THE CHLOROQUINE AFFAIR – How Media Brainwashes & then Politicizes Their Audiences


Accordingly, given the settled science surrounding hydroxychloroquine, and the hysterical outbursts of CNN/MSDNC’s pundits maddened by the results of November 8, 2020, I end with the words of the president:  “Wait to see what happens.”

In a coordinated effort led by GOOGLE searches that return answers on board with Democrat narratives we see in the mainstream media that has gone into frantic hypermode denying first, and covering up second, the reports of the effectiveness of the malaria and Lupus drug PLAQUÉNIL, aka, hydroxychloroquine.

For COVID-19 treatments, the drug is to be used in conjunction with Z-Pac, Azithromycin, a short treatment antibiotic, along with Zinc.

In order to promote the MSM’s narratives (which happen to be  malevolent lies that may kill countless people), the Democrat-owned media deliberately omitted the reporting of not one, but many successful clinical trials, some randomized. You will read about these next!

We took YAHOO NEWS as an example of what the people see.

In coordination with the mainstream media’s multi-pronged attacks, YAHOO set up a number of straw man ploys.

Distractions, redirections, misleading assumptions, no recollection of history, all passed on as medical advice.

Whereas the drug cocktail was used in China and elsewhere with documented success, the media has not reported the fact. The deliberate omissions problem first arose when the president of the United States mentioned that the drug might work. We should understand he did not prescribe the drug, but reacted to all the medical field reports in existence. In coordination with RESIST, the Democrat-Socialist movement to obstruct any success the president might enjoy, including his astonishing, booming economy, the mainstream media refused to cover the truth of the story immediately after the president raised the issue. That is why the media and their politicians first denied the success of the economy, then tried to talk it down, and when that too failed, tried to take the credit for it.

What we have here is a coordinated knee-jerk media that immediately rose against even testing the drug to save human lives. They would refuse people life-saving treatment merely because the president recommended it. Not because collectively they, or their “witnesses,” aka, Democrat activists they trotted out, knew anything about its effectiveness.

Democrats (and GOOGLE searches) insist it is dangerous because it has not been tested. Actually, millions of people use it regularly across the world against malaria, which was once humanity’s biggest killer. It is one of the most tested drugs ever invented. Not only is it safe in the 600-2400mg dosages (12 pills for the heavy weight adult) as it is usually used, but it is very safe. Its side effects are mainly benign and mild. Yes, as reported in the literature, some get diarrhea and suicidal thoughts. However, people have reportedly had frequent bouts of diarrhea and even committed suicide simply by watching CNN and MSDNC. Second, the media collectively warned against the Z-Pac antibiotic, because used on heart patients it carries cardiovascular risk. Patients, the media insisted, can die from it.

But dying from COVID-19 never happens, and there’s absolutely no risk to blind pedestrians running across a highway either.

Meanwhile:

VIDEO: DR. MARC SIEGEL’S 96-YEAR OLD FATHER RECOVERED IN ONE DAY AFTER HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE TREATMENT BY HIS CARDIOLOGIST ALONG WITH Z-PAC.

This is what the president actually said and repeated many times – as reported by TIME: ““What do you have to lose? Take it,” Trump said in a White House briefing on April 4. “I really think they should take it. But it’s their choice. And it’s their doctor’s choice or the doctors in the hospital. But hydroxychloroquine. Try it, if you’d like.”

STAT reported on Trump at another event: “It may work, it may not work. I feel good about it. That’s all it is. Just a feeling.” At the same press conference, Anthony Fauci, a physician who heads the NIAID and a veteran of outbreaks going back to HIV, emphasized the need for a methodical clinical trial…”

Neither the Salk Vaccine nor Tetanus ever had double blind, randomized, controlled statistical studies: methodical clinical trial.

YAHOO NEWS:

“On Monday, Trump announced that his administration had ordered 29 million doses of the drug as a treatment option for the more than 387,000 Americans who have tested positive for the virus. His plan stems from a March 20 study out of the U.K., which found positive effects among COVID-19 patients who took a combination of hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin.

Although the study garnered international attention, many have since criticized the small sample size (26 people) and the fact that it was non-controlled (the patients were all at different hospitals). In the absence of more evidence, however….”

Indeed, the absence of more evidence is hardly a problem with  the mainstream media that spits out opinion, not evidence, to support their medical advice:

VOX: “The evidence for hydroxychloroquine is flimsy…”

ABC: “What do you have to lose?” “Your life.”

NBC Today Show: “What do you have to lose? “Potentially your life.”

CNN Don Lemon: “It has serious side effects.”

CNN Dana Bash: ” He (Trump) continued today to push hydroxychloroquine in a way that is baffling to medical professionals.”

MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinsky, marinated in Trump-derangement after her botched facelift she denied she had, said: “You wrote in the Washington Post the one word why Donald Trump should not be president. What is it?” Gene Robinson, long-time Obama and Hillary activist writer for the Washington Post, aswered: “Hydroxychloroquine.”

A non-partisan observer might assume that these talking heads actually know something thousands of doctors who’ve been using this drug on patients do not. What we have here are partisan talking points that substitute for medical advice.

The media reported extensively that people died using hydroxychloroquine.

They reported that a Republican wife took the president’s advice and poisoned her husband with it.

The problem with this narrative distributed by the DNC with which the progressive news brainwashes its audiences are twofold: 1. the woman was not a Republican, but a frequent Democrat donor and a Hillary supporter; 2. she poisoned her husband with fish tank cleaner containing chloroquine and other substances meant for fish, not Plaquéil, a substance with a different chemical composition meant for human consumption.

