Regulators at the European Union are warning that COVID-19 booster shots could compromise the immune system. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) stated that taking a booster shot every four months, as some have recommended, could weaken the immune system over time and adversely affect the body’s ability to ward off sickness.
“[Boosters] can be done once, or maybe twice, but it’s not something that we can think should be repeated constantly,” Marco Cavaleri, the EMA head of biological health threats and vaccines strategy, said. “We need to think about how we can transition from the current pandemic setting to a more endemic setting.”
Meanwhile, Pfizer is planning to release a new vaccine to target omicron. The United Kingdom Health Security Agency found that Moderna and Pfizer vaccinations were only 10% effective at preventing omicron after the second dose. Yet, countries like Israel have already begun administering a fourth shot to healthcare workers and people over 60. It started with a two-dose vaccine, then a booster. When does it end?
Europe’s regulatory body known as the European Medicines Agency (EMA) held a press briefing on Tuesday, January 11 for updates on the COVID-19 pandemic. Marco Cavaleri, the EMA head of biological health threats and vaccine strategy, raised significant concerns about the present mass vaccination program implemented across the European continent. Acknowledging the highly contagious nature of the Omicron variant, the regulatory official expressed that the level of severity appears milder than the Delta variant yet emphasized the importance of further data collection for a true understanding of the unfolding Omicron epidemiological impact. Cavaleri explained that based on recent studies, vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease becomes significantly reduced, waning over time, and this means more fully vaccinated people in Europe become susceptible to breakthrough infections caused by either Delta or Omicron. However, the EMA official noted that with a booster, vaccine effectiveness shoots back up. Significant risks to human health manifest, however, based on the premise of a public health response driven by continuous COVID-19 vaccination booster jabs. Cavaleri cautions that repeated booster jabs may adversely impact the human immune system. The regulator’s comments effectively challenge the current paradigm of the COVID-19 response. Is it time now to transition to an endemic-based COVID-19 response regimen?
Health agencies in Israel have initiated a fourth COVID-19 booster for higher risk demographic cohorts (e.g. over the age of 60), and Turkey, as well as Holland, are contemplating a fifth booster jab. What are the implications for such a public health strategy? This could potentially be dangerous, negatively impacting the immune system, suggests EMA’s Cavaleri.
A pharmacologist by training, Cavaleri spent several years in pharma research and development (R&D) with a specialization in antibacterial and antifungal programs spanning preclinical to clinical development. By 2005 he joined EMA as a Scientific Administrator, progressively advancing in the regulatory organization.
Cavaleri’s message implies the need for an urgent dialogue on the present mass vaccination program. While TrialSite has continuously challenged the underlying premise that vaccines can eradicate a consciously evolving pathogen such as a coronavirus, greater concern centers on mounting risks associated with continuous COVID-19 boosters. Cavaleri shares the same concern during this press conference, emphasizing the need now to transition from pandemic to endemic stage of the COVID-19 pandemic.Subscribe to the Trialsitenews “COVID-19” ChannelNo spam – we promise
Danger of Over-Vaccination
Openly critiquing what in the United States is considered gospel by health officials, Cavaleri went on the record about the potential harm of ongoing COVID-19 boosters declaring they “can be done once, or maybe twice, but it’s not something that we can think should be repeated constantly.”
Pandemic to Endemic?
Openly questioning the current public health trajectory in Europe, the official continued, “We need to think about how we can transition from the current pandemic setting to a more endemic setting.”
Cavaleri’s message should be seriously embraced, as COVID-19 booster shots administered every four to six months may very well threaten the human immune system leading to dangerous vulnerability, thereby possibly exacerbating the current health crisis, and creating what could become a dire situation.
TrialSite’s founder Daniel O’Connor shared, “thus far clinical trials haven’t been designed, funded, and conducted to evaluate the impact of ongoing booster programs on human safety. How do we know what the impact of multiple boosts could be on our health in the short, intermediate, and long term?”
O’Connor further emphasized that “this kind of ongoing, unfolding response with powerful novel technology without the appropriate data to better understand the health implications seems haphazard, even reckless.” The TrialSite founder suggested that the ongoing public health response to COVID-19 itself “seems to be one big, ongoing real-world research initiative.”
