Jews don’t behave like Muslims
July 9, 2014
By Tabitha Korol

Lorna Salzman, author of “Jews Behaving Like Muslims,” featured in the New English Review, claims “Zionists and observant Jews” complain like Muslims regarding The Death of Klinghoffer, an “opera” to be produced at the Met. Salzman, evidently an anti-Zionist and self-hating Jew, disregarded the spirit of the complaints. Rather, she uses moral relativism (trickery) to equate disparate events and reactions, villains with victims. The two cultures are disparate. (Observant) Jews don’t behave like Muslims.

She knows that Islam, the harshest death cult on the planet, metes out severe punishment for minor behavioral infractions to maintain total control over its people – antithetical to Jewish law. She understands that Islamists invented Islamophobia to quash free speech and hide Islamic history and current activities from the masses – not so in Judaism. She grasps that the Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) was formed to enforce the prohibitions – Jews have no such organization. Salzman can research the hundreds of millions converted, enslaved, or slaughtered under Islamic law – unheard of among the Jews. She knows that the purpose of jihad is to establish sharia law over all the world. Jews do not impose Judaism on others. Jews don’t behave like Muslims.

The opera’s producers provided the murderous terrorists with justification for their evil and expunged the humanity from their victim. The conscientious Jewish community is trying to prevent a libelous, fabricated interpretation of an historic event from poisoning the minds of naïve viewers. Salzman is discombobulated.

Similarly, Salzman has rewritten the death of Rachel Corrie, again blaming “Zionists and observant Jews” for objecting to a performance that distorts the truth, without researching evidence that is a matter of record. Therefore, I will lay bare the proof that she ignored.

Contrary to Salzman’s claim, Rachel Corrie, an American student, was not killed by a tank; this was not a battlefield. She was killed in an area where an earth-moving bulldozer was operated by a worker who sits high off the ground, in a cage with limited visual range. It would be obvious to even the most naïve that this was a hard-hat area, restricted to a labor force.

Why was Corrie in Rafah, in Gaza during the Second Intifada? Why should any American student have been in Gaza around construction equipment? After intense investigation, it was learned that Corrie was a frequent activist and a member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), who took a year off to join in Palestinian unity. She was one of seven who acted as human shields to impede IDF-led bulldozer demolition of illegal housing on the border between Egypt and the Rafah refugee camp, in order to destroy guerilla hideouts and tunnels used for smuggling weapons to kill Israeli citizens. However, on this day, the IDF was conducting only routine terrain leveling and debris clearing. The investigation revealed Corrie was standing behind the debris, an area out of visual range by any driver from his elevated protective cage, and was pushed over with the debris by the Caterpillar D9 bulldozer. Corrie’s autopsy confirmed that the cause of death was falling debris, and not from the tractor’s rolling over her.

Rachel Corrie was “a rabidly anti-American and insidious opponent of the Jewish state,” stated attorney and former prosecutor Ari Lieberman, in Frontpage Magazine. He described photographs in which this woman, consumed with hate of America, the West, Israel and the Jews, was shrouded in black Islamist clothing in the midst of an Islamist demonstration. The illegal and traitorous conduct of Rachel Corrie and her fellow activists was directly responsible for the successful smuggling of explosives from Egypt into Gaza – explosives that were later used to kill children in southern Israel, six of whom had been named Rachel.

The query of why her friends did not reach out to save her resulted in the discovery of the experiences of other female activists — that in all likelihood, Corrie was one of many female activists who are used by Palestinians for their sexual gratification — routinely harassed and raped not unlike the “comfort women” of the Japanese during World War II. Rabid anti-Zionist Norman Finkelstein also confirmed that female internationals serve as comfort women for Palestinians. Jews don’t behave like Muslims. Therefore, it is possible that Corrie was raped, betrayed by her fellow activists to maintain silence, and depressed enough to act irresponsibly in front of the bulldozer.

