THE CHLOROQUINE AFFAIR – How Media Brainwashes & then Politicizes Their Audiences


Accordingly, given the settled science surrounding hydroxychloroquine, and the hysterical outbursts of CNN/MSDNC’s pundits maddened by the results of November 8, 2020, I end with the words of the president:  “Wait to see what happens.”

In a coordinated effort led by GOOGLE searches that return answers on board with Democrat narratives we see in the mainstream media that has gone into frantic hypermode denying first, and covering up second, the reports of the effectiveness of the malaria and Lupus drug PLAQUÉNIL, aka, hydroxychloroquine.

For COVID-19 treatments, the drug is to be used in conjunction with Z-Pac, Azithromycin, a short treatment antibiotic, along with Zinc.

In order to promote the MSM’s narratives (which happen to be  malevolent lies that may kill countless people), the Democrat-owned media deliberately omitted the reporting of not one, but many successful clinical trials, some randomized. You will read about these next!

We took YAHOO NEWS as an example of what the people see.

In coordination with the mainstream media’s multi-pronged attacks, YAHOO set up a number of straw man ploys.

Distractions, redirections, misleading assumptions, no recollection of history, all passed on as medical advice.

Whereas the drug cocktail was used in China and elsewhere with documented success, the media has not reported the fact. The deliberate omissions problem first arose when the president of the United States mentioned that the drug might work. We should understand he did not prescribe the drug, but reacted to all the medical field reports in existence. In coordination with RESIST, the Democrat-Socialist movement to obstruct any success the president might enjoy, including his astonishing, booming economy, the mainstream media refused to cover the truth of the story immediately after the president raised the issue. That is why the media and their politicians first denied the success of the economy, then tried to talk it down, and when that too failed, tried to take the credit for it.

What we have here is a coordinated knee-jerk media that immediately rose against even testing the drug to save human lives. They would refuse people life-saving treatment merely because the president recommended it. Not because collectively they, or their “witnesses,” aka, Democrat activists they trotted out, knew anything about its effectiveness.

Democrats (and GOOGLE searches) insist it is dangerous because it has not been tested. Actually, millions of people use it regularly across the world against malaria, which was once humanity’s biggest killer. It is one of the most tested drugs ever invented. Not only is it safe in the 600-2400mg dosages (12 pills for the heavy weight adult) as it is usually used, but it is very safe. Its side effects are mainly benign and mild. Yes, as reported in the literature, some get diarrhea and suicidal thoughts. However, people have reportedly had frequent bouts of diarrhea and even committed suicide simply by watching CNN and MSDNC. Second, the media collectively warned against the Z-Pac antibiotic, because used on heart patients it carries cardiovascular risk. Patients, the media insisted, can die from it.

But dying from COVID-19 never happens, and there’s absolutely no risk to blind pedestrians running across a highway either.

Meanwhile:

VIDEO: DR. MARC SIEGEL’S 96-YEAR OLD FATHER RECOVERED IN ONE DAY AFTER HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE TREATMENT BY HIS CARDIOLOGIST ALONG WITH Z-PAC.

This is what the president actually said and repeated many times – as reported by TIME: ““What do you have to lose? Take it,” Trump said in a White House briefing on April 4. “I really think they should take it. But it’s their choice. And it’s their doctor’s choice or the doctors in the hospital. But hydroxychloroquine. Try it, if you’d like.”

STAT reported on Trump at another event: “It may work, it may not work. I feel good about it. That’s all it is. Just a feeling.” At the same press conference, Anthony Fauci, a physician who heads the NIAID and a veteran of outbreaks going back to HIV, emphasized the need for a methodical clinical trial…”

Neither the Salk Vaccine nor Tetanus ever had double blind, randomized, controlled statistical studies: methodical clinical trial.

YAHOO NEWS:

“On Monday, Trump announced that his administration had ordered 29 million doses of the drug as a treatment option for the more than 387,000 Americans who have tested positive for the virus. His plan stems from a March 20 study out of the U.K., which found positive effects among COVID-19 patients who took a combination of hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin.

Although the study garnered international attention, many have since criticized the small sample size (26 people) and the fact that it was non-controlled (the patients were all at different hospitals). In the absence of more evidence, however….”

Indeed, the absence of more evidence is hardly a problem with  the mainstream media that spits out opinion, not evidence, to support their medical advice:

VOX: “The evidence for hydroxychloroquine is flimsy…”

ABC: “What do you have to lose?” “Your life.”

NBC Today Show: “What do you have to lose? “Potentially your life.”

CNN Don Lemon: “It has serious side effects.”

CNN Dana Bash: ” He (Trump) continued today to push hydroxychloroquine in a way that is baffling to medical professionals.”

MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinsky, marinated in Trump-derangement after her botched facelift she denied she had, said: “You wrote in the Washington Post the one word why Donald Trump should not be president. What is it?” Gene Robinson, long-time Obama and Hillary activist writer for the Washington Post, aswered: “Hydroxychloroquine.”

A non-partisan observer might assume that these talking heads actually know something thousands of doctors who’ve been using this drug on patients do not. What we have here are partisan talking points that substitute for medical advice.

The media reported extensively that people died using hydroxychloroquine.

They reported that a Republican wife took the president’s advice and poisoned her husband with it.

The problem with this narrative distributed by the DNC with which the progressive news brainwashes its audiences are twofold: 1. the woman was not a Republican, but a frequent Democrat donor and a Hillary supporter; 2. she poisoned her husband with fish tank cleaner containing chloroquine and other substances meant for fish, not Plaquéil, a substance with a different chemical composition meant for human consumption.

GQ even went far enough to accuse Trump of having invested into companies making Hydroxychloroquine, a charge later parroted by one reporter at a White House news conference. And denied by Trump. In fact the drug is a generic, it’s formula is publicly available, and it hardly makes money for any company.

So much so, that the Israeli pharma TEVA shipped 6 million doses to the United States gratis.

For progressives who have little education in Latin or science, gratis means “free of charge.”

In other words, the media found it expedient and politically worthy to indict the president for the astonishing, mind-numbing collective stupidity, of Democrats.

MEANWHILE we have oodles of science supporting the two-three drug cocktail not marinated in leftwing ideology:

a. The French Study

b. The Monsey Report
c. The Chinese Reports

d. Poll of 6000 Doctors recommending Plaquénil (hydroxychloroquine.)

e. Second French Study

f. SCIENCE DIRECT: Peer Review of Controlled Studies

g. South Korean Study

f. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS letter thanking President Trump for his leadership with hydroxychloroquine.

I won’t list the rest. There are dozens more you won’t find at GOOGLE, a Democrat Operation that will redirect you to articles that prove hydroxychloroquine works only on fish. Or Nancy Pelosi’s pantry. .

Never mind that randomized double-blind tests concerning microbes makes no sense.

They do make sense in myocardial infraction studies. You see, the test for COVID-19 is rather simple.

Administer the treatment. Afterward test for microbes.

If there are microbes, the drug failed.

If there’s an absence of microbes (and a folder with this morning’s DNC talking points directives), the drug cured.

Simple as that.

Accordingly, given the settled science surrounding hydroxychloroquine, and the hysterical outbursts of CNN/MSDNC’s pundits maddened by the results of November 8, 2020, I end with the words of the president:

“Wait to see what happens.”

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.