GQ even went far enough to accuse Trump of having invested into companies making Hydroxychloroquine, a charge later parroted by one reporter at a White House news conference. And denied by Trump. In fact the drug is a generic, it’s formula is publicly available, and it hardly makes money for any company.

So much so, that the Israeli pharma TEVA shipped 6 million doses to the United States gratis.

For progressives who have little education in Latin or science, gratis means “free of charge.”

In other words, the media found it expedient and politically worthy to indict the president for the astonishing, mind-numbing collective stupidity, of Democrats.

MEANWHILE we have oodles of science supporting the two-three drug cocktail not marinated in leftwing ideology:

a. The French Study

b. The Monsey Report
c. The Chinese Reports

d. Poll of 6000 Doctors recommending Plaquénil (hydroxychloroquine.)

e. Second French Study

f. SCIENCE DIRECT: Peer Review of Controlled Studies

g. South Korean Study

f. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS letter thanking President Trump for his leadership with hydroxychloroquine.

I won’t list the rest. There are dozens more you won’t find at GOOGLE, a Democrat Operation that will redirect you to articles that prove hydroxychloroquine works only on fish. Or Nancy Pelosi’s pantry. .

Never mind that randomized double-blind tests concerning microbes makes no sense.

They do make sense in myocardial infraction studies. You see, the test for COVID-19 is rather simple.

Administer the treatment. Afterward test for microbes.

If there are microbes, the drug failed.

If there’s an absence of microbes (and a folder with this morning’s DNC talking points directives), the drug cured.

Simple as that.

Accordingly, given the settled science surrounding hydroxychloroquine, and the hysterical outbursts of CNN/MSDNC’s pundits maddened by the results of November 8, 2020, I end with the words of the president:

“Wait to see what happens.”

The Gates Family, Eugenics and COVID-19


Bill Gates, through a variety of philanthropist projects, has been positioned as a likeable, mild-mannered public figure, who expresses repeatedly his ambition to improve the health of the world through new vaccine development and technological innovation.

Closer investigation reveals both the Gates family and their foundation have documented ties to reinvented eugenics movements of the modern age, and the work carried out by this organisation shows an array of ulterior motives that are contrary to saving lives.

What is the true story behind Bill Gates and his family? Should we trust his COVID-19 advice?

Shining the light on the Gates family. Photo: UN

In the following, Ethan Nash examines links between COVID-19 ‘solutions’ and social eugenics movements, including Bill Gates Snr and Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation and philanthropy deceptions, vested vaccine interests and engineering a pandemic.

THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT

In the late 19th century — a critical time in development of the sciences — British scholar Sir Francis Galton, in his book Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development, coined the term ‘eugenics’.

Galton, whose cousin was Charles Darwin, hoped to ‘better humankind’ through the ‘science of improving the human species’ by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits.

Decades of research on ‘controlled breeding’, including through means of sterilization, soon became accepted mainstream science at the turn of the century and the eugenics movement was born.

Supporters of eugenics believe people inherit mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions can be ‘bred out’ of the human gene pool through forced sterilization. Not surprisingly, ‘undesirable’ traits were concentrated in poor, uneducated and minority populations.

Many professionals in the scientific and biological fields rigorously researched ways to ‘improve the human race’ through means of eliminating these ‘negative traits’, and the movement would soon garner widespread political support — particularly in Australia.

As we have explored, the likes of Professor Richard Berry and growing Eugenics Societies of NSW and Victoriaplayed a pivotal role in mass campaigns for laws allowing the establishment of a ”lethal chamber” to euthanise what these groups called ”the grosser types of our mental defectives”.

Following World War I, numerous eugenics-based ideologies were beginning to enter mainstream societies across the world. However, after Hitler would adopt these concepts and implement an aggressive form of the concept, the world grew sour and a new change was needed to continue.

CULTURAL MARXISM

The concepts of eugenics were not exorcised from Western thinking following World War II, rather, they went underground or and were reinvented by assuming more “compassionate” guises.

Julian Huxley’s significant contributions to the movement ensured that the underlying notions associated with eugenics would transform and continue into new social movements.

During the 1950s, these groups would re-define eugenics as ‘socially progressive’, with linkages to the newly formed and comprehensive welfare states that offered ‘solutions’ to poverty and disease.

The Rockefeller Foundation heavily financed the modern eugenics movement and think-tanks such as the Tavistock Institute would give birth to many influential individuals and ‘social’ organisations.

Huxley adeptly associated the ‘new and modern’ eugenics movement with a range of reformist ideologies, such as the popularisation of birth control, the decriminalisation of homosexuality and abortion law reform. He described this process as “eugenic modernisation”.

The basic premise remained the same, however: it is far easier to eliminate the poor and the suffering, than it is to eliminate the complex and tenacious sources of their poverty or their suffering.

These people believe the masses are too moronic to govern themselves.

A plethora of new-age organisations and movements would arise during the era of ‘counter-culture’, and this ‘progression’ continued, the now-notorious Gates family would soon enter the picture.

BILL GATES SNR AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD

Photo: WUM

The key to understanding Bill Gates’ exposure to eugenic concepts is to trace his family past.

Bill Gates’ father, William H. Gates, Sr.was a prominent banker and a lawyer in Preston Gates & Ellis. He also presided over many bar associations, organisation boards and started the Technology Alliance — a regional push to expand technology-based jobs throughout the 20th century.

