocean currents are the primary cause of the climate changes in the north hemisphere. a long cycle of 1000 to 1100 years and a short cycle of 60 to 70 years. These cycles match up with the medieval warm period, the little ice age and current swings of 60 years. If a small amount is added for CO2 using the more current 1.0 degree C doubling almost all the current temperature movements shown by NASA.NOAA can be modeled. .

More gloom and scare from models


The current GCM’s are not even capable of forecasting present temperatures let alone future one!

Bob Greene's avatarJunkScience.com

This time, modeled global warming will make submerged permafrost melt faster, releasing methane faster. 

View original post 180 more words

Cold logic on climate change policy


The basic question is why fix something that isn’t broken? And worse you had better fix what is really broken not something else. We know today that the GCM’s predictions of global temperature as not correlating with CO2 levels, in fact there are approaching .5 degrees C higher the the estimated global mean as published by NASA. This indicates that there is a problem in the logic programed into the GCM’s and that cast doubt on the impact of CO2 levels and their impact on climate. Without solid evidence that we know with very high probability how to forecast climate it would be insane to try to modify it! Richard has it 100% right there are way to many other issues that need to be solved that are real and not speculative.

curryja's avatarClimate Etc.

by Judith Curry

Politically correct climate change orthodoxy has completely destroyed our ability to think rationally about the environment. – Richard Tol

View original post 948 more words

Experts Trying To Hide The Past Which Wrecks Their Story


There is a lot more control over the past than the future as this chart shows! So its easy to make a current number look either hotter or colder than some previous number!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

ScreenHunter_5580 Dec. 26 11.54

31 May 1947 – The Arctic is melting says scientist Los Angeles…

ScreenHunter_5293 Dec. 18 06.30

23 Feb 1940 – THE NORTH POLE. Is it Getting Warmer. | BUNDABER…

ScreenHunter_5296 Dec. 18 07.44

Papers Past — Auckland Star — 14 December 1940 — WARMER ARCTIC

The Arctic warmed 10 degrees from 1900 to 1950, and both poles were rapidly melting. This completely wrecks the scientists story about Mann-made Arctic warming, so they have simply tried to cover it up.

From: Tom Wigley <wigley@ucar.edu>
To: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <santer1@llnl.gov>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

ReykjavikGISS2012-2013

View original post

NOAA Demonstrates How To Defraud Taxpayers At Christmas


The simplest answer is usually best and in this case the misinformation is being driven by political appointees of Obama. There are in each department legal offices with the head a political appointment. These people are really political commissars there to make sure that the party line is followed.

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

WASHINGTON — The Arctic and its future are looking dimmer every year, a new federal report says.

Spring snow cover in Eurasia reached a record low in April. Arctic summer sea ice, while not setting a new record, continued a long-term, steady decline. And Greenland set a record in August for the least amount of sunlight reflected in that month, said the peer-reviewed report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other agencies.

Report: Arctic losing more of signature snow – San Antonio Express-News

The fine scientists at NOAA are defrauding taxpayers with omissions of key information. Why did they refer only to April snow cover? Autumn snow cover just set an all-time record maximum.

nhland_season4 (3) Rutgers University Climate Lab :: Global Snow Lab

Since CO2 hit 350 PPM, autumn/winter snow cover is increasing much faster than the decline in spring/summer snow cover.

ScreenHunter_5555 Dec. 25 09.38Rutgers University Climate Lab :: Global Snow…

View original post 90 more words

William of Occam and the methane on Mars


Kind of like what is the definition of “is” … lol

john1282's avatarJunkScience.com

Here’s an interesting and stimulating discussion.

View original post 223 more words

Fred Singer discusses Lima,Peru results


I was not aware of the Byrd-Hagel Climate Resolution and the impact on Clinton not supporting the Kyoto Protocol. This was a very interesting bit of history!

john1282's avatarJunkScience.com

Thanks Dr. Singer.

View original post 690 more words

Sane People Vs. Progressives


Can’t realy blame the citizens they have been told this for close to two generations now. The ones I talk to can’t believe that the government would lie to them for they have also been brainwashed into believing that business (capitalism) are evil and can not be trusted. Only a powerful federal government can look out for them!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

A sane person would think :

  • Fossil fuels allow me to keep warm and comfortable
  • Fossil fuels allow me to travel to work and to shopping
  • Fossil fuels allow me to go from one end of the country to the other in five hours
  • Fossil fuels bring food to my table
  • Fossil fuels allow me to instantly communicate with people all over the world
  • Fossil fuels keep me employed
  • Fossil fuels keep me out of the squalor which humans suffered through for most of their existence

A progressive would think :

  • CO2 is a greenhouse gas. We have to stop using fossil fuels, or some really bad things are going to happen. 97% of scientists agree with me.

It takes a lifetime of brainwashing to create humans that stupid and messed up.

View original post