How much Vitamin D should we be taking?


The discussion is based on world wide medical studies> Its a must watch if you’re interested in your health.

Somebody Investigate Fauci – At Last


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Sep 20, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Trudeau Fakes Getting Vaccine?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Canada Re-Posted Sep 19, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Fauci Has Lied but Biden Will Not Remove Him


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Sep 19, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Video Player00:0000:20

Bill Gates has been funding Fauci, and Gates insists that the entire world must be vaccinated but refuses to give vaccines to poor countries. Instead, he wants the wealthy countries to pay him full price for the vaccines and hand them over to the poor nations. So much for caring about the health of the people.

I believe Gates is a psychopath who pretends to care but really wants to kill off society. It is inconsistent to claim to “care” about the world’s health but then hold secret meetings on depopulating the planet.

Vaccine Hypnosis


Posted originally on GrrrGraphics.com on SEP 17, 2021 AT 12:36 PM

The western world is undergoing an aggressive mass-hypnosis campaign designed to get us all to take a Covid vaccination. Many of us are resisting and are now being demonized. Arch liar Don Lemon said we should be shunned and harassed. Will Lemon soon be donning a Nazi uniform?

We are inundated with messages urging us to take the experimental injections. There’s an annoying Walgreen commercial in which a woman uses a relaxed and friendly voice. After talking about something else she casually adds something about getting your free Covid vaccine because ‘you’re ready.’ When I hear her say that I reply, “No, I’m not ready. I’ll never be ready!”

Such commercials are everywhere and I assume they’re being paid for by the pharmaceutical industrial complex, but there’s one thing that makes the Covid jabs stand out. Unlike ads for other drugs, they do not list the side effects of getting the Covid shot. If they did, it would be horrific. I can hear it now…”Side effects may include heart inflammation, stroke, or sudden death.” They won’t say that, but serious side effects have occurred. Thousands of died and millions have experienced serious side effects. The mainstream media liars will not mention a word about such dangers. They keep repeating over and over that the vaccines are ‘safe and effective.’ If they say those words often enough and from enough sources including celebrities, they know they will break down resistance and people will eventually get them.

Many people do not trust government, our media, or the pharmaceutical representatives. They know Dr. Fauci gave American taxpayer dollars to the Chinese communists to achieve ‘gain of function.’ He lied to Congress. He and Bill Gates belong in prison, but since they are part of the New World Order, they are untouchable. Many don’t like or trust Fauci or Gates, but still they get the vaccine for a so-called pandemic with a 99.7 percent survivability rate!

They globalist totalitarians also do not want you to question their hypnotism. Observe what Senator Pocahontas (Elizabeth Warren) said last week. She wants Amazon to ban books that criticize the vaccines. Many of those books are written by real doctors and scientists who are ringing alarm bells, but Warren says what they’re writing is ‘misinformation.’ She won’t say exactly WHAT is the misinformation, but it’s a tactic now being used by the vaccine pushers. Anything that questions the ‘official’ narrative is now misinformation. That’s that. No debate. No free speech allowed. Just shut up and take your shot and hurry!

They are attempting to control reality with their hypnosis. That is, they want humanity to accept a false reality and it can’t be questioned. This will lead to a very bad end.

I’m not offering medical advice. If you insist on having mystery liquids that have been proven to be ineffective against Covid inserted into your body, then that’s your call. As for me, I will never be convinced. The love of freedom breaks their hypnotic spell.

— Ben Garrison

iPhone 13


Armstrong Economics Blog/Humor Re-Posted Sep 18, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Bill Gates Lying


Armstrong Economics Blog/Vaccine Re-Posted Sep 18, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Let’s be very clear. Gates has a huge stake in all the big vaccine companies. Marginally, if he makes just $1 per shot, he stands to become not only the richest man but the richest man in all of history.

Why Did The CDC Stop Recording Vaccine Breakthrough Cases in The U.S. on May 1st? – Today We Got The Obvious Answer, Vaccine Companies Want to Sell Booster Shots


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on September 17, 2021 | Sundance | 146 Comments

A “breakthrough case” is the term for a person infecting with COVID-19 after they have been vaccinated.  On May 1st the CDC changed the recording and record keeping of COVID-19 breakthrough cases, and stopped tracking them.  The change was announced July 30th {Data Link}.

