COMMENT #1 [From Germany]: Dear Mr. Armstrong,

I owe you an apology. For a long time I was of the opinion that the measures (lockdown, social distancing, flattening the curve) were fully justified. I had also clearly expressed this in my e-mails to you. I must admit that I was wrong. I am a learning being and was subject to confirmation bias. I only looked for the information that confirmed my previous opinion. Now I see things differently. There is a fear porn going on here. It is paranoia time, it is coronoia time. The press, the media is justifying any interference with our fundamental rights. The rule of law as we knew it in Germany is dead. I live in a fascist police state. An example: The Heidelberg lawyer Beate Bahner (specialist in medical law) has filed an urgent application for a constitutional complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court. The result: police investigations were initiated against Ms Bahner, her website was no longer accessible. Of course, the constitutional complaint was not accepted either. Ms Bahner has therefore returned her admission to the bar.

Enclosed her e-mail to all mass media in Germany (in German)

With sad greetings

TM

Sachsen droht Quarantäne-Verweigerern mit Psychiatrie

COMMENT #2 [From Germany]: Dear Marty,

it gets worse and worse

Saxony threatens quarantine objectors with psychiatry

Admission to a mental institution (in a state governed by the rule of law) may only be made on the basis of a court order, which in turn may only be made on the basis of appropriate psychiatric reports. Now the politicians want to put citizens into psychiatric institutions without any legal decision.

It should be noted that inmates of a closed psychiatric institution are exposed without any rights to any “treatment” with psychotropic drugs or other treatments. It is the sole decision of the institution’s management. General visiting rights etc. do not exist either and depend entirely on the arbitrariness of the institution, as does dismissal.

To put it somewhat casually: a pet has more formal rights in Germany than a human being.

Shocked and disgusted

T

REPLY: While everyone seems distracted on blaming China for creating this virus, even if they manufactured it and sent infected people on planes, that still does not answer WHY have Western governments so eagerly sought to use this virus as the excuse to transform Democracy into Authoritarianism. The European Commission is not elected anyhow, so the EU removed any accountability to the people for their leadership no different than China. Everywhere we look, civil liberties are being suspended in Europe. This is precisely in line with our model which forecast 2020 as the year for a European Revolution.

According to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, life in Canada will only return to normal after the development of a vaccine. The same is emerging in Germany. According to Chancellor Angela Merkel, the coronavirus will remain a threat until a vaccine is found and the population is immunized. “That means nothing more than living with the virus. It has not disappeared. Even if one day fewer people are infected,” said Merkel.

We are already seeing the narrative emerge that we should remain locked down until Gates comes up with his vaccine which curiously won’t be ready until AFTER the US Elections. The two characters that they have sought to overturn ar Trump and Borris Johnson. They both stand in the way of socialism. This is NOT normal. This virus is by no means that lethal to just overthrowing democracy. There is another motive that goes beyond Gates and China. This is the political forces seeking to hold on to power. Perhaps they have looked at Socrates and saw the Monetary Crisis Cycle coming and this was a preemptive strike to try to prevent the collapse of Europe and socialism. That may be the single greatest motive behind jumping on the bandwagon with Gates.

There is clearly social inequality unfolding because those who have jobs that require some level of manual labor to face to face contact from waitresses, cooks, dancers, and physical massage are all out of a job and cannot work from home. Those with higher-end white-collar jobs can at least work from home if the sales keep coming in. When they stop, so will their income. So what is the end goal here? Is it to hurt those who cannot work from home to become subservient upon the state where they state no longer borrows money – it just creates it?

What about the outstanding debt? Do they simply default as did Russia or China following their revolutions? If this is an attempt to reset the world monetary system intermixed with war to justify ending debt, pensions, and to subjugate everyone as in a communistic state, then the entire debt markets become the greatest risk. Will there be at least a managed economy with private ownership as in China, or are we looking at deliberate bankruptcy of enterprises to justify their nationalization as Peter Altmaier, the German Federal Minister of Economic Affairs, was joined by the left-wing Martin Schulz politician and Leader of the Social Democratic Party (Socialist) in a joint statement on March 13th, 2020 that effectively said that since they cannot bail out companies, perhaps they would just NATIONIZE them. Altmaier when asked bout his nationalization comments, he replied: “I do not see such a need at the moment.” He did not rule it out. Germany had already ruled that it was perfectly fine to nationalize private property to achieve social equality in Berlin.

