Posted originally on Mar 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong, Nobody has a computer that covers everything. Your forecast at the WEC that the Democratic Party would collapse is unprecedented. Nobody has even contemplated that such a thing could happed. Yet night now this is unfolding. The new polls from NBC News and CNN. The former poll showed that only 27% of Americans held a positive view of the party, with only 7% holding a “very positive” view. Both are record lows for the poll. Then, the CNN results found the Democrats’ approval at 29%, setting the record low for that poll as well.
Is there anything you can say as to how Socrates can forecast what nobody is capable of even thinking about?
Wm
ANSWER: My confrontation with the bankers who told the CFTC to shut us down after the forecast that Russia would collapse in 1998 was predicated on the assumption that the forecasts work only because I have more institutional clients than the NY crowd combined. What they never considered was that just maybe I discovered something profound that the New Yorker called the Secret Cycle.
What I discovered changed my life. There are two paths of research.
(1) The Max Path: You start with a theory and cherry-pick facts to claim you are right
(2) The Adam Smith Path: You observe to figure out how something functions.
You cannot discover what you already know.
The complexity that exists is remarkable. But the precision of how and when events will take place is also astonishing. All economic theories from Marx onward began with the same assumption: that the business cycle is random and that, therefore, the government, via its central banks, can manipulate it to create perpetual prosperity.
I had a nice discussion with Paul Volcker, and he agreed. The business cycle was about 8 years. Both Volcker and Burns concluded that the business cycle always wins. All the theories that try to manipulate society to eliminate the business cycle are out of mind. What I bumped into was not mere complexity but precision that I never expected to discover.
This is Not the First Political Party to Collapse
A significant factor in the collapse of the Federal Party was the anti-state view in favor of centralized federal power. Additionally, there was the War of 1812. For a long time, the Federalist party supported peace with Britain and war with France, whereas the Democratic-Republican party had the exact opposite position. Eventually, British behavior towards the US during its war with France caused anti-British and thus anti-Federalist sentiment. The Democrats have sought to exert power in Washington and dictate policy to the states on issues such as abortion. They have also supported Ukraine and fostered the war against Russia, which was why the Neocons swung to the Democrats.
The Hartford Convention of 1814-1815 was essential in the Federalist party’s collapse. This mostly Federalist convention in New England suggested some constitutional amendments. Still, it was alleged to consider New England’s secession from the Union and a separate peace with Britain, not unlike California. After the war, the convention was widely viewed as an act of treason and a black mark on the reputation of the Federalist party.
What is also overlooked is that the Federalists were essentially a mercantilist party compared to the South, which was agrarian. Alexander Hamilton, along with most Federalists, was trying to raise the status of the United States internationally while still fighting the last war. Thus, the Federalists were pro-industrialization, which was still in its infancy. They say that industrialization would make the United States a more powerful nation in the eyes of the international community. Many wrongly assume that the Federalists were a “conservative” party in the modern sense. Yes, Hamilton was pro-bank and pro-business.
Hamilton also established the National Debt to raise the United States’ credit standing in international eyes. However, he was foremost a federalist, building the United States into a significant power. What is overlooked is that the Federalists were the ancestors of not just the Whigs but also FDR insofar as they saw the federal government had a role in regulating, managing, and controlling society and the economy.
Don’t forget that during the Whiskey Rebellion, a tax revolt in Pennsylvania, George Washington sent troops to kill those who rebelled. That was the essence of the Federalists: dictatorial power from a central command. The Federalists, like Roosevelt, believed in a positive role for the federal government. That is the place the Democrats have occupied today. Biden tried to hire 75,000 IRS agents who would be armed.
Then came the War of 1812, disrupting manufacturing imports to the United States, which led even the Jeffersonian Republican Party to relax its policies toward industrialization. The Federalists had supported Britain for business. But many manufacturers found the laissez-faire of the Republican Party to be more beneficial than the Federalists, whose policy was if it moved, tax it. If it stopped moving, kick it. The War of 1812 killed the Federalists, and more industrialists moved to Jefferson.
Instead of the War of 1812, when the British burned Washington, DC, and the Federalists had supported the British, today we have the Neocon Proxy War in Ukraine against Russia, and some idiots on Capitol Hill wanted to commission a marble bust of Zelensky to stand in the US Capitol next to Washington and Jefferson.
The Democratic Party still refuses to admit that, just perhaps, their radical fringe proposing sex changes in prison for illegal aliens just might have gone too far. Producing comic books on equality and handing them to the Taliban for $$20 million. In the real world, you have to have a feasible business plan. In Washington, the crazier the idea, the more money you get.
Here are the two computer forecast arrays from 2018 and 2024. 2024 was a significant target in 2018, yet the 2021 target was the strongest with a Panic Cycle. That was Biden. That was all she wrote, folks, for the Democrats. They will not exist by 2033.
This chart plots as a percentage of total seats combined in the House and Senate. They peaked out before slavery, and each rally produced a declining trend. Sorry, but this is a bear market. It will be time to turn out the light for the Democrats, and their wacky WOKE agenda is loved only by the extreme fringe. My father was a Depression Democrat. He would never have voted Democrat today.
I am starting with a book on the Economic Confidence Model that I promised I would do to leave for society. I will probably print the first edition myself, for it will be well illustrated and formal publishers don’t like that because it is too expensive to produce. The second edition can be stripped of the illustrations they do not want to print. But I tend to be a perfectionist. It has to be right to put my name on it. I don’t sell advertising here because I do not want to appear to endorse any product.
Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2025 | Sundance
National Security Advisor Mike Waltz appears on Fox News with Laura Ingraham to discuss the exploding controversy around a left-wing journalist, Jeffrey Goldberg, being included on a Signal chat with members of President Trump’s cabinet.
According to Mike Waltz the name of a contact was mis-attributed to the telephone number of Jeffrey Goldberg. Waltz thought someone else (¹he will not say who) was in the chat group, but it was actually Goldberg. Waltz says his team and Elon Musk’s technical team are working through an investigative process to discover how that happened.
As I repeated earlier, the most likely origination of the mis-attribution is the intelligence community, specifically the CIA. The entire fiasco originates as an operation targeting the Trump administration. Mike Waltz says he is not a conspiracy theorist, but indicates he too thinks something like this is quite possible. WATCH:
Let me summarize for those new to these performances: (1) The CIA tech team organized the Signal App operation (directory manipulation). That’s how Goldberg got in. (2) Jeffrey Goldberg held the story until the day before the scheduled SSCI hearing. (3) The SSCI uses the hearing to attack the Trump officials at the top of the critical silos.
Why? The CIA group doesn’t like the Trump Ukraine and Trump Russia policy.
[¹We may discover that somehow the name Marco Rubio was attributed to the phone number of Jeffrey Goldberg. Rubio was reportedly on the chat, but didn’t say anything.]
Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2025 | Sundance
President Donald Trump answered several questions from the media during a White House meeting with various ambassadors and nominees for the position of ambassador.
During the media segment, President Trump was questioned about the national security cabinet members use of the Signal app to discuss administration plans to open sea lanes and confront Houthi terrorists. President Trump noted the difficulty of secure communication that would be responsive and fast for the purposes of rapid discussion.
President Trump fully supports National Security Advisor Mike Waltz who is attributed with the problem of originating an inadvertent invitation to a journalist the chat group. Overall, there are several media questions about this specific topic and President Trump seemingly appreciates the line of inquiry but swats away attempt attack his cabinet.
Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2025 | Sundance
CIA Director John Ratcliffe outlines how the Signal App is a CIA approved “permissible” tool for encrypted communication, and the app was pre-loaded onto his devices by CIA personnel. [Moment at 1:15, WATCH]
Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2025 | Sundance
President Trump has given remarks supporting National Security Advisor Mike Waltz during an interview with NBC.
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump stood by his national security adviser, Mike Waltz, after The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief was accidentally added to a private, high-level chat on the messaging app Signal where military plans were being discussed.
“Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man,” Trump said Tuesday in a phone interview with NBC News.
When asked what he was told about how Goldberg came to be added to the Signal chat, Trump said, “It was one of Michael’s people on the phone. A staffer had his number on there.”
Trump said Goldberg’s presence in the chat had “no impact at all” on the military operation.
The president expressed confidence in his team, saying he was not frustrated by the events leading up to The Atlantic’s story. The situation, Trump said, was “the only glitch in two months, and it turned out not to be a serious one.” (more)
The rest of the DC setup is transparently clear. (1) Goldberg held the story until the day before a long-scheduled Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. (2) The SSCI then used the hearing to blast the heads of the Trump administration intelligence silos on the issue of “classified” information in the text messages.
♦ The next act in this well-known performance will be for Democrats to demand the release of the Signal App transcript, if it’s not classified, then there’s nothing to hide.
♦ Public pressure via narrative drum-pounding will continue to increase, until the chat messages are released to congress. [Keep in mind, Jeffrey Goldberg likely already has them.]
♦ Everyone in the chat group will then be told they must recuse themselves from internal silo determinations as to the classified status of the conversation. More public pressure will be generated to achieve this “position of conflict” demand.
♦ The Intelligence Community, without the heads of the silos – likely leveraging the internal investigative agents of the FBI (INSD), will then say the content of the chat was indeed classified, TSCI level. There will be weeks and months of leaks to the media as each granular detail is discussed ad infinitum.
♦ The cabinet members will then face the drumbeat of resignation demands, and/or useful impeachment fodder for ‘lying to congress’ during today’s Senate Select Committee on Intelligence testimony.
At least that should be the anticipated approach by the “Seven Ways from Sunday” group, who operate to defend the interests of the Intelligence Community from agency heads like those who were on the Signal App chat group.
Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2025 | Sundance
As expected, the Democrats were ready to pounce when Trump intelligence officials appeared before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). Almost as if their staff had pre-planned a series of questions to ask Tulsi Gabbard and Director John Ratcliffe.
In this heated exchange, Colorado Democrat Senator Mike Bennet goes fully bananas when questioning CIA Director John Ratcliffe. These are not stable people. WATCH:
Posted originally on CTH on March 25, 2025 | Sundance
FBI Director Kash Patel, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard are among the witnesses who testify today before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).
The SSCI is the center of the organization silo in Washington DC that permits the Intelligence Community to operate as a fourth branch of government. The hearing today on global and domestic threats was previously scheduled and ‘coincidentally’ now falls on the heels of revelations surrounding a group text chat about Trump administration operations in Yemen.
The hearing is scheduled to begin at 10:00am ET, with livestream links below. The professional political left will be questioning the three cabinet members and will now focus on the national security threat created by Nat Sec Advisor Mike Waltz. WATCH BELOW:
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America