Returning to the Klinghoffer opera, Lorna Salzman wasted no time referencing the Met’s financial woes and its need of donor money from “wealthy Jews.” Why not add “successful and wealthy Jews,” although Jews, in general, have long been known for their participation in the arts (consider the names Jan Pierce, Beverly Sills, Richard Tucker, Robert Merrill, Rise Stevens, and more), and their strong financial support, both of which are legendary and disproportionate to their number. Jewish commitment and generosity are also known in medicine, science, education, technology, and their bounteous spirit is evident when Israel is among the first responders to victims of disasters. Muslims don’t behave like Jews.

The Hebrew word, tzedakah, meaning justice and righteousness, aptly describes the Jewish obligation to contribute to the welfare of others. However, in Judaism, the benevolence is considered an obligation rather than a mere act of goodwill. Do the Salzmans not share their good fortune with others?

The Arabic word, zakat, one of the Five Pillars of Faith, allows for alms giving by Muslims based on accumulated wealth and is obligatory for all who are able. However, it is designed to ease economic hardship for other Muslims and eliminate equality for followers of Islam – only. Muslims don’t behave like Jews.

Lorna Salzman appears to be psychologically damaged, bearing a deep resentment of her heritage. How else might we comprehend her belief that the authors were not expressing their own views, but those of the killers – jihadists who are taught to hate Jews, Christians, and Western civilization from toddlerhood on. Had the Muslims been as compassionate as she insists, they could not have killed a defenseless, aged stroke victim.

Islamic jihad cannot be assuaged. It began in the 7th century and it is eternal until Muslims refute their Qur’an’s directives to enslave, murder, and plunder with the end purpose of establishing a caliphate over the world.

[Muslim 001,0031] Mohammed: “I have been ordered to wage war against mankind until they accept that there is no god but Allah and that they believe I am His prophet and accept all revelations spoken through me. When they do these things I will protect their lives and property unless otherwise justified by Sharia, in which case their fate lies in Allah’s hands.”

The opera’s purpose is to promote the Islamic narrative – to hate the Jews and to temper our acceptance of Islamic violence and sharia law. The sooner we grasp the Islamic ideology and methodologies, the sooner we might save our country and civilization. Muslims are not like Jews.

Not the Same God
Posted Friday, July 12 @ 08:41:40 EDT

By Tabitha Korol
July 12,2013

It was not so long ago, in 2008, that Rowan Williams, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, welcomed Islam into the United Kingdom. He now speaks of having to adapt further to the growing Muslim population, now numbering two million, with 85 Islamic courts in the UK, where women are unequal to men and remain unprotected from the violence of their fathers and husbands. At least one cleric, Suhaib Hasan, is advocating stoning and amputation (which is yet one more adaptation to national acceptance of One Law for All). Apparently, English law has already evolved and adopted some aspects of Sharia, yet Williams now entertains further adjustments to achieve a society that works for the ever-popular “common good.” Sharia is not compatible with Democracy and never can be.

For what other immigrant society was adaptation implemented? I reviewed the migration pattern for the UK since 1100, when merchants from the Netherlands first settled; followed by the Dutch and French Protestants in the 1500s; enslaved Asians in the 1600s; the refugees from the French revolution and Chinese sailors in the 1700s; Jews from Poland, Ukraine and Belarus in 1800s;, followed by Irish settlers escaping the famine, and trading Indians and Chinese. Still, England was recognizably England.

In the 1900s, came the Belgian refugees who escaped WW I, refugees who escaped Nazi oppression in the 1930s, Poles who came from 1940 – 1960, Jamaicans who arrived in 1948, followed by immigrants from the Caribbean. All these cultures, yet not one had the audacity to demand changes to the laws of the land! While they maintain their identity and surely a measure of their culture, they have assimilated and consider themselves English, and they abide by English law.

Not so with the Muslims, and the reason is quite simple. Muslims came not for the same reasons as their forerunners, but with a different purpose, a different mission. They came not to become English, but to transform the English into their own identity, with their Muslim laws, rules, and religion. Just as Mohammed and his followers entered and conquered new lands in the Middle East and parts of Europe to implant their religion and course of conduct into the new host country, so their descendants follow the same path and purpose today. And the naïve Archbishop of Canterbury permitted these new immigrants to insist on Sharia laws, to which he yielded, and which can only lead to the downfall of the United Kingdom. In the interest of showing an acceptance of multiculturalism, or perhaps he was unable to defend himself against accusations of intolerance or narrow-mindedness, the deluded man sold out his country.

