Tag Archives: Norm Eisen

Jan 29 2025

Acting Attorney General James McHenry Fires Dozen+ DOJ Prosecutors from Jack Smith Investigation


Posted originally on the CTH on January 28, 2025 | Sundance 

Acting Attorney General James McHenry has fired more than a dozen career prosecutors from Main Justice citing their work with the Special Counsel Jack Smith targeting of President Trump.  This is an exceptionally valuable non-pretending approach toward eliminating the weaponization of the DOJ, the history of the manipulation of the DOJ/FBI serves as the backdrop.

Remember when Robert Mueller spent 2 years investigating the Trump-Russia collusion nonsense, and it was later discovered the investigative team (5o FBI agents) knew in January 2017, the Trump-Russia collusion claim was false.  Why did those 50 FBI agents remain employed, when it was clear they knew there was no basis for the accusations?  The simple non-pretending questions are always the starkest.

That’s the sentiment behind current Acting AG James McHenry, firing the lawyers who worked with Jack Smith.  In addition to the fabrication of a prosecutorial predicate, the deployment of Lawfare is not based on factual law.  The prosecutors showed their political bias by willingly engaging in a prosecution they understood was without merit.

(WASHINGTON AP) – […] The abrupt termination targeting career prosecutors who worked on special counsel Jack Smith’s team is the latest sign of upheaval inside the Justice Department and is consistent with the administration’s determination to purge the government of workers it perceives as disloyal to the president.

Monday’s norm-shattering move, which follows the reassignment of multiple senior career officials across divisions, was made even though rank-and-file prosecutors by tradition remain with the department across presidential administrations and are not punished by virtue of their involvement in sensitive investigations. The firings are effective immediately.

“Today, Acting Attorney General James McHenry terminated the employment of a number of DOJ officials who played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,” said a statement from a Justice Department official. “In light of their actions, the Acting Attorney General does not trust these officials to assist in faithfully implementing the President’s agenda. This action is consistent with the mission of ending the weaponization of government.” (read more)

Jan 28 2025

Tyler Burleson On His Unjust Imprisonment Without Bail


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Jan 26 at 1:00 pm EST

Jan 28 2025

We Need Legal Reform Really Bad!!!!!!


Posted originally on Jan 28, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Kagan Elena

QUESTION: Justice Elena Kagan denied the petition to prevent California from investigating and probably jailing doctors who went against Newsom’s COVID-19 protocol. If I remember correctly, isn’t she the former Solicitor General who told them to release you because she could not explain how you were being held without any charge of civil contempt for 7 years?

FD

Owen TR 2 7 2000 No List

ANSWER: Yes, your memory is correct. The judge was as corrupt as Trump discovered in New York City. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals is corrupt and they only protect the judges and government and even refuse to order judges to stop committing felonies by changing the transcripts. To be thrown in jail on civil contempt, you should have an order that specifies what it is you are supposed to do. I NEVER had such an order, and when I asked for one, the Judge simply said to his Receiver, “I thought you did that.” I should have legally been released then and there. He kept me in prison without any order.

Hect Model Schiavoni REDACTED

The reason there was no published order was that they wanted the computer code. They said they would close the company and fire 240 employees unless I turned over the code and even put it in writing to a lawyer offering to rent the company to keep the forecasts going.

HSBC Gag Cover
Republic Pays 606 WSJ

Then, when my clients joined me and went after the bankers, they put a gag order on me to stop me from helping my clients against the bank. Then the bank pleaded guilty and returned all the money to my clients, and to justify still keeping me in jail, they claimed there was yet another fraud, without any charges or complaint no less any description. The judge still refused to release me without even a complaint filed. This violated Due Process of Law and the Second Circuit ignored everything.

TR01072002 No Criminal Description

The Second Circuit just kept me in prison for a civil contempt statute with a maximum sentence of 18 months as a Political Prisoner to protect the bankers and the government. The court transcript even states there is no description of any alleged fraud, but they still just kept me in jail indefinitely because they wanted to stop our forecasts.

2006 Supreme Court

When I finally got to the Supreme Court, they ordered the government to respond, meaning they were taking my case. That is when Justice Kagan first asked for a postponement, which I declined. Justice Kagan had no choice because the case was outrageous, and she told the NY boys to release me. They released me from contempt and then told the Supreme Court the case was “moot” to get out of the whole mess.