Importantly, Gates Sr. served on the board of Planned Parenthood (PP) during the group’s infancy — a re-branded organisation birthed out of the American Eugenics Society.

The company spread from beginnings in Cold Spring Harbor genetics and virology labs on Long Island and Berlin, to today become one of the largest organisations in the US. Rockefeller-Bayar Co., BASF and Hoechst petrochemical-pharmaceutical consortium were all initial funders of the group.

Make no mistake: Planned Parenthood was built on population control schemes — allied with the same groups who wanted genetic hierarchy laws to ‘preserve’ humanity and who sought to ‘beautify’ countries by stopping the “unfit” from reproducing.

In their 2014 Annual Report, the pro-abortion and anti-family group reported seeing over 2.5 million patients in over 4 million clinical visits, including 324,000 abortions. The group claims to be a proponent of ‘free choice’, yet it is a eugenics front organisation in disguise.

Planned Parent has recently gone through their second executive in just eight months, after sacking President Leana Wen for daring to suggest the group should focus more on women’s health.

Does this sound like a group that dedicated to improving society? This one showdown revealed a genuine rift in the organization and a simple truth: promoting ‘women’s health’ was always a cover.

Bill Gates proudly speaks on his father’s involvement on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders”.

Gates’ father would take the concepts learned at Planned Parenthood and incorporate them into building the foundational blueprint for a new era of philanthropy activities that remain to this day.

THE GATES FOUNDATION

William Gates Snr. would continue his eugenicist efforts by becoming instrumental in the formation of a new philanthropic brainchild called the William H. Gates Foundation in 1994.

The group, like Planned Parenthood, would first focus on ‘improving’ reproductive and child health in the developing world. After pioneering philanthropist activities, the company merged with the new Gates Learning Foundation to create the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000.

The methodologies have evolved leaps-and-bounds since the early formation of the movement, however the objective remains the same. This time, the new multifaceted approach would see the philanthropist group partner with powerful United Nations organizations like the World Health Organisation (WHO) and UNICEF.

Today, the group is focused on many areas that drive continued work across the world. These activities have given birth to new forms of technological, eugenic endeavours.

The organisation is simply continuing the Gates family legacy of trying to dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine and now agriculture.

In 2010, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto valued at more than $23 million. This is when it became abundantly clear that the so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than ‘eradicating’ disease and feeding the world’s poor.

The evidence that GMOs cause disease has been piling up for decades, as the list of countries banning their import and cultivation grows. Bill openly promotes GMOs as the ‘answer’ to world hunger, but many think this is in exactly the same vein as when the British Army handed small pox-infested blankets out to desperate American Indians during the French and Indian War.

Melinda Gates has also made ‘women’s issues’ one of the top priorities for their philanthropic work. This includes the decision to elevate contraception-promotion and population control as “arguably the single-most important part of her work”. She has been openly criticised for these moves.

In 2017, the Gates Foundation pledged another $375 million for ‘family planning’, with the goal of providing contraception to 120 million women across the world, particularly in developing countries.

This emphasis on blanketing developing countries with artificial contraception for which women aren’t asking for reeks of social engineering and paternalistic eugenicist thinking.

The fact that couples in developing countries often desire and value large families means nothing to many Western elitist philanthropists: the not-so-subliminal underlying presumption is that women who desire large families simply don’t know what’s good for them. As such, they need to be educated and ‘encouraged’ with large-scale, foreign-funded advertising companies and coercion.

Now that we have explored the history of the Gates family, influences and aims of philanthropist philosophies and modern eugenics programs across the world, let’s explore the relatable picture.

BILL GATES AND VACCINES

Bill Gates needs no introduction. He is one of the most influential Polyergus of all time. For 25 years, he has controlled what has grown to become a multibillion-dollar colossus, Microsoft, and made himself one of the richest men in the world. The tech world was largely born through Gates.

He accomplished this feat not by inventing new technology, but by taking existing technology, adapting it to a ‘specific market’, and then dominating that market.

In recent years, Gates has turned a good deal of his attention towards philanthropy by creating the largest private foundation in the world, with over $46 billion in assets. He has secured billions of dollars in contributions from other wealthy benefactors such as Warren Buffett, and is primarily dedicated to ‘enhancing healthcare’ and ‘alleviating poverty’ across the world.

Bill Gates is heavily involved in development of new vaccines, as well as ‘forecasting’ international health challenges of tomorrow (such as preparing for epidemics), and works beyond the scope of national oversight and accountability in most cases.

He has spent years involved in the vaccine-manufacturing process, including quality control and clinical evaluation. This understanding has allowed Gates to ‘advise’ vaccine development programs and fund research into new areas of innovation for multiple disease programs:

Source: B&MGF

Gates invests in expertise and platform technologies that help us make vaccines faster, ‘better’ and cheaper, in addition to also investing in numerous education and training programs to ensure that knowledge around vaccines is created, shared and retained. Some examples of this include:

  • Adaptive trial designs.
  • Streamlining the schedule and dosing of vaccines.
  • Novel delivery formats for vaccines.
  • Modular, automated manufacturing platforms enabling small-batch vaccine production.

The billionaire was an early investing partner in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), which has now grown a substantial portfolio of public-private international health partnerships that are committed to increasing access to immunisation.

Today, GAVI has grown significantly. The group brings together developing country and donor governments (including Australia), the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank, the vaccine industry, research and technical agencies, civil society and other private philanthropists.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated $1.56 billion to the alliance’s 2016-2020 strategic period as of March 2019, and continues to advise the group on key business decisions.