What is the end goal? Managed Authoritarian-Socialism or just outright Tyranny? We are entering an age that once again will be the stuff that tries our souls. Governments have completely forgotten that they were supposed to be our representatives, not our lords and masters. Our public forum, where we elected our representatives to enact our laws, has crumbled to dust in a matter of just 8.6 weeks. The public edifices that were founded for eternity as the symbol of our liberty and freedom from oppression, lie prostrate, naked, and broken, like the limbs of a fallen giant. This stupendous postwar rebirth of civilization appears to be a mere relic of former glory which has been unable to withstand the injuries of corruption over time and fortune.

There are two schools of thought running around. One blames China for experimenting with Bat Viruses and insist that this was not intentional, but a leak from the Wuhan Lab because of a lack of security. There are some who want to file lawsuits against China in the USA, Britain, and India for damages. Xi complimented the Gates Foundation’s early efforts in the global cause of fighting against the virus and said he was grateful for a letter from Gates expressing support for the Chinese people. But does all of this really provide any proof to allegations, or are we dealing with speculation?

The arguments to blame China because they have a biological weapons program only leads to war. The USA has similar labs but the security is better known as the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA). ABC News reported that there was a Pentagon report from November 2019 claiming there would be a pandemic, but the Pentagon has responded there is no such report. This begs the question, will China publish a list of all visitors to the Wuhan Lab?

As I have said, if this was a biological weapon it was a dud since the kill ratio is 10% of that of the normal annual flu. That does not rule out that this was still a human-created virus for experimentations that just leaked out. There has been too much research published by Chinese scientists on experimenting with coronaviruses from bats to make this a deliberate attack by China. If it was an intended biological weapon, you do not publish reports on such experiments since 2010. An incompetent leak remains far more probable and that would even explain why the government would try to cover-up such a mistake. That is more plausible for if it was a deliberate attack, then you di not publish the research years in advance.

For this conspiracy to presume that China knew it would undermine the Western economies is virtually assuming they also have clairvoyance. It also does not account for the exaggerated manner in which the virus has been used to destroy Western economies. You would then have to make up a conspiracy theory that Gates was in bed with China. That does not seem likely. Could China have anticipated how crazy the West has responded that threatens to crash the economy faster than the Great Depression from which there will be no recovery for at least 3 years? Sometimes there is no complete plot, just reaction followed by counter-reaction.

There may have been a leak from China which was a mistake, but it has been a deliberate seizure of this virus to further agendas by both the Gates Foundation and politics. When Hydroxychloroquine has been used with 100% success in France, we had Gates and Fauci saying no – we need a vaccine. That was clearly the Gates agenda so were people supposed to die because Fauci claimed he wanted a long-term study?

I know for an absolute fact that some elites knew in January about this virus and sold all stocks and bonds during January. That does not fit the pure scenario. Was there advance knowledge and was there a deliberate use of this crisis to remove civil liberties ahead of a pending economic collapse due to negative interest rates and the inability of Europe to recover?  ECB would have no options to help Italy. It requires authoritarianism to suspect all the austerity provisions. Australia was in a similar situation and has also overreacted. In Australia, this has led to people raiding their retirement funds to survive. This virus has even been used as an excuse to stop shipments of gold from South Africa. Even New Zealand has crushed its economy in the name of this virus. In Britain, they began the UK’s weekly nationwide applause for NHS workers which is a clever diversion from investigating the motives going on behind the curtain. In the USA, the Democrats blocked relief for small businesses that employ 70% of the workforce ensuring that business failures will rise exponentially. Nobody asks why? Meanwhile, panic buying of food in China has been reported. France is facing a massive wave of bankruptcies of small businesses because of this lockdown.

Meanwhile, locking people down will only prolong the curve, not flatten it. Testing in Chicago has revealed that between 30% and 50% of the population already have COVID-19 Antibodies. This confirms it is not as serious as it has been made out to be. So why is this being used to collapse the economy? Who stands to gain from this?