TR No Restitution

I had no restitution and no penalties. They knew I would be right back in the Supreme Court if they tried that. Today, this does present a problem. If I return to the Supreme Court, Justice Kagan and Justice Sotomayor would have to recuse themselves because BOTH were involved in my case. That would probably set a legal record to have two justices compelled to recuse from the same case. When released, you are supposed to have 3 years of supervised release. The judge in Trump’s case dismissed that, and in my case, I reported only once, and that was it. They were afraid I would go right back to the Supreme Court. As soon as I got out, Congress invited me to Washington, where I was introduced as the guy with this model they were trying to suppress.

Mill John Stuart Legal Persecution mills

When I was in Frankfurt, Germany, for the debut of the film On Me the Forecaster, there was a question-and-answer period at the end. A woman stood up and said this is what was wrong with America – just raw corruption. A German lawyer stood up and said: “We do this to people here in Germany all the time.” Governments really cannot be trusted to enforce laws. John Stuart Mills also commented in On Liberty: “Let us not flatter ourselves that we are yet free from the stain of legal persecution.”

Dickens Suffer any Wrong

Charles Dickenson also wrote about the corrupt legal system in Britain at the time. He said: “Suffer any wrong that can be done you rather than come here!” – The Court of Chancery, which I was in civil contempt, the equivalent of the English Court of Chancery.

Shakespeare Killl Lawyers

Even Shakespeare wrote his famous line in Henry VI: “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” There were no lawyers for private citizens. Only the king had lawyers. The real meaning of those words was to kill all the king’s prosecutors for also legal abuse and corruption.

I have NO FAITH in our legal system. History confirms we are in serious trouble.

When the Rule of law collapses, the government is not far behind.

cntrl_alt_del

We really need to press that control-alt-delete and start over.

Jan 25 2025

EDNY Judge Finds Clear and Compelling Evidence of FISA-702 “Backdoor Search” Violations by DOJ


Posted originally on the CTH on January 24, 2025 | Sundance

A few interested sites are noting a recently published decision in the U.S. v. Hasbajrami case in Brooklyn, New York, where Eastern District Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall identified the misuse of FISA-702 “backdoor searches” regarding defendant, Agron Hasbajrami.

Hasbajrami plead guilty to charges of attempting to provide material support to a terrorist organization, alleging that he intended to travel to the Federally Administered Tribal Area of Pakistan, where he expected to join a terrorist organization, receive training, and ultimately fight against U.S. forces and others in Afghanistan and Pakistan. However, after his guilty plea, while he is serving time in prison, prosecutors admitted some of the evidence against him came as a result of privacy violations, unlawful FISA-702 searches.

Hasbajrami sought to have the evidence against him thrown out on 4th amendment grounds (fruit of the poisoned tree) and withdraw his guilty plea. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied Hasbarjami’s blanket evidence suppression motion for the exclusion of all FISA Section 702 collection in his case but did not weigh in on whether the warrantless Section 702 database queries were constitutional, instead remanding the case back to Judge Hall for a review of that question.

Judge DeArchy Hall received the case again and reviewed all of the government motions against the request to suppress the evidence.  What results is a very well-constructed explanation and opinion of how FISA-702 was misused in the case [SEE 60-pg Opinion HERE].

The judge determined that U.S. government officials did factually violate the technical rules and procedures for the use of FISA-702 searches, and the DOJ should have gone to court to obtain a warrant to look at Hasbajrami’s private communication. In essence, yes, the 4th amendment protections of Hasbajrami were violated.  However, the issue of overturning the resulting evidence becomes a matter of legal distinction.

The defendant, who admitted guilt (twice) did not claim the evidence was a result of misuse or a wrongful approach in searching the NSA’s library, from which FISA-702 search results are determined (a structural flaw in the defense motion).  The defendant filed a suppression motion on the issue of his 4th amendment rights being violated.  The judge opinion holds that the FBI’s Section 702 queries violated the Fourth Amendment; however, the court ultimately denied the defendant’s motion to suppress the resulting evidence on separate grounds.

The value in the ruling by Judge Hall, is a few fold:  First, it is an excellent review of the FISA-702 origin and all of the constitutional arguments that surround the controversial law.  Second, the ruling clearly shows that FISA-702 searches are currently being used unlawfully and continually by government officials.  Third, the ruling clearly shows how “backdoor” 702 searches are violations of the Fourth Amendment. [Albeit in this case, of no value to the argument put forth by Hasbajrami.]

[SEE CASE RULING HERE]

All this and a few bucks will buy you a cup of coffee.