Gates heavy involvement in the vaccine industry, in addition to continuing the eugenicists visions of the ‘social’ reformation, was fundamental in framing his positive public perception on the matter.

Considered a ‘hero’ in the fight to develop new technologies against growing diseases, the stage had now been set for Gates to become the new ‘go to’ voice if a pandemic was to ever break out.

COVID-19: A PLAN-DEMIC?

‘PREDICTING’ AN OUTBREAK

The Microsoft co-founder has hinted on multiple occasions over the past decade that the potential for something like the coronavirus that would soon arise and the world must be ‘ready’.

In 2015, Bill Gates gave a TED Talk titled, The next outbreak? We’re not ready, which is being shared widely online in recent weeks given the impact of COVID-19 across the world.

The part of the talk that’s making rounds online shows Gates explaining that while the greatest threat to humanity when he was growing up was nuclear war, the greatest threat now is a virus:

“If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”

However, as we have explored, there is no fundamental evidence to suggest a threat from the CoronaHoax, which has been invented as a means to usher in further mechanisms of control.

Rather, through these ‘cryptic’ messages, Gates was positioning himself in a positive light to connect with the public psyche. If something was to happen, ‘Gates would know the solution!’, they will cry.

Did Gates know something we didn’t know in advance? Emerging evidence suggest this ‘pandemic’ was foretold by the billionaire, which now serves as the mechanism to further carry out the agenda.

EVENT 201

On October 18, 2019, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, which is described on the group’s website as “a high-level pandemic exercise” carried out in New York.

The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be ‘necessary’ during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences:

“Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global — a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences.

A severe pandemic, which becomes ‘Event 201’, would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.”

The group claims they did not ‘predict’ the coronavirus, despite modelling their pandemic under the same name. However, when examining their documents, striking similarities begin to emerge:

“Event 201 simulated an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen was modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year.

Let’s think: The ‘real’ coronavirus started over a bat in a meat market, transmitted to humans and shows mild symptoms. The vaccine is also 12-18 months away from being developed.

Furthermore, the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation funded a research center in England called the Pirbright Institute, which specialises in the study of viruses that affect farm animals, and viruses which transfer from animals to people. They own a very similar patent for a type of coronavirus affecting animals.

The world fell for the deception, hook line and sinker. Now, nations are crying out for a ‘solution’ to the growing COVID-19 ‘crisis’ and Bill Gates (not surprisingly) has emerged at the head of the pack.

GATES TO THE RESCUE

Bill Gates is now the talk of the town, and in a recent interview, he told The Daily Show that his foundation was funding the construction of factories for seven coronavirus vaccine ‘candidates’.

He says the foundation would end up picking only one or two of the seven, meaning billions of dollars spent on manufacturing would be abandoned. However, spending a few billion to capitalise on the growing $35 billion vaccine market seems like a calculated investment.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has already committed $100 million to fighting coronavirus, as part of its broader efforts in international health. The group is also reportedly exploring the idea of supplying at-home testing kits for the coronavirus.

It also launched a $125 million COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator and gave $5 million to help public health agencies in the Seattle area ‘enhance their capacity’ to detect the virus.

So, a man who has profited largely off vaccine development for years and also held ‘simulations’ of pandemic outbreaks is now cashing in on the chase to develop a COVID-19 vaccine? How fitting.

Gates ultimate influence in this unfolding plan can be found in the instructions given in recent weeks.

THE ‘ONLY WAY OUT’

Bill Gates now has a net worth of $97.8 billion. Yet, being the ‘relatable’ person that he is, took to reddit for an Ask Me Anything on the COVID-19 pandemic. He would share his thoughts on ‘how best to deal’ with the outbreak and explored possible long-term effects on the world.

Gates said that broad vaccination for COVID-19 will need to become available “before you can be completely safe”. Until then, according to his claims, there’s a risk that communities could rebound unless they continue to practice strict social distancing and quarantines to see case numbers level off.

Gates said he doesn’t think large gatherings will be able to resume until widespread vaccination has taken place, as the ‘risks would outweigh the benefits’ of such events:

World leaders also agree with Gates’ timeline and perspectives. Shortly after doing the media rounds, the Australian government hinted at the fact society will be in lockdown until a vaccine is developed. This was soon followed by the New South Wales government and others.

Furthermore, Gates called for a national tracking system similar to South Korea, saying that “in Seattle, the University of Washington is providing thousands of tests per day, but no one is connected to a national tracking system”. He said that whenever there is a positive test, it should be used to understand where the disease is and whether we need to strengthen the social distancing.

In the future, he has floated the idea of ‘vaccine certificates’ to show proof-of-vaccination following the widespread rollout of COVID-19 products. This would be a new requirement for international and domestic travel, and is tipped to further expand to all facets of life.

Given the context detailed in this feature piece, do you trust the intentions of this man?

Gates has a rich history of eugenics influence and partakes in activities across the world that further progress the aims of the original movement, albeit in disguise.

Such is the story of the Dehumanization of Humanity. The ‘death of god’ lead to parasites believing they were gods, and this premise serves as the underlying force driving the transhumanist era.

Using objectivist logic, we must all exercise the precautionary principle when approaching Gates’ claims to ‘improve’ health through vaccines.

If a COVID-19 vaccine uses strains of an actual virus, as many do, in order to encourage the body to build immunization, subjects who receive the vaccine will be carriers of that virus.

