Posted originally on Mar 10, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
Joe Biden’s mental decline made him the perfect puppet president for the Democrats and neocons on both sides of the aisle. “Though presidents always have gatekeepers, in Biden’s case, the walls around him were higher and the controls greater, according to Democratic lawmakers, donors and aides who worked for Biden and other administrations. Staff limited Biden’s ability to speak with others and limited the sources of information he consumed,” Attorney General Andrew Bailey stated in a letter to the Department of Justice in which he is urging an immediate investigation into Joe’s cognitive decline and whether many of his policies, including pardons, are valid.
“I am demanding the DOJ investigated whether President Biden’s cognitive decline allowed unelected staff to push through radical policy without his knowing approval,” Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey wrote. “If true, these executive orders, pardons, and all other actions are unconstitutional and egally void.”
This becomes a grey area as the Founding Fathers likely believed the American public would not elect anyone resembling Joe Biden. Article II, Section 2 declares that the president has the legal right to “grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment”
The 25th Amendment states that impeachment or high crimes can be the only justification for dismissing presidential pardons. There is certainly an array of areas from the border to Burisma that were treasonous acts.
Section 3 of the Amendment has been invoked in recent history, but no one has dared to touch Section 4. President Regan invoked section 3 of the 25th Amendment in 1985 after signing power over to Vice President George Bush during a colon surgery. Then George W. Bush invoked the Amendment twice for short durations of time while he was receiving medical treatment.
Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President. [Emphasis added.]
Now, the Democrats chose to simply HIDE Joe Biden from the public rather than acknowledge his decline. Congress would need to establish an investigative committee and drain the swamp of every droplet as the corruption that went into Biden’s presidency spans throughout Washington.
“There are profound reasons to suspect that Biden’s staff and political allies exploited his mental decline to issue purported presidential orders without his knowing approval,” AG Bailey stated. Legislators would need to pinpoint exactly when Biden would have been considered too cognitively impaired to make decisions. They did not do this when a special council determined he was too old and mentally fragile to stand trial. It would be extremely difficult to pinpoint when Joe’s handlers completely overtook the reins of power.
AG Bailey is correct—the establishment hid Biden’s health from the public and he may be unaware of some of the measures he passed. Speaker Mike Johnson recalled one such incident where, after working tirelessly to meet Biden in person, he confronted him over a piece of legislation regarding a freeze on new liquid natural gas export permits. “Why would you do that? Cause you understand we just talked about Ukraine, you understand you are fueling Vladimir Putin’s war machine, because they gotta get their gas from him,” Johnson said he told Biden. Johnson said Biden was shocked and “genuinely didn’t know what he had signed.”
In fact, Biden told Johnson he never signed off on the freeze. “Sir, you paused it, I know. I have the export terminals in my state. I talked to those people in my state, I’ve talked to those people this morning, this is doing massive damage to our economy, national security,” Johnson said he told the commander-in-chief. “I walked out of that meeting with fear and loathing because I thought, ‘We are in serious trouble—who is running the country?’” Johnson said.
Unbelievable that our elected officials allowed this to happen. There has never been such an investigation in US history, but if it is allowed to occur, you can kiss the Democratic Party goodbye.
Posted originally on Mar 9, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
The Oversight Project has examined all the executive orders signed supposedly by Joe Biden. It turns out most were all autopen—a machine. This raises serious questions about whether they were legal in the first place, for we do not know if someone else was writing these executive orders and feeding them into the machine to be signed. Is an Executive Order valid if the President did not actually sign the decree?
The Oversight Project shared what it had found regarding Biden’s use of an autopen. This raises concern that when his mental capacity was in question, these executive orders were issued by someone else and signed by the machine. To be legal in a commerce sense, that person needs express consent of the contracted party to sign on their behalf.
As we have moved from paper to digital formats in business records and contracts, federal lawmakers passed the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (E-SIGN) Act in 2000. The E-SIGN Act reinforces the legality of digital signatures in business contracts. The law means electronic contracts and signatures are legal as long as the consumer consents. E-SIGN also allows individuals to choose a paper format instead.
The Hammurabi Legal Code required clear contract law around 1650 BC. We have Akkadian cylinder signature seals that emerged during the fourth millennium BC, coinciding with the dawn of writing. One would sign a contract with such a seal.
The Romans used signature rings to validate contracts and agreements. So, the idea of an autopen is not unknown in history. However, these signature seals or rings did not allow someone e else to authorize such a contract.
When a law is issued that could carry criminal penalties for violating it, this raises a fascinating legal question if it is an autopen rather than a bonafide signature. Can the president delegate his authority to someone else to issue a law? I would have to say NO WAY!
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 