The ruling essentially underpins the reality that government officials are using their access to the complete library within the NSA collection and storage database to conduct searches of U.S. communication that removes the constitutional protections of the 4th amendment.

Mr Agron Hasbajrami was ensnared by this surveillance process and admitted his guilt thereafter.

However, the issue is not Hasbajrami’s intent, or even his guilt.  The issue that surrounds us is this constant surveillance state and the tens-of-millions of searches that are done on the private papers of American citizens.

In essence we have a domestic surveillance state looking for suspect people who are operating against the interests of government.

Mr. Hasbajrami was caught wanting to join a terrorist organization.  However, as we have witnessed in the cold and brutal reality of the J6 roundup, that same “terrorist organization” may well be defined as your local “patriot group” or “parent’s advisory committee.”

Jan 23 2025

Ezra Cohen: “The Intelligence Community Is Distracted And Has Lost Sight Of The Objective”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 22, 2025 at 6:00 pm EST

Jan 18 2025

Sen. Colton Moore Details His Experience Getting Arrested For Defying Ban In GA


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 17, 2025 at 8:00 pm EST

Jan 18 2025

Natalie Winters SHREDS Merrick Garland: “You’ll Go Down As One Of The Worst AGs Ever”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 17, 2025 at 8:00 pm EST

Jan 18 2025

Natalie Winters BLASTS Michael Cohen: “You Know It’s Bad When MSNBC Is Heckling You”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 17, 2025 at 7:00 pm EST

Jan 18 2025

Judge Aileen Cannon Highly Skeptical of DOJ Request to Release Report on Mar-a-Lago Documents Case to Congress


Posted originally on the CTH on January 18, 2025 | Sundance

Every intellectually honest person knows exactly what is going on here, including Judge Aileen Cannon.

Judge Cannon had previously blocked the Jack Smith effort to release his politically framed report on the Trump Mar-a-Lago classified documents case.  The reason is simple, the DOJ is still prosecuting other defendants in the case in her courtroom.  A release of this report, even to congress, would be tantamount to the DOJ releasing public information negative toward the accused who have not even stood trial yet.

The Jack Smith special counsel operation is concluded, and there was no representative of the special counsel’s office in the courtroom Friday as the DOJ tried to argue they should be allowed to release the report to congress.  Judge Aileen Cannon was not buying their story about why such urgency was needed.  Everyone knows this is a political framework and pure lawfare.

FLORIDA – […] “Why is there such urgency to disclose this to Congress right now, prior to the conclusion of the criminal proceeding — which would seem to be the ordinary course?” Cannon asked veteran Justice Department attorney Elizabeth Shapiro. “At the end of the day, what’s the upside of doing this right now?”

Shapiro cited the “historical practice” of sending special counsel reports to Congress and a commitment by Garland to be “fully transparent” about the results of such investigations.

“I’m still not hearing a satisfying answer to that question,” Cannon said.

That prompted Shapiro to acknowledge that Garland only has control over the report for a few more days, given Trump is expected to replace him on Monday with an acting attorney general.

“His time is limited. He appointed these special counsels,” Shapiro said of Garland.

Shapiro said the conditions Garland has proposed for the leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary Committee to review the report — namely that they can only review it at the Justice Department, without electronic devices or staff, and must agree to keep its findings confidential — all but eliminate any danger of it becoming public.

“There’s virtually no likelihood that the report can leak,” Shapiro said.

However, lawyers for Trump and his two former co-defendants in the classified documents case — Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira — said it was clear that Cannon had no authority to police any potential breaches of those conditions by lawmakers. They also argued it was more or less guaranteed that Trump’s political opponents would disclose the information in some fashion.

“The courts cannot order members of Congress to do things,” said Nauta’s attorney Stanley Woodward, who raised his hand as he mocked the secrecy pledge as a “scout’s honor” oath.

“For all intents and purposes, it would really be a release publicly,” Trump attorney John Lauro said.

Cannon noted that the precise scope of grand jury secrecy is often hashed out between parties in a criminal case and resolved by a judge. “In this case, it appears to be a decision that was made entirely unilaterally” by Smith’s team, the judge said.

Cannon also said she received a copy of the report for review on Thursday and that it appeared to contain information Trump’s lawyers had previously argued was covered by attorney-client privilege. (read more)

Jan 16 2025

Natalie Winters SHREDS Mike Pence For Urging Senators To Oppose RFK Jr. Confirmation


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Jan 15, 2025 at 6:00 pm EST