Bill Gates, and the forces that drive this puppet, are pushing the world towards a choice: Take the COVID-19 vaccine and deal with the health consequences, or refuse and be denied basic services and after being labelled as a ‘health threat’. Take the jab or be targeted.

I know where I stand.

Will you be lining up to receive the newly developed Gates-funded vaccine?

Stay tuned for more.

The End of Democracy?


COMMENT #1 [From Germany]: Dear Mr. Armstrong,

I owe you an apology. For a long time I was of the opinion that the measures (lockdown, social distancing, flattening the curve) were fully justified. I had also clearly expressed this in my e-mails to you. I must admit that I was wrong. I am a learning being and was subject to confirmation bias. I only looked for the information that confirmed my previous opinion. Now I see things differently. There is a fear porn going on here. It is paranoia time, it is coronoia time. The press, the media is justifying any interference with our fundamental rights. The rule of law as we knew it in Germany is dead. I live in a fascist police state. An example: The Heidelberg lawyer Beate Bahner (specialist in medical law) has filed an urgent application for a constitutional complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court. The result: police investigations were initiated against Ms Bahner, her website was no longer accessible. Of course, the constitutional complaint was not accepted either. Ms Bahner has therefore returned her admission to the bar.

Enclosed her e-mail to all mass media in Germany (in German)

With sad greetings

TM

Sachsen droht Quarantäne-Verweigerern mit Psychiatrie

 

COMMENT #2 [From Germany]: Dear Marty,

it gets worse and worse

Saxony threatens quarantine objectors with psychiatry

Admission to a mental institution (in a state governed by the rule of law) may only be made on the basis of a court order, which in turn may only be made on the basis of appropriate psychiatric reports. Now the politicians want to put citizens into psychiatric institutions without any legal decision.

It should be noted that inmates of a closed psychiatric institution are exposed without any rights to any “treatment” with psychotropic drugs or other treatments. It is the sole decision of the institution’s management. General visiting rights etc. do not exist either and depend entirely on the arbitrariness of the institution, as does dismissal.

To put it somewhat casually: a pet has more formal rights in Germany than a human being.

Shocked and disgusted

T

REPLY: While everyone seems distracted on blaming China for creating this virus, even if they manufactured it and sent infected people on planes, that still does not answer WHY have Western governments so eagerly sought to use this virus as the excuse to transform Democracy into Authoritarianism. The European Commission is not elected anyhow, so the EU removed any accountability to the people for their leadership no different than China. Everywhere we look, civil liberties are being suspended in Europe. This is precisely in line with our model which forecast 2020 as the year for a European Revolution.

According to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, life in Canada will only return to normal after the development of a vaccine. The same is emerging in Germany. According to Chancellor Angela Merkel, the coronavirus will remain a threat until a vaccine is found and the population is immunized. “That means nothing more than living with the virus. It has not disappeared. Even if one day fewer people are infected,” said Merkel.

We are already seeing the narrative emerge that we should remain locked down until Gates comes up with his vaccine which curiously won’t be ready until AFTER the US Elections. The two characters that they have sought to overturn ar Trump and Borris Johnson. They both stand in the way of socialism. This is NOT normal. This virus is by no means that lethal to just overthrowing democracy. There is another motive that goes beyond Gates and China. This is the political forces seeking to hold on to power. Perhaps they have looked at Socrates and saw the Monetary Crisis Cycle coming and this was a preemptive strike to try to prevent the collapse of Europe and socialism. That may be the single greatest motive behind jumping on the bandwagon with Gates.

There is clearly social inequality unfolding because those who have jobs that require some level of manual labor to face to face contact from waitresses, cooks, dancers, and physical massage are all out of a job and cannot work from home. Those with higher-end white-collar jobs can at least work from home if the sales keep coming in. When they stop, so will their income. So what is the end goal here? Is it to hurt those who cannot work from home to become subservient upon the state where they state no longer borrows money – it just creates it?

What about the outstanding debt? Do they simply default as did Russia or China following their revolutions? If this is an attempt to reset the world monetary system intermixed with war to justify ending debt, pensions, and to subjugate everyone as in a communistic state, then the entire debt markets become the greatest risk. Will there be at least a managed economy with private ownership as in China, or are we looking at deliberate bankruptcy of enterprises to justify their nationalization as Peter Altmaier, the German Federal Minister of Economic Affairs, was joined by the left-wing Martin Schulz politician and Leader of the Social Democratic Party (Socialist) in a joint statement on March 13th, 2020 that effectively said that since they cannot bail out companies, perhaps they would just NATIONIZE them. Altmaier when asked bout his nationalization comments, he replied“I do not see such a need at the moment.” He did not rule it out. Germany had already ruled that it was perfectly fine to nationalize private property to achieve social equality in Berlin.

What is the end goal? Managed Authoritarian-Socialism or just outright Tyranny? We are entering an age that once again will be the stuff that tries our souls. Governments have completely forgotten that they were supposed to be our representatives, not our lords and masters. Our public forum, where we elected our representatives to enact our laws, has crumbled to dust in a matter of just 8.6 weeks. The public edifices that were founded for eternity as the symbol of our liberty and freedom from oppression, lie prostrate, naked, and broken, like the limbs of a fallen giant. This stupendous postwar rebirth of civilization appears to be a mere relic of former glory which has been unable to withstand the injuries of corruption over time and fortune.