A growing number of medical and health experts introduce the need to soon transition to an endemic-centric response model (e.g., treat COVID-19 as a bad seasonal flu). However, many other experts such as the University of Illinois, Chicago infectious disease chief Dr. Richard Novak was quoted yesterday stating that we are still quite a way off from such a transition. Speaking with Chicago-area media Novak said, “No, we probably won’t be carrying vaccine cards forever, but eventually we will have a virus that is endemic and will cause mild illness and become sporadic.” According to Novak’s interview with ABC7, the milestone marking pandemic to endemic stage may be a few more years away, “depending on future variants.”
However, EMA’s Cavaleri indicates at least in Europe, the various national health agencies ought to start a dialogue, perhaps exploring how to integrate the COVID-19 vaccine into a seasonal influenza vaccine regimen.
The CDC and NIH refuse to recognize the important role that herd immunity could play in combating COVID. Yet, one thing that they failed to consider was herd immunity to fear. A recent poll conducted by Axios and Ipsos shows that 88% of Americans personally know someone who has contracted COVID. The poll conducted at the beginning of the month marks the highest percentage of respondents who said they personally knew someone who had the virus.
In March of 2020, the public perception of the virus was that anyone who contracted it would surely die a horrific death. The since-deleted videos of people dropping dead in the streets of China and countless images of people struggling to breathe on ventilators took over the media. People were sanitizing their groceries, changing their clothes at the door, and shunning their own family members.
The fear-mongering worked for a long time, and while some stubbornly hold onto those beliefs, a larger number of people are realizing that COVID is simply a virus. As I previously noted, a growing number of people are directly contracting COVID, surviving, and realizing, “Hey, that wasn’t so bad!” Perhaps the cognitive dissonance will begin to pass; the masses need to become outraged to resist the authoritarian restrictions that have reshaped the global society.
Scientists at John Hopkins have said that it would take an infection rate of around 70% to achieve herd immunity. The video was filmed in September 2020, prior to vaccines becoming available and the illusion of vaccines being safe and effective shattering. Fact: the vaccine does not prevent infection. These mRNA vaccines for COVID cannot be compared to a vaccine for an illness such as polio, where eradication is actually possible. The professor in this video admits that the virus will NEVER be eradicated, and that is information the science community has always known. Nearly one in ten people now know someone who has had COVID, and under this pretense, we should have achieved herd immunity by now. COVID is here to stay, and we need to learn how to live with the virus instead of halting our former way of life indefinitely.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 10, 2022 | Sundance | 285 Comments
Project Veritas has obtained military documents hidden on a classified system [HERE – and HERE – and HERE] showing how EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses.
The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violated the gain of function research moratorium. However, according to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S.
[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022] Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.
The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top-secret shared drive.
DARPA is an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications.
Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
The report states that EcoHealthAlliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the basis gain of function research moratorium.
According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S. (read more)
Here’s my answer to the question posed by James O’Keefe.
In the original pdf guidance for the 2014 research pause of into weaponization of SARS viruses there was an important footnote [LINK]:
[FN¹ SOURCE – U.S. Government Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process and Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses – pdf, page 2 – October 17, 2014]
♦ October 17, 2014 – U.S. funding of SARS to create a biological weapon was paused due to the extreme risk of a pandemic. However, the pause allowed agencies within the U.S. government to continue funding if they determined “the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.” [LINK]
♦ 2014 through 2020 the Pentagon continued funding research in Wuhan, China. Fear of discovery would explain why many top officials in the U.S. Defense Department were against the Trump administration [with increased severity after the COVID pandemic began]. [LINK]
♦ May 2016 – [An Election Year] – “after thorough deliberation and extensive input from domestic and international stakeholders, the NSABB [National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] issued its recommendations. NSABB’s central finding was that studies that are expected to enhance Potential Pandemic Pathogen (PPP) have potential benefits to public health but also entail significant risks. NSABB recommended that such studies warranted additional scrutiny prior to being funded.” Anthony Fauci is on the NSABB.