From the beginning, I have found that something was very strange about this event. The response was excessive and the man who made that recommendation at Imperial College is still quoted as some expert by the BBC in London and nobody dares to interrogate him and his links to the Gate’s Foundation. This response was absolutely uncalled for. The destruction to the economy and even to the food supply is far more dangerous than the virus and will seriously hurt many more people and the future. The cure has been far worse than the disease. While in Britain they are cheering they must support the NHS and in the USA the press is using it to overthrow Trump, while in Canada Trudeau has tried to use it to eliminate democracy, only by the summer will the full economic damage to people’s lives begin to turn to civil unrest as people realize this will NEVER get back to normal for years. Could China have anticipated all this insanity?

The question will come down to historians was this a deliberate attack, or was it a leak which was exacerbated by the corruption behind the curtain of the Gates Foundation controlling every aspect of world health and politicians eager to use it because socialism was collapsing? This certainly seems to be very convenient for many people, not just China.

We saw civil unrest rise sharply in 2019 especially in Europe as the economy has been turning down and 12 years of Quantitative Easing by the European Central Bank has devastated the economy. Our models are updated to the end of March 2020 and you can see we have exceeded the annual highs already back to 1997.

We have a major crisis on our hands. Bill Gates is a VERY SERIOUS threat to not just the world economy, but to world peace. He has been using a loophole that allows health organizations people THINK and independent are actually controlled by Gates. You will see that 80% of the funding of WHO is not from governments, but from donations. Then you see that Gates is the largest donor after countries. Behind the curtain, the WHO has been bullied and pushed around by Bill Gates.

Melinda Gates has been behind pushing digital currency and she has been addressing the G& on the claim that this will empower women. Just unbelievable sophistry that digital currency will be better and create more jobs? She is also ANTI-Trump.

I have explained that Jeffrey Epstein was NOT a Pedifile which is someone who is after children pre-puberty. I certainly would not have been able to visually distinguish between a girl who was 17 and one who is 18. So what is the point of seeking girls who are 16-17 and risk a criminal violation? To me, it has always smelled of a blackmail scheme. Get people involved who may or may not even know they are 17 v 18 and then use that as a bargaining chip for other things. Here Gates teamed up with Epstein, not once, but three times he went to his island. He was dealing with Epstein since 2011 and was looking at partnering with him where he would get a $30 million fee. So was Gates one of his targets? Or was Gates looking to use Epstein for a power-play against others?

Bill Gates didn’t write the operating system which made Microsoft known as DOS. Gary Kildall (1942-1994) wrote CP/M, an operating system that ran on early microcomputers based on 8-bits. IBM either couldn’t or wouldn’t make a deal with Kildall. Bill Gates bought what became MS DOS from Seattle Computer Products for $50,000 and licensed it to IBM. DOS was actually written by a 22-year old Tim Paterson (born June 1, 1956). How much of Kildall’s intellectual property he appropriated is a matter of some dispute. IBM later did make a deal with Kildall by some accounts after threatening to sue IBM because DOS infringed on his copyright. The early IBM PC was sold with both CP/M and DOS operating systems, but CP/M was sold at a much higher price. Many never were aware of the two systems. Most buyers simply chose DOS, which became the standard, or were steered toward DOS by IBM.

Gate’s reputation has always been cloudy. His co-founder of Microsoft, Paul Allen (1953-2018), wrote in his memoirs that Bill Gates is a ruthless schemer who demeaned his employees and conspired to rip off his business partner. Mr. Gates and Mr. Allen first became friends in 1968 over their Seattle high school Teletype machine, on which they wrote their first software together. Mr. Allen moved to Boston and Gates dropped out of Harvard University in 1975 so they could work on what would eventually become Microsoft. The authors of “Primal Leadership” wrote in the Harvard Business Review some years ago that Gates was one of “those infamous corporate leaders who seem to have achieved sterling business results despite their brutish approaches to leadership.”

Microsoft founder Bill Gates stepped down in February 2000 as chief executive of Microsoft allegedly as part of the settlement with the Department of Justice in its battle in violation of the Anti-Trust Act. Gates remained as chairman with the new title of Chief software architect. He then claimed he wanted to return “to what I love most, focusing on technologies for the future.” This was an interesting explanation. However, on May 18th, 1998, the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the attorneys general of 20 different states filed antitrust charges against Microsoft to determine whether the company’s bundling of additional programs into its operating system constituted monopolistic actions. The suit was brought following the browser wars that led to the collapse of Microsoft’s top competitor, Netscape, which occurred when Microsoft began giving away its browser software for free.

