We do not want any more Fundamental Change

When Barack Hussein Obama took the oath of office on January 20, 2009 and again four years later he committed perjury for he fully indented to “Fundamentally” Change the Country; and he said so many times — and after almost 6years we can see that he certainly has Fundamentally changed the country — and not for the good. The problem with what he has done is that it was never in his power to do what he set out to do for the constitution, which sets the operation parameters for our form of government, clearly gives that power for CHANGE “solely” to the states in Article V, Amendments. The President has no part in the amendment process and so since he clearly wanted to make changes and clearly did make changes he also clearly committed perjury on January 20, 2009 and again on January 20, 2013.

However he was able to avoid that charge and by this time it’s not relevant unless a conservative could become president and get all the Fundamental Change legislation nullified that was passed during Obama’s two terms.

The only challenge Obama faced was the Tea Party movement which started in 2010 and so Obama and his supporters/handlers i.e. George Soros (Mr. Open Boarders), Bill Gates (Mr. Tech) and William Ayers (Mr. Marxist): did not get all the Fundamental changes that wanted. And its unlike that he will get much more although he will try to use other means such as the executive order and administrative directives to get as much as he can before November 2016 and the inauguration of the next president on January 20, 2017. This will leave much change yet to go to get the complete package of Fundamental Changes in place that those like Obama desire. So the next president will need to either complete the process or try and reverse it.

It’s not clear whether the countries conservatives can force the Republicans into actually trying to reverse the damage that has been done and if the Republican Party (RNC) cannot come to terms with what their base wants then will be hard pressed to win any nation elections. Given the mood of the country, not wanting Fundamental Change, it should be easy for the RNC to take the Senate in November 2014, so if the RNC doesn’t than that will be an indication that they will run another McCain or Romney and lose again, by that I mean that they need a Reagan, nothing less will matter. That doesn’t seem likely to happen although Wisconsin Governor Scot Walker comes closest at this point in time.

The real question is whom will the Progressive Democrats run? Hillary Rodham Clinton and Elisabeth Warren appear to be the front runners and both are far left progressives so in principle each could finish the Fundamental change that is desired by their handles. However both have problems and may not be electable. Hillary has a lot of baggage form the Clinton years and more recently as Secretary of State under Obama. Bengasi in particular will be a major issue for her. Warren has little name recognition outside her home state of Massachusetts and is not a good campaigner as it’s almost impossible for a republican to win in that state so no real skill is required. Hillary also has that problem as she has nowhere near the political charisma that her husband Bill has.

One way out for the men behind the scenes would be to run Michele Obama for president. It’s a twofer for them a Black (actual American back roots unlike her husband) and a woman. That would get all the Black votes and has the potential for a large percentage of the female vote, except for one problem — what to do with Hillary? Well there is a way out for the handlers and it is doable given their power. The solution is to get Hillary into the position of Secretary General of the United Nations. That would give the handlers significant control of world power and bring them a step closer to the one world government that they desire. Hillary would go along with this as it is a very prestigious position and it puts her in a theoretical position above Michelle which would be satisfying given their mutual dislike for each other, although that could just be an act.

Obviously this is pure speculation but it does make sense!