♦ January 9, 2017 – [Four Days after the Susan Rice Oval Office meeting with Obama, Biden, Comey, et al] – The Obama Administration re-authorizes funding for the creation of SARS biological weapons. “Adoption of these recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen’s virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).“ [LINK]
Given the workarounds, exceptions and plausible deniability for the consequences, built into the original moratorium guidance in 2014, the defense department was operationally permitted to keep funding the biological weapons research in Wuhan, China. The 2014 ban was a funding moratorium in name only; however, it appears the funding for U.S. research in North Carolina was stopped.
What was reauthorized in 2017, just before President Trump took office, was the need to use “national security” as an excuse to continue the research. It also appears funding of SARS as a biological weapon inside the U.S. (North Carolina) was now permitted again.
If you accept that the Pentagon would never spend to develop a biological weapon in China (Wuhan Lab) unless they already had developed that weapon on their own (North Carolina Lab), then the question about the release of that weapon starts to take shape.
Remember, the State Department was looking into the origin until Joe Biden shut them down and redirected the goal to the Intelligence Community. In essence, Biden handed the mission to the Fourth Branch of Government. Not surprisingly, after a few months the IC said their results were “inconclusive.”
♦ [Excerpt] – […] In one State Department meeting, officials seeking to demand transparency from the Chinese government say they were explicitly told by colleagues not to explore the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s gain-of-function research, because it would bring unwelcome attention to U.S. government funding of it.
In an internal memo obtained by Vanity Fair, Thomas DiNanno, former acting assistant secretary of the State Department’s Bureau of Arms Control, Verification, and Compliance, wrote that staff from two bureaus, his own and the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, “warned” leaders within his bureau “not to pursue an investigation into the origin of COVID-19” because it would “‘open a can of worms’ if it continued.”
[…] In late March, former Centers for Disease Control director Robert Redfield received death threats from fellow scientists after telling CNN that he believed COVID-19 had originated in a lab. “I was threatened and ostracized because I proposed another hypothesis,” Redfield told Vanity Fair. “I expected it from politicians. I didn’t expect it from science.” (read more)
♦ Washington (CNN) – “President Joe Biden’s team shut down a closely-held State Department effort launched late in the Trump administration to prove the coronavirus originated in a Chinese lab over concerns about the quality of its work, according to three sources familiar with the decision.
The existence of the State Department inquiry and its termination this spring by the Biden administration — neither of which has been previously reported — comes to light amid renewed interest in whether the virus could have leaked out of a Wuhan lab with links to the Chinese military. The Biden administration is also facing scrutiny of its own efforts to determine if the Chinese government was responsible for the virus.
♦ “On Wednesday, Biden issued a statement that he has directed the US intelligence community to redouble its efforts in investigating the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic and report back to him in 90 days.” (LINK)
♦ [WASHINGTON DC] – The intelligence community failed to conclusively identify the origin of the coronavirus following a 90-day investigation ordered by President Biden, but experts are divided on why.
A report by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) found that officials were unable to rule whether the virus escaped from a lab or spread to humans through an infected animal. But the ultimate conclusion reached by the $85 billion-a-year community was that it would be unable to pinpoint the origin of the virus if China didn’t fully cooperate. (LINK)
If you have followed how the U.S. Intelligence Community operates, you can see a pretty clear picture emerge of a strong likelihood surrounding what took place.
The U.S. Defense Dept developed SARS-CoV-2 in North Carolina. The 4th Branch (Intelligence Community) wanted to use it. The Pentagon restarts funding for development of SARS-CoV-2 in partnership with Wuhan, China – setting up the cover story. The 4th Branch (Intelligence Community) then uses the virus by releasing it in/around Wuhan. Everything after that is simply part of the 4th Branch covering their tracks. Wuhan, China becomes the patsy.
The IC release of COVID-19 would have two transparent motives for the 4th Branch: (1) Get rid of Trump via mail-in ballots, and intelligence assistance toward the 2020 election result; and (2) Expand their influence and control operations as the most powerful force in U.S. government.
One of the central players, who likely knows the details behind who exactly executed the release, is former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has been blaming the Chinese almost exclusively. [Methinks he doth protest too much.] Pompeo is the ultimate weapon of the deep swamp.
Former DNI John Ratcliffe is also a staunch figure pointing at Wuhan, China. Keep in mind DNI Ratcliffe was the recipient of the 4th Branch Intelligence Community products that pointed to Wuhan, China, though Ratcliffe had no involvement.