Charges were brought against Microsoft to determine whether its bundling of additional programs into its operating system constituted monopolistic actions. Back then, there were rising concerns that it was impossible to compete against Microsoft and many alleged Gates was a ruthless businessman. The government case accused Microsoft of making it difficult for consumers to install competing software on computers operated by Windows.

Gates was accused of creative editing of video, twisting facts, and emails, but Microsoft still lost the case. The presiding judge, Thomas Penfield Jackson, ruled that Microsoft violated parts of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which was established in 1890 to outlaw monopolies and cartels. He found that Microsoft’s position in the marketplace constituted a monopoly that threatened not only the competition but also innovation in the industry. Judge Jackson also called for Microsoft to divide the company in half and create two separate entities that would be called baby bills. The operating system would make up one half of the company and the software arm would make up the other.

Microsoft appealed citing the Judge was biased in favor of the prosecution. The appeals court overturned Judge Jackson’s decision against Microsoft. Instead of seeking to break up the company, the Department of Justice decided to settle with Microsoft. In its settlement, the DoJ abandoned the requirement to break up the company, in return, Microsoft agreed to share computing interfaces with other companies. The company saw its once invincible market share erode due to old-fashioned competition. This is what has been alleged was part of the unpublished deal that Gates himself would step down, which he interestingly did to avoid the breakup of Microsoft.

Bill Gates’ father was the head of Planned Parenthood. Many saw this as a covert means to justify abortion among minorities to reduce the population which he has been so concerned with which is why he has supported the Climate Change movement. Bill Gates in an interview said:  “When I was growing up, my parents were almost involved in various volunteer things. My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with that. And so it’s fascinating. At the dinner table my parents are very good at sharing the things that they were doing. And almost treating us like adults, talking about that.”

Gates appears to be carrying out his father’s objectives. His wife Melinda Gates, who had three kids, is alleged to have embraced abortion as a means for women to be liberated. Of course, abortion is a tool for eugenics. Many know of the racist legacy of Margaret Sanger (1879-1966), the founder of Planned Parenthood, who once gave a talk to the KKK and helped promote the “Negro Project.” In her own words, “[Birth control] means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extirpation of defective stocks— those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.” (NYT, April 8, 1923). To this day, 79% of Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are located within walking distance of African American or Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods (Map).

Few know that this project is continued on an international scale by the enormous wealth of Bill Gates and other capitalists. In 1965, the Rockefeller Foundation was a significant donor to the International Planned Parenthood Federation (Source). Today, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has spent billions on population control in Africa and throughout the Third World. Obianuju Ekeocha, author of Target Africa, wrote in her 2012 open letter to Melinda Gates:

“Amidst all our African afflictions and difficulties, amidst all the socioeconomic and political instabilities, our babies are always a firm symbol of hope, a promise of life, a reason to strive for the legacy of a bright future. So a few weeks ago I stumbled upon the plan and promise of Melinda Gates to implant the seeds of her ‘legacy’ in 69 of the poorest countries in the world (most of which are in Sub-Saharan Africa). Her pledge is to collect pledges for almost $5 billion in order to ensure that the African woman is less fertile, less encumbered and, yes, she says, more ‘liberated.’”

Bill Gates has targeted both Climate Change and the claim of gender equality, which is, interestingly, about women liberation not to have children. Of course, “gender equality” is all about reducing the population. Is Gates merely continuing his father’s work by changing the label? In the world of insurance, you buy fire, accident, and theft insurance. However, you do not buy “death insurance” because people saw it as bad luck. They changed the label to “life insurance” and suddenly everyone bragged about how much they had. Planned Parenthood has long had a racist undertone. Just change the label to “gender equality” and everything is good!

Bill Gates has taken over the world health issue as he allegedly ruthlessly he ran Microsoft. This man, I believe, has threatened civilization itself. We should be yelling to every politician in every country to (1) abolish any governmental agency from accepting any private donation AT ONCE! and (2) to launch an investigation into the connections with Gates that span the entire world. I may be risking my life even saying this – but we have a right to be free, not tagged and herded like cattle.