What the West Must Do In Order to Survive Islam


Islam is violent and there is no way around that fact!

Is the White House a ‘Sleeper Cell’?


Re Post from PJ Media January 12th, 2015 – 11:11 pm
By Roger L. Simon

obama_sleeper_cell_1-12-15-2

I’m still trying to figure out why Obama — or any high-level U. S. government official other than Eric Holder, who was in Paris but evidently had better things to do — didn’t join the nearly 4 million people who marched throughout France protesting the terror killings at #CharlieHebdo and the Hyper Cacher market. White House press secretary Josh Earnest has admitted the mistake and apologized (perhaps a little wishy-washily, but we’ll give him a pass), informing us that, unfortunately, there just wasn’t enough time to arrange presidential security for the trip.

That’s interesting. Somehow there was time for security for 40 or so other world leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel (arguably the most highly regarded politician on the planet at the moment and the de facto president of the EU), the UK’s David Cameron, Spain’s Mariano Rajoy and even Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu (probably a considerably bigger target than Obama these days and not exactly welcomed by France’s President Hollande, if reports are correct). Of course, the “American president” is supposedly more important but — correct me if I’m wrong — Obama was not originally so gung-ho on American exceptionalism, equating it with British exceptionalism and Greek exceptionalism, etc., etc. All countries, after all, feel they are exceptional.

Well, he’s changed his mind on this several times, so who’s to say? And there was a game on. I’m a sports fan, too, tennis more than football (wimpy, huh?), so I understand. You’d have trouble prying me away from the Australian Open when it starts next week. (Djokovic and Nadal ain’t so wimpy.) But still, in the event of one of the biggest and ugliest terror events in recent years, if I were president, I hope I’d TiVo a couple of rounds.

Just yesterday I theorized the real reason Obama didn’t go is he just couldn’t put the words “Islamic” and “terrorism” together in one sentence even if, forgive the tired image, it hit him in the face. (The exception of course being when insisting that something is NOT Islam.) He just can’t handle it after nearly fifty years of virtually non-stop anti-imperialist programming. His mind would fly apart if he had to utter the words “radical Islamic terrorism,” which French PM Valls, and any honest person, was quite willing to do.

Now I admit that was just a supposition. Just because I’ve never heard him link Islam and terror doesn’t mean in his heart of hearts he doesn’t. Though not a genius, he does have an IQ in triple digits and sees what’s right in front of his nose, I assume. He just interprets it differently. But why?

Is someone whispering in his ear?

Senator Dianne Feinstein has just informed us that, yes, there are Islamic terror sleeper cells in our midst in the USA. If that’s true, I wonder why Feinstein wasted so much of her time wounding the CIA during the last weeks of her tenure as Senate Intelligence Committee chair, but never mind. Could there be one of those cells in the White House?

I started this post thinking it was kind of funny. I liked the hed — “Is the White House a ‘Sleeper Cell’?” It reminded me of, um… Charlie Hebdo. But actually it’s not so funny. And it’s not impossible. We know something close already happened during the communist era (Alger Hiss), and the Israelis famously planted an agent, Eli Cohen, at the highest echelons of the Syrian government until he was caught via the KGB and hanged in the central square of Damascus. They say it was Cohen’s reports that were responsible for the rapid Israeli success against the Syrians in the Six-Day War.

But a “sleeper cell” in the White House? It would certainly explain Obama’s not going to France, which was a decision that hurt the USA, hurt the effort against Islamic terror and hurt the president’s already tarnished reputation into the bargain. There are so many other things that the existence of a White House “sleeper cell” would explain that I couldn’t even begin to count them. And as you know, a cell doesn’t have to be violent to be active. There are many ways to do damage.

But who would be a member of this cell? Is it one or all of them? Well that, I am sorry to say, I cannot tell you. I do not have the proper clearance. You are, however, free to guess. Who would stop you?

What Muslims Believe


There is no reason to believe that this is not very close to the truth and I don’t think this view needs to be this high to classify Islam “itself” as radical. US (and I’m sure those in the EU) politicians take money from Muslim PAC’s and the money comes from the Oil states which are all Muslim. Therefore they can’t call Islam radical and in fact, would rather not as it would mean their funds would be cut off.

On “Radical” Islam and Obama


Paul Eidelberg

Here are some synonyms of the word “radical”: thorough, complete, total, comprehensive, exhaustive, far-reaching, profound, stringent.

 

To use any of these synonyms to describe Islam is tautological, i.e., saying the same thing twice.

 

That being the case, President Obama is correct in refusing to speak of “radical Islam” when referring to terrorist acts committed by Muslims.

Consider this. By his own admission, Mr. Obama is a “cosmopolitan,” and he identifies his philosophical outlook as “multicultural moral relativism.”

Hence , there is nothing about Obama’s political and intellectual beliefs that would justify calling him as a “radical” American, which means he has loyalties which are not American, and which may even be deemed un-American insofar as he does not identify with America’s foundational documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Federal Constitution  – precisely why he has been called America’s first “post-American President”  – although it would be more correct to call him America’s first anti-American President.

This may explain why President Obama was not among the heads of state that went to Paris to honor the victims of Islamic terrorism, a phenomenon he denies as if the two words “Islamic” and “terrorism” constitute either a contradiction in terms, or a tautology.

Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s rant: ‘French citizens carried out Paris massacre, and Muslims pay the price”


Cry baby your guys got caught and killed too bad!

French Muslim Philosopher Abdennour Bidar: ‘Islam Has Given Birth To Monsters, Needs Reform’


Germany Bracing for Islamic Terror


Islamic “peace,” Imam Obama and multiculturalism


All I can say is they are at war with us; and by that I mean the Islam is at war with the entire world. You can fight them to the death or submit to them there is no other option.

danmillerinpanama's avatardanmillerinpanama

Multiculturalism fosters and perpetuates myths that Islam is the religion of peace, not death; that it is benign like other world religions and improves Western civilization. In Obama’s world, such fantasies are reality. They are principal bases of His foreign policies.

turbanbomb1

Islam

I argued here and here that adherents to Islam, not to “radical” or “extremist” Islam, but to Islam, are the perpetrators and supporters of the Islamic slaughter of those with whose ideologies and actions they disagree. They demand submission and will tolerate nothing less.

In His January 4, 2009 address in Cairo, Obama proclaimed:

America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles – principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings. [Emphasis added.]

. . . .

[P]artnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part…

View original post 1,158 more words

Islamic state child cubs ‘execute two Russian spies’


What are you going to do when they are here and there kids start killing your kids — they are serious about world domination and all Americans can think about is taking away our guns — not a good idea!

Military experts: U.S. not in ‘war on terror’


That have this almost right just leave out the “radical” and it would be what it is and has been for 1400 years! Its a war of the Islamists’ against the rest of the world!