 

China v Gates – Spinning the Conspiracies


There are two schools of thought running around. One blames China for experimenting with Bat Viruses and insist that this was not intentional, but a leak from the Wuhan Lab because of a lack of security. There are some who want to file lawsuits against China in the USA, Britain, and India for damages. Xi complimented the Gates Foundation’s early efforts in the global cause of fighting against the virus and said he was grateful for a letter from Gates expressing support for the Chinese people. But does all of this really provide any proof to allegations, or are we dealing with speculation?

The arguments to blame China because they have a biological weapons program only leads to war. The USA has similar labs but the security is better known as the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA). ABC News reported that there was a Pentagon report from November 2019 claiming there would be a pandemic, but the Pentagon has responded there is no such report. This begs the question, will China publish a list of all visitors to the Wuhan Lab?

As I have said, if this was a biological weapon it was a dud since the kill ratio is 10% of that of the normal annual flu. That does not rule out that this was still a human-created virus for experimentations that just leaked out. There has been too much research published by Chinese scientists on experimenting with coronaviruses from bats to make this a deliberate attack by China. If it was an intended biological weapon, you do not publish reports on such experiments since 2010. An incompetent leak remains far more probable and that would even explain why the government would try to cover-up such a mistake. That is more plausible for if it was a deliberate attack, then you di not publish the research years in advance.

For this conspiracy to presume that China knew it would undermine the Western economies is virtually assuming they also have clairvoyance. It also does not account for the exaggerated manner in which the virus has been used to destroy Western economies. You would then have to make up a conspiracy theory that Gates was in bed with China. That does not seem likely. Could China have anticipated how crazy the West has responded that threatens to crash the economy faster than the Great Depression from which there will be no recovery for at least 3 years? Sometimes there is no complete plot, just reaction followed by counter-reaction.

There may have been a leak from China which was a mistake, but it has been a deliberate seizure of this virus to further agendas by both the Gates Foundation and politics. When Hydroxychloroquine has been used with 100% success in France, we had Gates and Fauci saying no – we need a vaccine. That was clearly the Gates agenda so were people supposed to die because Fauci claimed he wanted a long-term study?

I know for an absolute fact that some elites knew in January about this virus and sold all stocks and bonds during January. That does not fit the pure scenario. Was there advance knowledge and was there a deliberate use of this crisis to remove civil liberties ahead of a pending economic collapse due to negative interest rates and the inability of Europe to recover?  ECB would have no options to help Italy. It requires authoritarianism to suspect all the austerity provisions. Australia was in a similar situation and has also overreacted. In Australia, this has led to people raiding their retirement funds to survive. This virus has even been used as an excuse to stop shipments of gold from South Africa. Even New Zealand has crushed its economy in the name of this virus. In Britain, they began the UK’s weekly nationwide applause for NHS workers which is a clever diversion from investigating the motives going on behind the curtain. In the USA, the Democrats blocked relief for small businesses that employ 70% of the workforce ensuring that business failures will rise exponentially. Nobody asks why? Meanwhile, panic buying of food in China has been reported. France is facing a massive wave of bankruptcies of small businesses because of this lockdown.

Meanwhile, locking people down will only prolong the curve, not flatten it. Testing in Chicago has revealed that between 30% and 50% of the population already have COVID-19 Antibodies. This confirms it is not as serious as it has been made out to be. So why is this being used to collapse the economy? Who stands to gain from this?

From the beginning, I have found that something was very strange about this event. The response was excessive and the man who made that recommendation at Imperial College is still quoted as some expert by the BBC in London and nobody dares to interrogate him and his links to the Gate’s Foundation. This response was absolutely uncalled for. The destruction to the economy and even to the food supply is far more dangerous than the virus and will seriously hurt many more people and the future. The cure has been far worse than the disease. While in Britain they are cheering they must support the NHS and in the USA the press is using it to overthrow Trump, while in Canada Trudeau has tried to use it to eliminate democracy, only by the summer will the full economic damage to people’s lives begin to turn to civil unrest as people realize this will NEVER get back to normal for years. Could China have anticipated all this insanity?

Many assume that the Chinese won’t co-operate with the international community about confirming the origins of patient ZERO because the CCP has attacked the US blaming it for the virus. This virus has weakened the West and we have China are beginning movements in the South China Sea and Russia testing US Air Space in Alaska.
By blaming China, we risk raising the tensions for war as is the case of China blaming the United States. With the economy turning down because of our own exaggerated response orchestrated by the Gates Foundation, China and Russia are given the incentive for war as the economy turns down. This creates a situation that is becoming more dangerous as there is a real push against China in some circles that still calls them Communist which does not reflect their economy. China is certainly preparing to be a leader on the world stage. Socrates shows that they will emerge as the financial capital of the world BECAUSE we are insanely pursuing socialism and this virus has tipped the scale to shift the economic power to China. The destruction of the US economy has been the WORST possible thing we could have ever done by shutting everything down for a virus that is far less deadly than the annual flu. Whenever the world goes into an economic collapse, that is when war takes place.
The question will come down to historians was this a deliberate attack, or was it a leak which was exacerbated by the corruption behind the curtain of the Gates Foundation controlling every aspect of world health and politicians eager to use it because socialism was collapsing? This certainly seems to be very convenient for many people, not just China.
We saw civil unrest rise sharply in 2019 especially in Europe as the economy has been turning down and 12 years of Quantitative Easing by the European Central Bank has devastated the economy. Our models are updated to the end of March 2020 and you can see we have exceeded the annual highs already back to 1997.

