Obama plans to restrain media offensiveness to Islam


Obama plans to restrain media offensiveness to Islam.

Obama Declares War On ‘Extremism’ – Lists 72 ‘Extremists’ And Not A Single Mention Of Islam


Since Obama is a Muslim this makes perfect sense!

Michael's avatarSword At-The-Ready

White-terrorists

Individuals and organizations that attempt to restore the values that our founders once believed in so strongly are regarded as dangerous “extremists” that need to be watched carefully

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” – Barrack Hussein Obama

This is an update to a story that we first blogged on back in August of 2013. Given the recent events in France and Obama’s deliberate absence of any senior U.S. officials from the Unity against Islamic Terrorism March, that Obama declares ‘war’ on ‘violent extremism’ sets off alarm bells with those of us who understand who this government under Obama considers to actually be an ‘extremist’.

In the immediate aftermath of the Jihad attacks in France, the US and Leftist global media has been going through bizarre contortions of logic to strip any reference of Islam from the attack, and literally go on…

View original post 2,246 more words

ISLAM


CAIR-Hamas Makes Demand of FOX: Fire Those Who Speak Ill of Islam


We used to say call a spade a spade!

Virtually all terror attacks have been by Muslims and all Muslims practice Islam so by simple logic Islam sponsors Terrorism or Jihad as they call it. But in any case Islam is by definition a Terrorist organization!

What the West Must Do In Order to Survive Islam


Islam is violent and there is no way around that fact!

Is the White House a ‘Sleeper Cell’?


Re Post from PJ Media January 12th, 2015 – 11:11 pm
By Roger L. Simon

obama_sleeper_cell_1-12-15-2

I’m still trying to figure out why Obama — or any high-level U. S. government official other than Eric Holder, who was in Paris but evidently had better things to do — didn’t join the nearly 4 million people who marched throughout France protesting the terror killings at #CharlieHebdo and the Hyper Cacher market. White House press secretary Josh Earnest has admitted the mistake and apologized (perhaps a little wishy-washily, but we’ll give him a pass), informing us that, unfortunately, there just wasn’t enough time to arrange presidential security for the trip.

That’s interesting. Somehow there was time for security for 40 or so other world leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel (arguably the most highly regarded politician on the planet at the moment and the de facto president of the EU), the UK’s David Cameron, Spain’s Mariano Rajoy and even Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu (probably a considerably bigger target than Obama these days and not exactly welcomed by France’s President Hollande, if reports are correct). Of course, the “American president” is supposedly more important but — correct me if I’m wrong — Obama was not originally so gung-ho on American exceptionalism, equating it with British exceptionalism and Greek exceptionalism, etc., etc. All countries, after all, feel they are exceptional.

Well, he’s changed his mind on this several times, so who’s to say? And there was a game on. I’m a sports fan, too, tennis more than football (wimpy, huh?), so I understand. You’d have trouble prying me away from the Australian Open when it starts next week. (Djokovic and Nadal ain’t so wimpy.) But still, in the event of one of the biggest and ugliest terror events in recent years, if I were president, I hope I’d TiVo a couple of rounds.

Just yesterday I theorized the real reason Obama didn’t go is he just couldn’t put the words “Islamic” and “terrorism” together in one sentence even if, forgive the tired image, it hit him in the face. (The exception of course being when insisting that something is NOT Islam.) He just can’t handle it after nearly fifty years of virtually non-stop anti-imperialist programming. His mind would fly apart if he had to utter the words “radical Islamic terrorism,” which French PM Valls, and any honest person, was quite willing to do.

Now I admit that was just a supposition. Just because I’ve never heard him link Islam and terror doesn’t mean in his heart of hearts he doesn’t. Though not a genius, he does have an IQ in triple digits and sees what’s right in front of his nose, I assume. He just interprets it differently. But why?

Is someone whispering in his ear?

Senator Dianne Feinstein has just informed us that, yes, there are Islamic terror sleeper cells in our midst in the USA. If that’s true, I wonder why Feinstein wasted so much of her time wounding the CIA during the last weeks of her tenure as Senate Intelligence Committee chair, but never mind. Could there be one of those cells in the White House?

I started this post thinking it was kind of funny. I liked the hed — “Is the White House a ‘Sleeper Cell’?” It reminded me of, um… Charlie Hebdo. But actually it’s not so funny. And it’s not impossible. We know something close already happened during the communist era (Alger Hiss), and the Israelis famously planted an agent, Eli Cohen, at the highest echelons of the Syrian government until he was caught via the KGB and hanged in the central square of Damascus. They say it was Cohen’s reports that were responsible for the rapid Israeli success against the Syrians in the Six-Day War.

But a “sleeper cell” in the White House? It would certainly explain Obama’s not going to France, which was a decision that hurt the USA, hurt the effort against Islamic terror and hurt the president’s already tarnished reputation into the bargain. There are so many other things that the existence of a White House “sleeper cell” would explain that I couldn’t even begin to count them. And as you know, a cell doesn’t have to be violent to be active. There are many ways to do damage.

But who would be a member of this cell? Is it one or all of them? Well that, I am sorry to say, I cannot tell you. I do not have the proper clearance. You are, however, free to guess. Who would stop you?

What Muslims Believe


There is no reason to believe that this is not very close to the truth and I don’t think this view needs to be this high to classify Islam “itself” as radical. US (and I’m sure those in the EU) politicians take money from Muslim PAC’s and the money comes from the Oil states which are all Muslim. Therefore they can’t call Islam radical and in fact, would rather not as it would mean their funds would be cut off.

On “Radical” Islam and Obama


Paul Eidelberg

Here are some synonyms of the word “radical”: thorough, complete, total, comprehensive, exhaustive, far-reaching, profound, stringent.

 

To use any of these synonyms to describe Islam is tautological, i.e., saying the same thing twice.

 

That being the case, President Obama is correct in refusing to speak of “radical Islam” when referring to terrorist acts committed by Muslims.

Consider this. By his own admission, Mr. Obama is a “cosmopolitan,” and he identifies his philosophical outlook as “multicultural moral relativism.”

Hence , there is nothing about Obama’s political and intellectual beliefs that would justify calling him as a “radical” American, which means he has loyalties which are not American, and which may even be deemed un-American insofar as he does not identify with America’s foundational documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Federal Constitution  – precisely why he has been called America’s first “post-American President”  – although it would be more correct to call him America’s first anti-American President.

This may explain why President Obama was not among the heads of state that went to Paris to honor the victims of Islamic terrorism, a phenomenon he denies as if the two words “Islamic” and “terrorism” constitute either a contradiction in terms, or a tautology.

Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s rant: ‘French citizens carried out Paris massacre, and Muslims pay the price”


Cry baby your guys got caught and killed too bad!

French Muslim Philosopher Abdennour Bidar: ‘Islam Has Given Birth To Monsters, Needs Reform’