If it sounds like this thesis is too far ‘out there‘, then you may not fully understand how the Fourth Branch of Government operates…..
…… Also, there were trillions at stake. He could not be allowed to win.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 10, 2022 | Sundance | 598 Comments
This issue has always been at the heart of the internal data that was never turned over for review. For two years, people have wanted to know the distinction and general health position of the people who were categorized as dying from COVID. What was their previous health status?
For reasons that can only be reconciled by admitting it was purposeful to their objectives, the CDC never released any information showing the background health status of those who were categorized as dying from COVID. However, recently the CDC said they were going to assemble those various subsets of key data for the public.
On January 7th, only being discussed today, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky made the admission, on a CBS morning broadcast, that 75% of those who are classified as dying from COVID had at least four underlying pre-conditions: “Over 75 percent had at least four comorbidities, so really these are people who were unwell to begin with.”… WATCH:
Meanwhile, this same institution is pushing another set of booster jabs upon healthy people with no preconditions. Madness!
Obviously, all of these recent admissions are because the politics of COVID has become a liability to the same people who were exploiting it. The reality of COVID is now harder to hide… the narrative must adapt accordingly.
The Socer/Football player Othman Coulibaly suffered a heart attack during the Al Wakra Club match against Al Rayyan. , per statement of the football club. The number of athletes having heart attacks is now well beyond 300 with about one-third dying. I have warned that once politicians got involved, they will NEVER admit a mistake and they are far too deep in this crisis and nobody cares. Mandating vaccines for young healthy athletes is outrageous. Qatar is due to host the World Cup later this year. These mandates may c create a sports crisis by that time.
If you listen carefully, Health Secretary Sajid Javid of the NHS in the UK shows that he is not willing to listen to real doctors. He has made up[ his mind claiming to take advice from vaccine experts who are the very people lobbying for the drug companies. But behind the facade is the fact that this is all being used for control. If 1 to 2% of the population die from vaccines, that is acceptable provided the governments get to control the population and restrict the freedom of speech and movement.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 8, 2022 | Sundance | 156 Comments
The U.K. government has passed a law forcing all doctors with direct patient contact to undergo vaccination or face removal from their NHS job on April 1st.
Approximately 90% of U.K. medical staff at King’s College in London have been vaccinated; however, a loss of ten percent of critical care providers could cause a problem. After spending the last two years treating COVID patients, Dr. Steve James confronted the British health authorities about the vaccine policy that increasingly makes no sense.
During his visit to King’s College Hospital in south London, for the first time U.K. Health Minister Sajid Javid -who has no medical experience- was confronted by Dr. James, who has natural immunity as a result of a prior recovery from COVID-19, who told Minister Javid the rules make no sense. WATCH:
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 8, 2022 | Sundance | 353 Comments
As the pharmaceutical companies make these statements, it does make you wonder what the impact is on all the people who trusted the vaccine officials implicitly and now face being told their vaccine status is no longer of value.
The CEO from Moderna is now openly telling everyone that booster shots wear off over time. As a result, the direct admission seems to be that a never-ending cycle of booster shots will be needed in order to remain vaccine compliant.
The longer-term consequences of this process to create artificial immunity are remarkably unquestioned by a seemingly incurious media.
(Via NBC) – Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel on Thursday said the efficacy of boosters against Covid-19 will likely decline over time, and people may need a fourth shot in the fall to increase their protection.
Bancel said people who received their boosters last fall will likely have enough protection to get them through the winter, when new infections surge as people gather indoors to escape the cold.
However, Bancel said the efficacy of boosters will probably decline over the course of several months, similar to what happened with the first two doses. The Moderna chief was interviewed by Goldman Sachs during the investment bank’s health-care CEO conference.
“I will be surprised when we get that data in the coming weeks that it’s holding nicely over time — I would expect that it’s not going to hold great,” Bancel said, referring to the strength of the booster shots. (read more)
It seems that once you get on the Rx Ronacoaster, you cannot get off until the ride’s over…. and the ride will never be over.
Additionally, it will be curious to see what the actual compliance rate is for these never-ending boosters. How many people will just keep showing up to vaccine clinics and keep dosing themselves with the product? Will people eventually start to ask questions, or just keep “boosting” themselves?