Bill Gates Has Been Controlling WHO


We have a major crisis on our hands. Bill Gates is a VERY SERIOUS threat to not just the world economy, but to world peace. He has been using a loophole that allows health organizations people THINK and independent are actually controlled by Gates. You will see that 80% of the funding of WHO is not from governments, but from donations. Then you see that Gates is the largest donor after countries. Behind the curtain, the WHO has been bullied and pushed around by Bill Gates.

Melinda Gates has been behind pushing digital currency and she has been addressing the G& on the claim that this will empower women. Just unbelievable sophistry that digital currency will be better and create more jobs? She is also ANTI-Trump.

I have explained that Jeffrey Epstein was NOT a Pedifile which is someone who is after children pre-puberty. I certainly would not have been able to visually distinguish between a girl who was 17 and one who is 18. So what is the point of seeking girls who are 16-17 and risk a criminal violation? To me, it has always smelled of a blackmail scheme. Get people involved who may or may not even know they are 17 v 18 and then use that as a bargaining chip for other things. Here Gates teamed up with Epstein, not once, but three times he went to his island. He was dealing with Epstein since 2011 and was looking at partnering with him where he would get a $30 million fee. So was Gates one of his targets? Or was Gates looking to use Epstein for a power-play against others?

Bill Gates didn’t write the operating system which made Microsoft known as DOS. Gary Kildall (1942-1994) wrote CP/M, an operating system that ran on early microcomputers based on 8-bits. IBM either couldn’t or wouldn’t make a deal with Kildall. Bill Gates bought what became MS DOS from Seattle Computer Products for $50,000 and licensed it to IBM. DOS was actually written by a 22-year old Tim Paterson (born June 1, 1956). How much of Kildall’s intellectual property he appropriated is a matter of some dispute. IBM later did make a deal with Kildall by some accounts after threatening to sue IBM because DOS infringed on his copyright. The early IBM PC was sold with both CP/M and DOS operating systems, but CP/M was sold at a much higher price. Many never were aware of the two systems. Most buyers simply chose DOS, which became the standard, or were steered toward DOS by IBM.

Gate’s reputation has always been cloudy. His co-founder of Microsoft, Paul Allen (1953-2018), wrote in his memoirs that Bill Gates is a ruthless schemer who demeaned his employees and conspired to rip off his business partner. Mr. Gates and Mr. Allen first became friends in 1968 over their Seattle high school Teletype machine, on which they wrote their first software together. Mr. Allen moved to Boston and Gates dropped out of Harvard University in 1975 so they could work on what would eventually become Microsoft. The authors of “Primal Leadership” wrote in the Harvard Business Review some years ago that Gates was one of “those infamous corporate leaders who seem to have achieved sterling business results despite their brutish approaches to leadership.”

Microsoft founder Bill Gates stepped down in February 2000 as chief executive of Microsoft allegedly as part of the settlement with the Department of Justice in its battle in violation of the Anti-Trust Act. Gates remained as chairman with the new title of Chief software architect. He then claimed he wanted to return “to what I love most, focusing on technologies for the future.” This was an interesting explanation. However, on May 18th, 1998, the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the attorneys general of 20 different states filed antitrust charges against Microsoft to determine whether the company’s bundling of additional programs into its operating system constituted monopolistic actions. The suit was brought following the browser wars that led to the collapse of Microsoft’s top competitor, Netscape, which occurred when Microsoft began giving away its browser software for free.

Charges were brought against Microsoft to determine whether its bundling of additional programs into its operating system constituted monopolistic actions. Back then, there were rising concerns that it was impossible to compete against Microsoft and many alleged Gates was a ruthless businessman. The government case accused Microsoft of making it difficult for consumers to install competing software on computers operated by Windows.

Gates was accused of creative editing of video, twisting facts, and emails, but Microsoft still lost the case. The presiding judge, Thomas Penfield Jackson, ruled that Microsoft violated parts of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which was established in 1890 to outlaw monopolies and cartels. He found that Microsoft’s position in the marketplace constituted a monopoly that threatened not only the competition but also innovation in the industry. Judge Jackson also called for Microsoft to divide the company in half and create two separate entities that would be called baby bills. The operating system would make up one half of the company and the software arm would make up the other.

Microsoft appealed citing the Judge was biased in favor of the prosecution. The appeals court overturned Judge Jackson’s decision against Microsoft. Instead of seeking to break up the company, the Department of Justice decided to settle with Microsoft. In its settlement, the DoJ abandoned the requirement to break up the company, in return, Microsoft agreed to share computing interfaces with other companies. The company saw its once invincible market share erode due to old-fashioned competition. This is what has been alleged was part of the unpublished deal that Gates himself would step down, which he interestingly did to avoid the breakup of Microsoft.

Bill Gates’ father was the head of Planned Parenthood. Many saw this as a covert means to justify abortion among minorities to reduce the population which he has been so concerned with which is why he has supported the Climate Change movement. Bill Gates in an interview said:  “When I was growing up, my parents were almost involved in various volunteer things. My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with that. And so it’s fascinating. At the dinner table my parents are very good at sharing the things that they were doing. And almost treating us like adults, talking about that.”

 

Gates appears to be carrying out his father’s objectives. His wife Melinda Gates, who had three kids, is alleged to have embraced abortion as a means for women to be liberated. Of course, abortion is a tool for eugenics. Many know of the racist legacy of Margaret Sanger (1879-1966), the founder of Planned Parenthood, who once gave a talk to the KKK and helped promote the “Negro Project.” In her own words, “[Birth control] means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extirpation of defective stocks— those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.” (NYT, April 8, 1923). To this day, 79% of Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are located within walking distance of African American or Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods (Map).