[…] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently monitors hospitalizations and deaths, from any cause, among fully vaccinated individuals with COVID-19, but not breakthrough infections, which it stopped monitoring as of May 1. CDC presents this data in aggregate at the national level but not by state, and there is no single, public repository for data by state or data on breakthrough infections, since the CDC stopped monitoring them. (read more)

At the time the CDC stopped tracking the incidents of vaccinated persons contracting COVID-19 and being hospitalized, many people wondered why?  Obviously if you stop recording vaccinated persons who are hospitalized, it will look like only unvaccinated persons are being hospitalized by the variants in the CDC records.  That skews the data and gives the false impression that only unvaxxed persons are getting infected and/or sick….

…Which is exactly what happened.

The medical industry and media narrative around the COVID-19 Delta Variant was that unvaccinated people in the U.S. were the majority group at risk.  The data supported that narrative because the breakthrough cases were no longer being recorded.   This makes the vaccine approach look better.  The approach of not counting the breakthrough case hospitalizations also makes the pharmaceutical companies look better; their vaccine looks more appealing & more effective.

However, another angle surfaced today that highlights the strength of the motive to stop recording those breakthrough cases; it also explains why some of the top leadership in the FDA quit their jobs rather than participate.

When the FDA vaccine approval panel was originally instructed to use the efficacy data with the goal of evaluating the booster shot request for the Pfizer vaccination; they were instructed to only look at the data from the U.S.

Knowing the CDC no longer was tracking U.S. breakthrough cases, that meant the FDA vaccine approval panel was only evaluating the Pfizer efficacy and hospitalization issue around the non-vaccinated group.  If this approach had been maintained, they would be making a determination of vaccine efficacy/effectiveness in the U.S. with the key metric omitted: The Pfizer vaccine would look more effective than it actually was, because the vaccinated and hospitalized metric was removed.

That skewed data looks like an intentional decision – for that specific intentional reason.   The CDC was trying to make the vaccines look more effective at avoiding hospitalization.  THAT is a political manipulation by changing a key part of the record-keeping.  THAT looks like the reason for the FDA officials to quit, rather than participate in politically manipulated science.

This scenario turned up today in the FDA rejection of a Pfizer booster, when the FDA vaccine approval panel finally won the argument and was allowed to look at more than just the manipulated U.S. data-set.   Despite the CDC stopping to track the vaccinated and hospitalized data in the U.S., the panel was allowed to consider the vaccinated and hospitalized outcomes from the U.K. and Israel {Source Link}:

[Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA leading expert in vaccines,] – “added the meeting focused on almost real-time analyses compared to what is happening in the world, and the goal remains slowing the spread of COVID-19, which is killing almost 2,000 Americans daily.

The question the advisory panel was originally given to consider only used the U.S. data, a small dataset, despite the presentations including data from the U.K. and Israel.

Marks instructed the panel to consider all the data, noting, “This is not a legal proceeding, this is a science proceeding, so you can take all the data into account.” (link)

By looking at the vaccinated/hospitalized rates in the U.K and Israel, a data-set intentionally not recorded by U.S. health officials, the panel rejected the Pfizer request for a booster shot, noting the efficacy just wasn’t there.  However, if the panel had only looked at the data approved by the CDC, the Pfizer vaccine efficacy would have looked much better because the vaccinated/hospitalized data was intentionally not recorded.

This my friends is how the healthcare of the U.S. is being manipulated by politics and Big Pharma.

This political manipulation also explains why the White House was proceeding with a booster shot distribution plan, even before the FDA vaccine advisory panel gave their opinion. $$$$

FDA Advisory Panel Rejects Pfizer Booster Shots


Posted originally on the conservative tree house September 17, 2021 | Sundance | 526 Comments

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory group who evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaccines have rejected the request for Pfizer booster shots.  However, the White House – desperately trying to push as many needle jabs as possible – was already on track to begin giving booster shots this month.  The implication here is that the White House was not following the recommendations of the FDA or the science.

WASHINGTON DC – A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel voted Friday against approval of Pfizer (PFE)/BioNTech’s (BNTX) third dose for the U.S.

The vote comes after a heated debate in recent weeks over the need for booster or additional shots, which both mRNA companies — Pfizer and Moderna (MRNA) — have advocated for.

Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA’s leading expert on vaccines, touched on the controversy in his introductory remarks. “We know that there may be differing opinions of the interpretation of the data regarding the potential need for additional doses, and we strongly encourage all the different viewpoints to be voiced and discussed regarding the data, which is complex, and evolving,” Marks said.