No country, once Islamized, has ever been able to regain its previous identity. Centuries after La Reconquista of 1492, Spain is again teetering under the new Muslim assault. India has been dealing with the presence of da’wa-Jihad for about 1300 years, with Muslimsnow numbering 280 million.

Now I call upon Cardinal Timothy Dolan to understand that what is transpiring in the United Kingdom has already full-blown in the once-non-Muslim countries of Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Egypt, Gambia, Guinea, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kosovo, Kyrgystan, Lebanon, Libya, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Syria, Turkey, and more. Islam is now the predominant religion in the Middle East, the Horn of Africa, northern Africa, and in parts of Asia. Large communities also exist in China, the Balkans and Russia, and in each of these countries, Muslims are imposing their Sharia law in increments, until the country will no longer be recognized for what it once was. The operation of Sharia courts in a democracy has nothing to do with religious freedom, but everything to do with political power and the appropriation of the host culture.

In the presence of mosque clergy, Cardinal Dolan thanked them and God for welcoming him as a friend and family member when, in fact, it is they who should have shown their gratitude for this country’s welcome, freedom, security, and life without Islamic oppression. Dolan misspoke when he indicated they love the same God, for Dolan’s God does not command His followers bring the entire world under Catholic rule, or demand the subjugation of Christians and Jews, or require Dolan’s co-religionists to slay those who do not share his beliefs – such as beheading a Catholic priest or blowing up school buses of Christian and Jewish children.

The Archbishop has taken it upon himself to represent his people in an arrangement for which he is ill prepared. He has arrogantly and wrongfully assumed he understands Islamic intentions and that he alone is capable of creating a harmony that no one has been able to achieve through 14 centuries of Islamic jihad. He is gambling with the lives of millions!

The goal of Islam is to deal with every aspect of life in every society, to bring their culture to everyone in all the corners of the globe, “until there is no more tumult or oppression and the Religion of Allah prevails. Qur’an (2:193), — although in every country where the Religion of Allah does prevail, there is great chaos, oppression, suffering and bloodshed, even among their own people. Muslims must wage Jihad, as an all-consuming, divinely ordained endeavor, or they believe they will be barred from Paradise along with the non-believers.

Hasan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, 1922, said,

We summon you to Islam, the teachings of Islam, the laws of Islam and the guidance of Islam, and if this smacks of “politics” in your eyes, then it is our policy . . . Islam does have a policy embracing the happiness of this world . . . We believe that Islam is an all-embracing concept which regulates every aspect of life, adjudicating on every one of its concerns and prescribing for it a solid and rigorous order.

Islam is a faith and worship, a country and a citizenship, a religion and a state. It is spirituality and hard work. It is a Qur’an and a sword.

O ye who believe! Fight the unbelievers who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you: and know that Allah is with those who fear Him” (9:123)

Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. (This means that idolaters are to be killed, unless they convert to Islam, and begin following Islamic laws, such as paying alms.)

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and his Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued (9i:289).

Islam’s double identity takes the form of groups that appear outwardly moderate, but advance the jihadist agenda through various non-violent initiatives – even as the members themselves have ties to violent jihadist organization.

The Ayatollah Khomeini, in true Muslim fashion, stated, Eleven things are impure: urine, excrement, sperm . . . non-Muslim men and women. (All of us)

The biographer of Mohammad recorded his master as saying: I have been made victorious with terror. Bukhari. Vol 3, Book 52.

These are just a few of the sacred beliefs of those the Cardinal is befriending. They do not worship the same God or share the same principles with Christianity or Judaism; they lack compassion and virtue.

Islam is a totalitarian, supercessionist theology that demands obedience or uses armed conflict to achieve obedience, and Dolan has an obligation to his co-religionists and to his fellow Americans not to sell them out by bowing and scraping to those who have come to woo and betray his allegiance. If we continue to accommodate, it will be inevitable that we will have bought ourselves a new master, along with irrevocable bondage for ourselves and our descendants.