Few know that this project is continued on an international scale by the enormous wealth of Bill Gates and other capitalists. In 1965, the Rockefeller Foundation was a significant donor to the International Planned Parenthood Federation (Source). Today, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has spent billions on population control in Africa and throughout the Third World. Obianuju Ekeocha, author of Target Africa, wrote in her 2012 open letter to Melinda Gates:

“Amidst all our African afflictions and difficulties, amidst all the socioeconomic and political instabilities, our babies are always a firm symbol of hope, a promise of life, a reason to strive for the legacy of a bright future. So a few weeks ago I stumbled upon the plan and promise of Melinda Gates to implant the seeds of her ‘legacy’ in 69 of the poorest countries in the world (most of which are in Sub-Saharan Africa). Her pledge is to collect pledges for almost $5 billion in order to ensure that the African woman is less fertile, less encumbered and, yes, she says, more ‘liberated.’”

 

Bill Gates has targeted both Climate Change and the claim of gender equality, which is, interestingly, about women liberation not to have children. Of course, “gender equality” is all about reducing the population. Is Gates merely continuing his father’s work by changing the label? In the world of insurance, you buy fire, accident, and theft insurance. However, you do not buy “death insurance” because people saw it as bad luck. They changed the label to “life insurance” and suddenly everyone bragged about how much they had. Planned Parenthood has long had a racist undertone. Just change the label to “gender equality” and everything is good!

Bill Gates has taken over the world health issue as he allegedly ruthlessly he ran Microsoft. This man, I believe, has threatened civilization itself. We should be yelling to every politician in every country to (1) abolish any governmental agency from accepting any private donation AT ONCE! and (2) to launch an investigation into the connections with Gates that span the entire world. I may be risking my life even saying this – but we have a right to be free, not tagged and herded like cattle.

President Trump Phone Interview Discussing Faith, The Easter Holiday, and The Need to Reopen Our Economy…


President Trump calls-in for a short interview with Jeanine Pirro to provide his perspectives on faith, the Easter holiday and the challenges to combat the Wuhan virus.

Our president outlines the complex dynamic of ongoing COVID-19 mitigation efforts, the movement of resources regionally to continue the fight; and the simultaneous need to restart the American economic engine while balancing the health interests of Americans.

White House Advisor Peter Navarro Discusses COVID-19 Response and Need to Reevaluate Chinese Manufacturing…


White House trade and manufacturing advisor, and current lead policy expert on deployment of the Defense Production Act, Peter Navarro, appears on Fox News to discuss the ongoing mitigation efforts to protect Americans from the Wuhan Virus.

Wolverine Navarro discusses the importance of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment and preventative measure against the virus.  While most studies are ongoing, there is increasing anecdotal evidence showing considerable benefit.  Factually, many doctors on the front-line of treatment are personally using hydroxychloroquine as a preventative med.

Mr. Navarro discusses the common sense importance of bringing back critical manufacturing to the U.S. so we can have control over our own medical supply-chain; and the considerations within the White House for reopening our economy. WATCH:

Bill Maher: The Naming of The Flu…


One of those odd times when Bill Maher finds himself on the same side as the rebel alliance; pointing out a transparent truth the moonbats refuse to accept. WATCH:

.

Devin Nunes Discusses COVID-19 Economic Impacts, China’s Responsibility and the DOJ Spygate Review….


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has cancelled any congressional session through the month of April.  Representative Devin Nunes discusses the next steps in fully funding the current CARES act relief package and re-opening the U.S. economy. Representative Nunes also outlines the ongoing issues around manipulation from China and the World Health Organization.

Additionally, Nunes gives his impression of the current status of the DOJ ‘Spygate’ review, and the activity of U.S. Attorney John Durham contrast against recent comments by AG Bill Barr.

“My own view is that, uh, the evidence shows that we’re not dealing with just mistakes or sloppiness, there was something far more troubling here; and we’re going to get to the bottom of it. And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.” ~ AG Bill Barr

Comrade Adams: Liberty is So Overrated….


An unfortunately common perspective amid the COVID-19 debate is that we should just acquiesce to a ‘new normal’ state, and allow the politburo to guide the outcome.

I mean what could possibly go wrong with a merging of Big Tech and government control of society?   Would it not be preferable in the new regime to have an alert on your phone warning you of your proximity to a non-compliant citizen?

A rogue citizen could put the compliant proles at risk of infection.  They may not just carry biologics they could carry a more alarming virus of wrong thought against the interests of the state.  Surely there should be an emergency alert of some form identifying the larger audience to these public enemies so we could respond accordingly.

Relax, it’s going to be lots of fun Comrades. Perhaps we just start with digital armbands, certifications within your portable transponder unit, to compliment our mandatory face masks.  Each state could create their designated digital stamps for your COVID ID.

Traveling would be so much fun, we could even collect the whole set. “Achtung Juden – New York”, “Juden Raus – California”, and the larger federal “Enemy of the People”, designation.   “Social Distancing” or “House Arrest”…. details, details, Comrades.

WatchMaga@WatchMaga

We Got a Runner

Embedded video

3,779 people are talking about this
Advertisements
Powered by wordads.co
Seen ad many times
Not relevant
Offensive
Covers content
Broken
REPORT THIS AD