European War is Inevitable


Posted originally on May 18, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

2025_05_15_08_21_20_Russia_seeks_to_remove_root_causes_of_conflict_not_ceasefire_Lavrov_on_Ista

QUESTION: Well, here we are at the 15th, right on schedule. Your model turns up, and it looks like no deal. Would you care to comment?

Uri

2022 Intl War Index

ANSWER: Putin said their purpose would be “to remove the root causes of the conflict and move towards creating a long-term, durable peace in a historical perspective”. Zelenskyy said he was prepared to attend, but only if Putin also showed up, because “everything in Russia depends” on the Russian leader as if that is not the case in Ukraine. Trump also was not attending.

AE War Index Q Combined 5 15 25

Zelensky is a Neo-Nazi and he takes orders from the EU and NATO. He wants every Russian dead. What would he do if Russia left the Donbas? He has outlawed them from speaking Russian, denied them any right to vote, outlawed Orthodox Christianity, and outlawed them from even celebrating Christmas. The Ukrainian people have a choice. Either to die for the Neocons, or rise up and overthrow Zelensky. Contacts in Romania realize the EU is trying to orchestrate them into war with Russia. The strategy here is to send the Eastern Europeans in to kill as many Russians as possible, and then Macron can invade Russia like Napoleon.

Our model peaked intraday in the last quarter of 2024, with the third quarter of 2024 as the highest quarterly closing. The correction was to be into the first Quarter, and then the second quarter was a Directional Change. We will now head into the third quarter of 2025, which should reflect the failure of any peace deal because any ceasefire is only to regroup and rearm Ukraine. There is no resolution to this, and the EU will NEVER allow Ukraine to have peace.

Zelenskyy Johnson

There was a peace deal. Putin withdrew his tanks around Kiev, and Boris Johnson flew to Ukraine and instructed Zelensky not to sign any peace deal. More than one million Ukrainians are now dead. My sources in the US military confirm that all the claims that Russia has lost 1 million are fake news. This is all to push for war. Europe does NOT want peace. They are broke, and without war, the people will be storming their parliaments with pitchforks to hang these politicians on the street, for everything they were promised will vanish in a sovereign default. They NEED a distraction, and that is war with Russia, the same as Carney ran against Trump in Canada and avoided all domestic economic damage carried out by the Liberal Party.

It is NOT a question of IF but only WHEN

That’s our Computer – not my personal opinion.

Davis: The Supreme Court Issued An Illegal Injunction Against The President Of The United States


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 16, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

House Budget Committee Markup – One Big Beautiful Bill FY 2025


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 16, 2025, at 3:00 pm EST

Hammer: “Trump Is Facing A Judicial Insurrection Of The Likes Of No President In American History.”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 16, 2025, at 3:00 pm EST

“We’re Going To Fund Trans Sex Changes In A Republican Bill.” Dave Brat BLASTS House GOP Budget


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 16, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

Supreme Court Keeps, Mostly Punts, Temporary Block on Deportation of Terrorist Aliens Using ‘Alien Enemies Act’


Posted originally on CTH on May 16, 2025 | Sundance

The Supreme Court attempted to split the baby between executive “national security” power and the dynamic use of the “Alien Enemies Act” today with a ruling that temporarily blocks the Trump administration from deporting criminal alien gang members under the UEA until the criminals are afforded some undefined amount of time to appeal their repatriation status.  Essentially, this is a stall and punt routine. [READ RULING HERE]

From the Ruling, “To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18, and we grant temporary injunctive relief to preserve our jurisdiction while the question of what notice is due is adjudicated. [See post, at 13 (ALITO, J., dissenting).] We did not on April 19 —and do not now— address the underlying merits of the parties’ claims regarding the legality of removals under the AEA. We recognize the significance of the Government’s national security interests as well as the necessity that such interests be pursued in a manner consistent with the Constitution. In light of the foregoing, lower courts should address AEA cases expeditiously.”

The 7-2 ruling was unsigned. Justices Alito and Thomas dissented. The main opinion issued by the court was labeled “per curiam” — a term meaning that it was issued by the court as a body, rather than any individual justice. However, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a separate opinion concurring in the decision. But Kavanaugh wrote that he’d prefer to have the Supreme Court dig into the legality of Trump’s Alien Enemies Act invocation right away, without waiting for the issue to be hashed out by lower courts.

NEW YORK TIMES – The Trump administration will not be allowed to deport a group of Venezuelan detainees accused of being members of a violent gang under a rarely invoked wartime law while the matter is litigated in the courts, the Supreme Court said on Friday.

The justices sent the case back to a federal appeals court, directing it to examine claims by the migrants that they could not be legally deported under the Alien Enemies Act, the centuries-old wartime law invoked by the Trump administration. The justices said the appeals court should also examine what kind of notice the government be required to provide that would allow migrants the opportunity to challenge their deportations.

The court said its order would remain in place until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled and the Supreme Court considered any appeal from that ruling.  Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote a dissent. He was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. (more)

The Alito dissent, which appears beginning on PAGE 11 of the pdf, is well worth reading.  Within the dissent Alito documents the timeline of the case and outlines why the Supreme Court intervention is unwarranted.   From the Alito opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts dragged the high court into the case without any reasonable justification for interceding.

Treason?! Rand Paul Grills State Dept. Nominee on Predecessor’s Anti-Trump Activities


Posted originally on Rumble on Bright Bart News Network on: May 15, at 1:00 pm EST

Ben & Jerry’s Founder Among Protesters Disrupting RFK Jr. Hearing


Posted originally on Rumble on Bright Bart News Network on: May 15, at 2:00 pm EST

Natalie Winters BLASTS Yale Professors For Anti-MAGA Video Exposing Colorado Revolution Tactics Of Left


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: May 15, 2025, at 9:00 pm EST

Rouge Judge & Her Audacity


Posted originally on May 16, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Dugan Hannah Judge

QUESTION: Regarding Judge Hannah Dugan’s indictment, some are saying her defence is similar to that of Donald Trump, and this is all political since she says she has absolute immunity. You are the unbiased legal source. One lawyer friend said, “Ask Armstrong, and you will hear the legal truth.” So what’s up with this?

GP

ANSWER: This county state judge of Wisconsin was properly indicted for allegedly obstructing the arrest of a Mexican immigrant by federal US authorities. She has claimed that the charges should be dismissed because she’s immune from prosecution for official acts. Her definition of a “legal act” is that she could kill her spouse and claim immunity.

Supremacy Clause U.S Constitution

This is not even remotely related to the allegations of Trump commenting on the election as president. That is within the scope of his position. What he is alleged to have done was not an official act by any stretch of the imagination. She is an activist judge who disagrees with federal law but has no judicial power to circumvent that law. She had no jurisdiction over the ICE issue, which is in a federal court, not a local county court. If I were in the grand jury, I would have indicted her without question. There is no justification whatsoever for her actions, and there is no claim that this is an official act for which she has immunity.