Climate Change – Maybe, Just Maybe, It’s Because Their Argument Is Unsound


Its been taught in the grad schools for decades now virtually everyone under 30 believes that we need sustainability (because of too much carbon) with in a few more years the majority of the citizens will agree to anything to save the planet and the polar bears.

PA Pundits - International's avatarPA Pundits International

Bolt New 01By Andrew Bolt ~

Mark Steyn on the despair of the warmists:

Global Warming meltdownThe hysteria of Mann-style alarmism is going nowhere with the public, as one of the hysterics in Australia, Graeme Richardson, acknowledges here:

The sceptics and deniers have turned the 70 per cent-plus belief in climate change into a minority because no one has engaged them.

As my distinguished co-author on Climate Change: The Facts, Jo Nova, responds:

That’s right Graham, we unfunded bloggers and the few surviving skeptical scientists not evicted and blackballed from our universities (yet) have tricked 20% of the population because no one has put forward the climate change arguments except for: The Climate Commission, CSIRO, Deutsche Bank, Citigroup, Royal Dutch Shell, GE, Panasonic, The ABC, The BBC, The Guardian, Fairfax, The Australian government, most universities, The EU, The UN, The World Bank, and the IMF.

Not to mention President Obama and the US Coast…

View original post 475 more words

Lindzen’s Iris


Lindzen knows his material and if you are technically minded in this field you should read his works

Bob Greene's avatarJunkScience.com

Two good articles on Dr. Curry’s blog on Lindzen’s Adaptive IR Iris. 

View original post 28 more words

Scientific integrity versus ideologically-fueled research


Sir Karl Raimund Popper (28 July 1902 – 17 September 1994) was an Austrian and British philosopher and a professor at the London School of Economics. He is considered one of the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century, and he also wrote extensively on social and political philosophy. The following quotes of his apply to this subject.

If we are uncritical we shall always find what we want: we shall look for, and find, confirmations, and we shall look away from, and not see, whatever might be dangerous to our pet theories.

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one, take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory nor the problem which it was intended to solve.

… (S)cience is one of the very few human activities — perhaps the only one — in which errors are systematically criticized and fairly often, in time, corrected

I think we have lost what Popper taught us!

curryja's avatarClimate Etc.

by Judith Curry

The main intellectual fault in all these cases is failing to be responsive to genuine empirical concerns, because doing so would make one’s political point weaker or undermine a cherished ideological perspective. – Heather Douglas

View original post 1,990 more words

Pebble-gate


When you have a lawless administration, like we do, — “What difference does it make now?”

sandyjfs's avatarJunkScience.com

The EPA appears to have broken the law when it preemptively vetoed the Pebble Mine Project. Wall Street Journal’s latest article, “EPA’s Pebble Blame Game,” reveals more of the scandal:

View original post 423 more words

Climate Alarmists – The Ultimate Snake Oil Salesmen


It maybe Snake Oil but it appears that it can still be sold — if you are an academic.

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Today, climate alarmists say that rain in Texas is caused by fossil fueled poisoned weather.

ScreenHunter_9474 May. 25 01.39

These same clowns were blaming the Texas drought on global warming, and predicting it would get worse.

ScreenHunter_9475 May. 25 01.43

More Drought, Heat and Water Wars: What Climate Change Already Means for Texas | StateImpact Texas

The reality is that Texas is having normal weather.

ScreenHunter_9473 May. 25 01.38

13 Sep 1952 – FLOODS FOLLOW TEXAS DROUGHT Australian Associate…

Nothing has changed one iota. The climate of Texas is exactly the same as it has always been. These people are selling snake oil – a non-existent cure for a non-existent problem.

View original post

The despotic regulatory state


That is a very accurate description of the American public which have now become nothing more than lemmings.

john1282's avatarJunkScience.com

Frederick Bastiat warned us of the problems of the administrative state. His story of the candle maker petition is a classic, but his bakery window story is equally insightful.

View original post 156 more words

Memorial Day Temperatures In Fort Collins Plummeting


Just turn the Chart upside down and Obama is right?

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

It is ridiculously cold here in Fort Collins, and May 25 temperatures have plummeted five degrees over the past century.

ScreenHunter_9469 May. 24 10.34

President Obama says that anyone who doesn’t believe his global warming lies, is a threat to national security.

View original post

NASA – Hiding The Decline


George Orwell, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

In 1976, the New York Times reported that the Northern Hemisphere had cooled nearly as much since 1945 as it rose in the first part of the century.

ScreenHunter_9434 May. 23 07.33

NYTimes.com

The National Academy Of Sciences reported this cooling.

ScreenHunter_9438 May. 23 07.49

But it didn’t fit the global warming agenda, so NASA has since made almost all of that cooling disappear.

ScreenHunter_9437 May. 23 07.45

Fig.A3.gif (625×474)

NASA temperature data is propaganda, not science. Skeptics who pretend that NASA temperature data is legitimate, are enabling this scam.

GISS-1981-2002-2014-global GISSUS1999vs2015

View original post

Comparing 1975 National Academy Of Sciences To 2015 GISS


George Orwell, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

In 1975, the National Academy Of Sciences published this graph, showing about 1°C warming in the Northern Hemisphere from 1885 to 1940, and that all 1900 to 1940 warming was lost by 1970.

ScreenHunter_9457 May. 24 06.49

GISS has since reduced the 1885 to 1940 warming by half, and reduced the 1940-1970 cooling by two thirds.

ScreenHunter_9456 May. 24 06.43 

The next graph shows an overlay of the two at the same scale, normalized to 1905-1940 

ScreenHunter_9458 May. 24 06.52 

The animation below shows how they reduced both the pre-1940 warming, and the post-1940 cooling. Neither are explainable by global warming theory, so government experts made both largely disappear.

GISSNH2015vsNAS1975

So which one is correct? In 1923, the Arctic was very warm and melting rapidly.

ScreenHunter_9425 May. 23 06.41

07 Apr 1923 – NORTH POLE MELTING. MANY GLACIERS VANISHED.

But inn 1970, the Arctic was very cold, and ice was expanding rapidly.

ScreenHunter_1434 Jul. 30 06.37

ScreenHunter_1435 Jul. 30 06.37

TimesMachine: July 18, 1970 – NYTimes.com

ScreenHunter_9465 May. 24 08.38

PaintImage10991 (1)

CIA Report 1974

The 1975 NAS graph makes…

View original post 63 more words

Do Climate Projections Have Any Physical Meaning?


And I agree 100% there is no science in any aspect of of the AGW!