He added the meeting focused on almost real-time analyses compared to what is happening in the world, and the goal remains slowing the spread of COVID-19, which is killing almost 2,000 Americans daily.

The question the advisory panel was given to consider only used the U.S. data, a small dataset, despite the presentations including data from the U.K. and Israel.

Marks instructed the panel to consider all the data, noting, “This is not a legal proceeding, this is a science proceeding, so you can take all the data into account.”

The meeting precedes a September 20 start date for additional doses, announced last month by the White House COVID-19 Response Team, despite U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data showing some Americans are already receiving third doses. Last month, the CDC recommended additional doses for immunocompromised people.

A CDC advisory panel will meet next week to discuss recommendations for who should receive a booster dose. (read more)

This happens on the same day the CDC announces a study [Data Here] showing the Moderna vaccine remained stronger in protecting against hospitalization compared to Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).

Among U.S. adults without immunocompromising conditions, vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalization during March 11–August 15, 2021, was higher for the Moderna vaccine (93%) than the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (88%) and the Janssen vaccine (71%).  (link)

However, Moderna has now highlighted their own diminished benefit study [DATA HERE] showing the vaccine effectiveness wanes after 8 months:

[…] “In the analysis, 88 breakthrough cases of COVID-19 occurred in the more recently vaccinated group (49.0 cases per 1000 person-years) compared to 162 cases in the group vaccinated last year (77.1 cases per 1000 person-years). The reduction in incidence rates for participants vaccinated more recently compared to participants vaccinated last year was 36% (95% CI: 17-52%). A Cox proportional hazards model showed similar results after adjusting for age and risk factors for severe COVID-19. Fortunately, only 19 severe cases were observed. While not significant, there was a numerical trend towards a lower rate of severe cases in the group vaccinated more recently (3.3 per 1000 person-years) compared to the group vaccinated last year (6.2 per 1000 person-years).” (read more)

Once you get locked in the vaccine roller coaster, you ain’t getting off until the ride’s over…

White House Attempts to Justify Withholding Monoclonal Antibody Treatments From Florida and Red States, Fails Miserably


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on September 16, 2021 | Sundance | 214 Comments

If the political parties were reversed, the entire White House press corps would be having apoplectic fits about the White House withholding COVID-19 treatments from New York or California, with endless articles written about how Donald Trump was intentionally politicizing healthcare and purposefully killing his political opposition.  Seriously, not an exaggeration; there would be no bigger scandal in the U.S. right now, and congress would be having emergency hearings with subpoenas already en route to HHS officials.

Alas, as the administration of Joe Biden steps in to take control over Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) inventories and distribution, block red states from receiving the treatment, and making grand pronouncements about controlling supply based on “equity”, the White House press corps sits on their hands….  except Newsmax reporter Emerald Robinson.

Watch Jennifer Psaki lie, twist, obfuscate and manipulate the discussion in an attempt to defend an indefensible position when questioned by Robinson about Biden’s recent moves to punish Florida.  This is one of the most insufferably twisted answers from the podium to date.  WATCH:

First, keep in mind Florida Governor Ron DeSantis was initially blasted by progressives, the media writ large and the White House for his support of Monoclonal Antibody treatment.  The mainstream media even attempted to claim that DeSantis’ support for the treatment was based on some financial benefit to the primary manufacturer, Regeneron.  A completely false narrative that quickly collapsed as DeSantis continued setting up dozens of mAb treatment centers around Florida.

As soon as they noticed the approach was working, HHS moved to block the DeSantis mAb program by taking control of the inventory:

On Monday, September 13, HHS transitioned from a direct ordering process to a state/territory-coordinated distribution system similar to that used for the distribution of mAbs from November 2020 – February 2021. (link)

Second, the issue of mAb use has nothing to do with vaccination status.  The COVID-19 virus has been shown to impact vaccinated people just as much as non-vaccinated.  Currently half of the people receiving mAb treatment are already vaccinated, infected and sick despite their vaccinated status.

Third, in her response Ms. Psaki attempts to define distribution “equity” as if Florida and Oklahoma have the same population.  Ridiculous in the extreme.  Oklahoma has 3.9 million residents and Florida has 22.9 million.  The population of Florida is six times as great as Oklahoma… and two months ahead in setting up treatment centers expanding their capacity to use it.

Lastly, the appropriate response to a shortage of the treatment is to increase production of that product, not to ration it.

.